Keller Quarterly (October 2022)

Letter to Investors | PDF

Summer has concluded and we’re starting to feel the chill of winter.  For reasons that I’ve never fully understood, the stock market “feels a chill” this time of year also.  More often than not, September produces a negative return for U.S. stocks, and this September was no exception.  For some reason, investors come back from their vacations and decide to sell stocks.  October is only a little better.  The market’s seasonality is not as regular as a farmer’s planting and harvest cycles, but it usually returns annually.  Savvy investors have known for generations that this time of year presents bargain prices that other seasons often do not.

Of course, this season’s downtrend wasn’t just due to turning the page on the calendar, but to expectations that the Fed will induce a recession.  We talked at length about this in our July letter. The Fed has few tools to fight inflation and most of them risk a recession.  To make matters worse, the current Fed previously guessed that inflation wouldn’t be too bad or long-lasting (“transitory,” they called it), so they left rates unusually low (near zero) for a very long time.  By the time they discovered they were wrong, inflation was raging and they felt it necessary to raise rates dramatically and quickly, further adding to the risk of a recession.

Last quarter we indicated that we thought it unlikely the Fed could rein in inflation without causing a recession.  Three months later, it now seems that a recession is likely.  Recessions have been rare over the last three decades, the result of very low inflation that allowed our central bankers to keep rates low.  But we believe the rise of persistent inflation will make recessions more frequent.  A recession two or three times a decade is actually much more common in financial history than the once-a-decade recession occurrence we’ve recently seen.  Investors who are not accustomed to this frequency regard recessions as cataclysmic as earthquakes or alien landings, but this is not the case.  We tend to look at recessions the same way farmers look at spring thunderstorms: nasty, but not unexpected.  They’re entirely manageable if you prepare for them.

Fear grips many investors as a recession nears, but, as we pointed out in July, strong companies often get stronger during a recession.  Yes, their profits may decline for a few quarters, but their competitors are often hurt more during a recession, leaving the stronger company in a better competitive position.  Additionally, the lower stock prices that cyclical bear markets produce mean that such periods are often the best times for long-term investors to be buyers of high-quality stocks.

Longer term, we do not believe inflation is temporary.  We believe the strong disinflationary trends of globalization and deregulation have peaked during the last decade.  We expect that globalization will continue to recede and that regulation of businesses will increase.  Inflation creates special problems for investors.  It is a silent financial thief, reducing the value of the cash an investor expects to receive in future years.  Our portfolios are structured for long-term inflation because we believe that, even if we have a recession that reduces inflation, it will return quickly in the recovery thereafter.  Inflation is a headwind, yes, but many companies are in a better position to deal with it than others, and these are the centerpieces of our equity portfolios.

I’ve received more questions about bonds this year than I have in decades.  Specifically, investors are surprised that bond prices have dropped at the same time as stocks.  In most recessions over the last 30 years, quality bonds rallied when a recession approached.  It’s different this time and for a single reason: rising inflation.  With their fixed coupons, long-term bonds are especially vulnerable to the effects of inflation.  Prior to the peak in long-term rates back in 1981, this sort of bond market behavior was common.

It’s important for bond investors to keep their maturities shorter than they would have in recent years in order to protect principal.  That’s not only what we recommend, it’s what we are doing in our fixed income portfolios.  For several years, we have been using target date fixed income ETFs in short- to intermediate-term “ladders” for our asset allocation, balanced, and fixed income portfolios.  Bond investors can structure their portfolios to take advantage of future inflation by rolling those laddered maturities into what we believe will be higher coupons in the future.

Whether you are invested in one of our equity strategies, asset allocation strategies, or fixed income/balanced strategies, you can be sure that we are not lackadaisical about inflation.  We regard it as a major threat to real returns and overcoming it as our overriding concern.

We appreciate your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – An Update on Bonds (October 17, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Our starting point for examining bond yields begins with our yield model.  The key components are fed funds, the 15-year average of CPI (which is a proxy for inflation expectations), the five-year rolling standard deviation of CPI (a measure of inflation volatility), German Bund yields, oil prices, the yen/dollar exchange rate, and the fiscal balance scaled to GDP.  Based on this model, the current yield on the 10-year T-note is well below fair value.

Although yields have increased, as the deviation line shows, they are still well below the model estimate.  Interestingly enough, it is not unusual for the deviation to be below the model estimate as the economy approaches recession.  This condition reflects the flattening and inversion of the yield curve.  As monetary policy is tightened, the markets begin to expect slower economic growth which in turn depresses long-duration yields.  However, the current deviation is wider than normal, which suggests that a backup in yields is still likely.  A yield of 4.10% would be in line with the lower standard error range.

Long-duration Treasury yields may be on track for consistently higher yields in the future.  Since peaking in the early 1980s, the 10-year T-note has been steadily declining.  Persistently low inflation has supported that downtrend.  However, market action suggests that we may be at the turn in yields which, if true, could create a secular bear market in bonds.

Since the late 1980s, the downtrend has been steady and mostly captured by a trendline flanked by a plus/minus of one standard error from a regression model.  That downtrend was definitively broken in March.

Why is the trend changing?  Most likely because investors fear that the inflation regime which fostered the downtrend is coming to an end.  Increasing political tensions, a breakdown in the globalization regime, and uncertainty about policymakers’ willingness to maintain low inflation are all conspiring to affect inflation expectations.  We would expect the yield to decline in a recession.  If the trend has truly changed, the low will likely be set above the upper line.  If that occurs, a long period of steadily rising yields becomes more likely.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (October 14, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain in a downtrend.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories rose 9.9 mb compared to a 1.0 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 7.7 mb, meaning the net build was 2.2 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 11.9 mbpd.  Exports fell 1.7 mbpd, while imports rose 0.1 mbpd.  Refining activity fell 1.4% to 89.9% of capacity.  We are clearly in the period of autumn refinery maintenance, so falling refining activity should be expected for the next few weeks.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are past the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen in October into November is usually due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build has been exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $105.85.

The SPR: As we discussed earlier, the SPR has become something of a buffer stock; thus, it makes sense when analyzing prices to consider U.S. inventories as the SPR and commercial stocks combined, as we do above.  Another element of the reserve is its composition.  Oil is broadly described as heavy or light (the measure of viscosity) and sweet or sour (the level of sulfur).  U.S. refineries have made investments over the years to favor sour crudes; the idea was that as fields aged, more oil would be of that variety.[1]  And so, when officials filled the SPR, sour crudes were favored, and until recently, the mix was 60/40 in favor of sour.  However, in the recent withdrawals, sour crudes were drawn much faster than sweet crudes.  Over the past year, 190 mb of crude oil has been pulled from the SPR: 156 mb have been sour, and 44 mb have been sweet.  At present, there are only 213 mb of sour crude remaining in the SPR, meaning its effectiveness to provide supply security has been compromised.

Unsavory Tradeoffs:  The OPEC+ decision to cut allocations by 2.0 mbpd has broad ramifications.  The cartel has argued that falling demand is behind the output decision.  This is what we see so far:

The bottom line is that the commodity business can require compromises.  At times, governments can decide that they will bear the cost of higher commodity prices because a producer is so far beyond the pale that cooperation is impossible.  For example, the U.S. has avoided buying Iranian oil since 1979, but in other cases, governments will turn a “blind eye” to such behavior to secure resources.  The Ukraine War has exacerbated these difficult decisions.  The EU delayed applying embargos on Russian oil and gas until early 2023, for example.  We expect more difficult issues to develop in the future.

Market News:

  • The EU held talks about setting a natural gas price for the group. The idea is that they agree on a price and if the market price is above that level, the cost would be subsidized.  At the time of this writing, the meeting did not succeed in setting a policy.
  • A leak in the Durzhba pipeline was discovered in Poland. Although there are fears of sabotage, first accounts seem to indicate that it was an accident.  The event has reduced oil flows to Germany.
  • As the EU ramps up LNG purchases, emerging market (EM) nations are struggling to acquire supplies and the buying will also likely push U.S. prices up as LNG production ramps up.
  • The U.K. has announced a new round of drilling licenses for the North Sea. The U.K. government stopped issuing licenses in 2019, promising a comprehensive environmental review.  High prices have prompted the decision to start issuing licenses again.
  • In an ominous sign, so-called “ducs,” or drilled but uncompleted wells, inventory is shrinking. This development suggests that wells are being completed faster than new wells are being drilled.  Without rapid investment soon, U.S. production will likely begin to contract.
  • In the late 1970s, President Carter gave his famous “malaise” speech, commenting on energy while wearing a cardigan. The message was that sacrifice would be required in the face of high energy prices.[2]  French President Macron is offering a similar message today.  Partly in response, Paris, the “City of Lights” is darker.
  • Another element of the 1970s was price caps on energy products. These caps were blamed for the infamous gas lines at filling stations.  Price fixing is one response to scarcity, but if rationing isn’t included, it usually leads to shortages.  Why?  There is a political incentive to set the price below the market-clearing price.  If the market price were acceptable, no one would have an interest in fixing the price.  During WWII, price fixing coupled with rationing worked reasonably well.  However, the incidence of this policy fell on higher income households who had the money to buy more food but were restricted by rationing.  As the war ended, so did rationing, and prices were allowed to fluctuate.  Note that as rations were lifted, food prices jumped after the war.
  • China’s LNG demand will remain elevated in the coming years. As we noted above, without increasing investment, the globalization of natural gas will tend to move U.S. domestic prices to overseas prices, meaning Americans will pay more for heating, fertilizers, and electricity.
  • Despite these experiences, price caps are being reconsidered as a way to make it through the winter. Several different ideas are being considered, but without proper care, the end result is likely shortages.

Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:


[1] This decision turned out to be a mistake.  Crude oil from fracking turned out to be sweet, meaning that it wasn’t ideal for U.S. refiners.  Thus, sweet crude is usually exported, forcing the U.S. to import sour crudes.  In broad terms, this means the U.S. is oil independent, but in practical terms, it’s not, due to the sweet/sour imbalance.

[2] It wasn’t a popular speech.

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Europe’s New, Right-Wing Leaders (October 10, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Late summer can often be a quiet time for global affairs, economics, and the financial markets.  Especially in Europe, people are off on their long summer holidays, making it difficult to find a “quorum” for political events and business meetings while sapping liquidity in the investment markets.  This year, however, August and September were marked by groundbreaking political changes that could have big consequences for investors going forward.  This report takes a look at the new, right-wing leaders in the United Kingdom and Italy.  As always, we will wrap up with a review of the implications for investors.

View the full report

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Weekly Energy Update (October 6, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain in a downtrend.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 1.4 mb compared to a 2.1 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 6.2 mb, meaning the net draw was 7.6 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was steady at 12.0 mbpd.  Exports fell 0.1 mbpd, while imports fell 0.5 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 0.7% to 91.3% of capacity.  We are in the usual period for autumn refinery maintenance, so falling refining activity should be expected for the next few weeks.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are at the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen in October into November is usually due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build could be exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $108.71.

Market News:

(Source:  EIA)

Geopolitical News:

 Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  • There is increasing interest in placing nuclear power plants on the sites of existing and closed coal utilities. Since the sites are already brownfields, there is less likely to be opposition and the coal plants are already connected to the grid.
  • High prices for lithium are spurring interest in other materials for batteries. The search for alternatives is a risk to lithium investment.  One battery design that might work for stationary requirements (like utilities) would be a flow battery.
  • The world’s largest CO2 removal plant will begin operations soon in Wyoming.
  • Energy storage other than batteries is another area of interest. Stored hydropower, where water is pumped to an elevated reservoir during periods of lower power demand to flow down through turbines during periods of high power demand, has been around for years.  China is working on a project that uses compressed air to accomplish the same outcome.
  • One of the great ironies of the clean energy industry is that it relies heavily on rare earths, which require large amounts of energy to mine and refine. So, as oil and gas prices have increased, production of these metals is starting to decline.

  View PDF

Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – The Gold Paradox (October 3, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

Gold prices have been weak in recent months despite high levels of inflation.  Gold is often considered an inflation hedge, and so the lack of strength is puzzling to many investors.  In this report, we will take a look at gold and try to explain why prices have failed to rally in the face of rising inflation.

We start our analysis of gold by using our basic price model, which uses the balance sheets of the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, the EUR/USD exchange rate, the real two-year Treasury yield, and the fiscal deficit.  We also have a variation that adds bitcoin.

Spot gold prices have underperformed the model for the past couple of years, but in the most recent update, the standard model’s fair-value estimation has declined to near current prices.  That would suggest the market was anticipating a weakening of positive fundamental factors.  As the Federal Reserve contracts its balance sheet and real two-year yields rise, along with dollar strength, we would expect additional weakness.

But, what about the inflation issue?  Isn’t gold an inflation hedge?  Not really.  It’s more of a currency debasement hedge.  In classical economics, inflation and currency debasement were essentially the same thing.  The classical model assumed full employment of resources (due to flexible prices and wages) and stable velocity; thus, the only source of inflation was excessive money supply.  However, the model was flawed.  Not only do prices and wages lack flexibility, which means that unemployed resources can exist, but velocity is far from stable.  Thus, even with a stable money supply, inflation can occur if velocity rises or if supply shortages develop.

Instead, the better way to think about gold is that it is money independent of government and debt.  Most currency we use is backed by a liability; for example, the “money” used by deploying a credit card is money created by a bank liability.  Determining currency debasement is difficult.  If the money supply is rising due to increased bank lending, for instance, is that debasement or a reflection of investment demand?  Accordingly, the markets tend to rely on exchange rates to ascertain debasement.  This isn’t a perfect solution,[1] but it has the benefit of clarity.  The impact of the dollar on gold is apparent in the below chart.

In this chart, we deflate gold prices by CPI and index that level to January 1970.  We then compare that to the JP Morgan dollar index, which adjusts the dollar based on relative trade and inflation.  Periods of strength in gold tend to coincide with periods of dollar weakness.  Note that in the 1970s, when gold developed its inflation-hedge reputation, the dollar weakened notably.  The rising dollar in the Volcker years led to weaker gold prices as did the period of dollar strength from 1998 into 2022.  In fact, one could argue that gold is holding up rather well in the face of dollar strength; during previous periods, when the dollar index was this elevated, gold traded much lower.  The reason gold is doing relatively well is likely due to factors discussed in the first chart.  Expanded central bank balance sheets and negative real interest rates have supported gold, but a bull market in gold will likely require dollar weakness.


[1] If all central banks are running expansive monetary policies, then exchange rates reflect relative, as opposed to absolute, debasement.

View PDF

Business Cycle Report (September 29, 2022)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

The Confluence Diffusion Index fell into contraction territory for the first time since 2020. The latest report showed that five out of 11 benchmarks are in contraction territory. The diffusion index declined from +0.3939 to +0.2121, slightly below the recession signal of +0.2500.

  • Tighter financial conditions weighed on bond and equity prices
  • Goods production slowed but remains supportive of the economy
  • Firms’ demand for available workers continues to outpace the number of jobseekers

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is in recovery. The diffusion index currently provides about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for recovery. Continue reading for an in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing. At the end of the report, the Glossary of Charts describes each chart and its measures. In addition, a chart title listed in red indicates that the index is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Weekly Energy Update (September 29, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Crude oil prices remain under pressure due to recession fears.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories fell 0.2 mb compared to a 2.0 mb build forecast.  The SPR declined 4.6 mb, meaning the net draw was 4.8 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production fell 0.1 mbpd to 12.0 mbpd.  Exports rose 1.1 mbpd, while imports fell 0.5 mbpd.  Refining activity plunged 3.0% to 90.6% of capacity.  We are in the usual period for autumn refinery maintenance, so falling refining activity should be expected for the next few weeks.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

The above chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  As the chart shows, we are at the seasonal trough in inventories.  The build seen in October into November is usually due to refinery maintenance.  With the SPR withdrawals continuing, the seasonal build could be exaggerated this year.

Since the SPR is being used, to some extent, as a buffer stock, we have constructed oil inventory charts incorporating both the SPR and commercial inventories.

Total stockpiles peaked in 2017 and are now at levels last seen in 2003.  Using total stocks since 2015, fair value is $107.52.

Market News:

 Geopolitical News:

  Alternative Energy/Policy News:

  View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Updates on Russia-Ukraine and Armenia-Azerbaijan (September 26, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Bill O’Grady | PDF

September has been full of dramatic developments in Russia’s war against Ukraine and in the broader geopolitics of the region.  Indeed, now that we’re into autumn and Russia and Ukraine are both trying to improve their positions ahead of winter, it may be a good time to update the recent developments in the war and how they’re playing out more broadly.  Renewed fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan in mid-September offers a good example of the broader implications of the war, so we especially want to touch on that.  As always, we wrap up this report with a discussion of the implications for investors.

View the full report

 

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google