Daily Comment (July 6, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with some interesting comments by a major Japanese defense industry leader warning that civilian industrial firms will not necessarily be able to exploit growing defense budgets around the world. We next review several other international and US developments that could affect the financial markets today, including the latest developments around the global oil market as the Strait of Hormuz reopens to shipping and the weekend launch of the “Trump Accounts” program.

Global Defense Industry: Amid a growing global trend of auto firms with underutilized factories trying to convert to green energy and defense products to take advantage of better prospects there, the head of a major Japanese defense contractor today has warned that auto factories probably can’t be used successfully to produce high-demand military drones. According to Eisaku Ito, chief executive of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, the problem is that production issues between drones and autos are so dramatically different.

  • As Ito explains it, factories geared toward automaking or producing other types of standardized, high-volume industrial products would not be able to handle the constant technological changes associated with drones.
  • Ito’s statement is important because many struggling industrial firms around the world likely see a silver bullet in the world’s rising defense budgets, which we have discussed in detail. However, investors should probably be wary of whether such “conversion” efforts can work. Experienced defense contractors and closely related technology firms are likely to be more successful in exploiting the trend.

Global Oil Market: The Wall Street Journal today carries a useful article noting that oil tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is starting to recover rapidly following the new US-Iran ceasefire and prices have fallen almost back to their pre-war levels. Near Brent crude futures are trading at about $71.94 per barrel this morning, and some analysts think they could fall to the mid-60s soon. However, the article notes that countries trying to rebuild their emergency stockpiles could help push prices higher again later in the year.

China: The People’s Liberation Army today said a PLA Navy submarine has test fired a long-range ballistic missile carrying a dummy warhead from the waters off northeast China. The missile apparently landed in the southern Pacific Ocean. Although the PLA notified neighboring countries of the launch ahead of time and publicly asserted that it was part of its normal training cycle, US allies in the region have condemned it as destabilizing.

  • More broadly, the launch is further evidence that Beijing is trying to take advantage of the US administration’s preference to ease tensions and establish a kind of détente with China after years of escalating bilateral tensions.
  • If Chinese officials really do believe that the US will now pull its punches, they could miscalculate, raising the risk of going too far and sparking an international crisis that could be unsettling for financial markets.

United States-Italy: Ahead of this week’s summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, during which leaders from the US, Canada, and many European countries will meet, President Trump has posted a social media meme saying Italian Prime Minister Meloni needs a restraining order. The meme illustrates the rapid deterioration in relations between the erstwhile allies. It also comes as even many right-wing European leaders have begun to distance themselves politically from the US president, signaling continued tensions even as more right-wing parties gain power.

US Politics: In a speech commemorating Independence Day on Friday, President Trump warned that a “resurgence of the communist menace in our land” is currently the “greatest threat” to the US, on par with both world wars and the 9/11 terror attacks. The statement illustrates what is likely to be a key Republican attack line against the Democrats in this autumn’s midterm congressional elections, given that Democratic Socialists have recently won many Democratic primaries across the US.

  • It’s not clear that the attack line will be successful.
  • However, to the extent it is successful, it would offset other favorable trends that have buoyed Democratic hopes for taking control of at least the House of Representatives.

US Financial Markets: Over the weekend, the Treasury Department officially launched the new “Trump Accounts” program, which gives citizens born between 2025 and 2028 ‌a government-funded, tax-deferred investment account of $1,000 that families can build on over time. Firms can also elect to match employee contributions to the funds. Initially, contributions will be invested in low-cost US stock index funds, such as the State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM).

View PDF

Daily Comment (July 2, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment opens with our thoughts on the Warsh-led initiative to dismantle conventional forward guidance. Following that, we examine several key market-moving developments, including Meta’s strategic pivot, the encouraging inflation figures out of the EU, and the prospect of another government equity stake. We also touch on other notable headlines before closing, as always, with a comprehensive roundup of the latest domestic and international economic data.

 Warsh Fed Takes Shape: Kevin Warsh recently offered clues into how Federal Reserve communications might evolve under his leadership. Speaking on Wednesday at a central banking forum in Sintra, Portugal, Warsh joined fellow central bank heads in articulating a unified stance on forward guidance, aiming to reset market expectations.

  • Additionally, Warsh downplayed the idea of immediate changes to the central bank’s practices. However, he stated it was his “aspiration” to steer the Federal Reserve away from standard government data — which he labeled backward-looking — in favor of more real-time metrics. He also noted that the dots plot will remain in place for at least the short term while his task force conducts its review of Fed communications.
  • That said, Warsh does not appear prepared to abandon forward guidance entirely. While he acknowledged that inflation has improved in recent weeks, he emphasized that readings above the Fed’s 2% target would not be tolerated, signaling a reluctance to support near-term rate cuts. He also reiterated his preference for continuing the balance sheet runoff, stressing that any policy adjustments would be clearly communicated in advance.
  • However, Warsh does appear to be following through on his plan to establish a task force. On Wednesday, he announced that former Bank of England Governor Mervyn King will lead the initiative. King has previously criticized the Fed’s approach to forward guidance, arguing that policymakers should focus less on signaling specific near-term actions and more on outlining how policy would respond under different economic scenarios.
  • King’s appointment suggests that Warsh may favor a shift away from rigid forward guidance, potentially aligning the Federal Reserve with a more flexible, data-dependent communication framework similar to that of the Bank of England. This broader move toward reduced reliance on explicit guidance has also been echoed by other policymakers, including ECB President Christine Lagarde at a recent forum and Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem last week.
  • Although there is growing interest in phasing out forward guidance, it doesn’t mean the transition will be a smooth one. In 2022, former Fed Chair Jerome Powell and Lagarde both moved away from forward guidance after being forced into more aggressive-than-expected tightening. Yet, both central banks ultimately reverted to the practice. Even recently, BOE Governor Andrew Bailey provided explicit guidance, noting that rate cuts are “off the table,” suggesting even the Bank of England hasn’t completely dropped the practice.
  • Warsh’s appearance at the forum gave him a platform to signal how he intends to shape the Fed’s communication strategy. Market reaction so far has been muted, in part because the incoming data since he took over has largely matched expectations. In our view, as long as investors are confident that Warsh will respond decisively if inflation reaccelerates, they are likely to give him the benefit of the doubt. That goodwill could erode, however, if they begin to question his credibility.

 Meta Compute: Meta wants to sell its excess computing power in a move that will likely put it in competition with its Magnificent 7 rivals Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. The move comes as Meta has been spending heavily on building its own data centers to develop its AI models. The plan involves selling access to its AI models hosted on its own infrastructure, as well as raw computing power. This shift reinforces our view that hyperscalers will eventually behave more like utilities as companies transition from growth to mature stages.

 EU Inflation Eases: Preliminary data indicates that euro area inflation slowed more than expected in June. Headline inflation decelerated from 3.2% to 2.8%, undershooting consensus expectations of 3.0%. The moderation suggests that recent price pressures — partly driven by the Iran-related shock — are likely to prove transitory. In turn, the data reinforces the view that the ECB may not need to tighten further as inflation continues to move toward its 2% target.

 OpenAI Stake: OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, is reportedly considering granting the Trump administration a 5% equity stake as part of its efforts to navigate regulatory hurdles ahead of a potential IPO. The move follows recent public remarks by the president expressing interest in securing ownership in the company. If executed, this arrangement could set a precedent for other firms pursuing public listings, particularly in sectors facing heightened regulatory scrutiny. The arrangement reflects a theme in our outlook of the growing government intervention in AI.

 Russian Escalation: Moscow launched significant airstrikes on Kyiv and other major Ukrainian cities on Wednesday, killing at least 17 people and injuring around 70. The attacks come amid an intensifying exchange of strikes that have targeted urban centers and signal a potential shift toward broader escalation. This dynamic suggests the conflict may be moving beyond a more contained, military-focused phase toward a wider campaign with fewer constraints on civilian infrastructure.

 German Tax Cuts: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has unveiled a 10 billion EUR ($11.44 billion) tax cut package aimed at jump-starting the economy. The proposal targets middle- and lower-income households. For example, a family with two children earning 60,000 EUR ($68,600) annually would receive a tax reduction of approximately 600 EUR ($686). The plan would be partially funded by raising the top marginal tax rate from 45% to 47%. Politically, the measure appears designed to shore up support among more populist factions as the ruling coalition faces declining approval.

Note: Due to the holiday, there will not be a Comment published tomorrow. We hope everyone enjoys the celebrations for the 4th!

View PDF

Daily Comment (July 1, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment opens with a discussion of the Bank of Japan and the evolving question of central bank independence. We then turn to equities, analyzing how the AI‑driven rally has created a new set of market leaders. Next, we briefly address the US decision to lift restrictions on Anthropic, NATO’s appeal for continued US commitment to the alliance, and the upcoming joint review of the USMCA. As always, we conclude with a summary of the latest domestic and international economic data releases.

BOJ in the Middle: Japan’s central bank is facing a growing threat to its independence. This shift comes amid efforts by the Japanese government to reshape the institution’s composition with an apparent preference for more dovish policymakers. While these changes are unlikely to alter the near-term trajectory of rate hikes, they have raised questions about the central bank’s longer-term commitment to policy normalization, particularly as the government seeks to stimulate the economy.

  • The Bank of Japan’s independence appears to be coming into question. The decision to reshape the institution reflects broader efforts by the government to align the central bank more closely with the current administration’s priorities. Notably, the economic minister, who attended the June policy meeting, pressed BOJ officials to incorporate the government’s growth objectives into their policy discussions.
  • While Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has not openly criticized the central bank’s recent monetary decisions, her stance suggests support for reshaping its policy framework. An upcoming policy blueprint, expected to be finalized soon, is likely to emphasize closer coordination between the government and the BOJ to maximize policy effectiveness and stimulate private demand.
  • Concerns over the Bank of Japan’s independence, particularly amid the recent rise in inflation, help explain the yen’s recent weakness. While the central bank’s independence is legally protected, statutory provisions require a degree of policy coordination with the government, creating potential tension between autonomy and alignment. As a result, investors increasingly question whether the BOJ will remain fully committed to its price stability mandate.
  • Rising pressure on the BOJ to slow its tightening cycle, combined with government efforts to stimulate growth, will likely weigh on the yen. Historically, when the yen weakens, Japan has offloaded US Treasurys to fund currency interventions. While this strategy will likely face pushback from the White House, Tokyo has few other options if it wants to support its currency. Consequently, we could see either a coordinated US-Japan currency policy or a potential sell-off in US government securities.

AI Trade: The S&P 500 delivered its strongest Q2 performance in six years, driven by a broadening AI rally that extended beyond technology into other sectors. This sharp uptick was fueled by easing geopolitical tensions and robust corporate earnings, which collectively bolstered market sentiment. The continued strength underscores the market’s underlying resilience amid persistent economic headwinds. However, beneath the surface of this broad-based advance, a notable compositional shift appears to be taking place.

  • Hardware tech stocks were the primary drivers of the S&P 500’s rise last quarter, as firms continued to deliver strong earnings. The S&P 500 Hardware Select Industry Index surged more than 55% during the period, led largely by chipmakers. This robust performance comes as companies looking to expand their AI capacity have ramped up spending on equipment and inputs to build the infrastructure needed to meet surging demand.
  • The strong performance of hardware stocks has overshadowed the underperformance of the hyperscalers that provide the revenue base for hardware companies. Despite being viewed as the heart of the AI boom, the Magnificent 7, which include five of the six major hyperscalers, are not only underperforming the S&P 500 by roughly 10% but are also trading down year-to-date. The weakness stems from heavy infrastructure spending, which has come under scrutiny due to its sheer magnitude.
  • While the S&P 500’s recent gains have once again been driven by technology, the internal shift from software to hardware stocks underscores the danger of concentration risk. As noted over the last few months, tech stocks carry significant upward momentum, yet signs of fragility are increasingly evident. To mitigate this volatility and reduce overall thematic exposure, diversifying into defensive sectors like aerospace and defense can provide valuable balance to investment portfolios.

Anthropic Freed? The White House has agreed to lift its export controls on Anthropic’s AI tools. The US Department of Commerce sent a letter to the firm granting permission for foreign nationals to use its Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models. The move comes after Anthropic implemented new safeguards that addressed the government’s security concerns. While removing these restrictions paves the way for the company to re-release its models globally, it leaves open the question of just how much influence Washington intends to exert over frontier AI providers.

NATO Plea: The head of NATO has sought to dissuade a potential US exit from the security alliance by appealing directly to its economic benefits. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte argued that $300 billion in outstanding European arms orders from the US help sustain over 195,000 American defense jobs. While it remains unclear whether this transactional argument will successfully convince Washington to stay, the massive scale of these contracts underscores that European rearmament is a long-term reality.

USMCA Talks Begin: The six‑year joint review of the USMCA begins today under the treaty’s sunset clause. The United States has signaled reluctance to commit to a 16‑year extension at this stage, raising the risk that the pact will shift into an annual review process that could stretch over the next decade and, in a downside scenario, culminate in termination or US withdrawal by 2036. Canada and Mexico have indicated that they will formally seek renewal and remain publicly optimistic that an agreement can be reached.

View PDF

Daily Comment (June 30, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment begins with an analysis of the growing political backlash Russian President Vladimir Putin faces over the war in Ukraine. We then examine recent Supreme Court rulings and their implications for executive authority. Next, we briefly cover a proposal to regulate AI agents, the continued weakening of the Japanese yen against the dollar, and a Swiss vote to ease restrictions on weapons exports. As always, we include a review of recent domestic and international economic data.

Putin in Trouble: President Vladimir Putin is facing his most significant political test in nearly two decades as the war in Ukraine drags on. On Monday, Putin was forced to acknowledge the impact of Ukrainian drone strikes on Russia’s energy infrastructure, a rare public admission of vulnerability. The acknowledgment comes amid growing domestic pressure on the ruling United Russia party as the economic and fiscal costs of the war continue to mount with no clear end in sight.

  • The Kremlin has increasingly sought to bind Putin’s political fortunes to those of the ruling United Russia party in an effort to sustain his appeal with the public. According to a government-aligned poll, his popularity has fallen to 69%, its lowest level since the war began in 2022. The survey was conducted shortly after Ukraine’s drone attacks on Moscow and St. Petersburg, which forced Russian citizens to confront the war more directly and underscored growing public unease about the protracted conflict.
  • Putin’s rare admission comes at a time when the country is forced to deal with rationing and intermittent internet blackouts. Ukrainian drone attacks have impacted Russia’s ability to produce oil, leading to domestic price spikes. To ease the supply burden, Russia has loosened its fuel quality regulations and permitted fuel import, a practice that was virtually non-existent prior to the conflict, given the country’s history as a major energy exporter.
  • The growing domestic pushback Putin faces regarding the conflict will likely make it harder for him to ignore increasing calls for a ceasefire. Historically, Putin has been reluctant to accept any deal that falls short of an outright victory, fearing that compromise could undermine his political legitimacy. Consequently, a resolution to the conflict may ultimately require a change in Russian leadership.
  • While Ukraine’s leverage has grown in recent weeks due to its successful drone strikes, it is worth remembering that Russia has not yet deployed its full military capabilities. If Putin feels threatened by a potential coup, similar to the mutiny he faced earlier in the conflict, he could begin taking much greater risks. Consequently, while a ceasefire remains the most rational outcome on the table, the risk of further escalation cannot be ruled out.

Supreme Court Rules: Recent Supreme Court decisions have significantly reshaped presidential control over executive branch agencies. Most notably, the Court overturned a 90-year precedent that had restricted presidents from firing certain independent agency officials at will. Ultimately, these rulings underscore the Supreme Court’s expanding influence over executive authority.

  • These rulings represent a major victory for the White House, which has consistently championed the unitary executive theory, the principle that the president should exert complete control over all agencies within the executive branch. Ultimately, the decisions are poised to significantly streamline the administration’s ability to direct federal regulators, paving the way for a more rapid rollback of key environmental, anti-trust, and financial regulations.
  • While the Supreme Court backed the White House’s push for greater executive oversight elsewhere, it shielded the Federal Reserve’s traditional independence. In a 5-4 vote, the Court allowed Fed Governor Lisa Cook to retain her seat while her lawsuit over mortgage fraud allegations plays out. This critical exception honors the historical precedent of insulating the central bank’s monetary policymaking from direct presidential control.
  • That said, the Supreme Court’s decision to grant a stay, thereby returning the case to the lower court, still leaves the question of the White House’s authority to remove Federal Reserve officials unanswered. The president has maintained that he still believes he has the power to reshape the Federal Reserve, suggesting that he may look to challenge the ruling further.
  • The recent Supreme Court rulings will likely empower the Federal Reserve to carry out its policy agenda in the near term. However, the potential for shifts in leadership across future administrations could amplify the broader impact of these decisions. As a result, markets may face increased volatility going forward. In addition, the president’s continued push to reshape the Fed is likely to weigh on the dollar.

Growing AI Resistance: In a sign of growing momentum to regulate AI, Senator Mark Warner (D‑VA) has introduced legislation targeting AI agents. The proposal would establish new privacy safeguards and give users greater control over how their data is used and shared across platforms. Although the bill is unlikely to advance in Congress with midterms approaching, it underscores how AI governance is becoming an increasingly salient political issue that could shape the debate heading into the 2028 presidential election.

Yen Troubles: The Japanese currency has fallen to its weakest level against the dollar in nearly four decades, reflecting persistent pressure on the yen. The sharp depreciation is being driven in part by concerns over the economic fallout from the war involving Iran and Japan’s ongoing struggle to contain elevated inflation. The renewed weakness is likely to fuel speculation that the Bank of Japan could step in again to support the currency through market intervention.

European Defense: Switzerland has scheduled a vote on easing its neutrality rules to permit arms exports to select Western countries. The move underscores a broader shift across Europe toward strengthening domestic defense capabilities amid heightened security concerns tied to Russia and increasing strategic friction with the United States. If approved, the policy change would reinforce structural demand for European defense manufacturers.

View PDF

Daily Comment (June 29, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment begins with key takeaways from Apple’s push to ease restrictions on the purchase of Chinese semiconductors. We then turn to the US-Iran conflict, outlining our assessment of the ceasefire’s durability. Next, we briefly examine Volkswagen’s restructuring efforts, the policy agenda of the leading UK prime minister candidate, and President Putin’s recent and notable admission. As always, we conclude with a review of the latest domestic and international economic data.

 Chip Shortage: The scale of the AI buildout is pushing firms to seek regulatory waivers to alleviate mounting supply constraints. Over the weekend, reports indicated that Apple is lobbying the US government for permission to source memory chips from a blacklisted Chinese supplier. The effort comes as Apple has already begun raising prices on key products in response to higher input costs, underscoring growing concerns that AI-related demand is beginning to exert upward pressure on inflation and may eventually weigh on earnings.

  • The AI buildout is reinforcing inflationary pressures from both directions. On the demand side, government incentives, particularly tax credits and subsidies, are draining inventories. On the supply side, trade restrictions and tariffs are boosting competition for inputs. These distortions are beginning to filter into consumer prices; while unlikely to trigger a sharp spike, they point to more persistent inflation and could weigh on margins, raising renewed questions around current valuations.
  • Apple’s push to ease restrictions on sourcing Chinese chips underscores how the US drive for supply-chain resiliency is already impacting firm profitability. While firms have successfully raised prices to protect profit margins so far, mounting consumer pushback suggests this strategy cannot be sustained indefinitely. As a result of heightened policy and economic uncertainty, we continue to advocate for a balanced portfolio approach.

 Ceasefire Tightrope: Tensions between the United States and Iran remain elevated as both sides contest control over the Strait of Hormuz while simultaneously engaging in longer-term diplomatic negotiations. Over the weekend, hostilities escalated, with both sides exchanging strikes after Iran moved to require shipping vessels to seek permission before transiting the strait. Although the two parties have agreed to continue talks and pause further strikes heading into the week, the episode underscores the fragility of the current ceasefire agreement.

  • The dispute appears to center on whether Iran has the authority to impose fees on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Last week, Iran targeted ships operating along the Oman coast, including vessels involved in a UN-backed effort to assist stranded shipping vessels. In response, the United States launched two-day strikes on Iranian targets, while Iran retaliated by targeting US military bases in Bahrain and Kuwait.
  • Although both sides agreed to a temporary halt in military strikes, the resumption of trade flows remains limited. Under the current framework, vessels are permitted to use the UN-backed maritime corridor off the coast of Oman; however, Muscat has reportedly informed European leaders that a transit toll may be imposed. This ongoing friction over potential fees is highly likely to spark another flare-up as both Washington and Tehran attempt to assert leverage in diplomatic talks.
  • Washington and Tehran appear intent on continuing talks despite ongoing tensions. Both sides have shown a willingness to use force but also to pursue a longer-term deal, and we expect intermittent tit-for-tat activity as details are negotiated. Our base case is that an agreement is ultimately reached, allowing the conflict-related risk premium in commodity prices to gradually ease, though a breakdown in negotiations would sharply increase market volatility.

VW Overhaul: The German automaker’s proposed restructuring is weighing on sentiment across Europe. The company has proposed a layoff of over 100,000 workers and closure of four plants as profits are squeezed by Chinese competition, US tariffs, and softer European demand. Drawing comparisons to GM’s 2009 overhaul, the move would significantly reshape its operations; even if not yet final, it highlights how European firms must adapt to a changing global environment.

Burnham’s Plan: The prospective UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham is set to lay out his vision for the country on Monday. In his speech, he is expected to advocate devolving more power from London to the regions and to launch a 10‑year mission aimed at lifting living standards through re-industrialization, housing, infrastructure investment, and utility reform. Although he is currently the only declared candidate for the premiership, he is widely seen as the frontrunner in the leadership contest.

Russia Feels Pain: On Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that Russia may begin importing energy resources following sustained damage from Ukrainian drone strikes. This rare admission marks one of the first times the Kremlin has publicly acknowledged the extent of the war’s impact on domestic energy infrastructure, potentially signaling a shift in battlefield dynamics away from Moscow’s favor. Despite this development, we continue to view a ceasefire between the parties as a plausible near-term outcome.

View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Evolution of the Tech Life Cycle (June 29, 2026)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

AI is reshaping the fundamental business model of technology companies. For decades, many tech firms distinguished themselves through capital-light operations and strong cash generation, allowing them to deliver both growth and profitability. This model enabled companies to attract investors by telling a compelling growth story, one centered on adaptability, continuous product expansion, and the development of diversified revenue streams.

However, this paradigm is shifting. Over the past three decades, investors have grown accustomed to technology companies positioning themselves as perpetual growth stories. Today, that narrative is becoming difficult to justify in the face of swelling capital expenditures and the compression of free cash flows. We believe the rise of hyperscalers marks the beginning of a fundamental structural change. Over the next decade, many of these dominant firms are poised to evolve toward a model that more closely resembles traditional utilities, characterized by stable demand, sticky recurring revenues, and high capital intensity.

The business life cycle typically unfolds in distinct stages, and the internet and data‑center ecosystem appears to be following a similar pattern. In the early stage, the focus was on launching websites and building foundational digital infrastructure. As the sector moved into its growth phase, firms increasingly monetized data and pursued acquisitions of smaller technology companies to expand capabilities and market reach. With the rise of AI, the industry is now entering a more mature phase, one that is likely to emphasize disciplined investment, stable cash flows, and a greater focus on returning capital to shareholders.

Early Stage

The modern technology company emerged in the late 1990s alongside the commercialization of the internet. This period saw a surge in startup formation, fueled by lower capital gains taxes, supportive regulatory conditions, and accommodative financial markets, all underpinned by optimism surrounding a potential productivity boom. Within this environment, many firms prioritized rapid user acquisition and market share expansion, often at the expense of a clearly defined path to near-term profitability.

This era produced early versions of today’s household names. Amazon initially focused on selling books online, while Google operated solely as a search engine. As broadband spread and connected computers around the world, the internet quickly evolved beyond simple information access. It first enabled the growth of e-commerce, and then expanded into entertainment, news, and social networking, fundamentally reshaping how people interacted, consumed content, and transacted.

Growth Stage

While growth during this period was rapid, profitability remained elusive, pushing many firms to pivot toward monetizing their platforms. They began offering data-driven services that allowed businesses to pay for insights into customer behavior, marketing, and research. This marked an early stage of maturation, as companies recognized that while raw data was inexpensive to collect, its true value lay in aggregation, analysis, and resale. That realization has since become a defining feature — and a central economic driver — of today’s digital economy.

The recognition of data as a valuable resource laid the foundation for the rise of artificial intelligence. Initially, hyperscalers leveraged data to generate insights into customer behavior, enabling more precise targeting of products and services across specific demographics. Over time, as data became more granular and analytical techniques more sophisticated, firms moved beyond insight generation toward automating routine tasks. This shift marked the emergence of a new revenue model, in which technology companies began developing tools and platforms designed to perform work directly, rather than simply to inform decision-making.

Maturing Phase

As these companies roll out more enterprise‑grade AI services, their strategic focus is shifting toward providing the tools and cloud infrastructure required to process vast amounts of data for AI workloads. In turn, this transition is pushing them away from historically capital‑light, software‑centric models and toward far more capital‑intensive structures as they invest heavily in building and expanding large‑scale data centers to support these compute‑ and energy‑hungry systems.

The shift toward providing these tools, combined with their capital-intensive nature, is likely to push these companies away from a pure growth profile and toward a more utility-like, value-oriented model over time. The scale of required investment implies a persistent cycle of maintenance, depreciation, and equipment replacement, which will weigh on margins and dampen long-term earnings growth.

Declining Phase or Life Cycle Extension

While the AI technology sector is likely far from its declining phase, the long-term trajectory is becoming clearer. The substantial fixed costs required to build and maintain AI infrastructure create significant barriers to entry, increasing the likelihood that dominant firms evolve into natural monopolies. At the core of this thesis is the expectation that these firms will become essential cloud service providers, as enterprises increasingly outsource workflows to AI-based systems.

As market share consolidates, revenue growth is likely to moderate. Rising dependence on a small number of providers — alongside mounting concerns around security, energy usage, and data control — could drive increased regulatory scrutiny. Over time, this concentration raises the probability of policy intervention aimed at ensuring broader access and affordability, particularly if AI services are viewed as critical economic infrastructure. Such oversight would likely constrain pricing power and compress margins, ultimately reducing growth expectations and prompting a reassessment of valuations as these firms begin to resemble value-oriented, rather than high-growth, equities.

There remains a plausible path for life cycle extension, but it likely requires a structural shift. As the industry matures, these firms may begin to resemble telecom companies in the post-dot-com era. During that period, telecom providers undertook massive capital investments to build out foundational networks in anticipation of rising data demand. Over time, they transitioned into broadband providers and expanded into adjacent services such as television and mobile, ultimately operating as stable, cash-flow-generating businesses.

A similar evolution could unfold in AI. While these firms initially focus on providing compute and infrastructure services, they may increasingly move up the value chain by offering more tailored, application-layer solutions, encroaching on areas traditionally dominated by software-as-a-service providers. This shift would support more stable and predictable earnings streams, but it would also limit the sector’s ability to sustain the elevated revenue growth rates currently being observed, reinforcing a transition from a high-growth to a more utility-like profile.

In Conclusion

While we remain confident that the AI rally still has momentum, we do not expect it to persist indefinitely. As large technology firms — particularly enterprise-focused builders — continue to scale out infrastructure, the market is likely to reassess whether current growth and valuation trajectories are sustainable. Elevated capital expenditures and ongoing reinvestment needs are likely to weigh on incremental returns on invested capital, gradually compressing margins. As growth opportunities become more constrained, this dynamic increases the likelihood of a valuation reset.

Over time, this maturation could pressure these companies to shift toward capital return, including dividends. However, we do not expect such a transition in the near term. Until then, the gap between elevated expectations and realized returns may become more apparent, particularly as government involvement increases, raising the probability of regulatory constraints on pricing and profitability.

Against this backdrop, we see more attractive long-term opportunities emerging in other parts of the market. Industrials and energy are particularly well positioned to benefit from the capital expenditure cycle required to build out AI infrastructure, while dividend-oriented equities may become increasingly attractive as investors seek more stable income streams. As AI names increasingly trade like regulated utilities, we view value stocks as a stable foundation for investors navigating the transition ahead.

View PDF

Don’t miss our accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify 

Daily Comment (June 26, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment begins with our view on speculation that OpenAI may delay its IPO. We then turn to rising tensions over tolls in the Strait of Hormuz. Next, we briefly discuss Italy’s push to overhaul its electoral system and the US government’s decision to restrict the use of another AI tool. As always, we include a review of recent domestic and international economic data.

 IPO Doubts: While robust earnings continue to buoy tech stocks, lingering valuation concerns are casting a shadow over the sector. On Thursday, The New York Times reported that OpenAI is considering a delay to its initial public offering, following advice that current sector volatility could dampen investor sentiment. The report is likely to intensify fresh worries that the sector has become frothy, underscoring a growing unease among investors regarding tech valuations and highlighting a shifting appetite toward other market sectors.

  • The reported delay of OpenAI’s IPO appears tied in part to the recent performance of SpaceX. After an initial surge, shares in the Elon Musk–led company have fallen over 20% from their post-IPO high, declining from around $202 to roughly $153 as early enthusiasm faded. The pullback has raised concerns about the durability of demand for high-profile IPOs, particularly in segments where valuations are already stretched.
  • Concerns are also mounting over the availability of liquidity to absorb new IPOs. Given the scale of the SpaceX offering — the largest on record — there is growing unease that retail investors may have limited capacity to support additional deals, particularly with Alphabet also planning its own equity issuance. The fear is that another large offering could prove too much for investors, who have already grown more risk-averse in recent months.

  • Bitcoin, which is heavily influenced by retail sentiment, offers a useful barometer for shifts in risk appetite. During the post-pandemic period, bitcoin and the Magnificent 7 stocks largely moved in tandem. However, that correlation began to break down in late 2025, when bitcoin peaked and subsequently failed to recover. The Magnificent 7, by contrast, have also lost some momentum but have since managed to hit new highs.
  • The decoupling of bitcoin and the Magnificent 7 likely underscores the primacy of earnings in today’s market. Mega‑cap tech companies have proven that, even with stretched valuations, underlying product demand remains resilient. This dynamic suggests that the AI‑led rally still has room to run in the near term, even if appetite for IPOs has begun to fade. That said, rising volatility across the space strengthens the case for adding exposure to sectors outside of tech as a way to diversify risk.

 Strait of Hormuz: The reopening of maritime transit has come under strain as the United States and Iran continue to negotiate the terms governing passage through the strait. On Thursday, Iran reportedly intercepted vessels and forced them to turn back, insisting that ships not transit the waterway without prior authorization. The resulting uncertainty is likely to heighten concerns about the durability of the ceasefire, particularly as Washington and Tehran remain at odds over whether transit fees or tolls will be imposed.

  • The dispute centers on Oman, a key US partner that also works with Iran on securing navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. On Thursday, Oman reportedly allowed internationally coordinated vessels to use a coastal corridor to facilitate passage, which Iran appears to view as violating its requirement that ships obtain prior authorization from its Persian Gulf maritime authority before entering the waterway.
  • The episode underscores how much of the ceasefire framework over the strait relies on strategic ambiguity. Earlier in the day, Secretary of State Rubio reiterated that the United States will not accept Iranian tolls for navigating the waterway under any circumstances, a stance that appears to have prompted Tehran to adopt a more assertive posture in projecting control over the strait.
  • While the recent conflict has introduced uncertainty, conditions in the strait are beginning to stabilize following the US-Iran ceasefire agreement. Earlier this week, oil prices retracted to pre-conflict levels, while transit volumes through the strait have recovered to roughly 25% of pre-war levels. This improvement suggests that, although the waterway remains contested, access has meaningfully improved relative to conditions just a few weeks ago.
  • Rising geopolitical tensions over the strait are poised to drive further volatility in energy prices, as the probability of direct conflict between the two sides remains elevated. Although attacks on commercial shipping have reduced vessel traffic through the chokepoint, the ceasefire appears to be holding for now. This is largely attributed to the US reluctance to escalate militarily while the two sides negotiate a long-term agreement. That said, markets are expected to remain on edge until a final deal is formally secured.

 Italy Vote Overhaul: Italian PM Giorgia Meloni is facing criticism over plans to overhaul Italy’s electoral system in ways that could favor her party in future elections. The proposal would grant a minority coalition additional seats if it secures at least 42% of the vote. Supporters argue that the change would enhance political stability by reducing fragmentation, while critics contend it is primarily designed to help Meloni consolidate power. The proposal reflects a wider pattern of incumbent governments tweaking voting rules to shore up their positions.

 AI Tools Restriction: Security concerns are driving tighter limits on advanced AI systems. The White House has asked OpenAI to restrict its latest model, GPT‑5.6, to a small group of government agencies because of security risks. If implemented, this would be the first time a government has constrained release of a major technology before launch. The request follows earlier efforts to limit foreign access to Anthropic’s Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models, signaling a firmer government grip on frontier AI.

View PDF