by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash
[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF
Our Comment opens with a discussion of private credit and AI, framed around key takeaways from the Milken Global Conference. We then share our views on the White House’s decision to end Operation Epic Fury. Next, we briefly address the administration’s push for greater oversight of AI models, North Korea’s move away from its longstanding goal of reunification, and the US decision to halt weapons shipments to Germany. As always, we include an overview of recent domestic and international economic data.
Milken Global Conference: Some of Wall Street’s largest firms took the stage at the Milken Institute Global Conference, emphasizing efforts to sustain momentum in both artificial intelligence (AI) and private credit. This push comes amid rising market skepticism driven by stress in private credit names like Tricolor and First Brands, alongside broader concerns about escalating AI-related capital expenditures. Yet the tone of the discussions suggests that, despite negative headlines, institutional investors remain largely confident in both sectors.
- Panel discussions at the conference struck a generally constructive tone, but with clear caution about the risks facing private credit. As the asset class has grown in importance, some participants highlighted that describing certain vehicles as “semi‑liquid” has become a source of tension, especially for less experienced investors. The language around liquidity may have created a false sense of flexibility. The rise in redemption requests has revealed how difficult it can be to withdraw cash during times of uncertainty.
- Additionally, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and BlackRock CEO Larry Fink have dismissed concerns about a growing AI bubble. During their discussions, both expressed optimism that AI investment will sustain momentum in equity markets and the broader economy as tech companies push to expand capacity. Their comments come as major banks continue to act as a conduit for many of these tech firms seeking fresh funds for projects expected to cost over $1 trillion in the coming year.
- The discussion surrounding AI and private credit comes as the two are becoming increasingly linked. Major banks have turned to private credit as one way to offload some of their exposure to tech-related debt. At the same time, private credit has looked to major banks as a backstop to enhance its ability to provide credit. Working together, the two have helped keep each other afloat while also becoming deeply interconnected.
- We continue to see ample credit availability and sustained AI investment as important supports for overall economic activity. This is especially important at a time when consumer spending is outpacing income growth and AI-related capex is beginning to crowd out other types of investment. Taken together, signs that private credit flows and AI infrastructure buildouts remain largely unimpeded are providing some reassurance that the economy can stay resilient even amid rising geopolitical and trade risks.
Operation Over? The White House has ended Operation Epic Fury as it shifts to alternative measures to pressure Iran to abandon its nuclear program. On Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US will halt offensive operations while remaining ready to defend against threats. The move signals a commitment to maintaining the ceasefire yet sustaining pressure through a blockade. Although further conflict has not been ruled out, the decision reduces the risk of escalation that had been weighing on markets.
- The decision to end the blockade comes at a time when the White House would need to seek congressional approval. The deadline was believed to have passed over the weekend, although there has been debate over what classifies as the start and end of a war. The president has insisted that the legal limits are likely unconstitutional, suggesting he was preparing to let the courts decide. However, the recent declaration indicates that such a step may no longer be necessary.
- There appear to be additional factors behind the operation’s end. In a post on Truth Social, President Trump said the decision was driven by progress in negotiations, while leaving open the possibility of future military action. He added that the halt came at the request of Pakistan and other countries and reflected momentum toward a formal agreement between the two sides. However, there are indications the administration may also be seeking to pivot away from the conflict ahead of the midterm elections.
- The potential end to the conflict will be supportive for risk assets as it indicates that the worst is perhaps behind us. This will likely allow investors to shift their attention to Q1 earnings, which continue to surprise to the upside. That said, the risk of renewed hostilities is not zero, and the ceasefire remains fragile. As a result, we continue to emphasize maintaining exposure to value as a potential portfolio shock absorber in the event of a return to fighting.
Government AI: Major AI companies are submitting their models to the US Commerce Department for vetting of national security risks as they prepare for wider release. The move comes as the US government looks for ways to ensure protection against safety risks following the release of newer, more advanced models. The push for government review of AI models comes as lawmakers consider possible regulations to limit AI risks to the broader public.
No More Reunification: North Korea has amended its constitution to remove references to reunifying the peninsula under a single country. The change comes as North Korea seeks to reaffirm its borders and define itself as an independent nation and a nuclear power with its own sovereign rights. Additionally, it may be a subtle sign that the country no longer wishes to challenge the borders established following the Korean War. This shift could reduce geopolitical tensions in Asia.
German-US Tensions: After deciding to withdraw troops from Germany, the US has also cut back on providing weapons. The White House announced that it would no longer supply Germany with weapons capable of striking deep into Russia. The administration’s decision follows Chancellor Merz’s criticism of the Iran war. We suspect that rising tensions between the US and Germany are likely to accelerate Germany’s plans to develop its own defense industries.


