Daily Comment (February 10, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with news that the White House this week will launch a major rollback of environmental regulations. We next review several other international and US developments that could affect the financial markets today, including an announcement of performance reviews for US defense contractors and growing investability issues for the Indonesian stock market.

US Environmental Policy: In an exclusive report this morning, the Wall Street Journal says the Trump administration this week will repeal the 2009 scientific finding that serves as the legal basis for federal greenhouse-gas regulation. The move will reverse the “endangerment finding” under which the federal government has limited emissions from power plants and autos. It will also end the regulatory requirements to measure, report, and certify compliance with emission standards.

  • According to EPA chief Lee Zeldin, “This amounts to the largest act of deregulation in the history of the United States.”
  • Whether or not that’s true, we would agree that the planned change, if implemented as reported, would be a significant deregulation with potentially far-reaching economic impacts.
  • Given the US’s large political constituency favoring policies to address climate change, especially among younger voters, the move could also increase polarization and affect the midterm Congressional elections in November.

US Housing Policy: Lawmakers are reportedly refusing to include the administration’s proposed ban on institutional investors buying single-family homes in either of the two major housing bills currently making their way through Congress. The ban is generally opposed by free-market advocates, the financial industry, and the housing industry. Therefore, lawmakers reportedly may fear that tacking it onto either of the housing bills would scuttle the legislation that they have spent months developing. For now, financial and housing interests appear to be having their way.

US Defense Industry: Late last week, the Pentagon reportedly sent a letter to major defense contractors warning them to brace for sweeping performance reviews to identify companies that aren’t fulfilling their contracts. The reviews apparently are to implement President Trump’s January order threatening to cancel the contracts of underperforming defense companies that buy back their shares or pay dividends.

  • The administration’s approach to the defense industry has been complex. Shortly after President Trump’s second inauguration last year, for example, he ordered significant cuts to the defense budget. The new order demonstrates his intent to squeeze efficiencies, improvement in quality, and faster turnaround times for weapons purchases — all at the expense of defense industry investors, if necessary. On the other hand, the president has recently called for a massive 50% increase in US military spending.
  • As our longtime readers know, we have had a positive view of global defense stocks for the last few years. Because of the administration’s tough stance toward the defense industry, we have been more positive on defense firms outside the US. The Pentagon’s new warning seems to validate that stance. All the same, we are closely watching to gauge whether a big increase in the defense budget will offset any of the financial challenges implied by the tougher contract scrutiny.

United States-Taiwan: The Financial Times late yesterday scooped that the White House’s forthcoming tariff plan for advanced computer chips will include exemptions for chips from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. based on how much the firm invests in new US fabrication facilities. The plan would aim to strike a balance between imposing tariffs to encourage domestic chip manufacturing and removing obstacles to US hyperscalers building new data centers for artificial intelligence.

United States-Canada: In a post on social media yesterday, President Trump said he will block the opening of the new Gordie Howe International Bridge linking Canada and Detroit unless the US “is fully compensated for everything we have given them, and also, importantly, Canada treats the United States with the Fairness and Respect that we deserve.”

  • The bridge, which is reportedly close to completion and has been paid for fully by Canada, was supported by the president during his first term as a way to relieve congestion in the vital US-Canada trade corridor.
  • The president’s last-minute demands likely constitute an effort to squeeze concessions from the Canadian government ahead of this year’s renegotiation of the USMCA trade agreement, despite the risk of worsening frictions between the US and its longstanding ally.

United States-Cuba: The Cuban government has reportedly told international airlines that it won’t be able to supply them with jet fuel starting today. As a result, Air Canada has announced that it will suspend flights to the island, and other foreign airlines are likely to be affected as well. The disruption suggests that the US effort to cut fuel supplies to the island are having their intended effect of strangling Cuba’s economy. However, it is still too early to know if the effort will force political change in Havana as intended.

China: The China Media Project, a research group, has issued a report showing that Alibaba’s popular Qwen model has been built to say only positive things about China. The report is the latest in a series examining how China’s increasingly popular open-source AI models have been manipulated for apparently political purposes. As China’s models become more widely used, the result is likely to be a skewed portrayal of China around the globe.

Indonesia: Two weeks after index provider MSCI said it will downgrade Indonesia to a “frontier market” from an “emerging market,” over investability and transparency issues, index provider FTSE Russell today said it has postponed a review and update of its Indonesia exposures over uncertainty in determining the free float of the country’s stocks. The blemishes on the Indonesian stock market threaten to limit how much it can benefit from investors’ growing interest in international stocks.

United Kingdom: Following our note yesterday about Prime Minister Starmer being pressed to resign over scandals including the naming of an Epstein associate as ambassador to the US, a meeting of Labour Party lawmakers yesterday reportedly offered him strong support, reducing the risk of a forced resignation for the time being. Nevertheless, Starmer’s political position continues to weaken, suggesting it will be increasingly difficult for him to drive policy initiatives in the near term.

View PDF

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – US Foreign Policy: Comparing the New vs. the Old (February 9, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA  | PDF

In our Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report from January 26, we posited that the United States under the new administration has adopted a foreign policy quite distinct from that of the previous eight decades. We showed how the new US policy is a type of neo-imperialism with elements of neo-colonialism. We emphasized that our characterization of the new foreign policy is not meant to be pejorative. It is merely descriptive, to help us understand how it works and what its implications might be. After all, the new foreign policy could well be positive for US citizens, and especially the working class, which shouldered much of the costs of the old policy focused on maintaining the US role as global hegemon. In this report, we look closer at the differences between these policies and their implications for investors. We show that the politics and economics of the two policies suggest very different investment strategies.

Read the full report

Don’t miss our accompanying podcasts, available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify 

Daily Comment (February 9, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with some quick notes on the monumental election in Japan yesterday. We next review several other international and US developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including a recap of elections in Thailand and Portugal, growing signs that UK Prime Minister Starmer may need to resign, and new data confirming that US software firms are facing increased financial stress.

Japan: In elections yesterday, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party of Prime Minister Takaichi won in a landslide, securing an estimated 316 of the 465 seats in the lower house, up from 198 seats previously. This marks the first time since World War II that a party has won a 2/3 super majority in the Diet. The conservative Takaichi will also have support of her coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party. The result is likely to be positive for Japanese stocks and the yen, as it supports Takaichi’s plan for more stimulative fiscal and monetary policies.

  • Indeed, Japanese stocks are soaring so far this morning, with the Nikkei 225 price index up about 3.9% to a new record high.
  • The yen has strengthened about 0.8% to 155.99 per dollar ($0.0064).

Thailand: In another election at the weekend, the conservative Bhumjaithai Party came out on top with an estimated 194 seats in the 500-seat legislature, while the progressive People’s Party will end up with only about 115. The results mark a dramatic return to conservatism after many years of liberal rule in Thailand.

Portugal: In yet another weekend election, Socialist António José Seguro won the presidency with approximately 65% of the vote, holding off right-wing nationalist André Ventura. All the same, the presence of the far-right Ventura on the ballot is being taken as a warning that populist conservatives have a following in Portugal and could drive policy to the right in the coming years.

United Kingdom: Prime Minister Starmer has now lost two high-level aides over their part in recommending that he name Lord Peter Mandelson as UK ambassador to the US — a toxic nomination given Mandelson’s prominent place in the Epstein files recently released by the Justice Department. Today’s resignation was from Tim Allan, who was Starmer’s communication director. Just one day earlier, Morgan McSweeney resigned as chief of staff. As a result, Starmer is coming under increasing political pressure to resign.

  • Even though Starmer had already sacked Mandelson, the new staff resignations are adding to the political pressure from a series of scandals and policy missteps.
  • Nevertheless, the potential exit of the Labour Party prime minister has so far been taken in stride by investors, with UK stock indexes and the pound continuing to appreciate. Those trends suggest investors could well look favorably on a political change in the UK, despite some short-term volatility if Starmer is forced to resign.

US Immigration Policy: According to the Financial Times, the US Embassy in London and other embassies around the world have begun to deny visas to even top business executives on the basis of past arrests for relatively minor criminal infractions, such as barfights and marijuana possession. Some visas to visit the US have reportedly been denied even for minor arrests as far back as the 1970s.

  • Of course, the administration’s barriers to trade, technology, and capital flows are much higher in profile.
  • Nevertheless, the new restrictions would presumably slow cross-border economic activity, including the inbound investment that the White House is seeking.

US Software Industry: New research from Axios shows that an increasing share of the loans backing software firms are trading at “distressed” levels, or below 80 cents on the dollar. The data indicates that $25 billion in software loan volume was marked at distressed levels by the end of January, more than double what it was in December. While technology leaders have begun to push back on the recent concerns that artificial intelligence will devastate software companies, these hard data points would suggest that real problems exist.

Chinese Food Policy: New data shows the proportion of soybean meal in domestically produced animal feed stood at 13.4% in 2025, unchanged from the previous year despite government efforts to replace the largely imported material with other sources of protein. The government’s effort aims to make China less reliant on foreign food supplies, but the new figures suggest the country remains quite reliant on supplies from the US and Brazil, giving them some leverage in trade negotiations and other disputes.

Chinese Demographics: As the country continues struggling to arrest its steep drop in birth rates, which has led to an aging population and outright population declines, the government has reportedly imposed a 13% value-added tax on condoms and other contraceptives, ending their previous tax-free status. However, we haven’t seen the intimate details of the change, so we won’t comment further.

View PDF

The Case for Hard Assets: An Update (First Quarter 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, Joe Hanzlik, Bill O’Grady, and Mark Keller  | PDF

Background and Summary

One of the key trends we perceived in 2008 (when we started our firm) was that the US domestic political consensus to maintain American hegemony was fraying. Prior to that point, fears of global communism had fostered a political consensus that encouraged Americans to bear the costs of hegemony. Those costs were tied to the two primary global public goods that the hegemon provides. These goods are:

  1. Global security — the hegemon develops a military of global reach and often projects power into conflicts unrelated to its own security. As part of this role, the hegemon also protects global sea lanes, supporting international trade.
  2. Global financial security — the hegemon provides the financial architecture of the global financial system. This includes providing the reserve currency and reserve asset and intervening in financial crises in other nations.

American hegemony was exercised differently than its predecessors. European hegemons used colonies to project power, in part because they were engaged in a “great game” against other competing European powers. In contrast, the US was engaged in an ideological contest, to not only prove to be a stronger power than the Soviet Union, but to be a better power. George Kennan’s famous “long telegram” became the blueprint of American policy against communism. Essentially, US policy was designed to outlast the Soviet Union by containing it and demonstrating that democratic capitalism offered better results than communism. And so, US foreign policy had a strong element of soft power,[1] where the US opened its economy to imports, which allowed allied nations to prosper in the post-WWII environment.

The US created a set of international organizations that built an order based on rules.[2] It also contained longstanding conflicts in Asia (China versus Japan) and Europe (Germany[3]) by providing security to both regions. Thus, Asian nations no longer had to fear Japan’s militaristic attempts to secure resources as the US Navy protected sea lanes and allowed commodities to flow freely. In Europe, nations no longer had to fear German insecurity because the US demilitarized the country. This policy was costly, but it was designed not just to secure American hegemony, but to defeat communism.


[1] For a recap of the American way of hegemony, see our three-part Weekly Geopolitical Report series from 2018, “The Malevolent Hegemon,” Part I, Part II, and Part III.

[2] This didn’t mean the US always abided by the rules, but US administrations did generally try to operate within them. For example, when the Bush administration was planning to invade Iraq, it did attempt to get UN approval.

[3] See our Weekly Geopolitical Report from July 27, 2009, “The German Problem.”

Read the full report

Daily Comment (February 6, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment begins with an analysis of TrumpRx and its potential implications for future government involvement in the economy. We then examine why Cuba is prepared to reopen talks with the United States, how rising tech spending is unsettling investors, and what’s behind Washington’s quiet efforts to ease tensions with North Korea. We round out the piece with a summary of key economic data from the US and global markets.

Fed Intervention: The White House has launched its first official online pharmacy, TrumpRx.gov, in a direct bid to lower prescription drug costs for Americans. The platform allows consumers to purchase medications at discounted rates, marking the administration’s most high-profile effort to tackle healthcare affordability through direct negotiations with pharmaceutical companies. While the initiative represents a tangible win for household budgets, it also highlights the federal government’s expanding influence within private markets and the broader economy.

  • The TrumpRx initiative illustrates the effectiveness of governmental pressure in extracting concessions from drug manufacturers. Through the “most favored nation” executive order, the administration pushed companies — including Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer — to align US drug prices with the lower rates offered abroad. A central strategy was the threat of imposing tariffs of up to 100% on pharmaceutical imports, which prompted companies to agree to the price discounts.
  • Furthermore, TrumpRx challenges pharmacy benefit managers, which often act as costly middlemen by capturing rebates and spreads while passing limited savings to patients. The government’s direct-to-consumer platform provides a transparent alternative, bypassing PBMs and insuring delivery of manufacturer discounts directly to households. This launch is just one day after Congress passed and President Trump signed a bipartisan spending bill with reforms to curb PBM power.
  • The TrumpRx launch signals a broader strategy of using tariff threats as high-stakes leverage to restructure key US industries. This carrot-and-stick approach has already compelled automakers like Ford and GM, plus tech giants such as Apple, to accelerate reshoring of manufacturing and supply chains. Now it’s rippling into housing, where major builders are pitching a one-million-unit “Trump Homes” program to secure tariff relief on critical imported materials like lumber and steel.
  • The government’s expanding economic footprint presents a dual-edged reality. On one hand, it offers market stability and shields strategically vital sectors, such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and energy, from global volatility. On the other hand, it creates a “compliance-first” environment where industries that do not align with federal mandates face significant punitive measures.
  • In the long run, this shift presents a fundamental challenge to the doctrine of shareholder primacy. For decades, corporate strategy prioritized short-term stock valuations above all else. Today, however, survival increasingly depends on national alignment and domestic investment more than on growth potential alone. We maintain a strong view that this new paradigm favors assets like precious metals, which are inherently harder to regulate and control within such a constrained environment.

Cuba’s Breaking Point: The head of the Cuban government has expressed readiness to hold talks with the United States. While making clear that Cuba does not intend to alter its political system, the government is prepared to engage in dialogue to improve bilateral relations. This push for dialogue coincides with an acute energy crisis in Cuba, triggered by a US-led oil embargo following its recent intervention in Venezuela. Talks between the two sides appear to be part of a larger US trend of forcing neighboring countries into its sphere of influence.

US-Russia New START: The United States and Russia are negotiating an agreement to extend the New START nuclear arms control treaty. Although the treaty was set to expire this week, both sides are actively seeking an extension, as neither appears willing to let it lapse. These talks are occurring amidst heightened tensions between Russia and the West over the war in Ukraine, a conflict during which Russia has issued threats of nuclear weapons use. An extension would help reduce the risk of a nuclear exchange between the world’s two largest nuclear powers.

Amazon Sell-off: The world’s largest online retailer saw its shares sell off after announcing a major ramp-up in capital expenditure. On Thursday, the company revealed plans to invest $200 billion in AI, data centers, satellites, and other large-scale projects. The move faced immediate investor pushback, driven by concerns that the massive spending may not translate into future profitability. The sell-off highlights the market’s growing sensitivity toward “build at all costs” models in the tech sector.

Japan Elections: The Asian nation is set to hold snap elections this weekend that will determine whether Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi retains her position and secures a mandate to advance her policy agenda. She remains highly popular, with recent polls indicating her party could capture more than 60% of the vote. A decisive victory could renew downward pressure on the yen as investors grow increasingly concerned about inflationary risks tied to expanding government debt.

Calming North Korea: The US plans to restore humanitarian aid to North Korea, a move intended to de-escalate recent tensions and maintain diplomatic relations. This outreach comes as Pyongyang accelerates its weapons program, which it frames as a deterrent against potential regime change. Washington also aims to prevent North Korea from deepening its strategic reliance on Russia and China. Despite these maneuvers, we assess that North Korea remains an underpriced geopolitical risk in global markets.

View PDF

Daily Comment (February 5, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment opens with our perspective on the recent market unwind and the key factors driving it. We then review Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s testimony before Congress and the implications for policy and markets. Next, we discuss Vice President JD Vance’s push to establish a floor on strategic mineral reserves and President Macron’s advocacy for a stronger euro. We round out the piece with a summary of key economic data from the US and global markets.

The Market Unwind: Several asset classes that saw sharp run-ups recently have begun pulling back as investors reassess global risk sentiment. Over the past two weeks, volatility has spiked in precious metals. Silver, which had recently surged past $100 per ounce, has now retreated toward $70. Domestic equities have similarly cooled amid a broad sell-off in major tech names. This shift reflects a “reality check” on AI hype, evolving expectations for central bank policy, and lingering geopolitical tensions.​

The AI Factor This sharp sell-off in tech stocks reflects growing investor “capex fatigue,” with many questioning whether the massive build-out will deliver high-margin returns. On Wednesday, despite Alphabet’s strong Q4 earnings, shares fell after management stated that 2026 capital expenditures will nearly double 2025 levels. The reaction underscores investor impatience for tangible results over further spending.

The Warsh Factor The nomination of Kevin Warsh to take over as Federal Reserve chair has triggered a sharp unwinding of the currency-debasement trade, fueled by renewed confidence in the Fed’s independence. Although President Trump emphasized that he would not have chosen Warsh if rate hikes were on the table, markets have interpreted the pick as a shift toward a more disciplined balance sheet policy. Investors now anticipate a less accommodative Fed under Warsh than previously expected.

Geopolitics Factor The easing of geopolitical tensions abroad has also fueled the retreat from safe-haven assets. US and Chinese leaders spoke ahead of scheduled negotiations on Wednesday, discussing trade and the war in Ukraine, which sparked optimism for constructive talks. Additionally, after recent signs of escalation, the US and Iran appear set to meet on Friday for nuclear discussions.

The recent unwinding of some positions may prove temporary, as we believe key underlying themes such as the expanding influence of AI, sustained central bank purchases of precious metals, and ongoing global fragmentation into regional blocs will remain intact despite recent volatility. Nevertheless, we maintain that the most prudent defense against these shifts is to ensure broad diversification across sectors (reducing overexposure to technology) and geographies, which should contribute to a more resilient and balanced portfolio.

Bessent Testifies: On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent met with lawmakers to discuss the state of the economy and the White House agenda. Over the three hours of testimony, remarks covered the role of the Federal Reserve, the impact of tariffs, US crypto policy, as well as other topics. While the testimony was at times very testy, particularly with Democratic lawmakers, it had no material impact on the markets. That said, his remarks provided key insights into the administration’s economic agenda.

Fed Independence Bessent’s comments suggest that while the White House publicly supports Federal Reserve independence, it may simultaneously seek to rein it in. He specifically targeted the Fed’s credibility, arguing for increased accountability after the central bank allowed inflation to exceed its targets and faced scrutiny over renovation funding. His critique appears to signal a push for greater executive oversight of the central bank.

Tariffs Additionally, Bessent’s testimony signaled that the White House is doubling down on its trade agenda rather than retreating. When challenged on a 2024 note where he previously characterized tariffs as inflationary, he pivoted, citing a San Francisco Federal Reserve study that suggests tariffs do not drive broad-based inflation. By reframing tariffs as a tool for economic resilience, his comments suggest the administration remains open to further trade duties if it deems it necessary.

Cryptocurrency Lastly, Bessent suggested that the administration may not prioritize the protection of crypto investors. When asked if he would intervene to support bitcoin, he clarified that the Treasury would not influence markets to artificially boost prices, noting that it lacks the authority to use public funds for such a bailout. These comments likely reflect the administration’s narrow focus on stablecoins — a preference largely driven by their utility in absorbing short-duration government debt.

Based on the Treasury secretary’s comments, it appears that the White House intends to remain actively engaged in managing the economy. This is likely to include using targeted trade restrictions to support reshoring, keeping the Federal Reserve operating within defined limits, and narrowing the administration’s crypto agenda toward stablecoins rather than the broader digital asset class. As a result, we continue to believe that firms broadly aligned with the White House’s policy priorities could perform well in this environment.

Vance Price Floor: At a ministerial meeting on critical minerals, the vice president endorsed the creation of a preferential trade zone. This proposal includes a price floor designed to insulate domestic markets from predatory practices, specifically “dumping” by nations like China, which often price out local competitors. This initiative underscores a growing global trend toward economic blocs as a primary defense against foreign industrial competition.

Strong Euro Policy: French President Emmanuel Macron is expected to advocate for euro appreciation against the dollar at next week’s EU summit, arguing it would enhance economic resilience and the currency’s global standing. While his specific policy proposals remain unclear, his position echoes the White House’s long-held view that the euro is undervalued, potentially opening the door to coordinated efforts to bolster it. If Macron secures support for this initiative, it should prove favorable for European equities.

View PDF

Daily Comment (February 4, 2026)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM ET] | PDF

Our Comment opens with our perspective on the recent sell-off in tech stocks. We then examine rising tensions between the US and Iran. Next, we address the proposed solutions by homebuilders to improve housing affordability, Texas’s renewed scrutiny of data center projects, and reports of Russian efforts to intercept allied satellites. We round out the report with a summary of key economic data from the US and global markets.

AI Disruption: On Tuesday, tech stocks sold off following the release of new AI software that could threaten the core businesses of several major firms. Anthropic, the creator of the Claude chatbot, unveiled an AI-powered automation tool capable of handling routine legal tasks such as contract reviews, NDA triage, compliance workflows, legal briefings, and template responses. The company also introduced a similar tool for customer service and sales. The announcement has intensified concerns that traditional business models may soon be disrupted by AI.

  • The sell-off in tech shares reflects growing concerns that recent AI breakthroughs could eventually impact the hyperscalers. Companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet provide the computing infrastructure that is powering many of the firms now at risk. Investors worry that if these clients become obsolete, their demand for cloud computing could decline, ultimately hurting the hyperscalers themselves.
  • While the risk to hyperscalers may not pose an immediate threat, it could deepen valuation concerns among investors. In recent quarters, these companies have significantly increased spending on data center expansion, with some even taking on debt to meet anticipated future demand. If their client base begins to shrink due to AI-driven disruption, it could further fuel worries about a potential AI bubble.
  • Heightened concerns over potential disruptions are narrowing investor focus toward immediate bottom-line earnings. This represents a stark pivot from last year’s tolerance for aggressive expansion and infrastructure scaling. As the market’s patience for “growth-at-any-cost” wears thin, we anticipate significant volatility if industry leaders fail to deliver on these sharpened expectations.
  • At this time, we believe the AI rally still has momentum, though some signs of fatigue have begun to emerge. We continue to recommend diversification as the best course of action to hedge against concentrated exposure to the tech sector. In our view, expanding investments across other industries as well as countries can provide valuable protection during periods of market volatility, particularly if AI-related expectations are eventually revised lower.

Iran Escalation: Tensions between the United States and Iran have intensified ahead of upcoming nuclear talks. On Tuesday, a US Navy ship reportedly shot down an Iranian drone that approached the USS Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea. The incident coincided with another confrontation in which Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps vessels allegedly harassed US-flagged ships in the Strait of Hormuz. Together, these events underscore the escalating hostilities between the two nations as they prepare for high-stakes negotiations.

  • As nuclear talks approach, the White House appears intent on pressing Iran to accept a set of reported concessions aimed at preventing further escalation. Washington’s three principal demands are: a permanent end to uranium enrichment on Iranian soil and the disposal or removal of existing enriched uranium stockpiles, strict limits on the range and number of Iran’s ballistic missiles, and a halt to Tehran’s support for regional proxy groups such as the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas.
  • While Iran has stated that it does not seek a conflict with the US, it has already signaled a willingness to push back in the negotiations. In the run-up to the talks, Tehran has reportedly demanded changes to both the venue and the format, pressing for the meetings to be moved from Istanbul to Oman and for direct, bilateral discussions with the United States focused on nuclear issues rather than a broader, regionally framed dialogue involving other Middle Eastern states.
  • As of now, tensions may be starting to ease. Iran’s demands do not appear to have met significant resistance from the White House, which has agreed to move the venue to Oman and is still determining whether other Middle Eastern leaders will participate in the talks. However, it is still unclear what concessions Tehran is willing to make in order satisfy the US wishes to end Iran’s nuclear program.
  • Rising tensions between Iran and the United States reflect the broader geopolitical risks that continue to affect financial markets. We believe the most effective protection against these rising risks is to invest in precious metals, which have historically served as safe-haven assets. That said, we remain cautiously optimistic that the two countries will ultimately reach an agreement that prevents further military escalation.

Trump Homes: Several national homebuilders are reportedly in early-stage discussions on a potentially significant “Trump Homes” initiative. The proposal aims to develop up to one million entry-level homes via a rent-to-own model. While the White House has not formally endorsed the plan, it signals a broader, active dialogue between the administration and industry on innovative ownership pathways. We believe firms that pivot toward these national objectives will likely secure a competitive advantage through increased federal support.

Data Center Resistance: Growing concerns over grid reliability have prompted Texas regulators to scrutinize the rapid expansion of data centers. The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) plans to revisit 8.2 gigawatts’ worth of approved projects to verify that they won’t jeopardize the state’s power supply. This move is designed to ensure that these high-capacity sites can operate without threatening the stability of the grid or being forced offline during energy spikes.

Russian Spies: European security officials have accused Moscow of intercepting at least a dozen Western satellites using its own space-based assets. The interceptions are seen as a serious national security risk, raising concerns that hostile actors could not only access sensitive communications but also disrupt satellite operations, potentially altering trajectories or causing crashes. The incident is widely viewed as an example of hybrid warfare extending into space, and it is likely to reinforce expectations of higher defense spending by governments.

View PDF