Business Cycle Report (November 29, 2022)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

The Confluence Diffusion Index fell further into contraction territory in October. The latest report showed that five out of 11 benchmarks are in contraction territory. The diffusion index declined from +0.1515 to +0.091, below the recession signal of +0.2500.

  • Hawkish Fed expectations weighed on financial indicators
  • Production indicators are weakening due to a decline in business sentiment
  • Hiring is slowing but the labor market remains strong

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is in recovery. The diffusion index currently provides about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for recovery. Continue reading for an in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing. At the end of the report, the Glossary of Charts describes each chart and its measures. In addition, a chart title listed in red indicates that the index is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Weekly Energy Update (November 17, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

(The Weekly Energy Update will not be published next week due to Thanksgiving.  The report will return on December 1.)

 Crude oil prices appear to be building in a base in the mid-$80s.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 5.4 mb compared to a 1.9 mb draw forecast.  The SPR declined 4.1 mb, meaning the net draw was 9.5 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.2 mbpd to 12.1 mbpd.  Exports declined 0.41 mbpd, while imports rose 0.3 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 1.5% to 92.1% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are past the seasonal trough in inventories and heading toward the secondary peak which occurs later this month.  SPR sales have distorted the usual seasonal pattern in this data.  This week’s large draw is takes inventories back to the seasonal average.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $106.63.

 

Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  • For the most part, we view COP-27 as environmental theater since without an enforcement mechanism, environmental promises are just that. However, we do note that there has been some movement to reduce coal usage in power production.
  • California voters did not support a measure to fund EV charging stations by raising taxes on high-income citizens. Without this funding, it isn’t clear how the state will prepare to shift from gasoline to electric vehicles.
  • Meanwhile, China’s share of the global EV market continues to grow.
    • BMW (BMWYY, $29.46) is building a $1.4 billion operation to expand battery production in China.
  • As biofuel research expands, there is a growing concern that without regulatory guidance, the potential for the fuel source will be hampered by inconsistent standards.
  • Separating hydrogen from water creates a clean (“green”) product. Unfortunately, it is also energy intensive and expensive.  Four U.S. nuclear power reactors are part of a study to see if nuclear power can be used to generate green hydrogen.  Meanwhile, a raft of startups are trying to develop other ways to bring down the cost of green hydrogen.
  • The U.S. has blocked 1,000 shipments of solar energy components from China on grounds that the products were made by slave labor. There have been rising tensions between the solar installation industry and the non-Chinese solar component industry.  The former wants the cheapest product it can find, while the latter wants to compete with China, the world’s low-cost producer.  As U.S./Chinese relations deteriorate, the non-Chinese production industry is seeing an opportunity.
  • Leaded fuel was used to counter engine knock, though, unfortunately, lead is highly toxic so it was phased out of gasoline in the U.S. over three decades ago. However, small aircraft were excluded from the move to unleaded fuels but are finally making the switch.
  • One of the problems of solar and wind energy is that it’s unreliable, so as it expands, utilities must still keep conventional capacity available for periods when the power generated from wind or solar is lacking. The expansion of wind and solar in the western U.S. is leading to reliability issues.
  • We are still in the early stages of battery technology. The current industry standard for EVs, the lithium-ion battery, has some flaws as it’s prone to fires, it’s expensive to produce, and it doesn’t have a long life.  But, in its favor, it does recharge quickly and is lightweight.  The next new thing may be the sodium-ion battery.  It’s a bit heavier than the lithium-ion battery, and not as energy dense. New technology, though, is showing rapid improvement.  If it flies, it would dramatically reduce the cost of EVs and have much faster recharging capabilities.  Better and cheaper batteries are likely the key to widespread EV adoption.
    • Asian battery producers have been reluctant to invest in Australian mining that would provide raw materials for batteries, putting the makers at risk of supply shortages.
    • EV makers are looking to vertically integrate their operations with miners of key battery materials and with battery manufactures to create secure supply chains.
    • China uses lithium-iron-phosphate batteries which are cheaper but have less range than batteries that use nickel.

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Impossible Trinity (November 14, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

The U.S. Dollar Index hit a 20-year high in September as the greenback gained against other global currencies. The climb in the U.S. dollar (USD) began in the post-pandemic recovery. Investors flocked to the greenback for safety as the U.S. economy outgrew its peers in the OECD. Aggressive policy tightening by the Federal Reserve accelerated the appreciation as U.S. dollar-denominated assets have become even more attractive for foreign investors. The strong pick-up in demand for the USD intensified inflationary pressures globally and could push other countries into recession.

With limited options, central banks and governments were forced to take extreme actions to prevent their currencies from depreciating. Throughout 2022, investors have penalized countries that failed to prioritize fiscal and monetary austerity to contain inflation. Examples include a controversial tax plan in the U.K., the European Central Bank’s stealth quantitative easing to maintain sovereign spreads within the eurozone, and Japan’s insistence on yield-curve control, which led to nosedives in those countries’ respective currencies. The resulting depreciation has made dollar-denominated imports more expensive, adding to price pressures. As a result, inflation rose to an all-time high in the eurozone and to multi-decade highs in Japan and the U.K.

The exchange rate volatility reflects the limitations of central banks and governments when conducting monetary and fiscal policy. Typically, policymakers have three options with macroeconomic policy: fixed exchange rates, sovereign central bank policy, or open capital markets. It is impossible to do all three simultaneously as it creates a phenomenon known as the impossible trinity, or the policy trilemma. In other words, policymakers can opt for a fixed exchange rate only by either giving up monetary sovereignty or restricting capital flows.[1]  Post-Bretton Woods, most developed economies chose to solve the predicament by opting for floating exchange rates. This choice allowed policymakers to have open capital markets and monetary sovereignty.

The problem with the post-Bretton Woods arrangement is that exchange rate levels affect macroeconomic policy goals. For example, a weak exchange rate can be inflationary, while a strong exchange rate can act as unwelcome policy tightening. Thus, extreme moves in exchange rate levels may become counterproductive to policy goals and may require a response to change the trend in an exchange rate. Unfortunately for policymakers, this is where the impossible trinity becomes a problem. During currency crises, emerging nations are notorious for implementing capital controls. However, developed economy policymakers have generally shied away from such controls, and this reluctance leaves them with only one policy option: they must cede sovereignty. For instance, the Bank of England, the Bank of Canada, and the European Central Bank have all accelerated their respective paces of rate hikes to keep up with the Federal Reserve. As a result, the decision to raise rates in line with the Federal Reserve has calmed the nerves of investors while simultaneously hurting economic growth.

Although the impossible trinity does describe the problem facing policymakers in a single country, there are multinational solutions to resolve the issue. The 1985 Plaza Accord, the 1987 Louvre Accord, and the 1995 Halifax Accord are all examples of international cooperation to address exchange rate divergences. The Plaza Accord was an agreement to address dollar strength. European and Japanese policymakers were reluctant to follow Federal Reserve policy rates as the Fed was addressing a serious inflation problem, while the other central banks were not facing the same issue.[2] However, the Fed’s monetary policy led to capital inflows and the rapid appreciation of the dollar. By the mid-1980s, the dollar’s strength was making U.S. manufacturing uncompetitive and was lifting foreign inflation. And so, in September 1985, the G-5 nations agreed to a coordinated policy response to weaken the dollar. In addition to direct intervention to weaken the dollar, the Fed cut policy rates as the other countries’ central banks raised policy rates. The dollar then reversed its trend.

One could argue that the trilemma was not really resolved but simply managed during these accords. In the Louvre Accord, for example, the policy actions of the Plaza Accord were reversed to halt the dollar’s depreciation. In a sense, policymakers agreed to a certain policy direction and worked in concert to achieve a particular goal, which was a change in the trend in exchange rates. Strictly speaking, all the central banks sacrificed sovereignty to resolve an exchange rate issue.

Policymakers, therefore, resolved the trilemma by allowing exchange rates to float within unspecified boundaries. When those boundaries are hit, central bankers are forced to give up monetary sovereignty until the exchange rates adjust to acceptable levels. The question facing markets now is if there is consensus among developed-market policymakers that the USD is too strong. So far, that consensus hasn’t emerged, but it is clear that Japanese authorities are not happy with the yen’s exchange rate but are continuing to maintain monetary sovereignty through selective intervention. History suggests such unilateral actions slow the “direction of travel” but don’t reverse the trend. If the Europeans are unhappy with the euro rate, they haven’t yet made it public. And, with U.S. policymakers mostly concerned with inflation reduction, there is little incentive to pressure the FOMC to cut rates.

That doesn’t mean there isn’t collateral damage coming from the exchange rate markets. The USD’s rise slashed an estimated $10 billion from corporate earnings for Q3 2022. Much of this pain was concentrated on U.S. firms with foreign revenue exposure, specifically in the tech sector. But so far, weakness in the tech sector has not been enough of an issue to support a policy change. Until U.S. policymakers think they have inflation under control, foreign policymakers  have to choose whether to allow their exchange rates to weaken further or adopt the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve. Given the persistence of U.S. inflation, dollar strength is likely to continue.


[1] Bretton Woods, which was a system of fixed exchange rates, solved the problem through restricting capital flows.

[2] In the early 1980s, German CPI was around 5%, while U.S. CPI was 14.5%.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (November 10, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices appear to be building in a base in the mid-$80s.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories rose 3.9 mb compared to a 0.3 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 3.6 mb, meaning the net build was 0.3 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.2 mbpd to 12.1 mbpd.  Exports declined 0.41 mbpd, while imports rose 0.3 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 1.5% to 92.1% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are past the seasonal trough in inventories and heading toward the secondary peak which occurs later this month.  SPR sales have distorted the usual seasonal pattern in this data.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $105.36.

 

 Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  • Cop-27 is underway this week. We won’t have much to say because we doubt anything binding will emerge.  We do note that the U.S. is proposing a system of carbon credits that can be purchased by firms.  Although the idea makes some sense, it should be noted that no accreditation process has been created, which means it could be merely a form of greenwashing.
  • Canada has ordered three Chinese firms to exit the lithium mining sector, citing national security concerns.
  • U.S. spending for wind and solar power has been weak this year.
  • Geoengineering is the process of directly acting to offset various climate issues. For example, one way to cool the planet is to inject aerosols into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space.  Geoengineering is controversial because the potential side effects are hard to predict, and those side effects might be “levied” against those who don’t benefit from the action.  Despite the controversy, DARPA is quietly funding various projects probably because the government wants to know how they would work if we were to reach a situation where such measures became necessary.
  • There are a number of new nuclear technologies being developed. Here is a primer on molten salt reactors.
  • Researchers claim a breakthrough related to creating renewable jet fuel.
  • Similarly, researchers in Singapore note that they have made the process of pulling hydrogen out of water more efficient by using a procedure involving light. Meanwhile, researchers at Rice University have devised a way to pull hydrogen from hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg gas), which is an unwanted byproduct of desulfurization in refining and natural gas processing.
  • One of the problems with expanding solar and wind power is that it takes up lots of space and the least costly place to acquire that space is rural areas. However, residents are cooling to these facilities, worried about the impact on farming, ranching, and property values.
  • U.S. automakers are lobbying for the Treasury to widen the nations for which EV components can be imported and thus be eligible for subsidies. We suspect this is to leave room for China to participate.
  • The EU is growing increasingly upset with the Inflation Reduction Act’s EV subsidy rules that restrict payments to consumers only if they buy vehicles mostly constructed in the U.S. European automakers wanted carve outs so they could participate, but the U.S. countered with “make your own subsidies.”  We could see an EU trade retaliation, but we doubt this will change U.S. policy.
  • Last week, we noted that the EU voted to end the sale of internal combustion engines in Europe by 2035. As regulators tally up the potential job losses, there are new calls to delay that transition.

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Reflections on the 20th Party Congress (November 7, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

(The Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report will not be published in two weeks due to Thanksgiving.  The report will return on December 12.)

The Communist Party of China’s (CPC) 20th Party Congress has come to a close.  By all accounts, General Secretary Xi has tightened his grip on power.  Not only has he secured a third term, breaking the pattern of a two-term limit informally implanted by Deng Xiaoping, but he has also filled his inner circle, the Standing Committee of the Politburo, and the Politburo itself, with loyalists.

In this report, we will offer our take on the meetings, including an examination of key speeches and a rundown of the new Standing Committee of the Politburo along with important figures within the Politburo.  From there, we will examine our view of the possible direction of Chinese policy in General Secretary Xi’s third term.  As always, we will conclude with market ramifications.

View the full report

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Weekly Energy Update (November 3, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices appear to be building in a base in the mid-$80s.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 3.1 mb compared to a 1.5 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 1.9 mb, meaning the net draw was 5.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 11.9 mbpd.  Exports declined 1.2 mbpd, while imports were steady.  Refining activity rose 1.7% to 90.6% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are past the seasonal trough in inventories and heading toward the secondary peak which occurs later this month.  SPR sales have distorted the usual seasonal pattern in this data.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2002.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $107.47.

The Diesel Scare:

A prominent news personality recently suggested that “the country will run out of diesel fuel by Thanksgiving,” leading to a steady stream of questions to our inbox.  So, here is our take…

Diesel is part of a family of fuels called “distillates.”  Other members of this family include heating oil (diesel with a higher sulfur content) and sometimes jet fuel.  In general, diesel for road use has a lower sulfur content (it’s cleaner, in other words) so other distillates can’t easily be substituted for the diesel.  In the weekly data, diesel demand isn’t broken out from overall distillate demand.  To create a standardized measure of inventory (a mere level won’t tell you how much you have relative to demand), we divide stockpiles into daily demand.  By dividing inventory into consumption, we determine how many days of supply are available given current demand.  We are hearing that there are 21 days of inventory available, but since we can’t confirm diesel demand separate from distillate demand, we can’t confirm that number, although we can say that distillate stocks are tight, around 27 days.

The above chart, which is weekly data going back to 1987, measures current distillate inventories compared to consumption.  As the chart shows, levels are around 25 days, which is “tight.”  On average, the “days to cover” is 35 days with a standard deviation of six days.  So, the current level of 27 days is in the “bucket” of two standard deviations below average.  At the same time, it is important to remember that this number tells us how many days we can go if our only source of distillate is inventory.  That would assume the U.S. refining industry would close, and we couldn’t import any fuel.  That isn’t the case.  It is strictly true that we could run out of distillate by Thanksgiving, but only if we closed the ports and stopped refining completely, which isn’t likely.  Simply put, conditions are tight but not dire.

Complicating matters is that Europeans are importing diesel as a backup fuel for electricity generation and heating, both at the utility level as well as the firm and household level.

This is why the administration has floated export controls to ensure domestic supplies.  The problem is that it will be hard to keep the EU supporting the war in Ukraine if Europeans are freezing because the U.S. won’t send diesel.  At the same time, it will be hard to maintain support for the war in the U.S. if tight diesel supplies lift overall inflation.  In the past, when diesel fuel stocks tightened, our exports were much smaller.  So, the export situation has complicated matters.

We do have some refining capacity to tap.  Currently, refinery capacity is running around 89%, so we could see increased production.  Unfortunately, U.S. refinery capacity has been declining for some time as about 3.0 mbpd of refining capacity has closed since 1993.

There is yet another complication.  The Northeast (PADD1) is facing a severe shortage of diesel.  This region uses both natural gas and heating oil for home heating (the rest of the country mostly uses natural gas or propane) and so tight supplies can be a real problem.  Due to the Jones Act, this region usually imports distillate from abroad because it is cheaper to use foreign shipping than higher cost U.S. shippers, who are protected by the act.  But currently, Europe is absorbing the global supplies that would normally end up on the Eastern Seaboard.  It is unclear how this situation will be resolved, but the overall tight distillate market is being exacerbated by the shipping situation to the Northeast.

We don’t expect that the trucking industry will “shut down” due to the lack of diesel; instead, diesel prices will likely rise, which will cause adjustments (more rail traffic, for example, as trains are much more efficient) and delays in shipping.  However, the situation isn’t good.  About the only silver lining is that for every barrel of crude oil refined, roughly a third is distillates and 55% to 60% is gasoline.  As refiners lift production to meet diesel demand, we will get more gasoline in the market.

We also note that a weaker economy will reduce energy demand.  Already, U.S. trucking firms are reporting that shipments are down and we note that European economies are slumping as well.

 Natural Gas Update:

Natural gas prices have been weak lately as the storage injection season is near its end, the tropical storm season spared the oil sensitive regions of the Gulf of Mexico, and so far, temperatures have been mild.  For the most part, the trends in supply and demand are balanced.

On a rolling 12-month basis, there is a modest level of excess demand.  Meanwhile, inventories appear to be in balance.

With supply and demand nearly in balance and inventories in line with seasonal norms, the direction of prices going forward will mostly be a function of temperature.  The official NOAA forecast suggests that most of the nation’s major population centers will be normal to warmer-than-normal this winter.

Of course, even in an otherwise mild winter, a cold snap can have important effects on demand and natural gas prices.  Overall, though, the forecast does offer hope that home heating costs will be manageable.

Market News:

  • In the latest IEA annual report, one of the more important assertions is that fossil fuels are approaching peak demand, in part driven by the war in Ukraine. We have doubts that this forecast is correct, but the fact that it exists will tend to affect investment decisions.  In other words, if investors believe peak demand is on the horizon, there will be less incentive for investment, which will tend to crimp supply and lift prices.
  • Major oil companies are reporting record-breaking profits. President Biden is floating a windfall profits tax, accusing the oil industry of war profiteering.  In general, such taxes are counterproductive.  If the goal is to increase supply, taxing it works against that outcomeIf production remains low, the case for higher taxes on energy companies will become more compelling.  However, unless the tax is crafted to offer exemptions for increased production, this tax won’t increase production.  And, given the near certainty that the government will be divided after next week’s elections, the White House would have to put the tax through in the “lame duck” session.
  • It looks like the price cap idea on Russian crude oil is slowly unraveling. It has been arduous to get enough nations on board with the plan, leading the U.S. to lift the proposed price cap.  At the same time, it may be difficult for Russia to overcome the looming insurance ban, since the country may not have enough ships to avoid reducing exports.
  • Although the U.S. is the world’s largest oil producer, it is also a major consumer as well. Complicating matters is the mismatch between what U.S. drillers produce and what refiners use.  The U.S. tends to produce more sweet/light oil, whereas U.S. refiners prefer sour/heavy crudes.  Thus, the U.S. tends to export the former and import the latter to make the adjustment.  There are two nearby producers that generate sour/heavy oils: Canada and Venezuela.  The former is a major exporter to the U.S.  However, recent prices suggest that Canada could export even more to the U.S. if pipeline constraints were relieved.
  • In recent reports, we have discussed how the SPR is evolving from a strategic reserve to a buffer stock. It seems that others are also thinking in a similar fashion.  Buffer stocks in commodities have operated to the benefit of both consumers and producers, but they have a long history of failure.  Scenes of blocks of processed cheese being tossed to the crowds from the back of trucks in the 1980s were the result of a buffer stock of dairy products that were used to keep milk prices above their market-clearing level.  In our current situation, the failure point for the SPR is that there will never be a price low enough to trigger buying for the reserve.  That’s because consumers really like free goods, and once you start buying for the SPR, you are setting a floor price.

(Source: Bloomberg)

  • The current spread of Western Canadian Select and WTI is nearly $30 per barrel, nearly double the average of $16.  Unfortunately, expanding pipelines is difficult, since local opposition tends to be high, and environmentalists have targeted pipeline construction as a way to reduce oil and gas production.  So, instead, the administration is considering easing sanctions on Venezuela.  Caracas has been under sanctions for its repressive tactics and support of drug trafficking.
  • After prompting OPEC+ to cut production targets recently, the Saudi oil minister suggested that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) might be willing to lift output if the energy crisis worsens. He also suggested that the recent cuts had more to do with maintaining a supply buffer than lifting prices.
  • Recently we have reported that LNG tankers are sitting off the Iberian Peninsula waiting to disgorge their cargos. Initially, it seemed they lacked a space to dock and regassify.  However, recent indications suggest it may be more about waiting for higher prices.  After all, as we noted last week, prices for prompt natural gas briefly turned negative due to weak prompt demandWeaker EU demand relative to supply is creating a game of “chicken” for buyers and sellers.  Current sellers who are hedged have to deliver the gas, and if they can’t, they must either take a lower price or offset the position but pay to store the gas on a tanker, which isn’t cheap.
  • COVID infections are disrupting China’s coal industry.

 Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Inflation Adjustment for Social Security Benefits in 2023 (October 31, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Even for dedicated, successful investors who have built up a substantial nest egg, Social Security retirement and disability investments can be an important part of one’s financial security.  For many Americans, Social Security benefits may be the only significant source of income in old age.  On average, Social Security benefits account for approximately 30% of elderly people’s income and more than 5% of all personal income in the U.S.  One aspect of Social Security is especially important in the current period of galloping price inflation: by law, Social Security benefits are adjusted annually to account for changes in the cost of living.  In this report, we discuss the Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for 2023 and what it implies for the economy.

In mid-October, the Social Security Administration announced that Social Security retirement and disability benefits will jump 8.7% in 2023, bringing the average retirement benefit to an estimated $1,827 per month (see chart below).  The increase, which will be the biggest since 1982, will boost the average recipient’s monthly benefit by approximately $145.  The benefit’s raise was right in line with expectations, given that it is computed from a special version of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) that is widely available.  The COLA process also affected some other aspects of Social Security, although not necessarily by the same 8.7% rate.  For example, the maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax was hiked to $160,200, up 9.0% from the maximum of $147,000 in 2022.

Media commentators often fret that the Social Security COLA could be “eaten up” by rising prices in the following year, or that the benefit boost could provide a windfall if price increases slow down.  In truth, the COLA merely aims to compensate beneficiaries for price increases over the past year.  It’s designed to maintain the purchasing power of a recipient’s benefits given past price changes.  Price changes in the coming year will be reflected in next year’s COLA.

For the overall economy, the inflation-adjusted nature of Social Security benefits is particularly important.  Since so many members of the huge baby boomer generation have now retired, and since more and more people are drawing disability benefits than in the past, Social Security income has become a bigger part of the economy (see chart below).  In 2021, Social Security retirement and disability benefits accounted for 4.8% of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP).  Having such a large portion of the economy subject to automatic cost-of-living adjustments helps ensure that a sizeable part of demand is insulated from the ravages of inflation, albeit with some lag.  In contrast, if Social Security income were fixed, a large part of the population would be seeing their purchasing power drop sharply, which could not only reduce demand but might also spark political instability.  Of course, the additional benefits in 2023 will help buoy demand and keep inflation somewhat higher than it otherwise would be.

Finally, it’s important to remember that an individual’s own Social Security retirement benefit isn’t just determined by inflation.  The formula for computing an individual’s starting benefit is driven, in part, by the person’s wage and salary history.  Higher compensation will boost a retiree’s initial retirement benefit, which will then be adjusted via the COLA process over time.  As average worker productivity increases, average wages and salaries have tended to grow faster than inflation, and as a result, the average Social Security benefit has grown much faster than the CPI.  Over the last two decades, the average Social Security retirement benefit has grown at an average annual rate of 3.2%, while the CPI has risen at an average rate of just 2.3%.  In summary, Social Security benefits provide an important source of growing purchasing power that helps buoy demand and corporate profits in the economy.

View PDF