Weekly Energy Update (June 1, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices have been volatile in front of the OPEC+ meeting.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell a whopping 12.5 mb when compared to the forecast build of 1.5 mb.  The SPR fell 1.6 mb, putting the total draw at 14.1 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 12.2 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.4 mbpd, while imports rose 1.4 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 1.4% to 93.1% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace into mid-February, injections first slowed and then declined.  As the average line shows, we are nearing the seasonal draw period, although that pattern has become less reliable with the U.S. exporting crude oil.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $59.17.  We will wait to see if OPEC+ (see Market News below) moves to push prices higher by cutting output.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.  With another round of SPR sales set to happen, the combined storage data will again be important.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $94.63.

Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

  • China continues to delay approval for another pipeline from Siberia. As we discussed last week, China appears to be getting remarkably cheap natural gas from the current Power of Siberia pipeline and is seemingly driving a hard bargain on funding a second pipeline.  Russia is in a tough spot on natural gas as its pipeline network is designed to send gas to Europe, but that market has been mostly lost due to sanctions (although not completely as Ukraine is still allowing Russian gas and oil to go through its territory).  Moscow needs to reroute pipelines away from Europe and toward Asia.  Beijing knows this, but despite promises of friendship, it isn’t willing to invest much to support Russia’s goal of moving its gas east.
  • The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is participating in the evasion of Western sanctions on Russia by importing Russian diesel and then re-exporting it.
  • One of the key benefits of a globalized world is that countries can specialize in what they most efficiently produce, which tends to lower inflation. As geopolitical tensions lead to a breakdown of globalization, nations may be forced to manufacture items that they might not be best at but still need to produce due to insecurity of supply.  China is especially vulnerable to food and energy deficiencies.  Due to its high population, limited arable land, and water constraints, China has tended to be a net importer of food.  With energy, China became a net importer in 1994.  As relations between the U.S. and China deteriorate, Beijing is vulnerable to the U.S. Navy’s ability to close off shipping lanes.  In response, China is considering new ways of securing food and energy.
  • Russia has always considered Central Asia to be in its sphere of influence. In fact, during the Soviet era, the “stans” were part of the union.  These areas are rich in natural resources.  China is openly competing with Russia for dominance in this area, in part to secure key resources, and in part to exercise dominance over Russia.
    • We also note a Russian scientist working on hypersonic missiles has been detained on charges that he was selling secrets to China.
  • German regulators are promoting heat pumps and looking to ban gas-fired boilers. The Greens support this idea, but other members of the ruling coalition oppose the measure.  This issue is fracturing the coalition, and although we doubt the government will fall over this measure, tensions within the coalition have been rising for some time.
  • Iran has launched an alternative to the S.W.I.F.T. network in a bid to circumvent U.S. financial sanctions.

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  • During the first decade of this century, ethanol was thought to be a way to reduce America’s dependency on foreign oil. Regulations at the time envisioned a steady rise in the ethanol fuel mix.  However, the shale revolution reduced U.S. dependence on foreign oil, undercutting the national security argument for corn-based fuels.  Complicating matters further was that geopolitical disruption boosted grain prices significantly; using corn for fuel is seen as boosting food prices.  The Bush-era ethanol mandate has expired and it looks like the industry is being forced to defend current sales rather than boosting future use.
  • From the outset of the environmental movement, there have been tensions between the “Buckminster Fuller” wing and the “Thomas Malthus” wing. The former leans on technological fixes to environmental problems, while the latter believes reliance on technology creates an endless “treadmill” of solutions that leads to new problems where the only real solution is a decline in living standards.  This division often emerges, and the most recent instance appears to be tied to the carbon-removal industry.  The UN released a report critical of carbon renewal, because it is fearful that relying on it will curtail the drive to deploy alternative energy.  However, industry experts indicate that without direct carbon capture, meeting temperature targets will be impossible.
    • German police raided the homes of climate activists on suspicions that they were planning attacks on oil pipelines.
    • One interesting sidenote with captured CO2 is what exactly to do with it. Although the gas has some industrial uses (in beer, for example), the amount of gas that is needed to be captured to make a difference far exceeds industrial demand.  However, one way the gas could be used, paradoxically, is to make synthetic natural gas.  By combining hydrogen with captured CO2, you can create a clean methane that would seemingly be carbon neutral.
    • Exxon (XOM, $102.61) has made a deal with steelmaker Nucor (NUE, $132.72) to build a carbon-capture program.
  • Resource nationalism is on the rise. Recently, we noted that South American commodity producers are considering nationalizing production of key metals, such as lithium and copper.  The Congo wants to change its royalty arrangements with foreign firms (mostly Chinese) on copper projects, in another example of resource nationalism.  This factor increases the attractiveness of key minerals in geopolitically safe places.  A new lithium development in Portugal has been especially welcomed.
  • Clean energy proponents are pressing to streamline projects, a complaint heard from fossil-fuel companies as well.
  • The president’s moratorium on solar panel tariffs survived a potential override of his veto.
  • As we noted last week, China continues to dominate in EV components. Chinese battery companies are beginning to invest in productive capacity outside of China, perhaps to avoid a deteriorating geopolitical environment between the U.S. and China.  Europe is a primary target for this investment.
  • When a new technology is developed, it takes a while for the industry to establish standards. Initially, there is a temptation for each firm to create its own standards with the hopes that they become dominant, as this adoption can create market power.  At the same time, widespread adoption usually requires a few standards so it’s easier for consumers to use the new technology.  The classic example is the VCR versus Betamax standard for videocassettes.  Although the latter was thought to be superior, the former dominated and eventually eclipsed Betamax.  Consumers would have otherwise needed two machines to handle the format.  This week, Ford (F, $12.13) announced that it would adopt the Tesla (TSLA, $197.40) NACS standard, which will allow Ford vehicles to use the 12k Tesla charging stations.  Other EV makers use the CCS standard.  By making this decision, Ford is increasing the odds that the Tesla standard will prevail.
  • A German startup has won funding for a new fusion energy machine.

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – China’s New National Security Law (May 30, 2023)

Bill O’Grady | PDF

In late April, China released a new version of its national security law.  Shortly thereafter, some prominent U.S. firms were raided by national security operatives, and there were reports of database access being restricted.  In this report, we will discuss the new law and who has run afoul of the rules so far.  The context of this new law is important since China isn’t alone in increasing its focus on national security—the U.S. has been taking steps in this direction as well.  As always, we conclude with market ramifications, where we will examine how the shifting focus on national security could affect foreign investment and trade.

Read the full report

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Business Cycle Report (May 25, 2023)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

The Confluence Diffusion Index rose slightly in April but continues to signal that a recession is close. The latest report showed that seven out of 11 benchmarks are in contraction territory. The diffusion index rose from -0.3939 to -0.3424 but still sits well below the recession signal of +0.2500.

  • Financial market indicators received a boost due to improvements in the banking sector.
  • Homebuilding rose sharply last month, suggesting an increase in goods-producing activity.
  • The labor market showed signs of cooling but continues to provide evidence that the economy is in expansion.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is in recovery. The diffusion index currently provides about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for recovery. Continue reading for an in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing. At the end of the report, the Glossary of Charts describes each chart and its measures. In addition, a chart title listed in red indicates that the index is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Weekly Energy Update (May 25, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices are rising back into their earlier trading range of $73 to $82 per barrel.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories fell a whopping 12.5 mb when compared to the forecast build of 1.5 mb.  The SPR fell 1.6 mb, putting the total draw at 14.1 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.1 mbpd to 12.3 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.2 mbpd, while imports fell 1.0 mbpd.  Refining activity declined 0.3% to 91.7% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace into mid-February, injections first slowed and then declined.  This week’s unexpected drop in stockpiles has put inventories well below seasonal norms.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $60.59.  Although OPEC+ is trying to stabilize the market, recession worries are clearly pressuring crude oil prices.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.  With another round of SPR sales set to happen, the combined storage data will again be important.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $94.88.

Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  • An industry report shows that one of the key factors holding back the energy transition is the lack of profitability. Although we expect this factor to improve with expansion, it also highlights the need for government subsidies until scale can be achieved.
  • Another important issue was noted by David Calhoun, the CEO of Boeing (BA, $2007.00), who indicated that there is no cheap way to decarbonize air travel and doing so would likely lead to much higher prices and less air travel.
  • As lithium demand soars due to EVs, Latin American nations are trying to manage the potential boom to benefit their societies. As we have noted recently, a couple of countries are considering nationalizing lithium mining.  We could also see them follow the Indonesian model with nickel—force firms to build fabrication and refining plants within their country to prevent these nations from being mere suppliers of raw material.  Chile has announced new taxes on copper miners.
  • JP Morgan (JPM, $138.40) announced $200 million in support for carbon removal. Direct carbon capture will likely be necessary to maintain temperatures, and the support by this bank is a good sign for the industry.
  • In the scramble to secure metals for EVs, even oil companies are looking to buy into production. Meanwhile, Ford (F, $11.82) is aggressively working to gain access to lithium.
  • One of the problems with EVs is the time required to recharge batteries. At best, it’s a 20-minute process but often requires hours to fully charge a vehicle.  For EVs used in normal commuting, recharging at home usually addresses this issue.  However, for road trips, EVs are simply less convenient when compared to internal combustion engine vehicles.  One idea that has been around for a while is battery swapping.  If an EV is built to have removable batteries, it is then possible to build facilities that will house charged batteries where drivers can swap their discharged batteries for charged ones.  If such infrastructure is built, it would shorten the downtime of getting a recharged battery to that of buying gasoline.  There is renewed interest in this idea, but the problem is that if solid-state-battery technology evolves, recharging times should decline to rival gasoline refilling.
  • We have been closely watching the evolution of China’s EV manufacturing. Increasingly, it looks like China has developed world-class quality vehicles at low prices.  We recommend this Sinocism podcast for details.  Chinese cars represent a serious threat to European and U.S. automakers.  Essentially, Western governments are facing a dilemma.  If they open up their markets to Chinese EVs, the energy transition will move faster and doing so will likely contain inflation, but the cost would be losing this market to China.  Or they could use tariffs and quotas to ban Chinese vehicles, slow the energy transition, and face higher inflation.  Our expectation is that the second outcome is most likely.
    • On a related note, Honda’s (HMC, $28.48) Chinese joint venture is starting to export EVs and plug-in hybrids abroad. The first sales are going to Europe.
    • Although we have been reporting on the world’s dependence on China for energy transition materials, this link has an attractive graphic that highlights China’s dominance.
    • An important element of China’s dominance is in the processing of energy transition metals. Other nations are trying to build more processing outside of China, but one of the reasons China leads the industry is that it has lower costs.  China’s processing superiority has led to vertical integration in components.  On a related note, Indonesia is trying to build a nickel processing industry to complement its preeminence in nickel mining; it’s not as easy as it looks.
  • Europe was hoping to get access to U.S. subsidies for EV production. It looks like negotiations have stalled, leaving the EU at a disadvantage.
  • As EVs become more prevalent in the West, ICE vehicles are ending up in the developing world.
  • China is also rapidly expanding into nuclear power.
  • Although fixed solar-panel arrays are the most typical deployment of these generating devices, floating panels in bays or lakes are common in Asia. We are starting to see such arrays in the U.S. as well.
  • One of the problems with solar and wind power is its intermittency. Because the power doesn’t flow regularly, utilities must keep traditional power backups to meet conditions where wind or sun power isn’t available.  Obviously, batteries would solve this problem, but sadly, “metal” batteries are expensive.  We are seeing increasing reports, though, of creative ways of storing energy by either heating water or salt in the earth and using it to push a turbine or by using pumped storage.
  • The EU’s joint purchasing program for natural gas is being seen as a success. By combining buying power, the Europeans have been able to purchase natural gas at lower prices than they otherwise would have been able.  Now the EU wants to branch out by using that same buying power to purchase hydrogen and other “green” materials.
  • Last week, we commented on U.S. funding for carbon capture projects. One of the downsides is that if the CO2 escapes, it can be deadly.  It is this fear that drives the permitting delays.
  • California has approved 45 new transmission projects worth a total of $7.3 billion.
  • In Europe, refiners are experimenting with using cow manure processed into methane to provide the energy needed for refining crude oil.
  • There are constant tensions between those who aim to streamline permitting and the parties that want to prevent any sort of disruption. Interestingly enough, this opposition is not just against fossil-fuel development.  A recent example involves the Burning Man festival in Nevada, which is tangling with a geothermal development.
  • Although lithium, rare earths, and cobalt dominate the headlines regarding the energy transition, aluminum is also a key metal. It is an important component for solar power and it reduces weight in vehicles which in turn improves fuel efficiency.  Despite this importance, it has been mostly neglected by policymakers.  Aluminum is sometimes called “molten electricity” due to the large amount of electricity needed to smelt the metal.  Because it takes so much electricity to make, production in the West has been falling.  This neglect may sadly lead to yet another supply problem in the future.

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Case for New Home Sales (May 22, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

A common topic among the financial markets is the impact of rapid monetary policy tightening.  After years of accommodative monetary policy, the spike in inflation caused by the pandemic has continued to persist.  To address the inflation issue, the FOMC has lifted the policy target rate at the fastest pace in over 40 years.  Rapid increases in the policy rate can often cause problems in the financial system which then filter into the real economy, and although unfortunate, such disruptions are often necessary in order to weaken demand and reduce inflation.

However, not all disruptions are created equal.  In general, policymakers want to achieve lower inflation with the least disruption possible.  This goal often means that policymakers want to avoid disturbing key asset markets, which, if adversely affected, could trigger widespread financial stress.  The events surrounding the mortgage crisis in 2008 are a clear example of what not to do.

When we wrote our 2023 Outlook, one of the risks we cited was falling nominal home prices.  The two worst financial crises in the past 90 years were both preceded by falling nominal home prices.  We are currently seeing a modest decline in home prices.

During the pandemic, working from home coupled with low mortgage rates led to strong home sales and swiftly rising home values.  Rapid policy tightening has led to a jump in mortgage rates, which normally places downward pressure on home prices.

However, the impact from housing on the economy and financial system, so far, has been rather modest.  On its face, this seems odd.  The rise in interest rates should reduce the value of homes; after all, if it costs more to finance a home, then the value of that home should decline at some point.

The chart above shows the number of weeks that a worker earning the average weekly wage for a non-supervisory position must allocate to service a mortgage at the going mortgage rate and the median existing home price.  This series is a way of capturing affordability.  The chart shows that during the Volcker Shock, a non-supervisory worker had to contribute almost a month’s worth of work to service a mortgage.  After the shock, though, the market settled into a range of 2.0 to 2.5 weeks.  Homes became remarkably affordable after the Great Financial Crisis, but the recent spike in interest rates has caused the number of weeks needed to afford a home to increase to the top of the range seen from 1985 through 2007.

So, why haven’t home prices fallen to reflect the higher interest rates?  Essentially, it appears that homeowners are reluctant to sell and give up their current low mortgage rates.  Goldman Sachs reports that 99% of homeowners have a mortgage rate of 6% or less, whereas the current mortgage rate is 6.48%.  This means that almost any homeowner that is selling a house to buy another one would need to be willing to accept a higher mortgage rate.  The same research shows that 72% of homeowners have a rate of 4% or less, and 28% are at 3% or less.  With labor markets remaining strong, there is little forced selling, and therefore we have seen a drop in listings.

The data in the above chart, which originates from Realtor.com, shows that since mid-2022, new listing numbers have plunged.  However, there is still strong demand for homes, especially since the millennial generation is hitting its home-buying years and is a large cohort.  So, with current homeowners staying put, an opportunity for homebuilders has emerged as new homes may be the best alternative.  We note that new home sales as a percentage of total sales have been rising.

New home sales relative to total sales dropped after the 2007-09 recession but steadily recovered, although the amount remained below the 16% level that was roughly the average from 1990 to 2005.  New home sales spiked during the pandemic, and then declined, but have started to recover again.

What does all this tell us?  New home sales relative to total sales have improved but remain below historical averages.  Since the vast majority of existing homeowners with mortgages have interest rates below current mortgage rates, there is a clear disincentive to list one’s home for sale.  To meet demand, homebuilders have an opportunity to build homes for new buyers.  This situation has boosted the shares of homebuilders.  Although this recent rally may extend, the risk to the position is a rise in unemployment that would be significant enough to trigger forced liquidations.  Since we expect a recession over the next six to nine months, there is a risk that new homes could be facing competition from existing homes later this year.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (May 18, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices were mostly steady over the past week.  Recession fears continue to stifle price movements.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories rose 5.0 mb compared to the forecast draw of 2.0 mb.  The SPR fell 2.4 mb, putting the total build at 2.6 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 12.2 mbpd.  Exports rose 1.4 mbpd, while imports increased 1.3 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 1.0% to 92.0% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace into mid-February, injections first slowed and then declined.  For the past two weeks, stock have increased, putting the current level near average.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $56.42.  Although OPEC+ is trying to stabilize the market, recession worries are clearly pressuring crude oil prices.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.  With another round of SPR sales set to happen, the combined storage data will again be important.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $93.20.

Gasoline markets are tight.

The previous chart shows the number of days the current level of inventory could cover based on current demand.  The latest reading is 24 days, a level we usually see in late October, well after the summer driving season has ended.  As the five-year average shows, we usually have about six more days of inventory available as we swing toward Memorial Day.  Barring a sharp decline in demand, we are going into the summer with unusually tight gasoline supplies, which may boost prices.

Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Opportunities and Risks in a Tripolar Nuclear World (May 15, 2023)

Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Some 30 years into China’s development boom, it’s no longer controversial to say that tomorrow’s global investment environment will be shaped by Beijing’s effort to displace the United States as the world’s dominant country.  China remains focused on building its various sources of power, whether they be political, economic, technological, or military.  We have examined those sources of power and their implications for investors in various publications.  This report dives deeper into one aspect of China’s growing military power: its new effort to expand its arsenal of strategic nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them against the U.S.

China’s nuclear buildup will result in a scarier, less stable world.  Many investors and investment managers will be tempted to close their eyes to this uncomfortable risk.  Here at Confluence, we think it’s better to understand this important trend and incorporate the resulting opportunities and risks into our investment strategies.  It may seem strange to mention opportunities in relation to a potential nuclear arms race, but history shows that riches are often made during times of war or international tension.  Although nuclear war is unthinkable and unwinnable, preparation for a conflict will require investment and economic allocation.  Portfolios should take this spending into account.  In discussing the investment implications of China’s nuclear buildup, we therefore identify both the opportunities and the risks that may arise.

Read the full report

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Weekly Energy Update (May 11, 2023)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Although prices have bounced to return to the lower end of the $84/$72 trading range, recession fears continue to dominate sentiment.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Commercial crude oil inventories rose 3.0 mb compared to the forecast draw of 2.5 mb.  The SPR fell 2.9 mb, putting the total draw at 0.1 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was unchanged at 12.3 mbpd.  Exports fell 1.9 mbpd, while imports declined 0.8 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.3% to 91.0% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  After accumulating oil inventory at a rapid pace into mid-February, injections first slowed and then declined.  This week there was an increase, although storage levels remain below seasonal norms.

Fair value, using commercial inventories and the EUR for independent variables, yields a price of $58.00.  Although OPEC+ is trying to stabilize the market, recession worries are clearly pressuring crude oil prices.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.  With another round of SPR sales set to happen, the combined storage data will again be important.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $93.53.

Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

  • As China and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) have agreed to price oil sales in CNY, there has been a notable uptick in Chinese investment into the KSA.
  • As is often the case when sanctions are applied, firms willing to violate the sanctions (and bear the risk) can be rewarded with unusual profits. In the case of Russia, Greek firms appear to be the most active.  Indian shippers are also involved.
  • The G-7 price cap has led the Kremlin to boost taxes on energy companies. Falling production and sales have crimped tax revenue and the state has decided to raise taxes to maintain revenues.  Of course, this action will also reduce revenue for investment.
  • There is a raging debate underway surrounding the USD’s reserve currency status. Our take is that U.S. financial sanctions are encouraging nations that are fearful of sanctions to develop alternative international trade and financing arrangements.  We doubt these arrangements will totally supplant the dollar’s deeply entrenched status.  We note that Russia and India suspended talks on settling trade in INR, most likely for the simple reason that Russia has realized it would accumulate the Indian currency without a clear way to recycle the INR.

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – Why We Are Keeping Duration Short (May 8, 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Financial markets are complicated, and when faced with complication, there is an incentive to simplify.  This simplification process takes on several forms, including narratives, bromides, adages, etc.  Even the modeling process is a form of simplification.  Sayings like “don’t fight the Fed” or “cash is trash” are often heard in the financial media.  These adages aren’t always true, but they are true often enough to be believed.

One less common position is “buy long duration in fixed income when the yield curve inverts.”  At first glance, this idea seems illogical.  If long-term interest rates are below short-term interest rates, buying the former means a lower rate of return.  However, total return in fixed income isn’t just about the interest rate—it’s also about price changes.  Since yield-curve inversion is a credible recession signal, a downturn in the economy usually leads to lower inflation and rallies in long-duration debt.  So, there is evidence to support the saying.

In our recent Asset Allocation rebalance for Q2 2023, we didn’t follow this adage and instead kept duration short in our fixed-income allocations.  In this report, we will explore the rationale behind this decision.  Our position is that we have entered a secular bear market in long-duration fixed income, which means that, over time, we expect long-term interest rates will rise.

The above chart overlays 10-year Treasury yields with stylized standard deviation trendlines for the periods shown in the chart legend.  Note that we have significantly violated the trendline from 1985 to the present.  We believe this “breakout” signals that a new trend is being established in this instrument and that trend will be for higher rates.  Also note that 10-year yields peaked in 1980.

The above chart shows the total return index for the 10-year T-note and the 10-year less three-year T-note yield spread.  We are using this yield curve instead of the more familiar two-year/10-year spread because the three-year T-note has a longer history.  It should be noted that there is little difference between the two yield curves when their time frames overlap.  We have denoted sustained inversions with vertical lines.  The table below shows the total return over three-month, six-month, one-year and two-year periods after inversion.

As the data shows, about a third of the time inversions led to negative returns for the 10-year T-note.  With a two-year holding period, the negative events fall to about 15%.  The 1979 inversion was the only one that yielded a negative return over the two-year time frame.  So far, the current inversion has yielded negative total returns.

Over the entire time frame, the average return is positive.  However, when we calculate the pre-1980 and post-1980 (excluding the current event) periods, it’s obvious that using the signal of yield-curve inversion to extend duration is a bull market feature.  In other words, once interest rates peaked in the early 1980s, bond yields steadily fell.

Looking at the rolling two-year returns is one way to confirm that the secular bull market in bonds was the key factor that supported extending duration when the yield curve inverted.  From 1962 to the present, the average two-year return on the 10-year T-note was 13.6%.  From 1962 through 1979, the return was 7.2%, whereas from 1980 to the present, it rises to 16.4%.  A similar exercise for the five-year T-note yields an overall average two-year return of 12.4%.  From 1962 through 1979, the return was 10.1%, whereas the return was 13.2% from 1980 to the present.  This suggests that when secular market trends are bearish, shorter-duration positions should perform better than longer-duration positions.

One of the early lessons an economist learns is that some models are initial-conditions-sensitive.  In other words, a relationship is often dependent upon a set of circumstances that may not fully be captured by a model.  Some of these variables might be psychological or social, and thus are not easily encapsulated numerically.  Secular trends can be taken for granted, and when they turn, investing patterns that worked for a long time suddenly fail to deliver.  If our assumption about the trends in long-term interest rates are correct, then we believe that remaining in short-duration fixed income is prudent.

View PDF