by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash
[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF
Our Comment today opens with a few words on the apparent stabilization of global stock markets this morning after Friday’s selloff. We specifically address whether the selloff might have represented the end of the artificial intelligence frenzy. We next review several other international and US developments that could affect the financial markets today, including more signs that the war in Iran is set to continue and a planned lobbying and public relations push by AI firm OpenAI to begin after tomorrow’s midterm elections.
Global Stock Markets: Shortly before market open, US stock futures prices suggest both the broad-based S&P 500 index and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 index are set to recover modestly from their rout on Friday. However, some of the recovery may simply reflect that oil prices are down so far this morning on optimism over back-channel peace talks in the Middle East (we are less optimistic, as shown in the following paragraph). Still, the selloff on Friday has raised questions about whether the long-expected end of the AI investment boom may be nigh.
- In our view, it’s too soon to know for sure whether the AI boom is going into reverse. Frenzies or bubbles can continue longer than investors expect, even if they suffer short-term pullbacks.
- All the same, we continue to see many possible factors that could trip up the AI frenzy at some point, including the competitive threat from Chinese AI models, popular pushback against data centers, concern about rogue AI agents, and the threat of onerous regulation.
- Given that these factors will probably call into question the prospects and valuations of today’s AI assets over time, we think it’s a fine time for investors to ensure that their portfolios are well diversified and positioned to take advantage of the eventual rotation toward recently lagging market segments, such as stable, well-run, dividend-paying value stocks.
United States-Israel-Iran: As signs increasingly point to the US and Israel launching a major attack on Iran after the midterm elections tomorrow, Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei publicly told the country’s top three military commanders that any such attack “must be met with an immediate and effective response, without geographical limitation” in order to achieve “maximum deterrence.” While the statement could be mostly posturing, it does suggest that Iran is prepared to keep fighting back hard and that global energy supplies remain at risk.
European Union-Canada: Wrapping up the EU-Canada summit in Montreal on Friday, Prime Minister Carney said Canada would accept the EU’s offer of an “associate membership,” aiming to achieve “the deepest possible partnership short of accession.” The two sides hope to flesh out the relationship — including how much Canada will contribute to the EU’s budget — by next June, despite lingering disagreements in areas such as the EU’s deforestation policies and whether Canada will be able to participate in EU public procurement.
- The arrangement shows how the EU and Canada want to strengthen their non-US relationships to better insulate themselves from Washington’s more antagonistic, less cooperative policies.
- However, it isn’t clear how much the new relationship will help the EU or Canada diversify their trade away from the US. Canada still sends approximately three-quarters of its exports to the US, even with Washington’s new tariffs and other trade barriers since early 2025, which illustrates how hard it will be for Canada to replace much of its US trade with exports and imports involving other economies.
China-Taiwan-United States: The Chinese coast guard on Saturday announced that it has stepped up patrols around Taiwan, including in the waters east of the island. According to the Chinese, the increased presence is aimed at “strengthening control over the relevant waters to effectively ensure orderly navigation and activities.” However, the expanded patrols fit a pattern suggesting Beijing is taking advantage of the new “Comprehensive Strategic Stability” (CSS) policy, which the US and China adopted to reduce tensions.
- We examined the détente-like CSS policy in our latest Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report, published on October 26, 2026.
- In the months since the CSS policy was put into place earlier this year, we have noted several instances in which the Chinese military has become more aggressive again in the South China Sea and elsewhere, suggesting it thinks it can now assert itself without fear of major US reprisals.
- Of course, the risk is that the Chinese could miscalculate and spark a confrontation with a US ally that would require Washington to act. Any such event could rekindle US-China tensions and would likely unsettle the global financial markets.
United States-China: The Federal Communications Commission late last week banned all Chinese laboratories from testing electronic devices destined for the US market starting in 2028. The ban will apply to devices including smartphones and computers. Since Chinese labs currently test and certify about 80% of such devices for the US market, the move has generated strong pushback from Beijing — another example of lower-level US agencies taking steps that could antagonize China and undermine the détente-like CSS policy.
China: Citing the latest satellite imagery, the Center for Strategic and International Studies said in an updated assessment last week that China’s latest aircraft carrier could be launched as soon as 2027. The new “Type 004” carrier would be the country’s fourth and is expected to be China’s first nuclear-powered carrier. Nuclear propulsion would give the ship much more power and range than current Chinese carriers.
- If the Type 004 carrier is launched in 2027, it will still have to undergo a long period of outfitting, operational testing, and training before being commissioned around 2030.
- China would still have far fewer carriers than the US, but it continues to shift its navy toward something more like the US’s “blue water” force. Over time, that will likely give China more geopolitical and military power to challenge US interests around the globe.
US Defense Policy: While the media this fall focused on the long, 321-day deployment of the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln before it finally returned home to San Diego on October 9, recent reports say the destroyer USS Spruance has now been deployed for a post-World War II record of more than 345 days, well above the US Navy’s standard of seven months. In our view, the long deployments suggest the US cut its defense budget too far after the Cold War and downsized its armed forces too much to defend its global security interests efficiently.
- US military assets — from troops, sailors, and airmen to ships and bombers — are therefore often being run too hard or for too long, creating morale, maintenance, and safety problems.
- A key question is whether Congress will keep increasing the defense budget. Even if it does, another question is how much it will pressure major defense firms to cut their prices or use more of their resources for investment in defense production.
US Artificial Intelligence Industry: In a scoop yesterday, Axios said AI modeler OpenAI plans to launch a major lobbying and public-relations effort right after tomorrow’s midterm elections, with the goal of favorably shaping any regulations from the new Congress and easing the public backlash against AI. Among other things, the program will push for mandatory brakes on cutting-edge models and try to rebrand “data centers” as “AI compute campuses.” If it affects the regulatory and popular environment for AI firms, the program could have an impact on AI-related assets.
Global Cybersecurity Industry: Just weeks after a flurry of suspected cyberattacks caused supermarket refrigerators and freezers to malfunction across France, a series of similar attacks has apparently been launched today in multiple other European countries, ruining food worth millions of euros. We have also seen reports that at least one freezer at a US military base has been hit. The attacks not only serve as a reminder that cyberattacks remain a threat, especially with the rise of AI, but also that cybersecurity firms are likely to see increased demand.





