Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – Where’s the Recession? A Recap (September 25, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Precise recession forecasting is really difficult.  Most recessions occur during periods of tightening monetary policy; however, history shows that monetary policy works with “long and variable lags,” meaning that the impact of rising interest rates doesn’t lead to consistent timing of downturns.  It’s a bit like wanting to schedule an outdoor event over the next 10 days, and the weather forecaster tells you it could rain in an hour or over the next 30 days.  It’s highly likely that he will be correct, but that forecast is useless for your scheduling purposes.  For investors, the key time frame for a recession warning is probably six to nine months.  Financial markets can continue in a “risk-on” mode for a year to 18 months before a recession and so getting overly defensive can hurt returns.  On the other hand, getting a very late warning may not give an investor enough time to adjust portfolios.

In our 2023 Outlook, we suggested a recession this year was “highly probable.”  We could still be right, but it is clear that the clock isn’t in our favor.  In recent Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly reports, we have discussed various reasons why the economy has avoided a recession.  For the most part, the economy has been less sensitive to higher interest rates, and these reports discuss why.  In this report, we will recap those reports to create a guidepost of what could bring about a recession.  For example, if a factor is still in place, it likely would suggest the recession could be further delayed.  On the other hand, if that condition is changing, a recession might be on its way.

“The Case for New Home Sales” (May 22, 2023): One of the primary conduits of tighter monetary policy to slow the economy is through the housing market.  Given the sharp rise in mortgage rates when we wrote our outlook, we were worried about a decline in home prices as such declines have historically been tied to serious downturns.  However, as mortgage rates rose, existing homeowners have stayed put.  Homebuyers are buying more new homes and homebuilders are accommodating these buyers with less expensive homes and by helping with purchases.  Until some factor, such as rising joblessness, forces current homeowners to sell, this situation is likely to continue.  Our take: This factor will likely continue to delay the recession.

“The Green Shoots of Re-Industrialization” (July 3, 2023): As the world deglobalizes, the U.S. is reindustrializing.  Far-flung supply chains, often in nations now deemed hostile, are leading companies, supported by policymakers, to build industrial capacity in the U.S.  Private non-residential construction has been rising sharply.  Given that various policies, such as the CHIPS Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, are just starting to have an effect, this support is in its early stages.  Our take: This factor will likely continue to delay the recession.

“Are Higher Interest Rates Bearish for Risk Assets?” (July 17, 2023):  Higher interest rates are expected to slow borrowing.  We are starting to see rising delinquencies for credit card debt and auto loans.  However, there has been a rise in interest income for savers.  After years of chasing yields in the more risky and esoteric parts of the financial markets, savers are now getting attractive interest rates on low-risk assets, such as T-bills.  This factor may not delay the recession, but it may reduce the downside risk for risk assets.  Why?  The primary beneficiaries of this rising interest income are the wealthy, who also are the majority owners of equities.  Our take: This may not delay the recession but could reduce the risk from one to markets.

“Where’s the Recession? Examining Employment” (August 14, 2023):  In this report, we note that the labor markets received a shock from the pandemic.  The 55+ labor force and employment fell well below trend.  COVID-19 is particularly risky for older people, and we estimate that if this part of the labor market had remained on its pre-pandemic trend, the unemployment rate would be 4.9%.  There is no evidence yet to suggest these workers are returning at a pace equal to the pre-pandemic trend.  The impact on the labor market could be mitigated through immigration, but labor markets over the next few months will likely remain tighter than they otherwise would have been.  Our take: Employers are adjusting to the lack of labor.  Although strike activity is elevated, there are also reports of wage cuts which would suggest employers are adjusting.  This factor should remain in place, but its impact does appear to be waning.  Thus, it may not delay a downturn much longer.

“Fiscal Tightening Looms” (September 11, 2023):  The level of fiscal support has delayed the recession.  The fiscal deficit has widened because of higher spending and falling tax revenue (partly due to the indexing of marginal tax rates; as inflation rose, the tax brackets shifted up).  However, the moratorium on student debt repayments is coming to an end this month.  The Biden administration has tried to soften the blow, but borrowers will be servicing their student loans again, which will reduce the spending power of the affected households.  Our take: This is a worry.  There is some evidence to suggest that these households assumed that the loan payments would never return and thus borrowed to fund other purchases.  If that is correct, this issue could accelerate a downturn.

Overall, the factors that we have highlighted in recent weeks suggest that the recession probably is an issue for 2024.  Tightening fiscal policy is the only real worry, although some of this tightening will likely be offset by re-industrialization.  The metrics on homes is not good; affordability is weak, but without a factor that forces sales of existing homes, we are probably looking at a mostly soft housing market.  It’s worth noting that residential real estate has had a negative contribution to GDP for nine consecutive quarters.  So, it’s not like residential housing is boosting the economy; instead, it is mostly not causing balance sheet problems for households.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (September 21, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices have continued their rise, with Brent trending toward $95 per barrel.  Recent extensions of the production cuts by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) have boosted prices.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell 2.1 mb compared to forecasts of a 1.7 mb draw.  The SPR rose 0.6 mb, which puts the net build at 1.5 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.9 mbpd.  Exports rose 2.0 mbpd, while imports fell 1.1 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 1.8% to 91.9% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Last week’s decline is mostly consistent with expected seasonal patterns.  However, we should start to see inventories rise in the coming weeks, but if they fail to do so, it could give another lift to oil prices.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $74.10.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in late 1984.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $95.20.

Market News:

Geopolitical News:

Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Goodbye Prigozhin (September 18, 2023)

Bill O’Grady | PDF

On August 23, an executive jet carrying seven passengers and three crew members crashed near Moscow on a flight to St. PetersburgYevgeny Prigozhin, the head of the Wagner Group, a private Russian military company, was reportedly one of the passengers. Prigozhin was having an eventful summer.  He had led an apparent mutiny in June, but called off his march on Moscow despite making significant progress toward the capitol after seeming to make a deal with Russian President Putin, and thereafter was seen conducting Wagner business again.

In this report, we will examine four issues.  First, is he really dead?  Second, if he is dead, who did it and how did they do it?  Third, we will discuss the benefits and costs of the Wagner Group to the Russian state.  And fourth, we will analyze the potential benefits and costs of his apparent assassination.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

Read the full report

Don’t miss our other accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Weekly Energy Update (September 14, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices have continued their rise, with WTI trending towards $90 per barrel.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories rose 4.0 mb, compared to forecasts of a 2.0 mb draw.  The SPR rose 0.3 mb which puts the net build at 4.2 mb (the discrepancy is due to rounding).

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.1 mbpd to 12.9 mbpd.  Exports declined 1.8 mbpd, while imports rose 0.8 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.6% to 93.7% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Last week’s rise is mostly consistent with expected seasonal increases in crude oil stockpiles.  However, the sharp drop in exports is a bit of a puzzle and if reversed next week, inventories could remain tight.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $73.30.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in late 1985.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $94.95.

Market News:

  • The executive director of the IEA issued an editorial in the Financial Times where he forecast peak oil and natural gas demand would occur by the end of the decade. The increase in EVs and renewables is expected to supplant fossil fuels.  Obviously, we won’t know for sure if he is correct for a few years, but this position does affect behavior.  Oil and gas firms have already shifted their focus from growth to providing return to shareholders and owners.  After all, how does one justify expanding production that may simply be stranded?  On the other hand, if he is wrong, and demand continues to grow, the behavior of firms increases the likelihood of much higher oil prices.
  • Russian refineries are planning seasonal maintenance that will allow for more oil exports but will also curtail product exports. It will be interesting to see if Russia maintains its promise to restrict oil supplies in light of this seasonal situation.
  • Although the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s (KSA) production restrictions have supported oil prices recently, it will almost certainly weaken the economy. That’s in part due to increasing Iranian exports and rising Guyana production that will reduce the KSA’s market share.  We don’t expect a change in Saudi production this year, but we wouldn’t be surprised to see an attempt to regain market share next year.
  • U.S. shale producers are trying to impress investors with their improved efficiency. In the past, it was all about production, but now there is a focus on profitability.  One measure of efficiency is the length of drilling laterals; in other words, getting more oil from each wellhead.
  • As the odds of an Australian LNG strike loom, Chevron (CVX, $165.59) is likely to deploy a legal strategy to avert a work stoppage. Workers have already went on strike to signal their resolve.  There is an element of Australian law that suggests that if two sides in a labor dispute are hopelessly deadlocked, one side can petition for arbitration and work continues.  It is apparently untested, and we would be surprised if the courts give Chevron an out.

Geopolitical News:

Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – Fiscal Tightening Looms (September 11, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

To understand the state of the U.S. economy and gauge near-term financial prospects, investors over the last couple of years have focused on issues like the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy, consumer price inflation, labor market indicators, and retail sales.  They seemed to pay much less attention to fiscal policy, except perhaps amid this spring’s Congressional standoff over the federal debt limit.  Our recent work suggests fiscal policy could become a much more important focus in the coming months.  In part, that’s because of the potential for a stalemate in Congress over the budget for the new fiscal year starting October 1.  More generally, it’s also because of the fast-growing budget deficit and looming changes in the government’s income and outlays.

To start out, let’s look at the broad contours of today’s federal budget situation.  In the 12 months ended in July, federal receipts totaled $4.480 trillion, but outlays rose to $6.743 trillion.  The deficit stood at $2.263 trillion.  That shortfall was nowhere near the enormous deficits at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, but it was still much worse than in the prior 12 months.  As shown in the chart below, the expansion in the deficit over the last year reflected both declining receipts and rising outlays.

To understand what’s going on here, let’s first dive deeper into federal revenues.  During the year ended in July 2023, they were down $352.4 billion from the year ended in July 2022, for a decline of 7.3%.  Our analysis shows the decline can be explained entirely by a $408.3-billion drop in individual income taxes, most likely because of lower capital gains taxes after the stock market’s long slide last year, lower wage income as more Baby Boomers and other workers dropped out of the labor force, and an upward adjustment to federal tax brackets because of the price inflation in 2022.  The drop in individual income taxes was partially offset by a modest rise in other receipts, such as Social Security taxes, Medicare taxes, corporate income taxes, and customs duties.

The bigger change came on the spending side of the ledger.  In the year ended July, federal outlays were a whopping $951.8 billion more than in the preceding year, for a rise of 16.4%.  A couple of major outlays fell.  For example, Income Security and Healthcare spending declined modestly.  On the other hand, several big spending types grew sharply.  Because of population aging, a boom in new retirees, and a big cost-of-living increase in Social Security benefits, outlays for Social Security and Medicare grew by a collective $279.6 billion.  In addition, interest outlays were up $182.9 billion from the prior 12 months as outstanding debt grew and interest rates rose.  Most dramatic of all, education outlays ballooned by $453.2 billion compared with the previous 12 months, mostly reflecting the pandemic-era moratorium on student loan repayments and interest.  That moratorium was declared back in March 2020, but final costs of $449.3 billion were recognized only in September 2022, making it look like there was a sudden, temporary spike in education expenditures during that one month (see chart below).

The spike in recognized education expenditures may drop out of the 12-month rolling average beginning with the Treasury report for September 2023, which could then show a drop in spending.  More broadly, as the student loan pause and other big pandemic relief programs come to an end in the coming months, the drop in overall fiscal stimulus could have a noticeable negative impact on demand.  Not only will college graduates lose their student loan subsidies and have to start paying principal and interest again, but daycare centers will lose their operating subsidies, prompting some to close and forcing many, mostly women, out of the workforce.  Of course, the administration’s big, new programs to subsidize infrastructure rebuilding and factory construction will soon begin to pump more money into the economy, but that probably won’t offset all the expiring pandemic outlays.

Without substantial growth in fiscal stimulus in the coming year, a major pillar that has prevented the economy from entering recession will be removed.  Although the tight labor markets from the loss of Baby Boomers and the consequent higher incomes remain as does rising interest income, the drop in fiscal stimulus raises the odds of a downturn in the coming quarters.  Thus, investors need to remain vigilant about a recession, even though the current consensus is calling for continued growth.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (September 8, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices have clearly broken out of their trading range, with Brent crude oil moving above $90 per barrel.  Prices are being supported by the Russian and Saudi extension of production restraint.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell 6.3 mb, much lower than the 1.8 mb draw forecast.  The SPR rose 0.8 mb which puts the net draw at 5.5 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.8 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.4 mbpd, while imports rose 0.2 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 0.2% to 93.1% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Last week, the continued decline in inventories put stocks well below seasonal norms.  We are nearing the seasonal trough, and if stockpiles continue to decline, it would be a bullish factor for oil prices.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $74.53.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in late 1985.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $95.32.

Market News:

Geopolitical News:

Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (August 31, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices were mostly rangebound this week, holding near recent highs.  We are watching Hurricane Idalia as it travels through the Gulf of Mexico.  Its current track suggests it will miss the most sensitive areas of oil and gas production, but it could disrupt oil and gas shipping for a few days.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell 10.6 mb, much lower than the 2.2 mb draw forecast.  The SPR rose 0.6 mb which puts the net draw at 10.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.8 mbpd.  Exports rose 2.2 mbpd, while imports rose 0.5 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 1.2% to 93.3% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Last week, the sharp drop in inventories put stocks well below seasonal norms.  We would expect inventories to continue to decline into mid-September and then start their seasonal rise into November.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $71.86.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in late 1985.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $95.49.

Market News:

  • Although it is commonly held that oil demand will peak sometime over the next 20 years, there are skeptics who argue that this is unlikely. One reason is that developing economies will likely see more intensive energy consumption which will keep oil demand growing.  The problem with the more commonly held view is that it affects investment.  As we noted last week, for the first time ever, U.S. oil firms returned more cash to shareholders than they spent on exploration.  This sort of activity makes sense if the future of oil and natural gas is bleak; however, if that is not the case, we could be dangerously underproducing oil which would lead to higher prices.
  • Low water levels in the Panama Canal are forcing delays and light loadings of vessels. The problem could constrain LNG shipping to Europe.
  • The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is expected to roll over its current cuts into October.
  • During the pandemic, oil prices briefly “went negative.” Essentially, there was a lack of storage space for crude oil and those trying to sell it were forced to pay traders to take it.  One of the contributing factors to the situation was selling from the oil ETFs.  As investors moved to sell the ETFs, the managers of the funds, which held nearby oil futures contracts, were also forced to “dump” contracts.  The forced selling created the downdraft in prices, leading to the unprecedented negative oil price.  In response, the largest ETF from the United States Oil Fund (USO, $72.78) changed its investing pattern.  Instead of holding the nearby futures, it spread its holdings among numerous contract months.  Although this action dampened the impact on the front month, it also made the ETF less sensitive to nearby prices.  Thus, investors wanting exposure to nearby oil prices found the product less attractive.  We note that the fund manager has decided to return to holding the nearby futures again.  Although this decision will make the product more attractive, it also will recreate the problem that led to the May 2020 price collapse.
  • Although it is rarely discussed in polite company, there is an undercurrent of assigning costs of regulation. This is the reason lobbying exists.  It is well known that the global shipping industry is “dirty,” as it has historically used bunker fuel, the dirtiest but cheapest cut of the crude oil barrel, but because of its international situation, it tends to be hard to regulate.  As new global regulations are put into place, there is a battle on how (or better yet, to whom) the costs of regulation will be allocated.
  • We have noted recently that U.S. oil production is rising. Interestingly enough, so is Canada’s.
  • Although U.S. oil production is rising, drilling activity in the Permian Basin is declining rapidly. However, we may see this trend reverse in the coming months.
  • The U.S.’s third largest oil refinery has been shut down due to a storage tank fire. The news lifted diesel fuel prices.
  • Another area seeing expanding oil production is in Suriname.

Geopolitical News:

  • We have not commented in detail on the Robert Malley situation. To recap, Malley was a special envoy to Iran who was recently relieved of his security clearance (and put on unpaid leave).  Officially, the concern is his handling of sensitive documents, but the real issue is that he may have been an Iranian mole in the State Department.  Although the mainstream U.S. media has mostly ignored the issue, it has been examined in great detail by John Schindler on Substack.  Interestingly enough, the Iranian media is reporting on the topic and has disclosed internal State Department documents.  It is unlikely that this situation will directly affect the oil and gas markets; however, it may disrupt administration negotiations with Iran and thus could lead to a drop in Iranian oil supplies.
  • There was an apparent coup in Gabon, which is a member of OPEC+. President Bongo had just won a third term, but apparently elements of the military opposed his continued rule.  Gabon is a relatively small producer (0.2 mbpd), so we don’t expect this event to have much impact on oil prices.
  • Turkey and Iraq are in a dispute over who will pay the $1.5 billion fine incurred by the Kurdish Regional Government. Until the fine is paid, Turkey is blocking Iraqi oil exports from Northern Iraq.
  • Iran has lived under some element of U.S. sanctions since 1979. The goal of sanctions is to change the sanctioned nation’s behavior.  With Iran, for the most part, it seems this really hasn’t worked.  It is clear sanctions have hurt Iran’s economy and its people, but Iran continues to act contrary to U.S. goals and persists despite the sanctions.  A new paper suggests that a major reason for this is that Iranian elites actually benefit from sanctions.  Essentially, Iranian elites shift the burden of sanctions onto ordinary Iranians and thus are willing to accept the sanctions regime.
  • As the U.S. increases pressure on Russia, Washington is easing sanctions on Venezuela. The Biden administration doesn’t want high oil prices; it just wants to undermine Moscow.
  • Although Iraq has ample natural gas reserves, it lacks processing capacity. Raw natural gas often contains liquids (which are quite valuable) and impurities that need to be refined for use in power plants, chemical processes, etc.  Because Iraq lacks processing capacity, it has been forced to import “dry” natural gas from abroad.  Turkmenistan and Iraq have announced a new trade deal for natural gas to feed Iraq’s electricity production.
  • The KSA wants to build nuclear power stations. By doing so, it can free up more oil and natural gas for export.  The U.S. and China are competing to provide the reactors, but Washington faces an impediment.  The U.S. wants to build reactors that won’t create materials that could be used in nuclear weapons, while Beijing does not have similar requirements.  Thus, the U.S. could find itself in a situation where it either doesn’t enforce its non-proliferation standards to get the business (which would probably be done by South Korea) or hold to the standards and see China build the reactors.  In either case, the program could give Saudi Arabia the materials needed to build a nuclear weapon.  We also note that Riyadh is using the nuclear issue as part of the U.S. goal of normalizing relations between Israel and the KSA.
  • Saudi foreign reserves fell last month despite high oil prices. This drop reflects production cuts.  Generally speaking, higher oil prices have tended to lift reserves, so the cuts are having an impact.

Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF