Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – From Magnificent 7 to European Revival (April 14, 2025)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

European equities have long suffered from investor skepticism and been burdened by perceptions of excessive regulation, bureaucratic inertia, and elevated operating costs. These structural challenges have historically overshadowed the region’s fundamental strengths. Yet 2025 has marked a striking reversal, with European stocks delivering exceptional returns that have handily surpassed US market performance.

Much of Europe’s recent outperformance relative to the US can be traced to the unwinding of the “Trump trade,” which began in the weeks following Donald Trump’s victory in the November 2024 election. During this time, markets seemed to embrace the narrative that his policies — deep tax cuts, aggressive deregulation, and a pro-growth agenda — would cement US economic dominance. While tariffs were always a part of the equation, investors initially expected them to be used selectively rather than aggressively.

While US equities surged after the November election, European stocks languished as investors anticipated a widening growth divide. The eurozone has now gone seven consecutive quarters without achieving 2% annualized growth in its gross domestic product, a streak dating back to the third quarter of 2022. Nowhere were these struggles more apparent than in Germany, where the industrial sector — traditionally the Continent’s economic powerhouse — became its biggest drag.

Market expectations shifted abruptly in the Trump administration’s early weeks as it simultaneously challenged existing trade arrangements and demanded greater military spending from allies. The tariff threats created immediate uncertainty as businesses shelved investment plans and consumers braced for inflationary pressures. Meanwhile, growing doubts about US security commitments prompted EU leaders to accelerate plans for strategic autonomy.

We think the rotation from US to European equities was primarily valuation-driven, with the US’s once-dominant Magnificent 7 declining as investors shifted from growth to value. This marked a dramatic reversal from previous years when tech-heavy growth stocks consistently outperformed. European markets, with their heavier weighting in value sectors and more attractive price-to-earnings ratios, became natural beneficiaries of this change in investor preference.

While capital rotation remains modest to date, escalating trade tensions may accelerate foreign divestment from US assets in favor of European markets. These geopolitical strains have triggered a broad risk-off shift among investors, with capital flowing toward value assets rather than growth equities. This reallocation reflects a fundamental reassessment of global trade dynamics as nations increasingly recognize that traditional US trade relationships may be changing for good.

This shifting sentiment marks a potential inflection point after years of sustained US equity outperformance. For decades, global investors have disproportionately favored US markets, having been lured by three key advantages: (1) superior growth prospects, particularly in the technology sector; (2) unrivaled market depth and liquidity; and (3) the structural strength of the dollar. These factors became particularly pronounced in the post-pandemic era when the greenback’s appreciation created an additional return tailwind for foreign investors.

In an especially important development during this period, the US began running deficits in both its trade balance and its “primary income” balance. This twin deficit was problematic because it signaled that foreign investors were earning higher returns on their US investments than what US residents were earning abroad. In other words, the US was not only importing more than it exported but also paying out more in interest and dividends to the rest of the world than it was receiving.

The growing imbalance stemmed from two key factors: persistent US equity outperformance relative to global markets and the Fed’s rate hikes that made Treasurys more attractive to foreign investors. These forces converged in the Net International Investment Position, resulting in the value of foreign-held US assets eclipsing America’s cumulative trade deficit for the first time ever. The shift reflected both a reversal from direct investment surplus to deficit and rising portfolio investment values — twin manifestations of superior US asset returns.

Typically, such conditions would prove problematic for most economies as they could trigger disproportionate currency outflows and subsequent depreciation or make its markets vulnerable to panics. However, the US dollar’s unique status as the global reserve currency and its deep and open capital markets have largely shielded it from these adverse effects.

Nevertheless, significant risks remain. US equity markets could experience heightened volatility should foreign investor sentiment deteriorate, with the technology sector being particularly vulnerable due to its elevated valuations. The scale of this exposure is evident in foreign holdings, which now compose over 30% of US equities, driven by a dramatic surge in both portfolio income and direct investment flows.

A sudden erosion of confidence in US equities could precipitate a significant capital rotation into foreign equities and gold. Europe appears particularly well-positioned to benefit from this shift, owing to its relative valuation discount and potential for capital repatriation flows. Within the region, Germany stands out as especially attractive given its increased defense spending commitments. Meanwhile, gold could emerge as the safe-haven asset of choice, with the potential to displace US Treasurys as a reserve asset over time.

View PDF

Don’t miss our accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify 

Daily Comment (April 11, 2025)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Good morning! Markets are closely tracking the latest trade developments. In sports, Alex Ovechkin has cemented his legacy as the NHL’s all-time leading goal scorer. Today’s Comment will explore why the bond market continues to shrug off inflation data, provide an update on the Trump tax bill, and discuss the EU’s escalating regulatory push against Big Tech. We’ll also cover other market-moving news and, as always, provide a roundup of key international and domestic data releases.

Bond Market Turmoil: In a telling sign of shifting market priorities, bond investors largely dismissed the better-than-expected inflation data.

  • The Consumer Price Index (CPI) fell in March for the first time in nearly five years, suggesting that recent tariffs have not yet translated into higher consumer prices. The index dipped 0.1% month-over-month, defying economists’ expectations of a 0.1% increase. Even the core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy costs, inched up just 0.1%, well below the projected 0.3% rise. The moderation in inflation was driven largely by falling gasoline and used car prices.
  • While the slowdown in the CPI report was welcomed, the exact drivers of the decline remain unclear. Weak demand — likely tied to broader economic concerns — appears to have weighed heavily on gasoline prices and airline fares, which fell 6.3% and 5.3%, respectively. Meanwhile, shelter cost, the index’s largest component, grew at its slowest pace since June of last year. The moderation in shelter costs suggests that the post-pandemic price distortions are gradually working their way through the economy.
  • While cooling inflation has traditionally been welcomed by markets, investors are growing increasingly concerned about persistent price pressures due to tariffs. Retailers are now warning of potential price hikes as rising costs and lower inventories squeeze margins. These increases could emerge across various sectors, from imported fruits (with the US importing roughly 65% of its supply) to bicycles (which rely heavily on foreign components).

  • Corporations appear to be ready to test their pricing power, with firms passing input costs on to consumers. While this worked early in the business cycle, it is unclear if it will be effective in the current environment. Lower-income households, while initially protected by pandemic-era savings and wage growth, now face diminishing financial cushions. Simultaneously, equity market declines threaten to suppress consumption via the wealth effect among affluent demographics. As a result, firms may face resistance.
  • While stagflation cannot be ruled out entirely, it’s important to note this phenomenon typically occurs during severe energy shocks. In fact, before the 1970s, most economists considered stagflation theoretically impossible. That said, given the unexpected resilience of households in weathering inflation so far, we can’t dismiss the possibility completely. Currently, the bond market appears to be establishing a new equilibrium, a process that may temporarily impair its traditional role as an economic indicator.

Fiscal Deficit Widens: As Republicans move closer to passing tax cuts, growing concerns emerge that investors may become wary of holding debt due to the rising deficit and uncertainty about future economic growth.

  • House Republicans advanced their budget blueprint, 216-214, targeting extensions of Trump-era tax cuts and deeper spending reductions. The close vote, which relied on almost complete GOP support, revealed the party’s narrow majority. Lawmakers touted potential long-term savings of $1.5 trillion, but the bill only specifies $4 billion in cuts over the next decade, demonstrating a substantial discrepancy between their stated fiscal goals and the immediate impact of the legislation.
  • Despite some fluctuations, the US deficit remains a significant concern. The federal government reported a $1.307 trillion shortfall for the first half of the fiscal year (October-March), marking the second-largest six-month deficit on record. This figure is close to the unprecedented $1.706 trillion deficit seen during the same period in 2021, when pandemic-related expenditures were at their highest.

  • Luckily, investor appetite for long-term bonds in the primary market remains resilient in the face of headwinds. Thursday’s $22 billion, 30-year Treasury auction saw robust demand, with the debt clearing at 4.435%, below the expected yield at the bid deadline. This strong showing follows Wednesday’s solid 10-year Treasury auction, suggesting investor concerns about tariffs dampening demand for US debt may be overstated.
  • While concerns persist about the recent rise in 10-year Treasury yields, there are no clear indicators this represents a crisis. The upward movement appears primarily driven by investors raising cash through position liquidations, though market speculation points to possible foreign central bank selling — the People’s Bank of China being the most probable candidate. Should this yield momentum continue, Federal Reserve intervention may become increasingly likely.

EU Prepares for US Talks: The EU is prepared to protect its interests as it seeks to meet the US halfway in some of its demands.

  • European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is set to negotiate with the US during a 90-day window. However, she has warned that the EU is prepared to walk away if talks are not conducted in good faith and potentially retaliate by targeting US trade in services, specifically tech firms, with digital taxes. Her threat follows US efforts to address the EU trade imbalance and scrutinize its tax policies.
  • Her remarks follow the Trump administration’s criticism of the EU, targeting not only its trade surplus with the US but also its defense spending, tax policies, and regulatory framework. While the European Union has shown a willingness to discuss military expenditure and trade issues, it has remained silent on addressing other American concerns such as getting rid of VAT or loosening tech regulation.
  • The current standoff between the US and EU will likely center on establishing a mutually beneficial framework for cooperation. The most probable outcome would involve creating an economic ecosystem that simultaneously limits China’s influence while advancing Western technological ambitions. Given these strategic imperatives, we believe negotiations could still foster closer transatlantic ties, provided both sides demonstrate a willingness to make concessions for a meaningful agreement.

End to Tariff Madness? China has retaliated against the US decision to impose 145% tariffs on its goods by introducing 125% tariffs on American products. However, Beijing has indicated it does not intend to escalate tariffs further.

  • China’s move to raise tariffs on US goods signals its readiness to withstand a prolonged trade conflict with Washington. While Beijing has pledged to avoid further tit-for-tat measures, it has firmly stated it will not back down. These tensions underscore the accelerating economic decoupling between the world’s two largest economies.
  • These escalating tariffs have now reached levels that make cross-border commerce commercially unviable for many firms. This development threatens corporate earnings in both nations, as US companies have depended on China’s rapidly growing consumer market for overseas profits, while Chinese firms have relied on access to America’s massive consumer base.

View PDF

Daily Comment (April 10, 2025)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Good morning! Markets are digesting the latest inflation figures while Lionel Messi’s double-strike propelled Inter Miami past LAFC into the CONCACAF semifinals. Today’s Comment will focus on President Trump’s decision to roll back tariffs, insights from the latest Fed minutes, and other major market-moving news. As always, we’ll include comprehensive summaries of today’s domestic and international economic releases.

Trump Reversal: US stocks experienced a rally following the administration’s tariff reductions on most nations, excluding China, which saw an increase to 125%. Despite the market’s positive initial response, persistent uncertainty remains.

  • The US agreed to postpone new tariffs for 90 days while pursuing trade negotiations with partner nations. Markets responded positively to the decision, where the average tariff rate would fall from 23% to 10% — a development that alleviated concerns about supply chain instability and potential economic contraction. The policy shift triggered a significant market rally, sending the S&P 500 up 9.5% and propelling each “Magnificent 7” stock to gains exceeding 10%.
  • While markets welcomed the policy reversal, uncertainty persists over the trade war’s trajectory. The president’s baseline tariffs remain in effect, pushing the average import tax rate for non-China trade partners to 15.7%. This includes the 25% tariffs still applied to Canadian and Mexican goods not covered by USMCA provisions. According to White House data, only 38% of Canadian imports and 50% of Mexican imports currently comply with the agreement’s standards.

  • It seems that the administration is seeking to condition markets to become less reactive to tariff announcements. The current pause may serve two key purposes by demonstrating presidential flexibility while also normalizing the recently imposed 10% tariffs as a sustainable baseline. This calculated approach should help stabilize markets as the price impact of these import taxes gradually filters through the economy. A major unknown is how consumers will respond to the eventual price shock.

Trade Friends Not Enemies: While the White House has shown limited interest in bringing down newly implemented tariff rates, it does seek to use trade tensions to form an alliance against China.

  • The US decision to pause the increase in tariffs has been widely viewed as a step in the right direction, though questions remain about how far the White House is willing to go in implementing reciprocal tariffs. Kevin Hassett, one of the White House’s economic advisors, suggested potential tariff rates below 10% might be possible, though he cautioned this would require an “extraordinary” trade deal to justify such reductions.
  • While this decision has provided some market reassurance, uncertainty persists regarding whether other nations will refrain from retaliatory measures. The EU has agreed to delay its metal tariffs by 90 days, and while Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed the announcement, Canada has not yet committed to any tariff relief.
  • China is bracing for tariff fallout, with leaders meeting today to discuss stimulus measures. The package will target housing, consumer spending, and tech innovation to protect growth. Since growth has slowed in China, speculation has swirled about Beijing deploying its “stimulus bazooka,” large-scale measures to revive an economy facing prolonged sluggish growth.
  • Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hinted that the White House may pursue a collective approach with allies to coordinate their approach toward China. His remarks seem to reflect a long history of the US trying to coalesce its allies into joining its efforts to isolate China. It also comes as Spain has been urging the EU to deepen economic ties with Beijing, aiming to reduce reliance on the United States.
  • Markets may be underestimating the psychological strategy at play. By first imposing 10% tariffs and then escalating to far higher levels, the initial increase appears modest by comparison. The use of “reciprocal tariffs” was designed to encourage global tariff reductions in exchange for US concessions. Yet, America’s traditionally low tariffs offered little bargaining power.

  • The updated tariff framework strengthens Washington’s leverage, pressuring allies to align their trade policies with its China strategy. Notably, US tariffs on Chinese goods are now so high that they will likely redirect Chinese exports away from the US and toward Europe — further fueling protectionist sentiment on the Continent. Ultimately, this policy may reinforce Europe’s perception that it must collaborate with the US to counter China.
  • The key unknown is the size and scope of China’s stimulus measures. A substantial spending package could help restore consumer confidence, which has remained weak since the pandemic. It could also boost domestic demand, reducing the economy’s reliance on foreign consumption of its goods.

Fed Stagflation Worries: Fed minutes showed officials’ fears about stagflation, while balance sheet reduction faced strong opposition despite broad support.

  • Nearly all FOMC members expressed concerns that inflation risks remain skewed to the upside, while employment risks also appear elevated. This outlook will likely compel policymakers to adopt a cautious, wait-and-see approach when adjusting monetary policy. These concerns arise as central bankers wrestle with the potential economic fallout from the Trump administration’s trade war.
  • Despite the Fed’s reluctance to commit to rate cuts amid ongoing uncertainty, markets are still pricing in three potential rate cuts this year, exceeding the two projected in the Fed’s latest economic outlook. This divergence suggests investors see elevated recession risks due to the ongoing trade war, which therefore keeps expectations for further monetary easing alive.
  • Regarding the balance sheet, policymakers appear divided on whether the reduced pace of unwinding was appropriate. The decision stemmed from concerns about preserving sufficient reserve buffers after Congress suspended the debt ceiling. Since January, Treasury’s drawdown of its General Account (TGA) to fund government operations — while Congress negotiated the debt limit — has created distortions in reserve markets, as these flows directly impact liquidity in the commercial banking sector.

  • While Fed Governor Christopher Waller was the only dissent, several others pushed to maintain the original pace of balance sheet unwinding. Their reluctance was due to concerns that it could compromise the Fed’s balance sheet normalization efforts. They believed alternative tools would have been sufficient to address reserve concerns. Specifically, an adjustment to the reverse repo facility rate could have provided an effective alternative, injecting needed liquidity to prevent a problem.
  • Thus far, market impacts appear contained despite elevated uncertainty. While recent bond market volatility reflects trade war concerns, Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack noted that while financial markets are under strain, they continue to function effectively. That said, we should emphasize that the Fed stands ready to intervene if necessary — either through balance sheet expansion to address liquidity shortages or by cutting the federal funds rate to mitigate solvency risks.

Chinese Troops in Ukraine: Two Chinese nationals were caught fighting for the Russian army, in a sign that the war may be broadening.

  • Ukrainian officials have accused China of not taking sufficient measures to stop its citizens from enlisting in the Russian military, with estimates suggesting up to 150 Chinese fighters may be involved. If confirmed, this would represent the strongest indication yet of Chinese support for Russia’s invasion and will likely call into question the country’s claim of being neutral in the war. Following the allegation, the White House threatened to take action.
  • The discovery of Chinese military involvement is poised to significantly escalate US-China tensions, particularly as Washington seeks to broker an end to the war in Ukraine. This support could substantially strengthen Russia’s negotiating position by demonstrating its capacity to prolong the conflict with Beijing’s backing. Moreover, it serves as stark evidence that American attempts to isolate Moscow and draw it away from Chinese influence may ultimately prove unsuccessful.
  • A critical unknown remains how the EU will respond to these developments. Over the last few years, the bloc has repeatedly urged China to intervene and restrain Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. European leaders have even cautioned that Beijing’s support for Moscow risks triggering a fundamental divergence in their bilateral relations.

View PDF

Daily Comment (April 9, 2025)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Good morning! The markets remain laser-focused on developments in the escalating trade war. In sports news, Arsenal secured a decisive 3-0 victory over Real Madrid in last night’s Champions League showdown. Today’s Comment will examine the growing anxiety in bond markets, the latest updates on tariff implementations, and other key market-moving events. As always, we’ll conclude with our comprehensive roundup of both domestic and international economic data releases.

Bond Market Sell-Off: Investors are growing increasingly apprehensive as the trade war escalates, sparking a sell-off in Treasurys.

  • The first day of the increased tariff implementation triggered a sell-off in global bond markets as investors retreated to the sidelines amid escalating uncertainty. Bond prices plummeted while yields surged, reflecting a rush to liquidate holdings as trade war tensions intensified. Despite these liquidity concerns, the US dollar has not strengthened — a potential sign that investors are diversifying their currency exposures.
  • A recent Treasury auction has also raised fresh concerns about the growing federal deficit. Tuesday’s three-year note sale drew unexpectedly weak demand, signaling investor reluctance to increase their holdings of government debt. The lackluster performance suggests market participants may be preparing to reduce their Treasury exposure if economic conditions deteriorate in coming weeks.

  • Recent bond market activity indicates declining appetite among US debt investors for medium-to-long term duration exposure. As illustrated in the chart above, tail and stop auction levels, which reflect where yields settled relative to market expectations, confirm this trend. The Treasury’s shift toward shorter-term issuance has enhanced liquidity in long-dated securities, though at the cost of reduced demand for intermediate maturities. Meanwhile, Treasury bills continue to demonstrate robust investor interest.
  • Growing concerns about bond market liquidity could force the Federal Reserve to stop quantitative tightening earlier than they planned, and possibly even start buying bonds again. While lowering interest rates is still a possibility, the Fed would likely only do that if there were serious solvency risks, such as companies being in danger of not being able to pay their debts. Right now, it doesn’t look like we’re facing that kind of problem.

Dealing With Tariffs: Amid rising economic headwinds, foreign policymakers are implementing targeted relief measures to protect vulnerable sectors and maintain stability — while also seeking a deal with the US.

  • As the new tariffs take effect, signs of diplomatic progress are emerging. The US continues negotiations with trade partners to potentially reduce these measures, with several key developments: Vietnam has agreed to reduce its trade balance by purchasing more US arms, South Korea anticipates finalizing a significant trade agreement imminently, and Japan appears to be receiving preferential attention in ongoing trade discussions.

Big, Beautiful, Bill in Jeopardy? Republican lawmakers are increasingly hesitant to back the president’s tax bill, voicing concerns over its fiscal impact and doubting its revenue potential amid ongoing trade tensions.

  • Several House Republicans opposed the president’s signature tax bill on Tuesday, raising objections to its hefty price tag. The dissenters are now threatening to block a key procedural vote needed to advance the legislation — a move that could stall the bill indefinitely. The resistance comes just hours after a high stakes meeting between GOP lawmakers, the president, and House Majority Leader Mike Johnson failed to resolve the spending dispute.
  • The growing trade conflict has strengthened Republican opposition to the spending bill, as lawmakers express doubts about its ability to generate sufficient revenue to offset its costs. While the White House projects $600 billion in annual tariff revenue, economists caution that elevated rates could decrease trade volumes, thereby jeopardizing revenue targets. In an attempt to alleviate concerns, the president has set a goal of $1 trillion in spending cuts.
  • While we expect Republicans will ultimately pass the tax bill, we question their ability to identify spending cuts substantial enough to reassure markets. This fiscal constraint may force lawmakers to consider revenue-raising alternatives, including potential tax increases on high-income households, as they prioritize preserving middle-class tax relief.

Coal on the Rise: President Trump signed an executive order to boost the production of coal with hopes that it can be used to fuel AI.

  • The new executive order aims to roll back industry regulations that have contributed to coal’s persistent production decline. Through emergency measures, the president has authorized the Department of Energy to intervene in sustaining coal operations. The administration further underscored coal’s strategic value by classifying it as a “critical mineral,” a designation that directly links its production to national security.
  • This move is expected to advance President Trump’s ambition to establish the US as a global AI leader. This comes as the president has sought to make the US the center of innovation for AI with his Stargate Project in which the US plans to invest $100 billion on co-located data centers, which would allow them to be built next to their energy source.
  • Surging demand for data centers and semiconductor production has reversed years of stagnant electricity consumption in the US, triggering the first sustained increase in over a decade. This trend could drive up utility bills industry-wide while creating inflationary pressure on housing costs.

View PDF

Daily Comment (April 8, 2025)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with some new observations on the global financial markets as they respond to President Trump’s new US tariff regime. We next review several other international and US developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including reports of a new Ukrainian incursion into Russia and another firing of a high-level US military officer as part of what appears to be a broad purge of officials.

Global Financial Markets: By market close yesterday, US stock prices were relatively little changed. However, intraday trading was just about as volatile as yesterday’s action in Asia and Europe. Stocks were whipsawed by a false report that President Trump would pause his reciprocal tariffs for 90 days and by news that he threatened an added 50% tariff on Chinese goods if Beijing doesn’t lift its retaliatory tariff of 34% on US goods by Tuesday. Amid this volatility, we think investors and their advisors should keep in mind the following key points:

  • While it is tempting to tag all this volatility on Trump’s tariffs, the problem is broader. As we’ve written for years, the global order is in the process of changing as the US reconsiders its role as the global hegemon. Even if Trump froze or rescinded his tariffs today, that process would likely continue, and the result would likely be further economic disruption and market chaos.
  • The administration’s mixed messages and shifting strategies also are likely to prolong the uncertainty. After all, even if Trump decided to pause or rescind some or all of the tariffs, businesses and investors now have probably been trained not to trust him. As with those of us who live in Missouri, their attitude might well be, “Show me” before they let down their guard and start making normal long-term decisions again.
  • It’s also important to remember that the epicenter of the trade war is China. In response to Trump’s threat to impose an additional 50% tariff on China, the country’s commerce minister today said, “If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end . . . China will resolutely take countermeasures to safeguard its own rights and interests.” We judge that the Chinese leaders should be taken at their word on this, which suggests a prolonged US-China trade war.
  • The ebb and flow of statements and potential tariff adjustments will certainly spark some rallies in the markets. Indeed, Japanese and US stocks today are rebounding on signs from the White House that it is open to negotiations. Given the discussion above, we think investors should be skeptical that a long-lasting rebound can be established so easily.
  • Investment strategy should therefore make full use of the various tools available to manage risk, from proper diversification to meaningful positions in safe-haven assets such as US Treasury obligations, defensive blue-chip stocks, and gold. Such tools may not protect against all losses, but they are likely to help reduce gut-wrenching volatility.
  • At the same time, our geopolitical, economic, and financial market analysis teaches us that today’s global transition and the Trump administration’s specific tariff policies have created big, long-lasting trends that are likely to be investable. For example, we have long championed high quality, dividend paying value stocks. Our Asset Allocation programs have also taken positions in European defense stocks. We continue to look for new opportunities amid the current market volatility.
  • While investors may be tempted to sell their risk assets in times like these, it’s important to remember that such a strategy is very hard to pull off as it requires being right about both the time to sell and the time to get back into the market to take advantage of any rebound. Because that’s so difficult, the better approach for many investors is probably to ride out the storm and resist panic selling.
  • Finally, while we might quibble with whether Trump really needed to impose his tariffs and other radical economic policies so abruptly and idiosyncratically — rather than telescoped beforehand and implemented step-by-step over time — we can appreciate the effort to address the US’s longstanding trade deficits, budget deficits, and debt. Even if Trump’s approach has created a lot of uncomfortable volatility and raised the risk of recession, the policies may well prove positive in the longer term. Time will tell.

China: State-owned investment fund Central Huijin yesterday afternoon confirmed that it had bought Chinese “A” shares to support the domestic stock market amid a rout sparked by the new US tariffs on China. The market intervention highlights the policy tools that Beijing is likely to roll out to protect the Chinese economy from the new tariffs. Other potential measures include interest rate cuts, a devaluation of the renminbi, and increased fiscal spending.

Turkey: In an interview with the Financial Times, Finance Minister Mehmet Şimşek said the global economic and market turmoil around the new US tariffs could actually be positive for his country. According to Şimşek, falling energy prices would help reduce Turkey’s current account deficit and help the country rebuild its foreign reserves. It would also help bring down consumer price inflation. The statement is a reminder that some well-placed countries could well see their geopolitical or economic positions enhanced in the new environment.

Russia-Ukraine War: Ukrainian President Zelensky today confirmed for the first time that Kyiv’s forces are now fighting in the Belgorod region of Russia, marking a second incursion after Ukrainian troops seized part of the Kursk region last summer. Even though the current US-brokered deal to stop attacking each other’s energy infrastructure is faltering, the new Ukrainian incursion is probably designed at least in part to be leverage in any broader peace negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv.

Canada: In its first-quarter business outlook report yesterday, the Bank of Canada said 32% of surveyed businesses indicated they are now planning for a recession in the coming year, up from an average of just 15% in the last two quarters of 2024. The figures confirm other reports suggesting the Canadian economy is already slipping into a contraction in response to the new US tariffs on Canadian goods.

United States-China-Panama: US financial firm BlackRock’s deal with Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison to acquire dozens of ports around the world, including key ports at either end of the Panama Canal, now appears to be in trouble after a Panamanian official said Hutchison owes $300 million to Panama and violated some Panamanian regulations. If the deal is scuttled, it would likely further fray US-China relations, which had been unexpectedly calm over the first two months of President Trump’s administration.

  • The BlackRock-Hutchison deal had been pushed by Trump to reduce Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, but General Secretary Xi was reportedly angry about it when he eventually got wind of it.
  • Because of Xi’s opposition, it would not be a surprise if covert Chinese influence was behind the wrench being thrown into the deal. At this point, however, it isn’t entirely clear whether the agreement will be killed definitively.

United States-Iran: Yesterday, the US and Iran said they will begin negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear program. However, the statements were contradictory, with President Trump saying the talks would take place directly between US and Iranian officials and the Iranians saying the talks would only be indirect through intermediaries.

  • If the talks take place and are successful, the eventual result could be an end to US sanctions on Iran and more Iranian oil freely trading on global markets.
  • If the talks fail, the chance of a US-Israeli attack on Iran would increase. Any such attack would likely be highly disruptive to the global economy and energy supplies.

US Military: Reports yesterday said Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield, the US representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s military committee, has been abruptly fired. That makes Chatfield one of about a dozen top military and national security officials fired after a meeting last week between President Trump and right-wing conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer. The firings have raised questions about who controls or influences top US national security officials and how the administration is managing US national defense.

  • Chatfield was previously the first woman to head the US Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island. While she headed the college, she was accused by conservative groups of being overly concerned with diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
  • Other officials recently purged include the head of the National Security Agency and several staff members of the National Security Council who Loomer reportedly accused of being disloyal to Trump.

US Fiscal Policy: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services yesterday said it will provide a 5.06% hike in the rate at which it pays health insurers participating in the Medicare Advantage program. The increase, which takes place in 2026, is more than double the 2.23% hike proposed by the Biden administration in January. Since the new figure signals the Trump administration will be unexpectedly supportive of Medicare Advantage, the news will likely give a boost to health insurers’ stocks today.

US Tax Policy: A Bloomberg report yesterday said the Trump administration is mulling a potential exporter tax credit to help firms damaged by other countries’ retaliatory tariffs on US goods and services. Administration officials remain divided on the idea, which in any case would require Congressional approval.

View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Growing Fragility in the US Bloc (April 7, 2025)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA  | PDF

We at Confluence have written extensively on the end of post-Cold War globalization and the fracturing of the world into various geopolitical and economic blocs. We’ve noted that the large, rich bloc led by the United States is an attractive place for investors, but fractured supply chains and rising international tensions may produce a range of economic and financial market problems, from elevated consumer price inflation to higher and more volatile interest rates. In this report, we explore what could happen to the US bloc as President Trump pursues his aggressive policies to push the costs of Western security and prosperity onto the US’s traditional allies. As we’ve noted before, those policies run the risk of reducing US influence with its allies and undermining cohesion within the US bloc. We assess in this report that reduced cohesion probably won’t splinter the US bloc in the near term. Nevertheless, we begin laying out how the world could change if the US bloc does disintegrate, and we discuss the economic and market implications if it does.

Read the full report

Don’t miss our accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify 

Daily Comment (April 7, 2025)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with the very latest on the Trump administration’s new tariff policies. We next review several other international and US developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including potential policy responses to the tariffs from countries such Japan and Germany, and news that the administration is considering a massive cut in the US Army’s active-duty troop count.

US Tariff Policy: President Trump’s baseline 10% tariff on most US imports went into effect over the weekend, and Treasury Secretary Bessent and Commerce Secretary Lutnick said in press interviews that the additional “reciprocal” tariffs on dozens of countries will start as planned on Wednesday. They also warned that even if foreign countries offer concessions to reduce their tariff rates, any negotiations will take time, and the maximum tariffs would be in place until then.

Eurozone: Greek central bank chief Yannis Stournaras, who sits on the policymaking board of the European Central Bank, warned in an interview today that the Trump administration’s new tariffs would create an unexpected demand shock for the eurozone, potentially pushing down consumer price inflation below the ECB’s target. The statement signals that some of the region’s policymakers may want to keep cutting interest rates at the ECB’s policy meeting next week, despite ECB President Lagarde’s recent hints of a pause in rate cuts.

Germany: Friedrich Merz, who is negotiating to form the country’s next government and is likely to become its chancellor, warned today that the economic and financial market turbulence from the US’s new tariffs mean that Germany must regain economic competitiveness as quickly as possible. Indeed, Merz said that strategies to deal with the US tariffs will now be a key focus for his center-right CDU party and the center-left SPD as they continue talks to form a coalition. That raises the prospect for big economic reforms in Germany once the government is formed.

United Kingdom: According to lender Halifax, the average price of a home in March was up just 2.8% year-over-year, matching the increase in the year to February but coming in short of the expected increase of 3.5%. On a month-over-month basis, UK home prices fell in each of the last two months, adding to the evidence that the rapid home price appreciation of 2024 has come to an end.

Japan: With the Japanese economy facing both brutal import tariffs in the US and fast-rising prices for food and other basics at home, some politicians in the ruling Liberal Democratic Party are pushing for a cut in the country’s consumption tax. Top LDP leaders are still reluctant to go that far, fearing wider budget deficits and increased debt, but rank-and-file party members are pushing to put such a tax cut in the LDP’s platform for this summer’s Upper House elections.

  • The rising calls for consumption tax cuts in Japan illustrate how countries around the world will feel pressure for stimulus programs as their exports run up against the Trump administration’s new tariffs.
  • As the debate in Japan shows, any such stimulus programs could lead to bigger fiscal problems and exacerbate the economic disruptions from the new US trade policies.
  • Separately, press reports say Chinese officials are also mulling significant economic stimulus measures, including a devaluation of the renminbi, to cushion the blow of the tariffs.

European Union-United States: European Commission Vice-President Séjourné today hinted in an interview that the EU won’t put tariffs on US bourbon as it retaliates for the Trump administration’s new imposts. That suggests that the EU executive has caved to demands from the wine and spirits industries of countries such as France, Italy, and Ireland, which feared the US would impose even higher tariffs on their products if the EU retaliated against US whiskey.

US Military: According to a report late last week, the US Army is “quietly” mulling a cut in its active-duty troop count from about 450,000 now to as little as 360,000 in the coming years. It is unknown whether any cuts are being considered for the Army Reserve or the National Guard. The contemplated cuts reflect a number of pressures, including President Trump’s directive to cut the defense budget by 8% and the administration’s plan to shift military resources away from land maneuver forces in Europe to naval and air forces in the Asia-Pacific region.

  • If the US downsizes its ground forces and shifts military assets out of Europe before the Europeans can rebuild their own defense capabilities, Russia would likely be emboldened to assert itself in the region, if not by actual territorial aggression, then perhaps by political pressure.
  • In any case, the drive to cut defense spending comes even though the US defense burden (military outlays as a share of gross domestic product) is now at a historic low of only about 3.3%, versus an average of 3.6% during the War on Terror and 7.1% during the long Cold War.

US Agriculture Industry: A report on Friday said administration officials and congressional lawmakers are considering new fiscal support for farmers hurt by retaliatory tariffs or other trade barriers imposed by other countries in response to President Trump’s tariffs on US imports. The talks are in the early stages, so it isn’t yet clear how big any such relief program would be. Still, the news suggests that US agribusiness stocks may hold up better than expected amid the evolving global trade war.

  • On a related note, new analysis shows that the recent retreat in US egg prices likely stemmed from a massive surge of imports. According to the data, February egg imports from Mexico and Turkey were about four times higher than they were in the same month one year earlier.
  • As avian influenza decimated US flocks earlier this year, prompting egg shortages and driving prices higher, Mexican and Turkish producers evidently responded to the price signal by shipping more to the US, exactly as economic theory would suggest. One key question now is whether the administration’s new tariffs will push those egg imports down again, creating another fowl price experience for US egg buyers.

View PDF