Asset Allocation Quarterly (Third Quarter 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

  • Our three-year forecast still includes a relatively mild recession followed by a recovery and the potential for an economic expansion.
  • We expect inflation to moderate in the near-term but modestly re-accelerate in the back half of the forecast period given underlying structural influences.
  • The Fed’s monetary policy is likely to ease as economic conditions slow. Additionally, we expect a measured and careful approach by the FOMC as the presidential elections draw nearer.
  • The duration posture remains short-term. We anticipate the yield curve will begin flattening from its current inverted state.
  • In domestic equities, we maintain our value bias as well as large cap cyclical sectors and quality factors within lower market capitalizations.
  • International developed markets include an overweight to Japan. We maintain emerging markets exposure in the most risk-accepting portfolio but exclude China.
  • Gold exposure is maintained for its benefits as a low-correlation asset along with its potential to act as a haven during economic turmoil and as a hedge against geopolitical risk.

ECONOMIC VIEWPOINTS

The economy has generally remained resilient despite the Fed’s tightening actions and a widely anticipated recession. While fiscal spending has supported the economy, consumer spending has carried the expansion on the back of strong household balance sheets. However, we are seeing the first signs of slowdown in consumer sentiment. As this chart indicates, household non-mortgage debt-to-cash ratios have crept higher recently, indicating weakening balance sheets which could negatively affect spending. Savings that were bolstered by stimulus payments have now been depleted by strong discretionary spending and inflationary pressures on the overall consumer basket. Early signs of slowing consumer spending are emerging from the Consumer Staples and Discretionary categories, which we believe are due to price elasticities of demand in response to higher inflation. It is significant to note that we are seeing household balance sheets deteriorate even before the resumption of student debt payments. An estimated 37 million borrowers had a three-year reprieve in student debt payments and reports indicate this primarily supported consumption and did not accrue into savings. We expect these debt payments to further suppress spending.

At the same time, labor markets have remained strong with unemployment near cycle lows. The unemployment rate may be artificially understated as employers are hoarding labor in fear of labor shortages even when consumer demand is slowing. Here, again, we are seeing early signs of a slowdown in hours worked and falling rates of wage growth.

Macro headwinds combined with monetary policy tightening reinforce our forecast for a mild recession, which is likely to be uneven  among different segments of the economy. For example, the increased cost of capital is likely to weigh more heavily upon more highly leveraged companies and those embarking on new projects or expansionary efforts. The overall recession is not expected to be severe since it has been widely anticipated and elevated levels of liquidity on the sidelines should provide support to risk markets. As this chart shows, we continue to see historically high levels of money market and ultra-short bond fund assets. These levels are high for two main reasons. First, the inverted yield curve is offering attractive yields in the short end of the curve with low levels of risk. Second, accruing this yield is attractive for investors waiting on the sidelines for a dip in the market, providing support to risk markets.

Inflation is already showing signs of slowing. We believe this is primarily in response to the short-term smoothing of the supply-chain problems and is only secondarily affected by slower demand caused by tightening monetary policy. Our expectation is that inflation will return toward the end of the forecast period due to underlying structural issues, such as deglobalization and aging demographics. We also expect the new inflation regime to be higher than during the ZIRP epoch but lower than it has been since the pandemic.

One of the mega-trends supporting domestic economic activity longer-term is the re-shoring of manufacturing capacity and generally shortening supply-chains. Geopolitical tensions are likely to remain elevated and further support international polarization into regional blocs. Reliability of supply is now prioritized over the absolute lowest cost of manufacturing. Capacity buildouts are multi-year endeavors, which will place increasing demands on construction labor and materials initially and skilled labor to operate in the long-term. We believe these pressures, alongside general supply-chain complications, will further reveal inflationary bottlenecks in the economy and could lead to the resurgence of inflation.

We expect the path of monetary policy to be measured and careful over the forecast period, especially as we head into the 2024 presidential elections. Fed fund rates are likely to settle higher following the recession as the FOMC attempts to control a systemically higher inflationary regime.

STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK

A mild recession is generally discounted into current equity fundamentals, especially lower capitalization stocks. Domestic large cap stock valuations remain near cycle highs, with the expansionary cycle extended by excitement around AI and machine learning. We remain cautious regarding large cap exposure as concentration remains at historic highs. For example, the top 10 names in the S&P 500 accounted for roughly 30% of that index at quarter end. To guard against concentration risk, we lean our style tilt toward value over growth. Additionally, we retain our Aerospace & Defense position and cyclical sector overweights as we project that deglobalization and re-militarization of foreign countries is a sustainable long-term trend. We maintain our sector overweights to Mining, Energy, and Industrials in most strategies. The Mining and Energy sectors are likely to benefit from electrification/green energy policies as electrification is metals heavy.

We believe small and mid-capitalization stock valuations remain attractive, while fundamental earnings power remains healthy. Mid-cap stocks, specifically, remain at historically wide valuation discounts to large cap stocks. Last quarter, we introduced a quality factor in our mid-cap exposure. Similarly, we remain in a quality-screening vehicle on the small cap side. The quality factor screens for profitability, leverage, and cash flows, which should support the group through economic volatility.

We continue leaning into the value bias across all market capitalizations. We view the sustainability of earnings growth as more attractive in equities categorized as value and the fundamental valuation multiples are modest compared to historical data. In addition, value style has a lower exposure to sectors that we view as overpriced. Although growth has vastly outperformed value year-to-date, we anticipate that we are in the early stages of a value outperformance cycle.

International developed equities remain attractively valued, while their earnings potential remains healthy. This quarter, we added a country-specific overweight to Japan as shareholder-friendly reforms are starting to take hold in the country and as capital flows are moving out of the rest of Asia and into Japan, which could potentially lead to earnings multiple expansion. We also forecast positive returns from emerging market stocks on the back of U.S. dollar weakness, although exposure to this asset class is limited to only the most risk-accepting strategy. Given the potential economic slowdown and geopolitical risks stemming from China, we have directed our exposure to an emerging market ex-China investment vehicle.

BOND MARKET OUTLOOK

With the anticipated decline in the fed funds rate (the Fed’s reaction to the recession) and a more docile near-term level of inflation, the most attractive segment of the Treasury curve is in short duration. While our base case is for a flat yield curve to reign by the end of the three-year forecast period, we harbor concerns regarding intermediate-term bonds and especially long-duration bonds. Should inflation reassert itself within the forecast period, yields on long-term debt could rise, exerting downward pressure on prices and resulting in a traditionally shaped yield curve. Consequently, the duration posture of the strategies with income as a component remain short-duration with a concentration in one-year Treasuries.

Among investment-grade corporate bonds, it is notable that spreads have not compressed beyond historic averages, underscoring the absence of investor concern even in the face of the much-anticipated recession. Moreover, corporate debt issuance has been subdued over the past few years and has not led to excessive debt levels on most corporate balance sheets. Nevertheless, it would be consistent with our thesis for spreads to widen modestly as the recession takes hold and the maturing of low coupon debt to be refinanced with bonds reflecting higher rates than what prevailed during the years prior to 2022. As a result, corporate bond exposure in the strategies represents a lower proportion than popular market indices.

In the speculative-grade corporate bond category, we find caution is warranted due to the sizable increase over the past 15 months in the cost of capital for highly leveraged companies that are refinancing debt. As with investment-grade corporates, spreads have been relatively contained. However, an uneven recession is likely to cause spreads on lesser rated corporates rated B or lower, especially those in the distressed category, to widen markedly. Accordingly, all exposures to speculative-grade bonds in the strategies are exclusively in BB-rated debt.

OTHER MARKETS

Allocations to REITs are absent as our forecast for the sector over the near-term calls for continued headwinds and low levels of demand for office and retail space, compounded by the difficulty in arranging financing. Although the strategies similarly avoid broad-based commodities owing to recession-induced pressure on prices, we maintain the allocation to gold across the strategies. We favor the continued gold exposure as it can act as a haven during economic contractions and as a hedge against geopolitical risk. Furthermore, gold can be beneficial due to the potential strength it offers during periods of U.S. dollar weakness and its use as a reserve asset for global central banks.

Read the full report

Asset Allocation Fact Sheet

Weekly Energy Update (July 20, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

On Monday, oil prices spiked on reports that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) was going to extend its voluntary production cuts until year’s end.  The report was incorrect but does show the power that the news has on the oil markets.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell 0.7 mb, less than the 2.5 mb draw forecast.  The SPR was unchanged.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.3 mbpd.  Exports rose 1.7 mbpd, while imports increased 1.3 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.6% to 94.3% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace in the first quarter, stockpiles have moved into a pattern consistent with the seasonal.  Current inventories are in line with seasonal levels.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $59.94.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $92.96.

About the Heat:  We have been commenting on the unusually warm temperatures currently in the Northern hemisphereEurope, unaccustomed to such heat, is having a very difficult time adjusting.  In the U.S. the southern tier of states has experienced extreme heat, especially in the Southwest.  China is seeing hot weather as well.  Temperature reporting is now front and center in the media.  Although climate change is being blamed for much of it, our experience with climate is that it’s complicated.  There are two complications that are important to mention:

  • Sunspot cycles: The sun plays a major role in the earth’s climate.  Sunspots are the result of magnetic activity on the sun that causes flares and ejections from the sun’s surface.  The scientific community is divided on the impact of sunspots on climate.  Some argue that it is an important factor, others dismiss the activity as negligible.  We are not climate scientists but interested observers.  Our take is that the cycles likely amplify the normal variation.  That means that sunspot cycles probably don’t drive climate by themselves but do play a role.
    • Sunspot cycles run 22 years, from trough to trough. The current cycle will peak in 2025.  In general, increased activity tends to lead to higher temperatures.  Thus, we are in the part of the cycle that should lift global temperatures.  The current cycle isn’t unusually amplified, but its current readings exceed the peaks observed in the last cycle.

(Source:  NOAA)

The combination of elevated sunspot activity and an El Niño ENSO cycle indicates that hot weather will continue.  In the developed world, this climate condition tends to be bullish for summertime natural gas prices, as it boosts air conditioning demand and consequently, electricity consumption.  So far, U.S. natural gas production has been robust enough to keep injections on par with seasonal norms.  This factor has kept natural gas prices low.  If winters are mild, it could be bearish for natural gas prices going forward.  There have been other effects as well:

Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – Are Higher Interest Rates Bearish for Risk Assets? (July 17, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Orthodox finance and economics rests on the idea that higher interest rates reduce economic activity and lower the attractiveness of risk assets.  We have no real quarrel with the part about reducing economic activity as higher borrowing costs will tend to slow investment and consumer durable spending.  The effect on risk assets seems rather straightforward as well.  Higher rates should divert funds to fixed income and away from equities and commodities.

However, when debt levels are elevated, rising interest rates could increase interest income.  Current debt levels are high.

This chart shows private sector debt (household plus non-financial business sector) scaled to GDP along with general government debt.  Although the total is down from the pandemic peak of 304.1%, it is still 262.0% of GDP.  Combine that debt level with rapid policy tightening, and interest income would be expected to rise.  In fact, in raw terms, it is.

Interest income is about 8% of total personal income, which is lower than the peak of 18% in 1984.  Thus, in looking at the overall data, there isn’t a strong case that interest income is all that significant yet.

However, there is a distributional factor that may affect risk assets.

In this chart, we estimate the flows of interest income by wealth distribution.  As the chart shows, over the past 18 months, interest income to the top 10% of households has increased significantly.  The middle 40% has seen modest gains, while the bottom 50% has seen small increases.

In terms of asset allocation, the top 10% hold around 50% to 60% of their wealth in equities.  Increased income flows to this wealth bracket, paradoxically, means that more liquidity is available for other purchases.  As long as interest rates stay elevated, we would expect fixed income and cash balances to remain high.  Although once policy starts to ease, this additional income will likely look for other alternatives; put another way, the bounce to stocks from policy easing could be higher than expected.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (July 13, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Falling U.S. inflation is raising hopes that the Fed’s tightening cycle is coming to an end.  That has lifted oil prices, triggering a breakout above the recent trading range.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories rose 5.9 mb, well above the 0.1 mb draw forecast.  The SPR fell 0.4 mb, putting the total build at 5.5 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 12.3 mbpd.  Exports fell 1.8 mbpd, while imports fell 1.4 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 2.6% to 93.7% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace into mid-February, injections first slowed and then declined.  This week’s build is contraseasonal; current inventories are in line with seasonal levels.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $59.77.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.  With another round of SPR sales set to happen, the combined storage data will again be important.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $94.27.

Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Green Shoots of Re-Industrialization (July 3, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

In a little-noticed report last month, total construction spending in April was up a modest 6.1% from one year earlier, but private nonresidential construction spending was up a whopping 30.2%.  That marked the fourth straight month in which private, nonresidential construction, a proxy for commercial construction, was up more than 20.0% year-over-year.  In contrast, outlays on public works (such as roads, bridges, and sewer systems) rose 15.1% in the year to April, while private residential construction spending fell 9.7%.  We believe these figures confirm an important new trend in the U.S. economy that will have big implications for certain asset returns going forward.

The strength in commercial construction may seem surprising, given today’s high vacancies and the pessimism regarding properties such as office buildings and shopping malls.  Those sectors continue to face major headwinds, and they certainly were not responsible for this recent rise in commercial construction.  The jump in commercial building has primarily come from new factory construction, especially manufacturing facilities for electronics and information-processing goods. Total outlays on factory construction in April were more than double their level in the previous April, with a year-over-year rise of 104.4%.  Expenditures on just the subsector of electronics and information-processing factories nearly quadrupled, showing an astounding increase of 271.8% on the year.  Of course, some of this increased spending simply reflects the high inflation in prices for construction inputs ranging from labor to cement.  Nevertheless, the spending increases far exceed any reasonable estimates of inflation for construction inputs.  The spending figures, therefore, confirm a huge rise in real factory construction.

The frenzy in building new electronics factories provides some of the first statistical evidence of U.S. re-industrialization, i.e., the rebuilding of the nation’s manufacturing, construction, and mining sectors as companies shift production back home from Asia or elsewhere abroad.  We suspect that a lot of the new factory construction reflects the recently announced, high-profile projects for electric-vehicle batteries, semiconductors, and other green-energy or info-technology goods.  However, we doubt that the recent spending uptick includes much of the hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies provided by last year’s Inflation Reduction Act or the CHIPS Act.  Slow bureaucratic and administrative procedures would suggest that most of those subsidies will only kick in later.  In addition, higher military budgets have not yet had their full impact on the defense industrial base.  The recent increase in factory construction, therefore, is probably only the beginning of a much larger, longer-lasting uptrend.

As geopolitical tensions between China and the West worsen, and as Chinese economic growth slows, we think the U.S. will be a key beneficiary of companies “near shoring” or bringing production back home.  New data suggests even Europe will see some re-industrialization.  The data shows that global businesses acquired or leased 9.6 million square feet of industrial space in the European Union during 2022, marking a 29% increase over the previous year.  The uptake of factory buildings comes even as weak consumer demand in the region pushes down contracts for retail and warehousing space.  Re-industrialization in the EU could accelerate even further if its member states adopt U.S.-style subsidies or if their defense spending increases spur an expansion in their defense industrial bases.

As the world fractures into relatively separate geopolitical and economic blocs, we have been arguing that re-industrialization will take root in the U.S. and, to a lesser extent, in Europe.  The data discussed here shows re-industrialization has indeed started to take root and is now pushing up green shoots that are likely to grow further.  Over the long term, this re-industrialization will be a mixed bag for Western societies.  It will likely make the West more resilient to external supply shocks and provide more opportunities for workers without a four-year college degree, but these new facilities and the shortened supply chains they represent will be less efficient than under the extreme globalization of the last few decades.  The result will likely be persistently higher inflation and interest rates.

Fortunately, shorter-term prospects are more positive. The building boom will likely support demand even as the overall economy slips into recession.  The new, highly modern factories being built could also quickly boost worker productivity when they come on line. Finally, since rebuilding the nation’s factory sector will require repairing and expanding roads and other infrastructure, it could also help reverse the recent fall in state and local government investment that we recently wrote about. For these reasons, we believe this re-industrialization will provide a short-to-medium term boost to several different stock sectors, such as broad industrials, construction companies and the service providers that serve them, providers of construction materials and equipment, and perhaps even real estate investment trusts (REITs) that focus on industrial properties.

View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Distinguishing My Wife From a Hat, an AI Story (June 26, 2023)

Thomas Wash | PDF

In his book, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales, Oliver Sacks, a neurologist, details his experience with patients suffering from varying neurological disorders. In one such case, he dealt with a man who had lost the ability to recognize faces. The patient was a university music teacher who had always been known for his calm and collected demeanor but had suddenly began behaving strangely. He would sometimes fail to recognize his students and was often seen patting the top of water fountains and parking meters as if they were small children. His antics were widely regarded to be jokes since he didn’t have trouble communicating, and his musical ability was as good as it had ever been.

It wasn’t until the patient was diagnosed with diabetes that he sought professional help. Aware of the disease’s impact on his eyesight, he visited an ophthalmologist, who reassured him that his vision was fine but referred him to see Dr. Oliver Sacks for a neurological exam.

During the visit, Dr. Sacks noticed something was off about the patient. The man seemed to be having trouble perceiving Dr. Sacks fully. Instead of looking directly at Dr. Sacks’ face, the patient fixated on certain parts. He gazed at Dr. Sacks’ nose, chin, right ear, and right eye, but never his face as a whole. After telling the patient the exam was over, the man attempted to find his hat but instead reached for his wife’s head and tried to lift it as if he were about to put it on. To Dr. Sacks’ surprise, the patient’s wife treated this as if it were an everyday event.

The case of the man who mistook his wife for a hat is a great illustration of how artificial intelligence (AI) neural networks process information. Like the patient, neural networks do not have the ability to look at an entire image to judge what it is. Instead, they break down images into parts, specifically into an array of numbers called pixels. AI models (neural networks) see images by recognizing patterns in the numbers that represent the image. They can make distinctions between different objects through training which then teaches them to associate certain patterns with specific objects. Just like the patient who needed to see an eye, nose, and mouth to know that he was looking at a face, AI models need numbers to achieve the same task.

This report provides a beginner-friendly introduction on how AI learns and processes information. We will begin by discussing the similarities between AI and our brains. Next, we will explain how AI works and explore some of its most important applications. We will then discuss some of the challenges and limitations of AI. We end the report with market ramifications. While this is not intended to be an exhaustive summary of AI, readers should come away with a stronger understanding of the technology and why it is such a big deal.

Read the full report

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Weekly Energy Update (June 22, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices may be establishing a new trading range between $67 and $75 per barrel.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell 3.8 mb when compared to the forecast build of 0.5 mb.  The SPR fell 1.7 mb, putting the total draw at 5.6 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.2 mbpd to 12.2 mbpd.  Exports rose 1.3 mbpd, while imports declined 0.2 mbpd.  Refining activity declined 0.6% to 93.1% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace into mid-February, injections first slowed and then declined.  This week’s draw is consistent with seasonal norms.  The seasonal pattern would suggest that stocks should fall in the coming weeks, but this pattern has become less reliable due to export flows.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $58.21.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.  With another round of SPR sales set to happen, the combined storage data will again be important.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $93.15.

Market News:

(Source: Reuters)

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Great Divergence (June 20, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

The S&P 500 is up 10% year-to-date and briefly reached the 4,200 level in late May. The recent rally in equity markets has been driven by the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI), which has bolstered tech stocks. In fact, much of this strong performance has come from the five largest tech companies, which now account for 24.7% of the index’s value, a record high. This concentration has led some investors to fear that a bear market similar to the dot-com bubble burst of 2000 may be on the horizon. The pessimistic outlook is related to concerns that the underperformance of the broader index has generally followed previous periods of high market concentration.

The chart above shows the relative performance of the S&P 500 Market Capitalization and Equal Weight indexes over the past 30 years. During times of uncertainty, investors tend to pile into established companies with large market capitalizations. These firms are typically better positioned to weather a downturn as they have more resources and access to capital. In this environment, the Market Cap index generally outpaces its Equal Weight counterpart. However, this outperformance does not usually last long. When the market recovers, investors often go bargain hunting as the lesser names are likely to offer more value. Thus, the Equal Weight index can outperform the Market Cap index over an extended period. That said, the recent unevenness is different than in previous market rallies.

The 2020 tech rally was driven by monetary and fiscal stimulus. The Federal Reserve injected billions of dollars into the financial system, which lowered interest rates and encouraged investors to take on more risk. Additionally, many households had excess savings due to the COVID-19 pandemic stimulus, which increased the number of retail investors. Overall, tech stocks benefited as investors looked for better returns. However, the rally was not sustainable.

As the Federal Reserve began to tighten monetary policy in 2022, interest rates rose and investors became more risk-averse. This led to a sharp decline in tech stocks, which continued until early 2023, when people began to focus on the investments that Microsoft (MSFT, $346.10) had made in machine-learning company OpenAI. The investments signaled the company’s commitment to artificial intelligence and its potential to usher in a new technology wave.

The craze for AI reached new heights in May after chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA, $431.33) forecasted that strong demand for AI chips could help the company generate $110 billion in revenue in 2024. The news led to one of the biggest tech rallies in two decades as the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index rose by more than 7% in May.

Analysts have compared the release of AI-related products such as ChatGPT to the advent of the internet browser, calling it a game-changer. Although still under development, the product has a wide range of potential uses, from content creation to task automation. The technology’s diverse applications have encouraged investors to purchase AI-related stocks at a premium as they are willing to pay for AI-related companies based on their future cash streams as opposed to current earnings.

Unlike the dot-com boom of the early 2000s, many of the companies developing AI technology are not startups. The major movers in AI are established tech giants, such as Microsoft, Amazon (AMZN, $126.50), Alphabet (GOOG, $124.77), Meta (META, $280.34), Baidu (BIDU, $148.19), Tencent (TCEHY, $45.55), and Alibaba (BABA, $92.13). These companies have proven track records of success, and they are unlikely to fail if the AI bubble goes bust. As a result, the recent rally in tech stocks poses significantly less risk than the internet mania of the early 2000s because the firms driving the rally are more stable and have better track records of profitability.

While the Market Cap index has outperformed recently, this outperformance is unlikely to last. Economic growth is expected to slow in the second half of the year, which could lead to a new down-leg in the market. As demand decreases, earnings will likely be negatively impacted, leading to a decline in stock prices. However, we do not expect the repricing of major tech companies to lead to a market crash. Instead, we believe other stocks within the S&P 500 will be less affected. Consequently, the Equal Weight index may recover against the Market Cap index toward the end of the year. Additionally, these companies could be very attractive once economic growth begins to pick up.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (June 15, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices may be establishing a new trading range between $67 and $75 per barrel.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories rose 7.9 mb when compared to the forecast draw of 1.5 mb.  The SPR fell 1.9 mb, putting the total build at 6.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.4 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.8 mbpd, while imports were flat.  Refining activity declined 2.1% to 93.7% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace into mid-February, injections first slowed and then declined.  This week’s outsized build puts inventories back at seasonal norms.  The seasonal pattern would suggest that stocks should fall in the coming weeks, but the seasonal pattern has become less reliable due to export flows.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $57.11.  Commercial inventory levels are a bearish factor for oil prices, but with the unprecedented withdrawal of SPR oil, we think that the total-stocks number is more relevant.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.  With another round of SPR sales set to happen, the combined storage data will again be important.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $92.53.

Market News:

  • The IEA released its forecast for oil demand over the next five years. The group estimates that expanding EV usage will dampen gasoline demand and thus lead to a peak in global oil demand after an almost continuous rise for 80 years.

  • As the above chart shows, oil demand is forecast to fall dramatically mostly due to negative growth for road transportation.  We have serious doubts that this will actually occur, but oil producers, especially those beholden to shareholders, have to be aware of this forecast since it suggests that investment in new production is at risk of being stranded.  Therefore, shareholders are likely to demand a shareholder return instead of investment into new production, and it appears this trend is already beginning to happen.  This forecast is likely to add to bullish pressure for prices, especially if demand exceeds expectations.
  • Oil prices continue to mark time in the wake of the OPEC+ announcement. Our take is that the U.S. wants prices around $60 per barrel and the Saudis have a target of at least $80 per barrel.  Because of this, we are sitting in a netherworld between these two price points.  Worries about Chinese demand are acting as a bearish factor on prices and offsetting the supply cuts coming from OPEC+.
  • U.S. crude oil exports have been increasing, but we are starting to get close to capacity at some export facilities.
  • Natural gas production in the Permian Basin has hit a new record high.
  • There is always tension between commodity project development and environmental concerns. Oil drilling in the Amazon Delta is pitting oil drillers against environmentalists.
  • Much to our surprise, it looks like the U.S. will add 3.0 mb to the SPR. Of course, this injection pales in comparison to the sales over the past year.  We note the Biden administration wants to purchase another 12.0 mb over this coming year.
  • Venezuela has suffered falling oil production for years. However, we are starting to see a slow recovery in this area.  As Russian sanctions change global oil flows, the U.S. has begun easing sanctions on Caracas.

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF