Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Fed’s Other Policy Tool (March 18, 2024)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

While the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate focuses on achieving maximum employment and stable prices, managing long-term interest rates has also played a significant role since the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act in 1977.[1] Recent actions have raised questions about the Fed potentially anchoring the 10-year Treasury yield to remain within a range of 4.0% to 5.0%, primarily using the nontraditional tool of “forward guidance.”

Over the last few months, policymakers have leaned heavily on forward guidance to achieve their policy aims. The strategic communication of future policy intentions allows Fed policymakers to influence market expectations and adjust financial conditions significantly. This, in turn, grants them greater flexibility in adjusting monetary policy and enables them to react more nimbly to economic changes without solely relying on interest rates or balance sheet adjustments.

This tool became particularly noticeable in October 2023, when yields on 10-year Treasury bonds surged above 5% for the first time in over 16 years. Several factors contributed to this surge. For instance, heightened government issuance of US Treasury obligations coupled with a surprisingly resilient economy prompted investors to reassess whether the low interest rates adequately compensated for the risks associated with holding long-term debt. Moreover, the Fed’s September Summary of Economic Projections hinted at an additional rate hike before year-end, fueling concerns that forthcoming short-term rate increases might outpace long-term yields even further.

In response, Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled a potential pause in rate hikes at the October 31- November 1 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee. The central bank doubled down on this sentiment in the subsequent meeting by revising its 2024 year-end rate forecast, cutting its median target from 5.1% to 4.6%. Fueled by hopes of a dovish pivot from the Fed and a potential economic soft landing, investors heavily purchased long-term US Treasury bonds. This surge in demand contributed to a substantial drop in long-term yields, with the average 10-year yield plummeting nearly 80 basis points, dropping from 4.80% to 4.02% in just two months.[2] This significant decline in yields helped loosen financial conditions and relieved fears of a protracted increase in long-term interest rates.

However, the Fed’s dovish stance proved less aggressive than the market initially thought. As interest rates dropped below 4% on the 10-year Treasury, policymakers quickly signaled their opposition to an immediate cut. San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly and Dallas FRB President Lorie Logan even suggested that further hikes remained a possibility. Fed Governor Waller, who opened the door to a spring rate cute, later emphasized the need for patience, indicating the committee wanted to see inflation continue its descent toward target levels. Chair Powell cemented this shift in stance at the January FOMC meeting, confirming that a March cut was not on the table. This hawkish pivot triggered a modest reversal in expectations over policy, causing the 10-year Treasury yield to rise by 15 basis points to 4.21%.

While the FOMC undoubtedly includes diverse viewpoints, the members’ recent pronouncements project a unified message. This cohesion amplifies the impact of forward guidance by minimizing misinterpretations. While individual views may differ, all members have publicly conveyed that current interest rates are likely near their peak, with rate cuts a possibility but not in the near-term. As a result, markets have revised their expectations, aligning with the median FOMC projection. Consequently, the moderation of policy rate expectations led to the stabilization of 10-year Treasury yields.

The Federal Reserve’s current approach, while not technically constituting yield curve control, may be a subtle form of it, which raises concerns about potential future interventions aimed at aligning with government priorities. The Fed’s use of “jawboning” to manage interest rate expectations raises questions about its potential shift toward a more active role in influencing market behavior. This could be particularly relevant considering the substantial US government debt and the alleged attempt of some officials to downplay the possibility of higher long-term rates in the future.

It’s important to note that forward guidance, while a tool for influencing expectations, is distinct from the yield curve control practiced during WWII, as it does not involve the expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet. If maintained over time and if seen as being implemented on the behest of the Treasury, this gray area could erode public confidence in the Fed’s independence. Such an impression could potentially hinder its ability to control inflation and negatively impact the value of the dollar. That said, we believe that if 10-year Treasury yields reach a range between 4.5% and 5.0%, it could present a buying opportunity for some investors.

View PDF


[1] The Federal Reserve Act mandates that the Federal Reserve conduct monetary policy “so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.”

[2] The Treasury’s decision to reallocate its bond issuance toward the short end of the yield curve also played a role in the drop.

Daily Comment (March 15, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning! Equities are off to a so-so start as investors brace for next week’s FOMC meeting. In sports news, the Champions League matchups are set, with a highly anticipated clash between Real Madrid and Manchester City in the quarterfinals. Today’s Comment delves into our analysis of the recent inflation reports, examines the potential impact of overnight reverse repo rates on the FOMC’s policy deliberations, and provides an overview of the upcoming Russian elections scheduled for the weekend. We also include, as always, a roundup of domestic and international data.

Double Dose of Inflation Trouble: Despite a negative market reaction to the latest inflation report, a closer look at the data reveals a more nuanced picture.

  • February’s faster-than-expected rise in wholesale prices is another indication that inflationary pressures remain stubbornly persistent. The producer price index (PPI) in February increased more than expected, jumping from 0.3% to 0.6%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This aligns with concerns about inflation after the consumer price index (CPI) also rose faster than anticipated earlier this week. Similar to the PPI, the CPI climbed from 0.3% in January to 0.4% in February. Following the PPI report, the 10-year Treasury yield rose 10 bps, while the stock market dipped with the S&P 500 and NASDAQ both falling about 0.7%.
  • Concerns in the market about resurgent inflation might be exaggerated. Recent data suggests that inflationary pressures are mainly driven by temporary factors, most notably the significant increase in energy prices. In February, the PPI witnessed a 4.4% surge in energy prices while the CPI reported a 2.3% rise, highlighting the importance of this trend. Additionally, the rise in fuel prices also resulted in higher transportation costs, which further contributed to the unusual increase in both price indexes. In essence, the factors that inflated prices were largely one-time events and may not signal sustained price pressures.

  • The hotter-than-expected inflation report likely strengthens the case for the Fed to delay a rate cut. Futures markets currently predict rate cuts in either June or July, which aligns somewhat with Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic’s recent comments. The upcoming FOMC meeting in April, with its updated economic projections, will provide a clearer picture of the committee’s policy path for the rest of the year. We expect them to either maintain their current forecast of three rate cuts this year or potentially revise it down to two.

Liquidity and the Stock Market: While a recent cash injection will bolster the financial system, it’s unlikely to prevent a potential liquidity crisis later in the year.

  • The Federal Reserve’s overnight reverse repo (ON RRP) facility balance has surged to $521.7 billion. This increase is likely temporary, but it gives policymakers some breathing room to decide when to slow down quantitative tightening (QT). The surge reflects investors who are seeking safe, short-term parking for their cash due to a temporary pause in Treasury settlements. However, with more attractive options now available in other investments like money market fund repos, banks have been diverting funds away from the facility. At the current pace, it is expected that ON RRP will run out of cash by midyear.
  • Overnight funding levels are a critical gauge of excess reserves in the banking system. A significant drop can signal potential market stress. As the chart below illustrates, the recent liquidity surge has likely buoyed risk assets. However, the FOMC is grappling with the optimal level of reserves, as it directly impacts the timing of QT unwinding. Governor Christopher Waller downplayed concerns about the zero-balance ON RRP, while Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan expressed anxieties about potential future liquidity issues.

  • The Federal Reserve is expected to discuss winding down its QT program at its upcoming meeting, even before the ON RRP facility is drained completely. However, the specific details of this shift remain unclear. While the expectation is for rate hikes to end before QT stops altogether, there’s a possibility the meeting could lead to a slowdown in the pace of tightening from the current maximum of $60 billion in Treasuries and $35 billion in mortgage-backed securities per month. This slowdown could alleviate some market liquidity concerns and potentially boost stock prices.

Russian Elections: While Russia’s upcoming presidential election is likely a formality, the outcome could reveal the true impact of the war in Ukraine on Putin’s domestic standing.

  • Another electoral victory for Putin may not startle the markets, but his post-election decisions are expected to draw significant attention. In remarks made on Wednesday, Putin stated that while he currently views the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons as unnecessary, Russia maintains readiness to employ them if it senses a threat to its sovereignty. This highlights the growing importance of nuclear deterrence in national security, especially with recent calls for a stronger European defense in response to Russia. Consequently, we expect continued high demand for uranium and related materials in the coming years.

Other News:  China is looking to stimulate its economy by boosting its tourism sector. This move suggests the country may be seeking to improve relations with the West as it grapples with an economic slowdown. Supporters of free-market principles have backed Nippon Steel’s acquisition of US Steel, but the controversy surrounding the deal highlights growing populist sentiment in the United States. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has pushed for new elections in Israel, signaling mounting impatience in the US with Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu’s management of the conflict.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 14, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning! Equities have pared early gains due to stronger-than-expected PPI data and subpar retail sales figures. Meanwhile, Purdue, UConn, Houston, and Tennessee were able to secure top seeds for the NCAA Tournament. Today’s Comment dives into our thoughts on central banks moving away from ultra-accommodative policy, the potential for broader social media scrutiny beyond TikTok, and how the IEA’s reversal on its oil demand forecast reinforces our concerns about future inflation volatility. As always, we’ll wrap up with a summary of key international and domestic data.

The Next Monetary Regime:  The European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve have signaled potential rate cuts, but this easing cycle could be unlike past ones.

  • The European Central Bank (ECB) is poised to implement changes to its operational framework, granting lenders greater autonomy in managing liquidity within the financial system. This shift aims to gradually wean banks off their reliance on the ECB for cash and foster a more self-sufficient approach to liquidity distribution. Interestingly, the Federal Reserve may be following a similar path. The Fed’s recent closure of its Bank Term Funding Program and its encouragement for banks to utilize the discount window suggest a potential move toward a less interventionist approach to liquidity management.
  • These central bank adjustments signal a potential departure from pre-pandemic monetary policy norms, which could include a more cautious approach to future interest rate cuts. The White House’s recent inclusion of higher interest rate expectations in its forecasts further reinforces this shift. The strategy to uphold elevated peaks and troughs in interest rates is driven by the imperative need to preserve central bank agility in striking a delicate equilibrium between sustaining price stability and fostering optimal employment levels. The overarching objective is to mitigate the likelihood of exhausting all available monetary instruments once the economy succumbs to recessionary pressures.

  • The evolving approach to monetary policy signals a potential paradigm shift for investors. With the era of near or below zero interest rates likely coming to a close, investors will need to adapt their strategies. While central banks may not entirely abandon this tool, their use of it is expected to be more measured moving forward. This shift in preference suggests a new normal for interest rates — they will likely settle at higher points across the yield curve compared to what we’ve witnessed over the past decade and a half. This is likely to remain true not just for the US but for most other developed economies as well.

Election Meddling: With presumptive presidential nominees likely secured by both major parties, lawmakers are shifting their focus to the growing influence of social media, particularly in the age of advancing artificial intelligence.

  • A bipartisan effort in the House recently passed a bill that could see TikTok banned in the US. The legislation requires the app’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, to sever ties with the platform or face a potential shutdown in the US. Citing national security concerns, lawmakers worry about the app’s ability to be used for propaganda or voter manipulation. President Biden reportedly supports the bill, but its fate now rests with the Senate. However, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer hasn’t scheduled a vote yet, as concerns about potential free speech limitations and government overreach are expected to be debated.
  • While TikTok faces intense scrutiny for potential national security risks, other platforms haven’t escaped criticism. Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly labeled Facebook “the enemy of the people,” alleging bias against conservative voices. On the other hand, New York Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) described the decision of X, formerly known as Twitter, to alter its algorithm to promote or suppress free speech as a form of election interference. The potential of AI-generated deepfakes to spread disinformation on social media platforms is likely to put more pressure on lawmakers to rein in Big Tech.

  • The growing pushback against tech giants is likely to extend beyond this year’s election cycle. Countries are grappling with the immense power wielded by these companies, and Europe has already implemented a regulatory framework to rein them in. US regulators are also taking a more aggressive stance. However, despite their high stock prices, this increasing regulatory scrutiny highlights the importance of diversification in investment portfolios, given the potential risks associated with tech’s high valuations.

Crude Oil Concerns: A brighter economic outlook in the US is raising concerns that crude oil demand will be significantly higher than the initial projections for 2024.

  • The International Energy Agency (IEA) adjusted its oil forecast, predicting a shift from a surplus to a deficit due to reduced OPEC supply and robust US economic growth. This adjustment reflects the IEA’s expectation that OPEC will likely maintain production cuts throughout the year, even though the group previously aimed for these cuts to last only until mid-2024. The agency further amplified its oil demand forecast, raising its projection by 50% compared to its June 2023 estimate. This significant upward revision reflects an anticipated increase in bunker fuel consumption due to shipping route adjustments to bypass Red Sea conflict zones.
  • The revised economic outlook is likely to further exacerbate the upward pressure on Brent crude prices, which have already surged 11% this year. Continued oil price hikes could significantly impact inflation. This connection is evident in the latest CPI report, where the increases in energy price heavily influenced the overall reading. Notably, even non-energy sectors like airline fares have experienced a recent surge, rising 15.2% at an annualized rate over the past three months. Rising price pressures could prompt the Fed to delay cutting interest rates to ensure that it doesn’t lead to a reacceleration of inflation.

  • Inflation volatility, particularly due to swings in commodity prices, is a major concern for the committee. While oil prices have garnered significant attention, rising copper prices are also emerging as an issue. This volatility is amplified by the uncertainty surrounding geopolitical tensions. Despite recent low oil prices amidst the Middle East conflict, we lack confidence in their long-term stability. Our primary concern lies in the potential for countries to hoard and weaponize their resource exports as global political fractures widen, aiming to extract concessions from rivals. As a result, we remain skeptical that inflation will be able to remain, sustainably, under the Fed’s 2% target.

 Other News: The US has held secret talks with Iran about ending the violence in the Red Sea, and these discussions highlight efforts from both sides to prevent a broader conflict in the region. Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, is eying John Paulson as Treasury Secretary, signaling a strategic move to populate his administration with trusted allies. Meanwhile, SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is poised for its third launch, with ambitions to successfully land a spacecraft on the moon. This endeavor underscores the increasing reliance of the United States on private enterprises for cutting-edge research and exploration.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 13, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment opens with a discussion of today’s expected congressional vote on forcing Chinese tech giant ByteDance to divest the US operations of TikTok.  We next review a range of other international and US developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including strong wage increases in Japan that could help prompt the central bank to end its negative-interest rate policy and more detail on the Biden administration’s proposed federal budget for the coming fiscal year.

US-China Espionage:  The House of Representatives is set to vote on a bill today that would force Chinese tech giant ByteDance to divest the US operations of its social media app TikTok or have the app banned in the US.  The move by the lawmakers stems from growing concern by intelligence officials that the app could be used to funnel data back to China for espionage or influence campaigns.  The House is widely expected to approve the bill, but its fate in the Senate is less certain.

  • The renewed focus on reining in TikTok will surely add another source of friction between the US and China, raising the risk that China will try to force a major US technology firm to divest its operations in China. Obvious potential targets might be Tesla or Apple.
  • More broadly, the anti-TikTok bill illustrates how big, influential technology firms are being forced to choose sides in the US-China rivalry. Both Washington and Beijing are now so distrustful that they don’t want their rival’s companies doing business on their home turf.  To the extent that they ban firms owned by their adversary from their home market, the result is basically “decoupling.”
  • Major US technology firms are generally very globalized, and many count China among their most important markets or their top manufacturing base. Some may try to maintain their businesses in China, but they will run the risk of increasingly brutal pressure to pull out of that market.  Naturally, the resulting shift in addressable market will have a major impact on those companies’ sales, profits, and stock values.

US-China Trade:  New analysis shows Chinese solar panel makers have doubled their output capacity in just the last year to 1 trillion watts annually and now produce fully three times as many panels as there is global demand.  The resulting glut of panels has driven global prices down some 50%, and the surge of imports into the US is threatening to put US producers out of business despite the expansion subsidies they’ve been offered through the Inflation Reduction Act.  We therefore suspect solar panels will become another key point of US-China frictions.

China:  The central government has ordered a stop to a string of big, expensive infrastructure projects in several poorer, highly indebted provinces in the country’s interior.  The move marks an expansion of Beijing’s effort to rein in excess capacity and debt, which has tripped up the real estate development sector over the last couple of years.  Importantly, the clampdown on investment and debt will likely exacerbate the Chinese economy’s other structural headwinds and could make it difficult to meet the government’s target of 5% economic growth this year.

Japan:  In the annual “shunto” wage negotiations that mostly wrapped up today, major Japanese companies granted average pay hikes of 4% or more, marking an acceleration from last year’s 3.6% increase and the biggest wage increase since 1992.  The robust raise will likely help ensure that Japanese consumer prices will keep rising and encourage the Bank of Japan to finally lift its negative-interest rate policy as early as this month.

Russia-Ukraine War:  The Ukrainian military has reportedly launched drone strikes against at least three oil refineries deep in Russian territory near Moscow and St. Petersburg.  Sources say the strikes, which were designed to starve the invading Russian military of resources, caused “significant damage.”  However, we suspect that even knocking out three refineries temporarily would have only a limited impact on Russia’s warmaking capability and economy.

US Politics:  After winning primary elections in several states yesterday, both President Biden and former President Trump have locked up enough of their respective party convention delegates to win their nominations for president.  Given the candidates’ ages and other factors, there is probably still some chance that either or both could be replaced at the head of their party ticket before November, but for now, it’s a Biden-Trump race until we see if a third-party candidate emerges.

US Artificial Intelligence:  If you’re fascinated by the new Sora artificial intelligence tool for generating videos with simple prompts, the Wall Street Journal’s technology editor has a story today with new examples.  Like some of the Sora-generated videos already released publicly, the videos are fascinating by themselves.  In addition, they suggest how difficult it’s becoming to discern real videos from those that might be artificially generated to influence political opinions or defraud consumers.

US Fiscal Policy:  While yesterday’s Comment discussed President Biden’s overall proposed budget for the fiscal year starting October 1, today we give more detail on the proposed budget for defense, since one of our key theses is that global defense spending is likely to rise in the coming years.  The proposed budget calls for total defense spending of $926.8 billion, up just 2.1% from FY 2024 because of a deal between the White House and Congress to cap spending.  That marks a big slowdown from the estimate’s rise of 10.7% in defense spending this year.

  • Since the nominal 2.1% rise in defense spending is below the expected rise in prices, the proposed budget actually represents a small decline in the military’s purchasing power.
  • The main savings in the proposed defense budget comes in weapons procurement and research, development, testing, and evaluation. Spending on those items will fall even in nominal terms.
  • In contrast, the proposal calls for a 4.5% increase in troop pay, partially offset by a small decline in troop counts and shifting more of the force from active duty to reserves.
  • In any case, increasing US-China geopolitical tensions and healthy Congressional support for the military will likely result in a bigger increase in funding than in the proposed budget.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 12, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with a Nigerian government crackdown on cryptocurrencies and their use to avoid the country’s currency controls.  We next review a wide range of other international and US developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including a worrisome spike in attempted terrorist attacks in Europe and a potential new US probe into unfair Chinese trading practices.

Nigeria-Cryptocurrencies:  Highlighting how governments around the world likely see cryptocurrencies as a threat to their sovereignty, Nigerian authorities have detained two high-level employees of crypto exchange operator Binance, apparently for facilitating Nigerian citizens’ use of stablecoins to skirt central bank exchange-rate controls.

  • Such transactions are a risk to Nigeria’s currency controls because cryptocurrencies have become prevalent in the country. Nigeria now has the world’s second-highest rate of cryptocurrency adoption, after India.  Nigerian cryptocurrency transactions in the year ended June 2023 totaled almost $60 billion.
  • The ability of citizens to skirt government financial and currency controls using crypto assets is one reason why countries may increasingly clamp down on their use, as China has already done. As we have written before, many central banks are instead studying the possibility of issuing their own digital currencies.

Argentina:  Radical libertarian President Milei is facing a scandal today after opposition Peronist legislators revealed that he signed a decree giving himself a 50% pay raise last month.  In response, Milei has fired his labor secretary and argued that he inadvertently signed the decree because it was an automatic inflation adjustment instituted by the previous Peronist government.  The scandal could become another headwind for Milei’s effort to rein in Argentina’s government spending, reduce bureaucracy, spark faster economic growth, and stabilize the currency.

Russia-Ukraine-NATO:  Following on French President Macron’s statement last month that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shouldn’t rule out sending troops to Ukraine, the Polish foreign minister on Friday told his parliament that it “is not unthinkable” that NATO forces could be deployed there.  The statement from the foreign minister, which contradicts the view of Polish Prime Minister Tusk, shows how Russia’s new momentum in Ukraine is increasingly scaring Western European leaders and forcing them to consider previously unthinkable actions.

European Union:  Authorities in multiple European countries have recently arrested a number of terrorists who were planning attacks on EU soil against Jewish and Israeli-connected targets, apparently in sympathy with Palestinians suffering from the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip.  The terrorists, at least some of whom have posed as refugees, are being directed in part by Iran and its militant Islamist proxies in the Middle East, including Hamas and Hezbollah.  The news suggests there is a rising risk of a successful attack that could undermine market confidence.

Israel-Hamas Conflict:  In its annual threat assessment report yesterday, the US intelligence community warned that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s grip on power is “in jeopardy” because of the Hamas attacks on Israel last October 7 and the government’s continued war against Hamas in Gaza.  If that leads to new elections in Israel, the assessment argues that voters could elect a more moderate government than Netanyahu’s.

  • Separately, Israel and Hezbollah fighters in southern Lebanon have sharply escalated their attacks on each other over the last day. Israel has even launched airstrikes deep into Lebanese territory.
  • The intensified fighting in southern Lebanon is a reminder that Israel’s fighting with the Palestinians and Iran-backed militant groups still has the potential to spark a broader conflict that could be deeply concerning for financial markets.

China:  Moody’s has downgraded the debt of Vanke, the China’s second-largest real estate developer, to below-investment grade status and warned of further downgrades in the future as the company struggles with declining contracted sales.  The downgrade illustrates the ongoing challenges facing the country’s enormous real estate sector as the government leans on it to cut excess capacity and debt, which in turn has prompted lower prices and falling demand.

United States-China:  In case you thought you could read a Comment from us that doesn’t include a new US-China friction, think again.  The United Steel Workers union will file a petition today with the US Trade Representative alleging that China uses discriminatory practices in shipbuilding and maritime logistics to undermine US producers.  The petition will ask the government to launch an investigation into the matter, which could eventually result in further tariffs or other trade barriers against Chinese products or services.

  • Ultimately, pushing back against China’s dominance in global shipbuilding aims to help revive the once-thriving US shipbuilding industry. That could have important implications for both private industry and the US Navy, which is constrained by limited domestic shipyards.  However, any potential revival of the US industry would be a very long-term project.
  • In any case, any new investigation into Chinese unfair trading practices or punitive trade barriers would exacerbate the spiraling tensions between the West and China, further fracturing the global economy and presenting risks for investors.

United States-Philippines:  As the Biden administration keeps trying to solidify US alliances to protect against Chinese aggression, Commerce Secretary Raimondo has urged US technology firms to at least double their investment in Philippine facilities that handle a key part of the info-tech supply chain:  assembling, testing, and packaging computer chips produced in the US or elsewhere.  Raimondo’s call is an example of US “friend shoring,” or trying to shift more of its critical supply chains to friendly countries, both to shore up those allies and boost resilience.

US Fiscal Policy:  The Biden administration yesterday released its proposed federal budget for fiscal year 2025, which starts on October 1. The plan calls for total outlays to rise 4.7% to a total of $7.265 trillion, largely because of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other entitlements passed by Congress in previous years.  The plan calls for receipts to rise 7.9% to $5.485 trillion, reflecting both economic growth and proposed tax increases on higher-income people.

  • The deficit of $1.781 trillion would be modestly lower than the estimated $1.859 trillion in FY 2024.
  • The plan also calls for a number of sweeteners designed to help the Democratic Party in the November election. For example, it calls for a new mortgage tax credit and subsidy for home sales.
  • Nevertheless, because of the fractured Congress, the proposed budget is seen as highly unlikely to pass in anything resembling its current form. Rather, the proposal will serve as a key reference point for Biden’s re-election campaign.

US Labor Market:  Port operators on the East Coast and Gulf Coast are starting negotiations with the International Longshoremen’s Association for a new, multi-year labor contract to follow the current one when it expires on September 30.  However, the dockworkers are already threatening to strike if they don’t get the concessions that they’re demanding.  If the negotiations fail and a strike occurs, it will likely happen at the peak of the delivery season for holiday imports, potentially causing important disruptions to the economy and pushing prices higher.

View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – Uranium Demand, Supply, and Investment Prospects (March 4, 2024)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

In an important adjustment to our Asset Allocation strategies last October, we introduced an exchange-traded fund focused on uranium producers into our mid-cap equity exposure.  At the time, we noted in our Asset Allocation Quarterly that the move aimed to take advantage of government policies around the world that are encouraging an increase in the use of nuclear power to generate electricity, even as uranium supply is crimped.  However, we have not yet provided the in-depth explanation of our view that we usually do.  This report aims to start addressing that by giving a broad outlook for uranium demand and supply in the coming decades.  We expect to provide additional analysis of the uranium market in other reports in the coming weeks and months.

The chart below, from the World Nuclear Association, shows expected global demand and supply for the uranium used in electricity generation — by far the main source of demand for uranium.  As shown in the chart, electricity-generating demand for uranium is expected to rise from 65,651 metric tons in 2023 to about 110,000 metric tons by 2040, for a compound annual growth rate of 3.1%.  The expected rise in demand largely reflects new reactors currently under construction, planned, or proposed (net of reactor retirements).  China accounts for only 55 of the world’s current fleet of 436 operating reactors and 17% of today’s total global uranium demand, but its expected build-out of more than 220 new plants by 2040 represents about 44% of the new reactors to be added during the period and at least that share of the additional global uranium demand.  India is in a distant second place in terms of expected new reactors and uranium demand.  New and improved generating technologies could also support expanded generating demand.

As shown in the chart above, most of the current and future generating uranium is expected to come from existing mines, followed by restarted mines, mines under development, planned mines, and prospective mines.  Note that total mined uranium and secondary supplies are expected to fall far short of demand in the coming decades.  Many economists and industry authorities therefore expect a sharp rise in uranium prices, which would incentivize the opening of new mines.  Indeed, spot uranium prices have already surged some 66% just from our entry point into the ETF on October 19 through February.  Since electric utilities need to secure long-term fuel supplies, most uranium is currently sold under long-term contracts, so the producers in our ETF haven’t necessarily gotten the full benefit of today’s spot prices.  However, since the looming rise in demand is expected to make uranium increasingly valuable, we believe producers will soon see new opportunities to expand production at profitable prices.

As our regular readers know, we at Confluence believe a key trend going forward is that the world will keep fracturing into relatively separate geopolitical and economic blocs, and that the China/Russia bloc is likely to crimp supplies to the US bloc as tensions mount.  Fortunately, as shown in the chart below, uranium deposits are well distributed — even common — around the world.  Still, most of the world’s production today comes from the China/Russia bloc, with Kazakhstan being the main producer (at 46% of the total), followed by Uzbekistan and Russia.

Why does Kazakhstan account for such a preponderant share of today’s global uranium output?  To understand that, it’s important to first review recent global price trends.  From the run-up to the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009 until 2016, global spot uranium prices fell by more than 50% in the face of increased supply from dismantled nuclear weapons and falling demand due to newfound generating efficiencies and safety concerns after the Fukushima accident in Japan.  Low prices made it unprofitable to mine much uranium in regions where the cost of production was high.  As shown in the chart below, the China/Russia bloc, and Kazakhstan in particular, has a near monopoly on the world’s supply of ultra-low-cost uranium.  Kazakhstan’s production cost currently averages less than $40/kg.  That’s equivalent to about $18.18/lb and well below the average market price of about $50.00/lb through much of 2023 and the current price of almost $100.00/lb.

As shown in the last chart, most of the uranium available in the US bloc (largely consisting of deposits in Australia and Canada) costs $80 to $260 per kg to produce.  That’s equivalent to about $36.36 to $118.18 per pound, rendering it uneconomical to produce until recently.  Going forward, we believe that the expected increase in global demand, the growing shortfall in total mine production, and the risk of supply restrictions out of the China/Russia bloc will boost uranium prices further and lead to new, profitable production opportunities for uranium producers even in higher-cost regions of the world.  We therefore believe our new exposure to uranium producers could provide additional risk-adjusted returns within Confluence’s asset-allocation portfolios.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 1, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning! Financial markets are off to a sluggish start today. In sports news, University of Iowa star and top WNBA prospect Caitlin Clark declared for the draft. In today’s Comment, we delve into the impact of the NYCB turmoil, analyze the latest inflation data, and explore the possibility of tightening monetary policy at the Bank of Japan (BOJ). We conclude, as always, with a summary of recent domestic and international data.

More Regional Bank Pain: Regional banks are under increased scrutiny following turmoil at New York Community Bank, raising concerns about a potential financial crisis linked to commercial real estate.

  • While the Federal Reserve’s primary mandate prioritizes price stability and maximum employment, its historical role in preventing bank panics remains relevant in the context of rising risks within the regional banking system. The expected termination of the Fed’s Banking Term Funding Program alongside these concerns could incentivize policymakers to reconsider their monetary policy stance. So far, the Fed has only hinted at potentially lowering rates, while maintaining its quantitative tightening. Based on these factors, we believe a rate reduction of at least 50 basis points could be warranted if the situation worsens, and potentially even more if a significant crisis erupts.

The January Spike: January’s hot inflation raises concerns that the Federal Reserve might delay rate cuts, but historical trends suggest a wait-and-see approach is likely.

  • The core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge, saw a notable 0.4% uptick in January. Despite this substantial rise, the year-over-year change in the price index actually dipped from 2.94% to 2.85%. While this moderation might suggest a momentary relief, it has also sparked concerns about the Fed’s ability to effectively combat inflationary pressures. Policymakers seem to put little emphasis on the report. Atlanta and Chicago Fed Presidents Raphael Bostic and Austan Goolsbee suggested that the recent inflation report has not influenced their views on monetary policy.
  • Policymakers’ dismissal of the report might be linked to the seasonal nature of inflation data. Historically, January tends to have the highest inflation rate compared to other months, often around 3.1% as the chart below demonstrates. This sharp increase is due to what some economists refer to as “residual seasonality,” in which prices increase due to changing out of contracts. This year’s inflation increase notably surpassed the historical average, hitting an annualized rate of 5.2%, though it marks an improvement over the preceding two Januarys, which recorded increases of 6.2% and 5.7%, respectively.

  • Wages undoubtedly wield significant influence over inflation. The recent surge in strikes and a constricted labor market have empowered workers to negotiate higher earnings from employers, possibly fueling price pressures. However, there exists a trade-off between increased wages and employment levels. January witnessed a notable increase in WARN notices, which are expected to filter into employment figures over the next few months. While we anticipate most layoffs to be concentrated in finance and tech, it wouldn’t be surprising to see other industries affected as well.

BOJ Ready for Lift Off: Despite the risk of recession, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) continues to signal its intent to exit its ultra-accommodative monetary policy.

  • That said, there is optimism that labor will be able to receive a notable bump in pay this spring. Economists are predicting that wage hikes will rise by about 3.9% from the prior year. Although lower than the 5% minimum initially sought by labor leaders, the negotiated pay increase still exceeds the previous year’s three-decade high of 3.58%. A rate hike is likely to occur in March or April. This development could pressure the greenback, put upward pressure on global bond yields, and potentially drive increased investment in Japanese financial markets.

Other News: Brazil’s and China’s economies are showing signs of weakness, reflecting broader global economic stagnation. The slowdown in these nations underscores a worrisome trend affecting economies worldwide. Moreover, George Galloway’s victory in Rochdale highlights a potential decline in the Labour Party’s popularity, possibly linked to its stance on the Gaza conflict. Lastly, Tesla CEO Elon Musk is suing OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman. This legal dispute reflects the ongoing struggle in tech for control and dominance as various entities vie to shape the trajectory of artificial intelligence development.

View PDF