Business Cycle Report (October 26, 2023)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

The Confluence Diffusion Index declined for the second consecutive month in a sign that the economy is losing momentum. The September report showed that seven out of 11 benchmarks are in contraction territory. Last month, the diffusion index declined from a revised reading of -0.2121 to -0.2727, below the recovery signal of -0.1000.

  • Equities accelerated due to base effects, offsetting the monthly decline.
  • Pessimism about the future has weighed on consumer confidence.
  • Despite tighter financial conditions, the labor market remains robust.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is in recovery. The diffusion index currently provides about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for recovery. Continue reading for an in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing. At the end of the report, the Glossary of Charts describes each chart and its measures. In addition, a chart title listed in red indicates that the index is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – A Regime Change in Bonds? (October 23, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Jim Bullard, former president of the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, based his policy votes and economic analysis, in part, on a concept known as regimes.  Our take on his concept is that an edifice of factors underly clearly observable correlations in markets, and when this edifice changes, the former rules of thumb no longer hold.  Regime changes are jarring for investors as previous relationships no longer hold, and there is a sense that the world no longer makes sense.  However, over time, new rules of the road emerge, and markets tend to become understandable again.

We think that something similar is occurring in long-duration fixed income.  Since the early 1980s, low inflation volatility (supported by globalization and deregulation) and strong confidence in the Federal Reserve’s ability to give value to the dollar and suppress inflation, led to steadily falling long-term bond yields.  Consequently, this allowed investors to use bonds as a buffer in portfolios, fostering solid performance of the 60/40 portfolio.  However, as we have been detailing for some time, the steady erosion of U.S. hegemony is undermining globalization and as the world factures, national security concerns are overriding efficiency.  This set of circumstances are expected to lead to higher and more volatile inflation.

In an attempt to quantify what this means for investors going forward, we use a reduced form of our 10-year T-note model.  First, let’s look at the model from 1960 through the present:

The model includes the fed funds rate, oil prices (WTI), the 15-year average of yearly CPI (which is our inflation expectations proxy), the five-year standard deviation of yearly CPI, the deficit to GDP ratio, and a binary variable for periods when Congress and the White House are controlled by the same political party.  There are a few unexpected outcomes.  First, oil prices carry a negative coefficient, meaning that higher oil prices lead to lower yields.  Second, the coefficient on the deficit is also positive, meaning that larger deficits bring lower yields.  Both are contrary to common expectations.

Now, let’s look at the model from 1960 through 1982.  This was the pre-Volcker era, where it was generally held that monetary and fiscal policies should work in concert, and after the gold standard was ended in 1971, there was uncertainty surrounding what would give value to fiat currency.

Note the differences from the overall model.  First, the oil price and deficit coefficients are positive, which means that rising oil prices and deficits led to higher interest rates.  Also, a unified government led to lower yields.  We suspect the government variable reflects a period when there was greater confidence in government, and thus, a clear mandate (expressed by single party dominance) led to lower yields.

Now for the 1983 through the current period model:

Some major changes have emerged.  First, the oil coefficient sign flipped, meaning higher oil prices have led to lower yields.  The best explanation of this circumstance is that investors had faith that the Fed would see high oil prices as an inflation threat and would move to tighten policy to ensure oil price increases didn’t lead to persistent inflation.  Second, the trend in inflation has had a much greater impact on yields when compared to the earlier period.  This change likely reflects the “scars” of the high inflation period of the 1970s.  At the same time, the deficit variable’s sign also flipped as higher deficits led to lower yields.  This change likely reflects faith that the Fed will lean against deficit spending.  In other words, Volcker was seen to have implemented Fed independence, which, along with a clear inflation target, replaced gold as the factor that gave credibility to the dollar.  Finally, the lack of faith in government is reflected in the sign flip of that variable.  Since 1983, a unified government has led to higher yields on the expectations that an administration with such a mandate would use it to spend money and potentially bring inflation.  Or, put another way, a divided government was considered a positive.

Recent market behavior has raised concerns that the regime that began in 1983 could be ending.  Large fiscal deficits have led to fears of rising debt service costs.  There is increasing worry that we could be approaching fiscal dominance, where the Fed is no longer independent because it must partially monetize Treasury spending to maintain order in the Treasury bond market.  This outcome may not materialize since it’s possible that policymakers would implement austerity measures to reduce deficits, although there is some evidence to suggest that investors doubt the resolve of policymakers.  If the Fed’s independence is compromised, we would likely see oil prices become positively related to yields again.

What will be important going forward is that the truism of the past forty years may not hold to the same degree.  That doesn’t mean we will completely revert to relationships last seen in the 1960-82 period, but it probably means that a breakdown in variable relationships from the most recent period is likely.  Investors should be prepared for new relationships to emerge over time.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (October 19, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Continued tensions in the Middle East are supporting crude oil prices.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell 4.5 mb compared to forecasts of a 0.6 mb draw.  The SPR was unchanged, which puts the net draw at 4.5 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 13.2 mbpd.  Exports rose 2.3 mbpd, while imports fell 0.4 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.4% to 86.1% of capacity.  The rise likely signals that we are coming to the end of the autumn refinery maintenance period, which should lift oil demand.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Last week’s is contrary to seasonal patterns, but we do note that refinery operations rose this week.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $74.38.  However, given the level of geopolitical risk in the market, we are not surprised that oil prices are well above this model’s fair value.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in late 1984.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $94.45.

Market News:

Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  • For EVs to be a viable replacement for ICE (internal combustion engine) cars, the issue of range anxiety will need to be addressed. Currently, the range is about 350 miles, which is serviceable, but recharging can take a long time and finding places to recharge can be a challenge.  However, Toyota (TM, $177.68) may have the ultimate solution: a solid state battery that has a range in excess of 900 miles with a 10 minute recharge.  Such a combination would be an improvement over ICE vehicles and would likely resolve much of the range concern.  Toyota is working to mass produce these batteries, which are expected to be in its cars by the end of the decade.
  • Although there is general agreement among environmentalists that fossil fuel use needs to be curtailed, there is persistent opposition to the mining of the metals needed to make the transition. Often, these resources reside in environmentally sensitive areas.  Although we understand the concern, if areas where the metals can be found continue to be excluded, it may become difficult to accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels.
  • As Britain contemplates achieving net zero by 2050, it is starting to count the costs of decommissioning its natural gas distribution network. These costs will be formidable.
  • A recent study by the Dallas Federal Reserve is a “good news, bad news” story for wind and solar. There is clear evidence that these alternative power sources helped Texas avoid brownouts this summer.  The bad news is that the intermittency of these two sources have made managing the grid difficult as solar and wind power tend to increase in the daytime and taper off in the evening.  This pattern requires grid operators to adjust other power sources to accommodate this pattern.  Ramping up other sources, primarily natural gas fired turbines, tends to increase maintenance costs.  Battery storage may help grid operators deal with the intermittency issue.
  • Within the EU, France and Germany are at loggerheads over the nuclear power issue.  The former wants nuclear power to be included as a green alternative.  Germany, which has decided to close its reactors, opposes this characterization.

Note: The next edition of this report will be published on November 2.

  View PDF

Keller Quarterly (October 2023)

Letter to Investors | PDF

One quarter ago I discussed the inadvisability of living in the future (or the past), at least as far as investing goes. Much better, we said, to stay in the present, investing in what is, not what if. Today we deal with the difficulty of investing in the present. The recent past has delivered a decade’s worth of crises: a global pandemic, war in Ukraine, a resurgence of inflation, rising interest rates, a U.S. banking crisis, political polarization and paralysis, possible government shutdown, an auto industry strike, increasing “great power” tensions, and now…a war in the Middle East.

Go, go, go, said the bird: human kind

Cannot bear very much reality.

(Burnt Norton, I, 44-45. I promise to quote a poet other than T.S. Eliot in future letters.)

Investors, like most people, prefer to have reality approach little by little, rather than all at once. But, as my colleagues are probably tired of hearing, “We don’t get to invest in the world that we wish we had, only in the world we have.”

So, how is an investor to deal with such an onslaught of reality? Today, we sing an ode to Asset Allocation. By asset allocation, we mean the practice of diversifying one’s entire portfolio of investments by asset type. The reason to do this is that different classes of assets not only perform differently over time, but also respond differently to events. This is essential because no one can predict the future. While the recent run of extraordinary events appears unusual to many, our experience is that, in the world of investing, the extraordinary is ordinary. One must be prepared for anything.

We believe the best way for an investor to be prepared for anything is to have one’s assets diversified by type. And we’re not just speaking of stocks and bonds (or even different types of stocks and bonds), but all assets, including commodities, currencies (most easily accessed via assets denominated in foreign currencies), gold (more of a currency than a commodity), real estate, and even “good old-fashioned” cash.

As noted above, not all assets respond to reality in the same way. In almost any of the myriad of possible economic, geopolitical, and market environments, some assets will do meaningfully better than others. For example, when war breaks out in the Middle East, the prices of oil, gold, defense stocks, Treasury bonds, and the dollar usually rise, even while the prices of many other assets decline. Sensible diversification by asset class can bring a measure of stability to a portfolio even on days of crisis.

If we knew that today’s winning stocks would continue to work forever, we would not need asset allocation; there would be no need to own multiple asset classes if we knew precisely what was going to happen a year from now. But since we don’t know the future, we diversify by asset class. This is the same reason that we buy insurance on our cars. If we knew for a fact that we would never have an accident, such insurance would be a waste of money. But we don’t know that, so keeping the car insured is prudent.

Asset allocation is for every investor. And you do have an asset allocation, even if you’ve never thought about it. But thinking about it is the first step toward modifying it to best fit your needs. Regardless of which Confluence strategies (Value Equity, International Equity, Alternative Investment, or Asset Allocation) you might be invested in or what other investments you may have, it is important that you thoughtfully evaluate your asset allocation. We encourage you to sit down with your financial advisor to plan an asset allocation strategy that is right for your risk tolerance and long-term objectives. At Confluence, we believe asset allocation is the most prudent way to maintain investment stability when reality seems too much to bear.

We appreciate your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – What Shall We Call the New Era? (October 16, 2023)

Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Whether you’re a policymaker, an investor, a small business owner, or simply a student of world history and international affairs, it’s useful to have meaningful labels for various epochs.  Ideally, such a label is widely accepted and captures some essential aspect of the era you’re thinking about,  making it easier to talk about that era with others.  The Elizabethan Age, The Progressive Era, World War I, World War II, and The Cold War are all terms that suit that purpose quite well.  Each immediately conveys not only the period you’re talking about, but it also conjures up something of the political, economic, and military landscape of the period.

The world has just concluded a great epoch that ran for nearly three decades from the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of Soviet Communism to Donald Trump’s term as U.S. president.  During that epoch and in the years since it has ended, the labels used to describe it have been unsatisfying, probably because we were still unsure about which of its aspects were defining and which were not.  Now that that world has ebbed, there seems to be a growing consensus toward calling it the post-Cold War period or the period of Globalization.  Both terms capture the sense that it was a time of relative peace, which encouraged global trade and investment.

But what about the new era that is now taking hold as China and its evolving geopolitical and economic bloc increasingly assert themselves against the global hegemony of the United States?  In this report, we explore some ways to describe this new world epoch in hopes that it will help sharpen investors’ understanding of what really differentiates it from the post-Cold War globalization period that has now come to an end.

Read the full report

Don’t miss our other accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Weekly Energy Update (October 13, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

The Hamas attack on Israel did lift oil prices earlier this week, but markets are mainly taking a “wait and see” approach to prices so far.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories jumped 10.2 mb compared to forecasts of a 0.4 mb draw.  The SPR was unchanged, which puts the net draw at 10.2 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production has jumped 0.3 mbpd to 13.2 mbpd; we have suspected for some time that the DOE was undercounting production, which has led to large “adjustment” plug numbers.  Exports fell 1.9 mbpd, while imports rose 0.1 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 1.6% to 85.7% of capacity.  We are clearly heading into the autumn refinery maintenance period which should reduce oil demand.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Last week’s jump in inventories is consistent with seasonal patterns and represents some “catch up” to the recent stockpile declines.  With refinery operations slowing, further increases in inventories would be expected.  At the same time, as the chart below shows, we should be near the trough of the seasonal maintenance period and demand should start rising soon.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $72.52.  However, given the level of geopolitical risk in the market, we are not surprised that oil prices are well above this model’s fair value.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in late 1984.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $93.83.

What’s Happening to Gasoline Demand?

As summer came to a close, gasoline demand turned down sharply.

It isn’t unusual for gasoline consumption to decline when summer ends.  Vacation season ends as school starts and, often, a seasonal decline in homebuilding activity can also hurt demand.

However, as the chart above suggests, the recent decline is rather sharp, and, more importantly, actually began during the summer.

We have noted that driving activity hasn’t been the same since the Great Financial Crisis.

From the early 1980s into the crisis, gasoline demand steadily rose.  Recessions didn’t generally  cause significant declines, but driving activity flattened following the crisis.  We did see some improvement from 2015 until the pandemic, but since the pandemic, miles driven have been under pressure.  There are likely a myriad of reasons for this change.  We were approaching the point where suburban sprawl had reached a limit; commutes were so long that households could no longer live further from work.  The pandemic introduced more widespread work-from-home employment, which played a role.  Also, social media now allows friends to “meet” without physically going anywhere.  So, it makes sense that gasoline demand would be affected.

This model looks at gasoline consumption from 1973 to the present.  We seasonally adjust the data and run a Hodrick-Prescott trend variable through the data.  Note the plunge in the divergence[1] in the most recent data.  The decline in gasoline demand suggests that something is affecting consumption.  Given that gasoline consumption is usually price insensitive, this may be a warning that the economy is under pressure.  Usually, when gasoline demand is this weak, a recession is underway.

Market News:

Geopolitical News:

  • The major geopolitical news of the week was the surprise attack by Hamas on Israel. On Sunday, Hamas, operating in the Gaza strip, launched a widescale attack on southern Israel, assaulting several towns, killing several hundred Israelis, and taking over 100 hostages.  In our Daily Comment, we have covered this event.  For energy markets, there are four key factors:
  1. The Saudi/Israeli normalization talks are likely dead for now. Although there was progress being made before the invasion, it would be difficult for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) not to show solidarity with Hamas.  At the same time, the degree of restraint Israel would have to exercise to keep negotiations alive would be near impossible for the Netanyahu government.  A deal that might encourage the Saudis to utilize the 2.0 mbpd of excess capacity to bring down oil prices is unlikely at this point.
    • Broader normalization among the Arab states is also uncertain at this time. Generally speaking, these states are issuing “both sides” types of statements and calling for a curtailment of violence.
  2. If Iran is held culpable for supporting Hamas’s attack, some level of Israeli (and perhaps U.S.) retaliation is probably unavoidable. Although the retaliation could be covert by focusing on cyber-attacks and special operations, such low-key strikes might not be politically sufficient for Israel.  After all, this event is being described as Israel’s “9/11.”  A direct attack on Iran would almost certainly roil the oil market and send prices higher.  If Iranian crude shipments were forcibly curtailed, it would not be a surprise if Iran closed off the Strait of Hormuz.  We expect the U.S. to tread carefully in blaming Iran, but the evidence thus far seems to support its involvement.  We do expect the U.S. and Europe to try to prevent a widening of the conflict as a broader war would bring the risk of higher oil prices.  So far, Iran is claiming no role in the attack, which contradicts accounts recently detailed by the WSJ.  Our expected playbook on Iran is for increased sanctions, which will likely include freezing the recently unfrozen $6.0 billion of Iranian assets.  At the same time, expect to see reports that confirm Iran was not directly involved in the actual attack.

  1. This attack may stunt natural gas development in the eastern Mediterranean. The projects could be vulnerable to attack, and even if the current facilities can be secured, geopolitical risks could affect future investment.
  2. As we have noted in recent reports, there is some evidence that Iran may have penetrated upper levels of the Biden administration. The Hamas attack could raise concerns about the administration’s recent actions to improve relations with Iran.

Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  • Nio (NIO, $8.53), a Chinese car company, is losing $35k per car. China’s ability to subsidize these losses makes the country a formidable competitor in this area.  As we have noted in recent reports, China appears to be targeting the EU for its EVs, and Brussels is increasingly concerned about Chinese dumping and the potential damage to Europe’s auto industry.
  • The stigma against nuclear energy is slowly weakening in Europe as the need for electricity and the appeal of no carbon emissions make the source increasingly attractive.
  • Kenya is emerging as a major leader in geothermal power. It plans on generating half of its electricity from this clean source.
  • Perhaps the most important metal in the energy transition is copper. Battery metals will change as technology changes, but, to date, no one has developed an electrical conductor as price efficient as copper.  Unfortunately, existing mines are faced with a reduction in productivity as ore concentration declines.  Thus, new mines will be necessary in order to boost output; however, it has been difficult to fund and approve new projects.
  • Heat pumps are an efficient, yet controversial, method for heating and cooling. The problem is that they don’t work well in extreme temperatures.  In the case of Germany, the government has been forcing homeowners to use heat pumps when they would prefer not to.  As the IEA points out, though, improving efficiency is an important part of reducing energy consumption.
  • Technology has become an issue in recent union contract negotiations. For example, part of the demands of the Hollywood writers included protection against AI-derived scripts.  The UAW is worried that EVs will reduce the number of autoworkers required to build cars and, at the same time, the union fears battery factories are increasingly being sited in right-to-work states.  The new technology is a threat to UAW jobs and the current strike is trying to address these issues.

[1] We have truncated the residual data to reduce the chart distortions from the pandemic.

  View PDF