Weekly Energy Update (September 15, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain under pressure on recession fears.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories rose 2.4 mb compared to a 2.5 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 8.4 mb, meaning the net draw was 6.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.1 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.1 mbpd, while imports declined 1.0 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.6% to 91.5% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  The rise in stockpiles over the past two weeks is contra-seasonal.  As the chart shows, we are nearing the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen in October into November is usually due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build could be exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $106.07.

The SPR has been falling rapidly.

With so many crosscurrents in the oil markets, we are beginning to see some degree of normalization.  The inventory/EUR model suggests oil prices should be around $66 per barrel, so we are seeing about $20 of risk premium in the market.

Natural Gas Update

Now that summer is behind us, it’s time to examine the state of the natural gas market as winter approaches.  Currently, on a rolling 12-month basis, supply is exceeding consumption.

Some of the supply improvement has come from rising net imports.  As the chart below shows, the U.S. was a net importer of natural gas until late 2017 (again, on a rolling 12-month basis).  Since then, the U.S. is a net exporter, hence the negative net import reading. The recent rise in net imports appears to be tied to the Freeport LNG disruption, as LNG exports have fallen.  By next spring, that facility is expected to be at full production, which will reduce American supplies, assuming steady production.

Although supply has been ample, hot summer weather has lifted consumption and puts the U.S. at a modest storage deficit going into autumn.

This model seasonally adjusts storage levels, and the deviation line shows the difference between current and normal storage.

Expectations of rising LNG exports have pushed U.S. natural gas prices well above seasonal norms.  As always, the key to prices in the winter is temperature.  One way to measure the impact of temperature on energy demand is using the concept of the degree day.  The degree day measures the average temperature (high + low/2) compared to 65o with the idea that no climate control is necessary at that temperature.  If above 65o, cooling is required while if below, heating is required.  The temperature deviation is then adjusted by population.  Below are the deviations from normal.

Heating degree day values tend to be higher than cooling because extreme cold is more common than extreme heat.  A temperature of 0o generates a heating degree day where the equivalent would be 130o for a cooling degree day.  Thus, on the above charts, we have scaled the degree days equally.  Casual observation would suggest that winters have become milder as the last extreme cold month, December 2000, was a heating degree day of 200 which has not been exceeded since.  Such readings were far more common in the 1970s.  On the cooling side, there is a clear upward drift in deviations.  It is quite possible that rising greenhouse gas levels are a factor in both warmer winters and hotter summers, but one cannot rule out longer cycle factors, such as sunspots.  What this means for natural gas markets is that colder winters may not be as bullish a factor as it once was, but summers pay a larger role in demand.

Market news:

  • As autumn approaches, natural gas demand tends to decline. Moderate temperatures ease electric demand.  There is always a risk of hurricane disruption in the Gulf of Mexico, but so far this year, the region has been spared from storms.  Hurricane season peaks, on average, by September 10, so there is a growing chance that we will avoid a serious disruption from tropical activity.  Although EU natural gas inventories have increased, it is important to remember that inventory is a supplement to production and imports.  Thus, to ensure ample supplies, barring a mild winter, U.S. LNG flows, which have been critical to the inventory build, will need to continue.  This means that U.S. natural gas prices will remain elevated, unless the U.S. decides to curtail exports.
  • A follow-on effect of high natural gas prices is high fertilizer prices as natural gas is an important feedstock for fertilizers, and tight supplies are hammering the European fertilizer industry. In response, Germany has been increasing chemical imports.
  • One of the surprises over the past 18 months has been the lack of supply response from the oil industry in the face of elevated prices. A key reason is the worry about policy changes leading to stranded assets.  We expect this fear to cap the supply response and keep oil prices high.
  • Although the supply situation for crude oil remains bullish, demand is cyclical and as the odds of a recession rise, the potential for demand destruction is increased as well.
  • One of the key elements of recent legislation was permitting reforms. Environmentalists and other groups have been using the courts to prevent pipeline construction, for example.  The Inflation Reduction Act is designed to reduce the time of objections to construction.  Interestingly enough, it could work the other way.  Although intermittency is a hinderance to using solar and wind power, long-range electricity distribution could, in theory, counter intermittency by allowing solar or wind power to be sent long distances when it might be dark and calm.  This bill should help that process as well, as often proposals for electricity lines face local objections.

 Geopolitical news:

  • It is looking increasingly like a return to the Iran nuclear deal isn’t going to occur. To some extent, it appears that Iran won’t take “yes” for an answer.  The White House has generally accepted Iran’s demands, only to see new ones emerge.  We suspect the Iranian leadership needs an enemy much like the Castros do in Cuba; it is hard to repress one’s population without an ever-present enemy.  We have been skeptical of a deal and despite continued negotiations, it doesn’t look like one is coming.
  • Part of managing sanctions is the use of GPS and vessel transponders. Increasingly, software is spoofing this system, reducing the effectiveness of sanctions. Actual interdiction is still possible but would require a much larger military effort.
  • Lebanon has been in a financial crisis for some time. Things have gotten worse as the central bank has stopped supplying dollars to energy importers, leading to soaring product prices.

 Alternative energy/policy news:

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Ukraine War at Six Months: Some Reflections (September 12, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

On February 24, Russian forces entered Ukraine.  Despite warnings from U.S. intelligence about an invasion, the general consensus was that Moscow was merely threatening to act.  Thus, when Russia invaded, Europe was mostly caught by surprise.  Much of what followed was also unexpected.

As we reach the six-month mark of the conflict, we believe it’s worth taking some time to discuss what has surprised us about the war so far, some of the key risks going forward, and the most likely outcome of the conflict.  We will also touch on the lasting changes this war will cause and one important narrative that will likely lose its power.  We will close with our usual look at market ramifications.

View the full report

Note: There is no accompanying Geopolitical Podcast this week.
Previous episodes are always available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – Storm Warning (September 6, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Throughout this year, there has been much talk (and confusion) about recession.  Officially, the National Bureau of Economic Research is the formal arbiter of recession.  This private group of economists assesses when there is a broad-based decline in economic activity and when that activity recovers.  It then tells us when the recession began and when it ended.  It’s important to note that it can be months after the recovery is underway that the recession is made official.  The NBER isn’t making real-time calls on the business cycle.  Thus, it’s never wrong, but it isn’t timely, either.

In the absence of an official designation, economists (and others) offer their insights as to whether the economy is in recession.  A common rule is that two consecutive quarters of negative real GDP growth signals a recession.  As rules go, it’s not a bad one as every time we have seen this measure met, a recession was usually underway.  But we have also had recessions where this rule was not triggered.  It’s also important to note that the historical data has been revised numerous times, and it is possible that we could see one or both negative quarters reversed.  Since the beginning of the year, a parade of pundits and economists have weighed in on the topic.  Our take has been that conditions are deteriorating, but we aren’t in recession…yet.

However, evidence is rapidly accumulating that a recession is on the horizon.  Since the business cycle is so important to financial markets, we use a wide variety of sources to update us on business conditions, some of which are protected by copyright.  Although we cannot disclose them publicly, we do note they are signaling a downturn.  We also have ones we can share and others we have created ourselves.  The following are a couple of useful charts.

The yield curve is considered the most reliable signal of the business cycle available.  Every inversion, where short-term interest rates rise above long-term interest rates, has preceded a downturn.  However, this statement does not delineate “which” yield curve should be the determining one.  After all, there are numerous permutations of yield curves available.  To resolve this issue, we have created an indicator that uses 10 different yield curves[1] and counts them as they invert.  Over the past 45 years, when seven curves have inverted, a recession always follows.  Currently, all 10 have inverted.  On average, a recession occurs in roughly 15 months with the fastest occurring in just eight months.

The following chart combines two indictors from the New York FRB and the Atlanta FRB.  The former (the red line on the chart) uses the yield curve, while the latter works off GDP (the blue line).  The New York FRB signals a recession with a reading greater than 40, whereas the Atlanta FRB trigger is a reading over 30.  Neither is signaling a downturn at the moment, but both are quite close to a recession signal.

Our best estimate is that a recession will likely be evident by late this year or, more likely, in Q1 2023.

The chart below shows weekly Friday closes for the S&P 500.  The lower line shows the index value compared to the previous peak.  The variance with recessions is notable.  In three of the four deep recessions, declines of around 50% occurred.  In normal recessions, the declines were usually less onerous, although the 1970 and 2001 recessions had rather sizeable pullbacks.  Most of the time, recessions coincide with weaker equity markets, but the degree of weakness varies.

In general, odds favor a normal recession (shown on the above chart with gray bars).  Deep recessions (shown with blue bars) tend to be characterized by unusual situations.  For example, the 1937 recession was caused by premature and excessively tight monetary and fiscal policy when the Fed raised rates and the Roosevelt administration tried to run fiscal surpluses.  The 1973 recession had an oil and geopolitical crisis.  The 1981 recession was characterized by extremely tight monetary policy to end persistent inflation, and the 2007 recession had a financial crisis.  Currently, the financial markets are not expecting any of these outcomes as monetary policy is expected to pivot quickly in response to a decline in growth, inflation is expected to moderate, and no financial or geopolitical crises are anticipated.  Obviously, vigilance is required, because bad recessions tend to be “black swan” sorts of events and the downside would be significant.  Given current geopolitical tensions and disruptions to supply chains, there is certainly a case to be made that the expected recession has the potential to be a deep one.  However, the more likely outcome is a milder downturn for equities.

With a 20% decline already recorded, there has been some discussion that a recession is already discounted.  Although this outcome is possible, we think that the earlier pullback was more of a reflection of the removal of extreme stimulus.  Thus, another “leg” lower when the recession arrives is more likely.  Currently, we think a drop to 3500 would not be unreasonable.

View PDF


[1] Specifically, we use the 10/1, 10/2, 10/3, 10/5, 5/1, 5/2, 5/3, 3/1, 3/2, and 2/1.

Weekly Energy Update (September 1, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

(The Weekly Energy Update will not be published next week.  The report will return on September 15.)

Crude oil prices remain under pressure on fears of a deal with Iran and weakening economic growth.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 3.3 mb compared to a 2.5 mb draw forecast.  The SPR declined 3.1 mb, meaning the net draw was 6.4 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.2 mbpd to 12.0 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.8 mbpd, while imports were unchanged.  Refining activity rose 0.3% to 93.8% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Clearly, this year is deviating from the normal path of commercial inventory levels although the past months’ inventory changes are more consistent with seasonal behavior.  We will approach the usual seasonal trough for inventories in mid-September.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $107.69.

With so many crosscurrents in the oil markets, we are beginning to see some degree of normalization.  The inventory/EUR model suggests oil prices should be around $64 per barrel, so we are seeing about $24 of risk premium in the market.

Market news:

(Source:  Bloomberg)

 Geopolitical news:

 Alternative energy/policy news:

       (Source:  Axios)

    • One factor driving the price of EVs higher is the goal of giving the cars the same range as a gasoline powered vehicle. However, when “fill up” of electricity can be done daily in one’s garage, an EV with a much smaller range might be more practical for everyday use and be cheaper to make.
    • We remain bullish on metals required in the conversion away from fossil fuels because it doesn’t appear that the demand is impossible to fill. At the same time, miners continue to find that local opposition is delaying the building of new mines for the materials required for batteries.

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Agricultural Commodities in the Evolving Geopolitical Blocs (August 29, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

As regular readers of this report will know, Confluence has long predicted that as the United States steps back from its traditional role as global hegemon, the world will become much less globalized and countries will coalesce into at least two rival geopolitical and economic blocs—one led by the U.S. and one led by China.  In our report from May 9, 2022, we described the results of our recent study that aimed to predict which countries will end up in each of the evolving blocs.  Following that, in our report from June 6, 2022, we showed how key mineral commodities are unevenly distributed among the evolving blocs, and what that might mean for geopolitics and investment strategy.

In this report, we dive even deeper into the differences between the evolving blocs by looking closely at the international trade in key agricultural commodities within and between the groups.  We explore what those differences and relationships might mean for geopolitics going forward, especially regarding the rivalry between the U.S. and China.  We conclude with a discussion of the implications for investors.

View the full report

 

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Business Cycle Report (August 25, 2022)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

The Confluence Diffusion Index declined for the third consecutive month. The latest report showed that seven out of 11 benchmarks are in expansion territory. The diffusion index declined from +0.6364 to +0.3939 but remains above the recession signal of +0.2500.

  • Poor economic data weighed on financial market indicators
  • Goods production slowed due to a labor shortage and a decrease in business sentiment.
  • Labor conditions remain strong but show signs of softening.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is in recovery. The diffusion index currently provides about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for recovery. Continue reading for an in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing. At the end of the report, the Glossary of Charts describes each chart and its measures. In addition, a chart title listed in red indicates that the index is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Weekly Energy Update (August 25, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain under pressure on fears of a deal with Iran and weakening economic growth.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 3.3 mb compared to a 2.5 mb draw forecast.  The SPR declined 8.1 mb, meaning the net draw was 11.4 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.2 mbpd to 12.0 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.8 mbpd, while imports were unchanged.  Refining activity rose 0.3% to 93.8% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Clearly, this year is deviating from the normal path of commercial inventory levels although the past two weeks are consistent with seasonal behavior.  We will approach the usual seasonal trough for inventories in mid-September.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $106.51.

With so many crosscurrents in the oil markets, we are beginning to see some degree of normalization.  The inventory/EUR model suggests oil prices should be around $64 per barrel, so we are seeing about $24 of risk premium in the market.

Market news:

 (Source:  Strategas)

 Geopolitical news:

 Alternative energy/policy news:

(Source:  Adam Tooze)

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Inflation Surprise (August 22, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

July inflation came in below expectations.  On a yearly basis, the market expected an overall rate of 8.7%, while the actual reading was 8.5%.  For core CPI, the actual was 5.9% compared to expectations of 6.1%.  Perhaps the most bullish part of the report was the monthly change, where the overall rate was unchanged compared to June and the core rose by 0.3% compared to expectations of a 0.5% rise.  This was the first monthly reading for the overall rate that was zero or less since May 2020.

The reaction of financial markets was swift and bullish.  The S&P 500 rose over 2% on Wednesday, August 10.  The dollar fell, commodities mostly rose, and the short end of the yield curve rallied.  Why the strong reaction?  The July data was the first time in months we have seen a modest rise in inflation and there is hope that we may be past “peak inflation.”  This hope may be fulfilled.  It’s clear the U.S. economy is slowing and there is evidence that supply chains are slowly improving.

Is this optimism justified?  Although the news on inflation was positive, comparing the policy rate relative to CPI and unemployment suggests the FOMC still has a long way to go before achieving a neutral rate.

In the above chart, the independent variable is CPI less the unemployment rate.  The blue line shows the difference from the model’s estimation of what the policy rate should be based on the difference between CPI and unemployment.  Since 1957, the Federal Reserve has never conducted a policy this easy.  Although recent tightening has somewhat narrowed the gap, the FOMC needs to see either a rise in unemployment or a sharp drop in inflation.

Financial markets, in contrast, are anticipating an end to this tightening cycle.  Comparing the implied interest rate from the Eurodollar futures market, two years into the future, suggests the Fed will be easing in the coming months.

Eurodollar futures are already projecting a lower rate over the next two years.  We have not reached the extremes of earlier tightening cycles, but another rate hike of 50 bps will push the deviation into easing territory.

So, why the difference in the two models?  The financial markets are anticipating a change in economic conditions, either falling inflation, rising unemployment, or both.  Why?  In part, it’s because the financial markets are anticipating recessionary conditions.  For example, the yield curve has inverted.   The chart below depicts a study that looks at 10 different Treasury yield curves.  History shows that when more than six of these curves invert, a recession occurs, on average, in 15 months.  In July, eight of the curves inverted.  As an aside, note that it is common for these curves to steepen after the inversion but before the recession develops.  One should not take any comfort in fewer yield curves inverting once we exceed six.

What is unknown is how fast inflation will fall or unemployment will rise.  Our concern is that the financial markets are anticipating a rapid adjustment in the first chart’s indicator that may not be borne out by the data.  If that outcome occurs, the FOMC may tighten more than the market expects and maintain that tightness longer than anticipated.  That outcome would likely be negative for equities, but for now, hopes of falling inflation and an easing response from policymakers have lifted risk assets.  If this positive outcome fails to materialize, a downturn in risk assets is likely.

View PDF

 

Weekly Energy Update (August 18, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain under pressure on fears of a deal with Iran and weakening economic growth.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 7.1 mb compared to a 0.3 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 3.4 mb, meaning the net draw was 10.2 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.2 mbpd.  Exports rose 2.9 mb, while imports were unchanged.  Refining activity dipped 0.8% to 93.5% of capacity.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  Clearly, this year is deviating from the normal path of commercial inventory levels although this week’s outsized decline is consistent with seasonal behavior.  We will approach the usual seasonal trough for inventories in mid-September.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2004.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $104.45.

With so many crosscurrents in the oil markets, we are beginning to see some degree of normalization.  The inventory/EUR model suggests oil prices should be around $64 per barrel, so we are seeing about $24 of risk premium in the market.

Market news:

 Geopolitical news:

 Alternative energy/policy news:

  • With the Inflation Reduction Act now signed into law, a backlash against economists for pushing for a carbon tax is developing. To some extent, this makes sense as using other tools can be more politically popular.  However, from an efficiency standpoint, a carbon tax would still be a superior policy, but obviously, if you can’t get it passed, holding on to that policy to the exclusion of all others makes little sense.  What the bill is really all about is industrial policy.  Government shaping the economy is nothing new but is generally considered legitimate only in cases of clear market failure.  Since a carbon tax was never implemented, it really hasn’t been proven that a market failure exists.
  • There is great excitement in the environmental community over the new measures but one potential concern is the lack of workers to build out the plan.
  • Germany is extending the life of its three remaining nuclear power plants.
  • Any commodity activity disturbs something. Whether its drilling, ranching, farming, or mining, something or someone gets disturbed.  As demand for lithium rises, opposition to mining or brining has emerged.  Although such opposition may be overcome, higher costs are likely to result.
  • As we noted last week, the price of EVs continues to climb. Ford’s (F, $16.18) announcement of substantial price increases on its F-150 “Lightning” EV pickup is the most recent example of this issue.
  • There is growing evidence that the Arctic is warming faster than other parts of the world. The impact is difficult to estimate, but we would expect greater weather variability from this situation.
  • Much of the Midwest, parts of the Southwest, Florida, and the Atlantic coast could become subject to extreme heat events in the coming decades. But the real worry is heat in areas unprepared. The linked map shows the areas of installed air conditioning.
  • Hot weather just isn’t an inconvenience. The drought and warm weather is affecting industrial activity in Germany.  In China, power shortages, caused by hot weather, are causing car and battery plants to suspend operations.  Tech firms have also temporarily shut down.
  • Delays of utility-scale solar projects are steadily rising. These delays may be tied to trade restrictions which have recently been eased.
  • California looks ready to extend the life of the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant that was scheduled for decommissioning.
  • Increasingly, we are seeing an “all of the above” strategy in energy investment. Investing in renewables doesn’t necessarily preclude investing in fossil fuels.
  • Although wood burning is not necessarily environmentally friendly, it appears Germans are considering it in the face of rising fossil fuel prices. Wood pellets are also seeing rising demand in Europe and Asia.
  • This recent report from the Peterson Institute details China’s dominance in rare earths processing.

  View PDF