Daily Comment (February 5, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an artificial-intelligence leader’s expectation for a future marked by national AI systems.  We next review a range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including signs that biotechnology will be a new source of friction between the U.S. and China and a range of news items related to migration policy in North America.

Global AI Industry:  Nelson Huang, chief executive of artificial-intelligence darling Nvidia, said in an interview last Thursday that countries around the world should build their own “sovereign AI infrastructure.”  According to Huang, a country’s data should be considered its own natural resource, so it should be collected, controlled, and refined within the country’s borders.

  • Of course, Huang could simply be “talking his book,” in the sense that building national AI computing systems in each of the more than 200 countries of the world would vastly increase the demand for Nvidia’s AI semiconductors.
  • On the other hand, his statement also reflects the growing sense that data is extremely valuable, and that it becomes even more valuable when used to train a powerful AI system. Who owns that data and who can capture its value will be increasingly important questions going forward, especially when one country’s government or companies try to capture and exploit data from another country.

United States-China:  Signaling that biological engineering will be another technology of contention between the U.S. and China, the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party has introduced a bill that would ban any entity receiving federal funds from buying equipment or services from companies in “adversary countries,” most notably China.  Similar legislation has been introduced in the Senate.  The goal of the legislation is to protect the U.S. biotech industry’s competitiveness in genomic sequencing, medicine development, and the like.

  • One key target of the legislation is Chinese genomic-sequencing giant BGI Group, which has spawned concern because of its global genomic data collection efforts, its obligation under Chinese law to transfer data to the country’s government if requested, and its apparent links to the Chinese military.
  • As with other advanced technologies such as 5G telecommunications and computer chips, it appears that the U.S.-China rivalry is about to lead to new restrictions in biotech trade, investment, and technology flows. As with those other technologies, the new restrictions will likely have big impacts on Western biotech firms that compete against the Chinese, rely on Chinese equipment or services, or hope to sell to the Chinese market.
  • Of course, the U.S. has also clamped down on trade, investment, and technology flows with China in traditional industries as well. After former President Trump imposed punitive 25% tariffs on Chinese steel imports and 10% on Chinese aluminum imports, the Biden administration surprisingly maintained those duties. Over the weekend, Trump said that if he is elected again, he would impose tariffs of more than 60% on imports from China.

Philippines-China:  Today’s riskiest international dispute may be the overlapping territorial claims of China and the Philippines over certain islands and shoals in the South China Sea.  Nevertheless, a Philippine supply ship on Saturday successfully delivered fresh provisions to a grounded Philippine navy ship that serves as an outpost on the Second Thomas Shoal.  Previously, Chinese coast guard and maritime militia vessels had tried to stop such resupply missions by using water cannons against the Philippine vessels or even ramming them.

  • China’s efforts to stop the resupply missions are dangerous because accidentally sinking a Philippine vessel or killing Philippine sailors could theoretically bring into force the U.S.-Philippine mutual defense treaty, bringing the U.S. into direct confrontation with Chinese forces.
  • China’s restraint this time around suggests it is looking to cool tensions, in large part because of the severe economic headwinds it is now facing.

China:  As Chinese stock values continue to slide amid the geopolitical tensions mentioned above and the country’s current economic headwinds, the China Securities Regulatory Commission today vowed that it will implement several measures designed to buoy prices.  The proposed measures include cracking down on illegal trading and channeling more medium- and long-term capital into the market.  Nevertheless, mainland stock indexes fell sharply again today, bringing their year-over-year losses to more than 20%.

Israel-Hamas Conflict:  In the other major conflict that threatens a broader war, the U.S. bombed dozens of sites on Friday run by Iranian and Iran-backed forces in Syria and Iraq, and then continued striking Iran-backed Houthi militant sites in Yemen over the weekend.  While the targeted militant groups have themselves conducted dozens of attacks on U.S. ships and troops in sympathy with the Hamas government in Gaza that is now subject to retaliatory strikes by Israel, the attacks are keeping alive the risk that the Israeli-Hamas conflict will expand regionally.

Canada:  Reacting to concern that legions of international students are driving up housing costs, Ottawa is imposing a 35% cut in the number of foreign undergraduate students it will grant visas to in 2024 and 2025.  The cap, which will not apply to students seeking masters or doctorate degrees, will reduce the number of foreign students in Canada by about 210,000.

El Salvador:  Crime fighting President Nayib Bukele handily won re-election yesterday, setting the stage for him to continue aggressively incarcerating criminal gang members and cutting off their ability to communicate with enforcers outside of prison.  Bukele’s policies have reportedly led to a significant reduction in violent crime and a resurgence of commerce in some areas.  That could encourage similar policies elsewhere in the region, reducing the incentive for Central Americans to go to the U.S.

U.S. Immigration Policy:  As we flagged in our Comment last week, leaders in the Senate yesterday released their big immigration-and-foreign-aid bill that aims to tighten immigration restrictions at the southern border in return for additional military aid to Ukraine and Israel.  However, Republicans in the House have already declared the legislation dead on arrival, putting in limbo both new steps to deal with the surge of migrants at the border and additional assistance to Ukraine and Israel.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  In a CBS interview yesterday, Federal Reserve Chair Powell said “almost all” of the members of the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee supported cutting the benchmark fed funds interest rate three times in 2024, for a total cut of 75 basis points.  However, he also stressed that economic conditions could lead the policymakers to cut rates more or less than currently planned.  In any case, Powell’s statement was consistent with our view that bond investors expect more aggressive rate cuts than the Fed is likely to deliver.

U.S. Higher Education:  In a post-pandemic first for the Ivy League, Dartmouth University said it will reinstate a requirement that applicants provide SAT or ACT scores starting next year.  According to the university, the scores provide the best indication of how students will perform in their freshman year.  Currently, providing the scores is optional at the school.

View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – U.S. Oil Production at a Record High (February 5, 2024)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

These days, because investors have so many different assets to buy in so many different financial markets, it can be easy to miss an important trend or change in trend.  Indeed, that seems to be the case with crude oil, where the long stagnation in U.S. output after the COVID-19 pandemic has suddenly turned into a new surge.  In fact, U.S. oil production has recently reached a new record high.  In this report, we explore what allowed domestic output to start expanding again, what it means for the global economy, and the potential implications for investors.

As shown in the chart below, U.S. field production has fluctuated quite a bit over the last century.  From 1920 to 1970, output grew approximately 4.2% per year, reaching 9.6 million barrels per day (bpd).  However, output then fell and plateaued, despite the incentives to produce during the period’s high prices.  Beginning in about 1985, production began what appeared to be an inexorable decline in the face of public policy and the limits of the available technology.  To many people’s surprise, output suddenly reversed and started growing rapidly again during the Great Financial Crisis of 2008-2009, driven by new technologies such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that opened up previously untappable shale formations.  U.S. production jumped at an annual rate of 8.7% from 2009 to 2019, reaching almost 13.0 million bpd.

Obviously, the pandemic was a shock to the global economy.  With the collapse in demand, oil prices actually turned negative for a short time in early 2020.  More importantly, U.S. output fell sharply and appeared to stagnate.  Much of the stagnation reflected reduced investment in new exploration and development as investors demanded better capital discipline and a stronger focus on profitability after the many bankruptcies of shale drillers during the period of 2009-2019.  Stronger environmental regulations, which aimed to shift the economy away from fossil fuels, also discouraged drilling.  Many investors began to question whether the industry could ever grow again.

In mid-2023, U.S. oil output began to accelerate in earnest, likely reflecting the incentive of high energy prices at the time and an unexpected second wind from technology improvements.  Press reports say fracking and other shale technologies as well as operating approaches have simply improved more than expected.  In any case, U.S. oil output has now reached 13.3 million bpd.

For the global economy, booming U.S. oil output doesn’t just mean that the country has become the world’s largest producer (which it has).  As shown in the chart below, it also means that the U.S. has been able to significantly scale back its imports of foreign oil.

Surging U.S. oil production has altered global pricing dynamics.  For example, before the shale boom, U.S. domestic oil prices (represented by the West Texas Intermediate) were typically slightly higher than foreign prices (represented by Brent Crude).  For the last decade, however, the rich supply of domestic oil has held down U.S. prices.  Reduced U.S. import demand and new laws allowing U.S. oil exports have also improved supplies for other countries.  As shown in the following chart, Brent Crude now tends to trade several dollars higher than WTI.  Nevertheless, the U.S. changes haven’t been enough to totally offset the fact that Saudi Arabia and its partners in OPEC and OPEC+ are withholding supplies in order to boost prices.

Going forward, the unexpected rebound of U.S. oil output and exports signifies that American production could help keep a lid on global prices for an extended period, even as the OPEC+ countries continue to withhold barrels.  What could change the outlook?  One key risk that we’re focused on is the possibility of a geopolitical crisis that disrupts supplies from a major foreign producer or exporter.  If such a crisis occurs outside the Middle East, the availability of excess output capacity in Saudi Arabia and the rest of OPEC+ could potentially fill in the gap.  If the crisis disrupts Middle Eastern supplies, however, the result would likely be a spike in global prices despite the renewed U.S. output boom and excess production capacity in the region.

View PDF

Daily Comment (February 2, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning! Equities slumped and Treasury yields are up following a really strong jobs number. In other news, the GOAT of Formula One, Lewis Hamilton, will be joining the iconic Ferrari team next year. In today’s Comment we dive into Thursday’s tech earnings bonanza, explore the surging popularity of leveraged loans, and unpack recent central bank policy decisions. As always, we’ll include a roundup of global and domestic economic releases.

The Train Keeps Moving: Tech giants pleasantly surprised investors with earnings that exceeded expectations, and yet the duration of this upbeat trend remains uncertain.

  • Tech stocks currently outperform the market, but questions linger about the sustainability of their growth. The average P/E ratio of 38, while lower than the dotcom bubble peak, is still significantly higher than historical market averages, raising concerns about future valuations. Meeting current market expectations would require unprecedented revenue growth. Additionally, regulatory hurdles pose a major potential challenge. While navigating these hurdles successfully won’t guarantee smooth sailing, failing to do so could significantly impact performance and valuations. As a result, we still believe that investors could probably find better value in other places in the market.

Debt Wall Solution? As concerns rise about large amounts of maturing debt, companies are exploring options to restructure their obligations and avoid default.

  • As companies grapple with maturing debt, many are turning to private credit funds for relief, seeking lower interest rates or longer maturities. Leveraged loans offer a potential solution, allowing them to refinance existing debt with lien debt. However, this comes at the cost of potentially higher interest rates and the risk of asset seizure in case of default. While this trend offers relief from elevated interest rates, it also raises concerns about potential risks to the broader market if economic conditions worsened.
  • The record-breaking issuance of U.S. leveraged loans in January ($140.1 billion) highlights the growing global appeal of this financing option, while European debt issuance in this category surged by 20.1% in 2023. This increase in issuance reflects companies seeking to manage their existing debt in a challenging economic environment, but also raises concerns about increased refinancing risk for borrowers with higher risk profiles. Notably, refinancing activity reached a record high of $50.4 billion, while repricing (renegotiating loan terms) reached $78.7 billion, suggesting a strong focus on reducing debt payments through various strategies.

  • Leveraged loans offer a double-edged sword in tackling the debt maturity wall. While they can ease debt pressure and potentially mitigate the broader economic impact of rising interest rates, concerns linger about their long-term stability. This stems from the subjective valuation of underlying collateral, particularly for loans backed by volatile assets like commercial real estate. The opaqueness of private credit funds, where some of these loans reside, further complicates matters, making it difficult for investors to conduct thorough due diligence. However, if the economy remains strong and default rates stay low, these loans may not pose a systemic risk.

The Dust Settles: With central banks in the U.S., Europe, and Japan all signaling that rates are unlikely to change, the market awaits the exact timing, which remains anyone’s guess.

  • Elevated interest rates may keep a significant amount of money parked in low-risk investments, but it could act as a potential tailwind for riskier assets once central banks start easing interest rates. This is evidenced by the record-breaking $6 trillion in U.S. money market assets. Although small and mid-cap stocks have not been able to grab headlines, these companies may be an attractive target for investors looking for a bargain. Valuations suggest that these firms provide investors with a lot of upside when risk sentiment changes.

Other News:  Fed Chair Jerome Powell will appear on 60 Minutes on Sunday, sparking speculation that he may aim to clarify recent remarks interpreted by the market in unexpected ways, or possibly to address concerns about the overall health of the financial system. Tensions are rising between China and the Philippines after Beijing criticized the latter’s congratulatory message to Taiwan’s newly elected president. This incident highlights China’s growing influence and its sensitivity towards its neighbors’ formal interactions with Taiwan. Hungary is looking to play ball with the West after finally approving an aid package for Ukraine and possibly approving Sweden’s NATO bid.

View PDF

Daily Comment (February 1, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning! Equities are unfazed by Powell’s remarks this morning, while Caitlin Clark continues her dominant run in women’s college basketball. Today’s Comment dives into the latest Fed rate decision, explores renewed concerns about regional lenders, and examines the potential impact of China’s overcapacity on other nations. As always, we’ll wrap up with a summary of key international and domestic data releases.

Mission Not Accomplished: The Federal Reserve dashed hopes for a March rate cut, sending stocks plummeting and lifting bond yields from their intraday lows yesterday as investors recalibrated their expectations.

  • The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 5.25%-5.50% in its January meeting. While the decision was largely expected, the accompanying statement and Chair Powell’s comments offered valuable insights into the Fed’s future plans. The FOMC statement notably dropped any mention of further rate hikes and instead mentioned that it would consider “any adjustments” to its key policy rate. Chair Powell elaborated during the press conference, expressing the committee’s confidence in the trajectory of inflation toward the 2% target. However, he emphasized the necessity for additional evidence before contemplating rate cuts, suggesting such measures are unlikely to materialize by March.
  • Stronger-than-expected economic data, including a robust December jobs report and resilient consumer spending, could be behind the Federal Reserve’s decision to delay rate cuts. The December jobs report smashed expectations, with the economy adding 216,000 jobs and far exceeding the forecast of 170,000. Additionally, personal consumption remains a key driver of GDP, with December discretionary spending accelerating from 6.2% to 6.5%, significantly outpacing the 10-year average of 5.0%. Despite robust data, inflation has remained largely unaffected, prompting some members of the committee to express concerns about economic conditions that could potentially hinder the attainment of the 2% inflation mandate.

  • The Federal Reserve is expected to closely scrutinize economic data over the next few months, searching for signs that could justify a policy shift. Two key inflation and employment reports will be released before the Fed’s next meeting, and the upcoming revisions to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on February 9 could provide further clarity on the central bank’s progress against inflation. While the Fed has ruled out interest rate cuts in March, a policy pivot within the first half of the year remains a possibility. The latest CME FedWatch Tool shows that there is a 90% chance that policymakers will vote to cut interest rates in May.

Regional Bank Worries? The surprise earnings loss reported by New York Community Bancorp fueled fears of instability in the U.S. financial system amidst fresh concerns about the U.S. commercial real estate market.

  • The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) omitted its prior statement about the banking system being “sound and resilient,” which raises concerns that policymakers are increasingly worried about financial conditions when compared to the previous meeting. While the impact of NYCB’s news on FOMC discussions surrounding the banking system remains unclear due to the absence of questions on the topic during Powell’s Q&A, his suggestion of initiating discussions on balance sheet reduction in March indicates potential measures to address liquidity risk. However, the specific form this reduction will take — whether tapering quantitative tightening or complete cessation — is yet to be determined.
  • The fallout from NYCB spread to other banks around the world with Tokyo-based Aozora Bank and German bank DeustchBank both reporting losses on loans on U.S. commercial properties. Such issues in real estate could likely put more pressure on central bankers to loosen monetary policy.

 China’s Economic Fallout: There are fears that China’s economic slowdown could have spillover effects on the global economy, according to a business lobby group.

  • China’s bloated industrial capacity and escalating trade protectionism cast a long shadow over its fight against deindustrialization. Despite impressive recent growth, the country lacks concrete measures to unleash domestic consumption, a critical step needed to stabilize internal demand for its manufactured goods. Unfavorable demographic trends have further exacerbated this challenge and dampened consumption potential. While China’s economic resilience is undeniable, a strategic shift is necessary to navigate this complex crossroads and ensure sustainable, long-term growth.

Other News: The U.S. continues launching strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen, escalating tensions in the region amid preparations for a response to the Jordan drone attack that killed three American service members. This escalating conflict in the Red Sea raises concerns about the potential for a broader war in the Middle East. U.S. regulators have targeted Chinese chipmakers over concerns that they aided AI firms with ties to the Chinese military. This crackdown on chip manufacturers reflects the intensifying competition between the two economic giants for dominance in the field of artificial intelligence.

View PDF

Daily Comment (January 31, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with the latest on the tensions in the Middle East, which still could expand into a broader regional conflict and disrupt key global oil supplies.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including more indications of weak Chinese economic growth and a preview of key U.S. monetary and fiscal policy announcements due out today.

Israel-Hamas Conflict:  Kataib Hezbollah, the Iran-backed militant group thought to be responsible for this week’s drone attack on U.S. forces in Jordan that killed three Americans, said yesterday that it will temporarily halt further attacks on the U.S.  Nevertheless, U.S. military officials said the announcement would not stop a planned retaliatory strike against the group, and President Biden said he has already decided how that strike will be carried out.

  • Kataib Hezbollah’s stand-down could well reflect pressure from Iranian officials, who likely fear a U.S. strike and the prospect that the conflict sparked by the Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7 could expand to a regional war.
  • Separately, Israeli forces continue their military operations against Hamas in Gaza; Prime Minister Netanyahu is still considering what kind of government should rule the territory when the fighting is over. Netanyahu remains under pressure from right-wing members of his governing coalition to eventually push Palestinians out of Gaza — a move that would likely be criticized around the world as ethnic cleansing and potentially spark further sympathy attacks by militant groups.
  • In sum, the conflict remains a major source of global instability, especially if it widens and more seriously disrupts Middle Eastern energy supplies or Asian-European shipping.

China:  The National Bureau of Statistics said its January purchasing managers’ index for manufacturing rose to a seasonally adjusted 49.2, improving slightly from the December reading of 49.0.  The January PMI for services and construction rose to 50.7 from 50.4.  As with most major PMIs, the official Chinese gauge is designed so that readings over 50 indicate expanding activity.  At their current levels, the Chinese PMIs reflect the strong headwinds that are holding down growth, especially in manufacturing.

Hong Kong:  The municipal government has released a summary of the new national security law that it intends to add to its mini-constitution this year.  The proposed law, which is subject to popular discussion for 30 days, is intended to supplement the national security law imposed by Beijing in 2019.  Observers have already raised concerns about its provisions against sedition and the release of state secrets.  If passed, the law would likely further discourage foreign investment and travel to Hong Kong.

European Union-Russia:  The European Parliament has launched an investigation into allegations that Latvian lawmaker Tatjana Ždanoka has been spying for Russia for years.  The allegations were first published in a Russian investigative newspaper.  Ždanoka was one of just a dozen or so European Parliament lawmakers who voted against a resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in March 2022.

European Union-Mercosur:  French officials yesterday said the European Commission has stopped negotiating over a free-trade agreement between the EU and Mercosur, a trade bloc consisting of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay.  If true, it appears Brussels has caved to protesting farmers in France and elsewhere in the EU, who fear a surge of cheap South American food imports, despite the promise of greater EU industrial exports.  The end of talks over the deal also illustrates how politics has swung against free trade throughout the developed countries.

Eurozone:  French consumer prices in January were up just 3.4% from the same month one year earlier, compared with 4.1% in the year to December.  The good figures on price inflation have kindled new hopes that the European Central Bank could soon start to cut interest rates.  However, in an interview last night, ECB chief Lagarde warned that the monetary policymakers still want to see more data confirming that price pressures are easing.  Lagarde specifically cited a need to see easing wage growth.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  The Fed wraps up its latest policy meeting today, with its decision due at 2:00 PM EST.  The officials are expected to leave the benchmark fed funds interest-rate target unchanged at its current range of 5.25% to 5.50%.  Investors will focus on the decision statement and Chair Powell’s press conference, either of which could provide clues as to when the Fed will finally start cutting rates and reducing its balance sheet runoff.  Many investors expect those moves as early as March, but we continue to think they’ll come a bit later than that.

U.S. Fiscal Policy:  Today, the Treasury Department will release its borrowing plan for the coming quarter, including its planned debt issuance by maturity.  The quarterly refunding plan has recently been a market mover, and investors will be watching closely for any major change in the Treasury’s issuance of short-term obligations versus longer-term maturities.  If the plan shows larger-than-expected issuance of longer-term debt, it will likely drive down Treasury prices, boost yields, and potentially weigh on risk asset values as well.

U.S. Immigration Politics:  After Republicans in Congress pushed President Biden to accept tighter limits on immigration in return for new military aid to Ukraine, former President Trump has scuttled the deal to avoid giving Biden a win in the run-up to the election in November.  Meanwhile, Republicans on the House Homeland Security Committee have pushed through a measure calling for the impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas for failing to enforce the national immigration laws and stop the recent surge of illegal border crossings.

  • The tussling over border policy signals that immigration reform and border security will be a big part of the presidential campaign leading up to November.
  • Given that polling suggests voters are more supportive of the Republicans’ tougher restrictions, it’s probably no surprise that Biden tacked to the right on border security in his effort to win support for more aid to Ukraine. Now that the Republicans have apparently decided not to accept the win, a key question is whether voters will punish them for playing politics with an issue they previously called essential to national security.

U.S. Defense Industry:  As countries around the world work to rebuild their armed forces in response to worsening geopolitical challenges, new data shows U.S. defense companies recorded $81 billion in new foreign military sales in 2023, up 56% from 2022.  The figures are consistent with our view that increased geopolitical tensions have set the stage for years of increased sales and profits for traditional defense contractors and other industrial or technology firms producing defense-related goods and services.

View PDF

Daily Comment (January 30, 2024)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with a couple of notes on global oil supplies, including reduced capacity investment in Saudi Arabia but a new supply discovery in China.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, such as new data confirming Europe’s slow economic growth and a preview of key U.S. monetary and fiscal policy decisions due this week.

Global Oil Industry:  In Saudi Arabia, state-owned Saudi Aramco (2223.SR, SAR, 144.40) said it will comply with a request from the energy ministry to suspend a planned investment program that would have expanded its maximum sustainable production capacity from 12 million barrels per day to 13 million bpd by 2027.

  • The energy ministry didn’t provide an explanation for its move, but other big oil producers in recent years have cut back investment because of profitability concerns and fears of falling future demand associated with the transition to green energy.
  • Saudi Arabia and its OPEC+ partners have also been holding down current output in an effort to boost prices amid weakening global demand. Therefore, the energy ministry’s decision to limit new capacity investment could aim to help raise concerns about future supplies, thereby helping to boost prices.

China Oil Industry:  Officials yesterday announced the discovery of a large new oil field in central Henan province, saying the field could hold up to 732 million barrels of light crude.  That volume alone would amount to more than half of China’s current annual oil production.  The field, therefore, could help replace declining output elsewhere and modestly help reduce China’s dependence on foreign energy supplies, although the available volume probably isn’t enough to have a significant impact on global prices.

China Stock Market:  In yet another move to support China’s flagging stock market, the Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission and both major stock markets yesterday said strategic investors would be prohibited from lending out shares for short selling during specific lock-out periods.  The modest measure isn’t likely to help the stock market very much, but the drumbeat of new efforts to buoy the market show that the government is intent on at least arresting its recent decline.

China Military:  The Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference has removed another high-ranking military official associated with missile development, meaning at least 16 such officials are now being investigated or disciplined for corruption or espionage.  As we’ve noted previously, the continued chaos surrounding the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Forces has likely unsettled General Secretary Xi, although we don’t necessarily subscribe to the theory that it has reduced Xi’s willingness to use military force if needed.

EU Regulation:  Amazon (AMZN, $161.26) and robotic vacuum maker iRobot (IRBT, $15.50) called off their proposed merger yesterday, largely because of pushback from antitrust regulators in the European Union and the U.K.  The deal’s scuttling shows how European officials have become much more aggressive than their U.S. counterparts when it comes to ensuring free-market competition and combating market concentration.  Going forward, large U.S. firms hoping to combine will probably continue to face high antitrust hurdles in the region.

EU Economic Growth:  The EU’s gross domestic product in the fourth quarter of 2023 was unchanged after a modest decline in the third quarter.  As a result, the region’s GDP in all of 2023 was up just 0.5%, much weaker than the U.S.’s growth of 2.5%.  The EU economy continues to struggle with elevated interest rates, high energy prices because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and now broader supply disruptions because of the conflict in the Middle East.  As a result, EU stock values rose much less than U.S. stock values in 2023.

Germany:  A panel of outside advisors today issued a report saying the country’s constitutional “debt brake” is too rigid and should be broadly reformed to allow for more future-oriented fiscal spending.  Implemented in 2016, the rule limits the country’s structural budget deficit to 0.35% of GDP, adjusted for the economic cycle.  It was suspended at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it has nevertheless been criticized by left-wing and centrist politicians for slowing growth-enhancing public investment in infrastructure and green technology.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  The Fed today begins its latest policy meeting, with its decision due tomorrow at 2:00 PM EST.  The policymakers are widely expected to leave the benchmark fed funds interest-rate target unchanged at its current range of 5.25% to 5.50%.  We think investors will be focusing on the decision statement and Chair Powell’s press conference, either of which could provide clues as to when the Fed will finally start cutting rates and reducing its balance sheet runoff.  Many investors expect those moves as early as March, but we continue to think they’ll come a bit later than that.

  • Separately, Elizabeth Warren and three other Democratic senators wrote a letter to Chair Powell over the weekend urging him to cut the current “astronomical rates” in order to bring down housing costs.
  • Without doubt, the policymakers at the Fed are feeling a lot of political pressure to cut rates these days. Importantly, they’re likely feeling pressure from the Biden administration and from former President Trump, as well as Warren and her Democratic colleagues.  Nevertheless, we still believe Powell will try to delay easing policy a bit longer than investors currently expect in order to be sure inflation pressure is under control.

U.S. Fiscal Policy:  The Treasury Department will release its borrowing plan tomorrow for the coming quarter, including its planned debt issuance by maturity.  The quarterly refunding plan has recently been a market mover, and investors will be watching closely for any major change in the Treasury’s issuance of short-term obligations versus longer-term maturities.  If the plan shows larger-than-expected issuance of longer-term debt, it will likely drive down Treasury prices, boost yields, and potentially weigh on risk asset values as well.

View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Introducing the U.S. Space Force (January 29, 2024)

by Daniel Ortwerth, CFA | PDF

On December 20, 2019, something extremely rare happened in the United States Armed Forces: An entirely new branch of service was born.  For context, the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps were born by acts of the Continental Congress in 1775.  The Coast Guard came into being by act of the first U.S. Congress in 1790, and the relatively young Air Force was born by a similar act of Congress in 1947.  Clearly, these are very rare events, so it was a historic occasion when Congress authorized the establishment of the U.S. Space Force (USSF) as an independent branch of the U.S. Military just four years ago.

We begin this report by discussing the background of the USSF, including how its birth was similar to that of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) and how its relationship with the USAF is similar to the Marine Corps’ relationship with the Navy.  We also discuss why a new service branch was deemed necessary and what it says about the future of space warfare.  As always, we wrap up with a discussion of the implications for investors.

Read the full report

Don’t miss our accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google