Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – A Pause That Refreshes? (December 4, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

(Note: This is the final AABW of 2023; the next report will be published in January 2024.)

In 1929, Coca-Cola® introduced the tagline “a pause that refreshes.”  Although other advertising campaigns have come and gone, this line still sticks around in the public consciousness.  And, it has moved beyond a cold soft drink on a hot day as it can also refer to monetary policy.

First, is the FOMC in or near a pause?  Let’s take a look.

The FOMC, for the most part, still relies on the Phillip’s Curve—the idea that there is a tradeoff between unemployment and inflation.  Although it is doubtful that this relationship is strong enough to use as a basis for policy, the lack of an alternative means the Fed has continued to use this model.  And so, on the lower line in the chart above, we simply take the yearly change in CPI less the unemployment rate.  As the chart shows, prior to 1980, the Fed tended to react to CPI exceeding the unemployment rate (a positive reading in the indicator) by raising the policy rate.  However, as soon as the indictor began to fall, the policy rate was lowered.  The unabated rise in inflation led the Fed to move to a pre-emptive stance.  After 1980, the FOMC would begin to raise rates if the indicator merely approached zero, and it would keep rates elevated until the indicator showed clear signs of falling.  That was true until 2021.  The Powell Fed allowed the indicator to move strongly positive and then reacted aggressively to correct its error.

Now we have an indicator that is -0.7.  Although this level wouldn’t preclude additional rate increases, if the current downward trend in the indicator continues, then the FOMC will likely at least stop raising rates.  Inflation has been falling, and we note that unemployment has been increasing as well.  In fact, we are rapidly closing in on a key recession signal.

In general, when the current unemployment rate exceeds the rate from two years prior, the economy is typically in recession.  If the current unemployment rate continues to hold steady into year’s end, then the difference will be zero.

For the equity market, pauses that are not associated with an immediate recession are bullish.

The above chart shows the weekly close for the S&P 500 and the policy rate.  We have highlighted policy rate pauses in yellow that lasted at least six months going back to the late 1950s.  The index change data is shown in boxes and refers to the change in the S&P 500 over the period of the pause.  The data shows that long pauses raise hopes of a soft landing, which is a policy tightening cycle that doesn’t result in an immediate recession.  The pauses that led to an immediate recession showed a decline in the S&P 500 Index prior to the onset of recession.  However, the pauses that either avoided a downturn or experienced downturns that weren’t immediate, tended to have strong returns over the period of the pause.

This chart illustrates the dilemma for equity investors as we head into 2024.  If the Fed is about to embark on a period of steady policy rates, and the recession is delayed or avoided, history would support a rise of 15% to 25% in the overall equity markets in the coming months.  On the other hand, if a recession comes, then a decline is likely.

Perhaps the most difficult question is the length of the pause.  In the above graph, it’s notable that extended policy rate pauses tended to disappear from the mid-1960s into the mid-1990s, which likely reflects a higher inflation environment.  Simply put, there was increased volatility in the policy rate, likely due to the higher and more volatile inflation environment.  So, if the FOMC is going to implement a lengthy pause, further declines in inflation will probably be necessary.  But, if the recent inflation spike was an artifact of the pandemic, and isn’t structural, a long pause could develop which would be bullish for equities.  Of course, that outcome would depend on the avoidance of a recession, and it’s unclear whether the recent policy tightening will lead to a downturn.

View PDF

Business Cycle Report (November 30, 2023)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

The Confluence Diffusion Index

was unchanged from the previous month, offering some reassurance that economic conditions are not exhibiting further signs of deterioration. The October report showed that seven out of 11 benchmarks are in contraction territory. Last month, the diffusion index remained unchanged at  -0.2727, below the recovery signal of -0.1000.

  • Risk assets were boosted due to optimism regarding Fed policy.
  • Consumer sentiment is on the verge of a positive shift.
  • The labor market showed signs of cooling.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is in recovery. The diffusion index currently provides about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for recovery. Continue reading for an in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing. At the end of the report, the Glossary of Charts describes each chart and its measures. In addition, a chart title listed in red indicates that the index is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Weekly Energy Update (November 30, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices have retreated from their early October highs.

 (Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories rose 1.6 mb compared to forecasts of a 1.7 mb draw.  The SPR rose 0.3 mb, which puts the net build at 1.9 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 13.2 mbpd.  Exports were unchanged while imports fell 0.7 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 1.9% to 89.8% of capacity.  Refinery activity has started its seasonal recovery which should last into December.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Inventories have now risen to seasonal norms.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $63.71.  However, given the level of geopolitical risk in the market, we are not surprised that oil prices are well above this model’s fair value.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in late 1984.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $90.25.

Market News:

Geopolitical News:

  • The Hamas/Israeli conflict is on hold due to a ceasefire that has facilitated the exchange of hostages and prisoners. Each day the ceasefire is extended reduces the odds that the conflict will spread, but we doubt that this ceasefire will hold much longer.
  • A Houthi hijacking team attempted to take control of an Israeli-related oil tanker. The U.S. Navy was able to thwart the hijackers.  However, the action does suggest that shipping in the region is at risk due to the Hamas/Israeli conflict.
  • Over the past several months, there has been a lot of reporting about oil sales being transacted in currencies other than USD. In particular, India has been paying for Russian oil with INR.  Russian oil companies are finding that the Russian Central Bank has no interest in converting INR into RUB, meaning the oil companies are essentially “stuck” with a near worthless currency.  Of course, if Russia were not under sanction, the bank could exchange the INR for USD or some other currency, but because sanctions have excluded Russia from the dollar system, there is no obvious way to liquidate the currency.  It has reached the point where Russian oil companies are threatening to divert shipments to other nations.  Russia is encouraging India to pay in CNY but given that the Chinese have a closed capital account, it may not be easy for India to acquire CNY easily.  Overall, the dollar system works pretty well, while abandoning it is hard.
  • Although the U.S. has tied the easing of sanctions on Venezuela with running free and fair elections, Caracas is moving to invite oil companies into development licenses in a clear sign that it expects Washington to ease sanctions regardless of its behavior.
    • Another worrying development is that Venezuela is claiming a large part of Guyana. Although Venezuela claims the Essequibo region as part of its territory, no one else does nor has for well over a century.  Venezuela’s claims are massive:

(Source:  Washington Post)

    • The problem is that the western border has been disputed since 1814.  In 1895, President Cleveland established a commission to establish a border.  Because Guyana was a British colony, the U.K. initially rebuffed the effort but quickly realized it couldn’t enforce its claim.  At that point, Venezuela, the U.S., and the U.K. agreed to international arbitration, which established the current borders.  Venezuela was not pleased, and evidence that surfaced after WWII suggested that a Russian member of the arbitration board had conspired with London to expand the border in Guyana’s favor.  In the wake of this news, the Kennedy administration quietly looked at allowing either Venezuela or Brazil to expand their claims to prevent communism from gaining a foothold as independence loomed.  Guyana became independent of Britain in 1966.  New talks between Venezuela and Guyana began but never reached a conclusion.
    • President Maduro announced a referendum in the disputed territory to determine where the border should sit.  Given that Venezuela isn’t recognized as being in control, it isn’t obvious how the vote will take place.
    • Until recently, there wasn’t much interest in pursuing claims.  Guyana was desperately poor.  But as we have documented this year, Guyana is rapidly becoming a major oil producer.  Fearing Venezuela will take military action, the Brazilian army has been put on high alert.  Although we don’t expect this event to come to “blows,” Maduro is mercurial and may believe that the U.S. is in such need of oil that he can move with impunity, not just against his domestic opposition, but also to reclaim areas of Guyana.  If war breaks out, it would be hard for the U.S. not to become involved.  And, it would bolster oil prices.
  • Iran postponed a leader visit with Turkey. It was not clear why the visit was delayed.
  • Although Russia and China are “friends,” it is worth noting that Beijing is pressing hard on Moscow about the Siberia 2 pipeline project.

Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – Reflections on Earnings (November 20, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

The third quarter’s earnings season is coming to a close and, once again, earnings beat expectations.  In this report, we will take a more in-depth look at S&P 500 earnings and overall corporate earnings.

This chart examines S&P 500 earnings on a four-quarter trailing basis.  We have regressed nominal GDP against earnings; the idea is that the red line on the chart should estimate the impact of economic growth on earnings.  In other words, the red line reflects what part of earnings is explained by nominal GDP growth.  The lines that bracket the red line represent a standard error from the forecast.  One reason for owning stocks is to participate in the growth of the economy.  When earnings are above the red line on the chart, it suggests margin expansion.  There have been periods of outsized margin expansion. For example, from 1925 into 1929, earnings outpaced GDP by a wide margin.  They also reached the upper line on a couple of occasions in the 1950s, but that level wasn’t reached again until 2007.  It’s notable that once earnings recovered after the Great Financial Crisis, they then stayed elevated and even shrugged off the pandemic recession.

Why have earnings been so persistently strong?  A likely reason is that firms have accumulated market power.  That means firms don’t face competition and therefore have a greater ability to maintain profit margins.  Often, these firms have monopsonistic or oligopsonistic power in the labor markets.  When faced with rising input costs, firms can either depress labor costs through wage cuts or layoffs or pass on cost increases to consumers via higher prices.  Unfortunately, there is no single variable that captures market power.  However, observing the margins after GDP to the trend in CPI, the current environment does suggest market power.

The periods shaded in yellow show when the trend in inflation is rising.  The margin measure is the residual from S&P 500 earnings not accounted for by GDP.  The fact that margins are holding up while facing rising prices does suggest that firms enjoy market power.  As the chart shows, margins tended to weaken during periods when the trend in CPI was rising.

The impact of market power over labor is also evident.

The above chart shows the labor share, which is defined as compensation relative to output.  As the chart indicates, the labor share was mostly steady from 1949 into 2000.  Although in this century, there was a definitive shift downward in the labor share.  It has stabilized in the wake of the Great Financial Crisis, but it has not improved to its earlier levels.

This market power is likely due to three factors.  First, globalization, which in its current form weds global markets with technology, has allowed firms to separate the design function away from production, giving firms the opportunity to source low-cost labor abroad.  In the U.S., immigration-friendly policies tended to lift the labor supply.  Second, anti-trust policy adopted the Bork Standard beginning in the mid-1980s.  This legal theory postulated that if a company’s pricing policy didn’t adversely affect consumers, market combinations were not harmful.  This policy led to larger firms that developed market power.  Third, deregulation allowed for the rapid adoption of new technologies which lowered costs, but pricing power meant that these cost reductions would not necessarily be passed on to consumers.

The key question is whether this environment will persist.  There is evidence to suggest that it won’t.  First, globalization rests on a functioning hegemon providing global security and a reserve currency and asset.  We have detailed in numerous Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Reports the ways in which America’s hegemony is under threat.  As U.S. power wanes, conflicts become more common, leading to supply disruptions that tend to depress market power.  Second, Lina Kahn, the head of the Federal Trade Commission (one of the bodies that approves mergers and acquisitions), is working to implement an earlier anti-trust standard which argues that size alone is an impediment to combinations.  We doubt she will be initially successful, but now that the Bork Standard has been questioned, we expect the policy will erode over time, leading to greater competition.  Finally, we anticipate that increased regulation, especially in terms of industrial policy (the government steering investment), trade impediments, and immigration restrictions will give labor power again.  We are already seeing a wave of strikes that have had remarkable success, mostly due to the exit of baby boomers from the labor force.  Over time, however, restricting immigration will play a role in boosting labor power.

Thus, we expect this period of remarkable profitability will end at some point.  The trick is timing.  It isn’t likely to happen immediately, but the conditions to reverse profitability are developing.  These circumstances are something investors will need to monitor in the coming years.  What should an investor expect to see as these margins narrow?  Lower capitalization stocks, which don’t enjoy the benefits of market power to the same degree as larger firms, will probably outperform large caps.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (November 16, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices have retreated from their early October highs.

 (Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories rose 0.8 mb compared to forecasts of a 2.0 mb build.  The SPR was unchanged, which puts the net build at 0.8 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 13.2 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.4 mbpd, while imports were unchanged.  Refining activity rose 0.9% to 86.1% of capacity.  Refinery activity has started its seasonal recovery which should last into December.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  We continue to see lower-than-normal inventory accumulation although the gap to average is narrowing.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $67.53.  However, given the level of geopolitical risk in the market, we are not surprised that oil prices are well above this model’s fair value.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in late 1984.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $91.44.

Market News:

  • The IEA released its November oil market report, covering the month of October. Rising U.S. and Brazilian oil production lifted global production to 102.0 mbpd.  Demand is also expected to be 102.0 mbpd, meaning that inventory accumulation will remain modest.  Demand next year is expected to rise to a modest 0.9 mbpd.  The IEA estimates that OPEC+ has 5.1 mbpd of spare capacity of which the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has 3.2 mbpd.
  • As world leaders prepare for COP28, we see a divergence between promises and behaviors. Despite promises of reduced carbon emissions, nations around the world continue to expand fossil fuel production.  This is a classic example of the “free rider” problem, which states that an individual benefits from good but costly behavior, but benefits more from other’s good but costly behavior.  And so, no one does anything, but expects others to “do good.”  Without an enforcement mechanism, carbon reduction is just talk.
  • This year is shaping up to be one of the warmest on record, with October shattering records. The overall upward trend in temperatures is being bolstered by the sunspot cycle, El Niño, and an undersea volcanic eruption earlier this year.  If this warmth continues, it will be bearish news for natural gas, propane, and heating oil.
  • Environmentalists are targeting the U.S. LNG industry on the grounds of excessive methane emissions. Methane often leaks from natural gas wells and is a potent greenhouse gas.  However, if these activists are successful, it puts European energy security at risk.

Geopolitical News:

Alternative Energy/Policy News:

Rapidly rising costs for wind turbines are leading to cancelled projects or attempts to renegotiate prices.  If governments don’t get involved, wind projects may stall.  Parts companies for windmills indicate that wind goals set for 2030 will not be met.

Note: Due to the Thanksgiving Day holiday, the next report will be issued November 30.

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Archetypes of American Foreign Policy: A Reprise (November 13, 2023)

Bill O’Grady | PDF

A critical issue in 2024 will be the U.S. presidential elections.  America is going through a particularly partisan period where passing legislation is difficult and policy shifts between administrations are widening.  Foreign policy isn’t exempt from these changes.  In preparation for next year’s election, we wanted to update one of our earlier reports on the archetypes of American foreign policy.

In this report, we will briefly describe and discuss the four archetypes of American foreign policy.  With presidential elections roughly one year away, we hope that this discussion will assist readers in examining the candidates and their potential foreign policy positions, using these archetypes as a guide.  After we have laid out the archetypes, we will offer a short history of foreign policy from the end of WWII into the present and discuss how it has evolved from the Cold War into the post-Cold War period.  We will conclude with reflections and market ramifications.

Note: Due to the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday, the next report will be our 2024 Geopolitical Outlook published on December 11.

Read the full report

Don’t miss our other accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google