Weekly Energy Update (October 20, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain in a downtrend as concerns about global growth, especially with China, are weighing on prices.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 1.7 mb compared to a 2.0 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 3.6 mb, meaning the net draw was 5.3 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.1 mbpd to 12.0 mbpd.  Exports rose 1.3 mbpd, while imports fell 0.2 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 0.4% to 89.5% of capacity.  We are approaching the end of refinery maintenance season, which means oil demand should begin to rise soon.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are past the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen from October into November is usually strong due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build has been exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $105.59.

 Market News:

  • In a widely anticipated move, Germany has extended its use of nuclear power plants into next April.
  • Although the actual cuts in production from OPEC+, as we noted last week, won’t be as dire as the headlines suggest, it will still remove some barrels from the world’s oil supply. Unfortunately, the U.S. won’t be able to fill the gap, despite rising production in the Permian.
  • As world trade flows for energy adjust, Europe is moving away from Russia as an energy supplier and working to establish new flows with other nations. The U.S. has become an important supplier and so has Qatar.
    • Currently, Russia is supplying the EU with about 0.6 mbpd of crude oil. Those flows will be cut off on December 5. Not only will the EU stop importing Russian oil, but European insurance firms will no longer be able to underwrite cargo insurance for oil tankers.  Without this insurance, the costs of Russia shipments will soar because some of the key chokepoints won’t allow vessels to pass without this insurance.  It is not obvious, as we note in the above bullet point, where this crude will come from.  This is where the price cap idea comes into play.  If a buyer were willing to pay less than the cap, insurance would be provided.  Of course, the opposition of OPEC+ to the price cap was likely part of the reason to cut production targets.
      • Interestingly enough, Indian refiners, who have been large buyers of Russian crude oil, have suspended purchases until clarity is provided on how the EU sanctions will work.
    • One potential place for the EU to purchase oil would be from the U.S. SPR. However, some members of Congress are pushing for a bill that would ban the export of SPR crude oil.  However, this action would contradict the original SPR measures created by the IEA.  Under IEA rules, in a global emergency, national SPRs could be under the IEA’s jurisdiction.  The goal of the SPR is to discourage hoarding.  If we were to see national governments prevent the export of SPR oil, it is quite likely that global oil prices would soar.  If this bill gains traction, it could cause further disruption to global oil markets.  However, we could also see a situation where SPR oil would simply displace the domestic oil that would have been exported instead.
    • On the topic of the SPR, the Biden administration has announced additional sales, although the announcement did cause some confusion. There is about 15 mb of sales left in the original announcement and 26 mb scheduled for release next year (as part of a budgetary agreement), but the administration is worried about high gasoline prices and has suggested even more could be sold from the reserve.
      • As we noted in earlier reports, the administration seems to be moving the SPR from a strategic reserve to a buffer stock. Buffer stocks have been used in commodity markets before, with the goal being to stabilize prices.  The trick to managing the stock is getting the price right (which begs the question:  why bother?). Set it too low, and the stock becomes exhausted.  Set it too high, and it becomes too large.  When first floated, the administration suggested $80 as a baseline to begin buying oil.  That has now fallen to a range of $67 to $72.  We don’t expect that ANY oil will be bought by this administration as there does not seem to be a price that is politically low enough.
    • The EU has been able to build natural gas inventories, in part, because weak Chinese demand for LNG has allowed for shipments to be diverted. China is signaling this diversion will end, although Chinese demand is expected to remain sluggish.  China is also indicating that it will increase its energy reserves as winter approaches.
    • As the EU attempts to shift its natural gas supply away from Russia and to LNG, it is finding that bottlenecks at terminals are becoming a problem.
    • The EU has generally been unable to craft a functioning price cap for natural gas, so the group is trying to create other measures to bolster available supply.
    • To a great extent, the world’s energy situation is dependent upon the weather.
  • The DOE has issued estimates for this winter’s heating costs, and although natural gas remains the cheapest source of heating, it is poised to have the fastest price increases.
  • Although crude oil inventories appear adequate, the situation in diesel fuels is a growing concern.

(Sources:  DOE, CIM)

  • Diesel fuel is often used for emergency electricity generation, and so, if there are disruptions in electricity this winter, demand could rise into a tight market which will then lift crude oil prices as well.
  • One of the factors that has reduced U.S. crude oil production has been the demand from investors that companies focus on profits and returns to shareholders. This desire is partly driven by the ESG movement and the fears that peak oil demand is near.  If oil and gas are going to be industries in decline, then shareholders will tend to focus on near-term returns.  In terms of net-zero promises, there is evidence to suggest that publicly traded firms are more sensitive to such goals than are private firms.  It appears that such pressures are leading Harold Hamm to take Continental Resources (CLR, $73.68) private.
  • Prime Minister Truss of the U.K. has essentially lost control of her government after proposing a radical economic program that the financial markets fundamentally rejected. The new Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, has reversed nearly her entire fiscal package.  Part of the original package was massive support measures to protect businesses and consumers from higher energy prices.  The original bill was expected to cost £60 billion and its generosity was part of the reason that the financial markets panicked.  However, in walking back the package, Hunt didn’t offer a replacement to protect less affluent households that may be at risk due to higher prices.

Geopolitical News:

  • Mohammed al-Sudani has been appointed to be the new prime minister of Iraq. It is unclear how long he will be in office because he is not popular with the al-Sadr faction.
  • Last week, Saudi Arabia argued that its decision to support a cut in oil production targets was based on market concerns and was not done to support Russia. The U.S. has dismissed the explanation as “spin.”
  • Russia is proposing to make Turkey a hub for natural gas transfers. Although clearly attractive for Turkey, we doubt the EU would see this as a viable alternative.  It might not help Russia either, because if Iran ever normalizes relations, Turkey could be a conduit for Iranian gas as well.
  • Exxon (XOM, $101.23) announced that it has fully withdrawn from Russia after accusing Moscow of “expropriation.” The charge could signal that the company is planning to sue Russia over its exit.
  • Unrest and atrocities continue in Iran. Recently, there was a fire at the infamous Evin prison which houses dissidents and political prisoners.  It appears that the fire was related to recent national protests.  There is a general question about the stability of the regime, and one of the keys to watch for is if the security services turn on the government.  There is little evidence that that most potent Iranian forces have joined the protesters.
  • Iran’s support for Russia’s war effort has triggered a response from the U.S. Washington is planning various penalties against Iran that could target third parties.
  • In France, protests against high fuel prices have evolved into complaints about inflation in general.

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  • One of the more controversial issues in environmentalism is geoengineering. As defined, these are various technologies designed to offset some environmental ill. Trees, for example, can be used to reduce CO2.  However, some measures that would reflect sunlight out into space in order to keep the planet cool could raise fears concerning unexpected side effects such as changing rainfall patterns that could then create distributional or geopolitical concerns.  And so, these worries have tended to dampen investment in such technologies.  However, the White House has announced a five-year research study on geoengineering to investigate its various technologies.
  • CO2 emissions growth looks set to unexpectedly slow this year after declining global growth.
  • Financial analysts argue that there is ample liquidity available for the private sector to fund alternative energy. However, the bulk of this investing power is in the energy and mining sector, which may not be keen on investments that will harm its basic industry.
  • At the CPC conference, General Secretary Xi said China would not “rush” its clean energy transformation, likely meaning that fossil-fuels consumption will remain elevated.
  • Although there is a wide debate over climate change and its effects, one area where the impact is quantified is in insurance. The insurance industry and the Treasury are analyzing climate risk, which may result in some areas paying much more for coverage.  Insurers are pushing back against the government’s investigation.
  • The SEC is pressing publicly traded firms for information on climate issues. Lobbying efforts to shape regulation are increasing.
  • Russian drones have attacked an important sunflower oil terminal in Ukraine. Although this attack will obviously affect the world supply of edible oils, it may also have an impact on biofuels.
  • Although starting from a low base, carbon capture project activity is increasing rapidly.
  • We are also starting to see increased investment in green hydrogen projects.

  View PDF

Keller Quarterly (October 2022)

Letter to Investors | PDF

Summer has concluded and we’re starting to feel the chill of winter.  For reasons that I’ve never fully understood, the stock market “feels a chill” this time of year also.  More often than not, September produces a negative return for U.S. stocks, and this September was no exception.  For some reason, investors come back from their vacations and decide to sell stocks.  October is only a little better.  The market’s seasonality is not as regular as a farmer’s planting and harvest cycles, but it usually returns annually.  Savvy investors have known for generations that this time of year presents bargain prices that other seasons often do not.

Of course, this season’s downtrend wasn’t just due to turning the page on the calendar, but to expectations that the Fed will induce a recession.  We talked at length about this in our July letter. The Fed has few tools to fight inflation and most of them risk a recession.  To make matters worse, the current Fed previously guessed that inflation wouldn’t be too bad or long-lasting (“transitory,” they called it), so they left rates unusually low (near zero) for a very long time.  By the time they discovered they were wrong, inflation was raging and they felt it necessary to raise rates dramatically and quickly, further adding to the risk of a recession.

Last quarter we indicated that we thought it unlikely the Fed could rein in inflation without causing a recession.  Three months later, it now seems that a recession is likely.  Recessions have been rare over the last three decades, the result of very low inflation that allowed our central bankers to keep rates low.  But we believe the rise of persistent inflation will make recessions more frequent.  A recession two or three times a decade is actually much more common in financial history than the once-a-decade recession occurrence we’ve recently seen.  Investors who are not accustomed to this frequency regard recessions as cataclysmic as earthquakes or alien landings, but this is not the case.  We tend to look at recessions the same way farmers look at spring thunderstorms: nasty, but not unexpected.  They’re entirely manageable if you prepare for them.

Fear grips many investors as a recession nears, but, as we pointed out in July, strong companies often get stronger during a recession.  Yes, their profits may decline for a few quarters, but their competitors are often hurt more during a recession, leaving the stronger company in a better competitive position.  Additionally, the lower stock prices that cyclical bear markets produce mean that such periods are often the best times for long-term investors to be buyers of high-quality stocks.

Longer term, we do not believe inflation is temporary.  We believe the strong disinflationary trends of globalization and deregulation have peaked during the last decade.  We expect that globalization will continue to recede and that regulation of businesses will increase.  Inflation creates special problems for investors.  It is a silent financial thief, reducing the value of the cash an investor expects to receive in future years.  Our portfolios are structured for long-term inflation because we believe that, even if we have a recession that reduces inflation, it will return quickly in the recovery thereafter.  Inflation is a headwind, yes, but many companies are in a better position to deal with it than others, and these are the centerpieces of our equity portfolios.

I’ve received more questions about bonds this year than I have in decades.  Specifically, investors are surprised that bond prices have dropped at the same time as stocks.  In most recessions over the last 30 years, quality bonds rallied when a recession approached.  It’s different this time and for a single reason: rising inflation.  With their fixed coupons, long-term bonds are especially vulnerable to the effects of inflation.  Prior to the peak in long-term rates back in 1981, this sort of bond market behavior was common.

It’s important for bond investors to keep their maturities shorter than they would have in recent years in order to protect principal.  That’s not only what we recommend, it’s what we are doing in our fixed income portfolios.  For several years, we have been using target date fixed income ETFs in short- to intermediate-term “ladders” for our asset allocation, balanced, and fixed income portfolios.  Bond investors can structure their portfolios to take advantage of future inflation by rolling those laddered maturities into what we believe will be higher coupons in the future.

Whether you are invested in one of our equity strategies, asset allocation strategies, or fixed income/balanced strategies, you can be sure that we are not lackadaisical about inflation.  We regard it as a major threat to real returns and overcoming it as our overriding concern.

We appreciate your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – An Update on Bonds (October 17, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Our starting point for examining bond yields begins with our yield model.  The key components are fed funds, the 15-year average of CPI (which is a proxy for inflation expectations), the five-year rolling standard deviation of CPI (a measure of inflation volatility), German Bund yields, oil prices, the yen/dollar exchange rate, and the fiscal balance scaled to GDP.  Based on this model, the current yield on the 10-year T-note is well below fair value.

Although yields have increased, as the deviation line shows, they are still well below the model estimate.  Interestingly enough, it is not unusual for the deviation to be below the model estimate as the economy approaches recession.  This condition reflects the flattening and inversion of the yield curve.  As monetary policy is tightened, the markets begin to expect slower economic growth which in turn depresses long-duration yields.  However, the current deviation is wider than normal, which suggests that a backup in yields is still likely.  A yield of 4.10% would be in line with the lower standard error range.

Long-duration Treasury yields may be on track for consistently higher yields in the future.  Since peaking in the early 1980s, the 10-year T-note has been steadily declining.  Persistently low inflation has supported that downtrend.  However, market action suggests that we may be at the turn in yields which, if true, could create a secular bear market in bonds.

Since the late 1980s, the downtrend has been steady and mostly captured by a trendline flanked by a plus/minus of one standard error from a regression model.  That downtrend was definitively broken in March.

Why is the trend changing?  Most likely because investors fear that the inflation regime which fostered the downtrend is coming to an end.  Increasing political tensions, a breakdown in the globalization regime, and uncertainty about policymakers’ willingness to maintain low inflation are all conspiring to affect inflation expectations.  We would expect the yield to decline in a recession.  If the trend has truly changed, the low will likely be set above the upper line.  If that occurs, a long period of steadily rising yields becomes more likely.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (October 14, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain in a downtrend.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories rose 9.9 mb compared to a 1.0 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 7.7 mb, meaning the net build was 2.2 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 11.9 mbpd.  Exports fell 1.7 mbpd, while imports rose 0.1 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 1.4% to 89.9% of capacity.  We are clearly in the period of autumn refinery maintenance, so falling refining activity should be expected for the next few weeks.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are past the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen in October into November is usually due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build has been exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $105.85.

The SPR: As we discussed earlier, the SPR has become something of a buffer stock; thus, it makes sense when analyzing prices to consider U.S. inventories as the SPR and commercial stocks combined, as we do above.  Another element of the reserve is its composition.  Oil is broadly described as heavy or light (the measure of viscosity) and sweet or sour (the level of sulfur).  U.S. refineries have made investments over the years to favor sour crudes; the idea was that as fields aged, more oil would be of that variety.[1]  And so, when officials filled the SPR, sour crudes were favored, and until recently, the mix was 60/40 in favor of sour.  However, in the recent withdrawals, sour crudes were drawn much faster than sweet crudes.  Over the past year, 190 mb of crude oil has been pulled from the SPR: 156 mb have been sour, and 44 mb have been sweet.  At present, there are only 213 mb of sour crude remaining in the SPR, meaning its effectiveness to provide supply security has been compromised.

Unsavory Tradeoffs:  The OPEC+ decision to cut allocations by 2.0 mbpd has broad ramifications.  The cartel has argued that falling demand is behind the output decision.  This is what we see so far:

The bottom line is that the commodity business can require compromises.  At times, governments can decide that they will bear the cost of higher commodity prices because a producer is so far beyond the pale that cooperation is impossible.  For example, the U.S. has avoided buying Iranian oil since 1979, but in other cases, governments will turn a “blind eye” to such behavior to secure resources.  The Ukraine War has exacerbated these difficult decisions.  The EU delayed applying embargos on Russian oil and gas until early 2023, for example.  We expect more difficult issues to develop in the future.

Market News:

  • The EU held talks about setting a natural gas price for the group. The idea is that they agree on a price and if the market price is above that level, the cost would be subsidized.  At the time of this writing, the meeting did not succeed in setting a policy.
  • A leak in the Durzhba pipeline was discovered in Poland. Although there are fears of sabotage, first accounts seem to indicate that it was an accident.  The event has reduced oil flows to Germany.
  • As the EU ramps up LNG purchases, emerging market (EM) nations are struggling to acquire supplies and the buying will also likely push U.S. prices up as LNG production ramps up.
  • The U.K. has announced a new round of drilling licenses for the North Sea. The U.K. government stopped issuing licenses in 2019, promising a comprehensive environmental review.  High prices have prompted the decision to start issuing licenses again.
  • In an ominous sign, so-called “ducs,” or drilled but uncompleted wells, inventory is shrinking. This development suggests that wells are being completed faster than new wells are being drilled.  Without rapid investment soon, U.S. production will likely begin to contract.
  • In the late 1970s, President Carter gave his famous “malaise” speech, commenting on energy while wearing a cardigan. The message was that sacrifice would be required in the face of high energy prices.[2]  French President Macron is offering a similar message today.  Partly in response, Paris, the “City of Lights” is darker.
  • Another element of the 1970s was price caps on energy products. These caps were blamed for the infamous gas lines at filling stations.  Price fixing is one response to scarcity, but if rationing isn’t included, it usually leads to shortages.  Why?  There is a political incentive to set the price below the market-clearing price.  If the market price were acceptable, no one would have an interest in fixing the price.  During WWII, price fixing coupled with rationing worked reasonably well.  However, the incidence of this policy fell on higher income households who had the money to buy more food but were restricted by rationing.  As the war ended, so did rationing, and prices were allowed to fluctuate.  Note that as rations were lifted, food prices jumped after the war.
  • China’s LNG demand will remain elevated in the coming years. As we noted above, without increasing investment, the globalization of natural gas will tend to move U.S. domestic prices to overseas prices, meaning Americans will pay more for heating, fertilizers, and electricity.
  • Despite these experiences, price caps are being reconsidered as a way to make it through the winter. Several different ideas are being considered, but without proper care, the end result is likely shortages.

Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:


[1] This decision turned out to be a mistake.  Crude oil from fracking turned out to be sweet, meaning that it wasn’t ideal for U.S. refiners.  Thus, sweet crude is usually exported, forcing the U.S. to import sour crudes.  In broad terms, this means the U.S. is oil independent, but in practical terms, it’s not, due to the sweet/sour imbalance.

[2] It wasn’t a popular speech.

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Europe’s New, Right-Wing Leaders (October 10, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Late summer can often be a quiet time for global affairs, economics, and the financial markets.  Especially in Europe, people are off on their long summer holidays, making it difficult to find a “quorum” for political events and business meetings while sapping liquidity in the investment markets.  This year, however, August and September were marked by groundbreaking political changes that could have big consequences for investors going forward.  This report takes a look at the new, right-wing leaders in the United Kingdom and Italy.  As always, we will wrap up with a review of the implications for investors.

View the full report

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Weekly Energy Update (October 6, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain in a downtrend.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 1.4 mb compared to a 2.1 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 6.2 mb, meaning the net draw was 7.6 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.0 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.1 mbpd, while imports fell 0.5 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.7% to 91.3% of capacity.  We are in the usual period for autumn refinery maintenance, so falling refining activity should be expected for the next few weeks.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are at the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen in October into November is usually due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build could be exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $108.71.

Market News:

(Source:  EIA)

Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  • There is increasing interest in placing nuclear power plants on the sites of existing and closed coal utilities. Since the sites are already brownfields, there is less likely to be opposition and the coal plants are already connected to the grid.
  • High prices for lithium are spurring interest in other materials for batteries. The search for alternatives is a risk to lithium investment.  One battery design that might work for stationary requirements (like utilities) would be a flow battery.
  • The world’s largest CO2 removal plant will begin operations soon in Wyoming.
  • Energy storage other than batteries is another area of interest. Stored hydropower, where water is pumped to an elevated reservoir during periods of lower power demand to flow down through turbines during periods of high power demand, has been around for years.  China is working on a project that uses compressed air to accomplish the same outcome.
  • One of the great ironies of the clean energy industry is that it relies heavily on rare earths, which require large amounts of energy to mine and refine. So, as oil and gas prices have increased, production of these metals is starting to decline.

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Gold Paradox (October 3, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Gold prices have been weak in recent months despite high levels of inflation.  Gold is often considered an inflation hedge, and so the lack of strength is puzzling to many investors.  In this report, we will take a look at gold and try to explain why prices have failed to rally in the face of rising inflation.

We start our analysis of gold by using our basic price model, which uses the balance sheets of the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, the EUR/USD exchange rate, the real two-year Treasury yield, and the fiscal deficit.  We also have a variation that adds bitcoin.

Spot gold prices have underperformed the model for the past couple of years, but in the most recent update, the standard model’s fair-value estimation has declined to near current prices.  That would suggest the market was anticipating a weakening of positive fundamental factors.  As the Federal Reserve contracts its balance sheet and real two-year yields rise, along with dollar strength, we would expect additional weakness.

But, what about the inflation issue?  Isn’t gold an inflation hedge?  Not really.  It’s more of a currency debasement hedge.  In classical economics, inflation and currency debasement were essentially the same thing.  The classical model assumed full employment of resources (due to flexible prices and wages) and stable velocity; thus, the only source of inflation was excessive money supply.  However, the model was flawed.  Not only do prices and wages lack flexibility, which means that unemployed resources can exist, but velocity is far from stable.  Thus, even with a stable money supply, inflation can occur if velocity rises or if supply shortages develop.

Instead, the better way to think about gold is that it is money independent of government and debt.  Most currency we use is backed by a liability; for example, the “money” used by deploying a credit card is money created by a bank liability.  Determining currency debasement is difficult.  If the money supply is rising due to increased bank lending, for instance, is that debasement or a reflection of investment demand?  Accordingly, the markets tend to rely on exchange rates to ascertain debasement.  This isn’t a perfect solution,[1] but it has the benefit of clarity.  The impact of the dollar on gold is apparent in the below chart.

In this chart, we deflate gold prices by CPI and index that level to January 1970.  We then compare that to the JP Morgan dollar index, which adjusts the dollar based on relative trade and inflation.  Periods of strength in gold tend to coincide with periods of dollar weakness.  Note that in the 1970s, when gold developed its inflation-hedge reputation, the dollar weakened notably.  The rising dollar in the Volcker years led to weaker gold prices as did the period of dollar strength from 1998 into 2022.  In fact, one could argue that gold is holding up rather well in the face of dollar strength; during previous periods, when the dollar index was this elevated, gold traded much lower.  The reason gold is doing relatively well is likely due to factors discussed in the first chart.  Expanded central bank balance sheets and negative real interest rates have supported gold, but a bull market in gold will likely require dollar weakness.


[1] If all central banks are running expansive monetary policies, then exchange rates reflect relative, as opposed to absolute, debasement.

View PDF

Business Cycle Report (September 29, 2022)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

The Confluence Diffusion Index fell into contraction territory for the first time since 2020. The latest report showed that five out of 11 benchmarks are in contraction territory. The diffusion index declined from +0.3939 to +0.2121, slightly below the recession signal of +0.2500.

  • Tighter financial conditions weighed on bond and equity prices
  • Goods production slowed but remains supportive of the economy
  • Firms’ demand for available workers continues to outpace the number of jobseekers

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is in recovery. The diffusion index currently provides about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for recovery. Continue reading for an in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing. At the end of the report, the Glossary of Charts describes each chart and its measures. In addition, a chart title listed in red indicates that the index is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Weekly Energy Update (September 29, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain under pressure due to recession fears.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 0.2 mb compared to a 2.0 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 4.6 mb, meaning the net draw was 4.8 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 12.0 mbpd.  Exports rose 1.1 mbpd, while imports fell 0.5 mbpd.  Refining activity plunged 3.0% to 90.6% of capacity.  We are in the usual period for autumn refinery maintenance, so falling refining activity should be expected for the next few weeks.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are at the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen in October into November is usually due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build could be exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $107.52.

Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

  Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF