Asset Allocation Bi-Weekly – Believe It or Not, Fiscal Policy Is Tightening (March 7, 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

The U.S. economy and government economic policies have many moving parts, but investors often latch onto just one or two indicators or policy initiatives to gauge where asset prices are heading.  These days, their focus has been on consumer price inflation and the Federal Reserve’s plan to hike its benchmark short-term interest rate to combat it.  Tighter monetary policy should help cut demand, leading to lower inflation, but it will also have a direct negative impact on asset prices.  In this report, we argue investors aren’t paying enough attention to another aspect of economic policy.  Investors might not realize it, but federal fiscal policy is also tightening, which will further weigh on economic growth.  It will be an additional challenge for asset prices.

Investors are often incensed at the enormous numbers that get bandied about when talking about government spending, but it’s important to keep in mind that the overall economy is also enormous.  U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) totaled about $23 trillion in 2021.  In the decade leading up to the coronavirus pandemic, total federal receipts averaged 16.3% of GDP, while federal spending averaged 21.6% of GDP.  The budget deficit averaged 5.3% of GDP.  However, to cushion the blow of the pandemic starting in early 2020, the government passed trillions of dollars of emergency spending, ranging from forgivable loans for affected businesses to enhanced unemployment benefits and cash grants for individuals.  As shown in the chart, total federal outlays in the year ended March 2021 were up a massive 65.7% from the prior year, even as federal receipts were essentially flat.

The added spending during the pandemic undoubtedly helped preserve economic activity.  It also blew out the budget deficit and, against a backdrop of pandemic supply disruptions, has contributed to today’s high inflation as well.  However, the chart above shows that this fiscal stimulus has already gone into reverse.  In the year ended December 2021, spending was essentially unchanged from the previous year.  Because of the rapid economic recovery, government receipts (mostly income taxes) were up 25.7%.  Flat spending against a huge jump in tax income helped cut the budget deficit to “just” $2.577 trillion in 2021, or $771.4 billion narrower than in 2020.  The deficit in 2021 was only about 11.4% of GDP, roughly half what it was in 2020.

The $771.4 billion in deficit reduction during 2021 was a drag on the economy, but it wasn’t very noticeable because companies and individuals had so much pent-up demand.  In addition, companies and individuals still had a lot of excess cash and savings left over from the stimulus programs earlier in the pandemic.  The experience in 2022 could be very different.  For one thing, forecasts from authorities such as the White House Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office suggest the deficit will fall dramatically again this year.  In dollar terms, the deficit is expected to narrow by some $1.3 trillion, mostly because of higher income tax receipts and reduced transfer payments to states, local governments, and individuals.  That’s exactly like taking $1.3 trillion out of the economy, just as many firms and individuals start to deplete their savings and face much higher price inflation.

As shown in this chart, the fiscal tightening that began in 2021 has been shaving more than two percentage points off the annualized U.S. growth rate for the last several quarters.  Taking another $1.3 trillion in net federal spending out of the economy in 2022 will cut several additional percentage points out of the growth rate, on top of the other headwinds to demand.  This fiscal drag will be offset partially by factors such as the Biden administration’s new infrastructure spending and reduced demand for imports.  Nevertheless, we still expect it to have a major impact in slowing demand, just as the Fed looks set to impose multiple interest-rate hikes.  The chart shows that the Fed’s recent rate-hiking campaigns have all occurred during periods of negative fiscal impacts, but none of those periods had fiscal tightening on the scale we’re about to see.  This simultaneous tightening of fiscal and monetary policy may help ease inflation pressures.  It also means real economic growth in 2022 may be a little better than the anemic rates seen in the decade before the pandemic.  That will likely limit the upside for equities and commodities this year.  At the same time, it should also limit the downside for bond prices and keep yields from rising as much as some investors now fear.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 4, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning! In today’s report, we continue our coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. We next discuss some non-Ukraine news, including the Iran nuclear deal and the upcoming election in South Korea. We conclude with our pandemic coverage.

Russian forces continue to make advances in Ukraine. After intense fighting, Russian troops took over the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant on Friday. The attack at the power plant sparked concerns about a possible nuclear explosion after a fire broke out. Ukraine has 15 nuclear sites, and attacks on the country could raise the possibility of another Chernobyl. Following the attack, the U.N. nuclear watchdog stated there was no radiation release, relieving concerns of a possible nuclear crisis. In addition, Russia appears to be making inroads in Ukraine’s second- largest city of Kherson and the southern city of Mariupol; however, the convoy outside Kyiv remains stalled.

As Russian troops continue their fight with Ukraine, Putin is struggling to maintain alliances. In a phone call with Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Putin urged OPEC not to politicize the global energy supply. The comment was meant to dissuade Saudi Arabia from using the war as an opportunity to take more market share, while Russia is struggling to find buyers for its oil. Currently, there are potentially two countries with excess capacity that have the ability to take advantage of the situation, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, and the West is pressuring them to boost production. Additionally, higher prices are also an opportunity for both countries to cash in on their oil. If this would happen, Russia’s economic woes would likely worsen, as it may be forced to sell its oil at an even steeper discount.  As a result, it isn’t clear that the OPEC and Russia’s alliance, also known as OPEC+, can be sustained as prices continue to rise.

In addition to potentially losing OPEC as an ally, it appears other countries are becoming more cautious regarding aligning themselves with Russia. China’s infrastructure investment bank has halted all business with Russia and Belarus. The move is to reduce exposure to Russian assets as the fallout from the Ukraine invasion persists. China is still trying to contain the collapse of its property market, so its appetite for risk is limited. Furthermore, the possibility of sanctions from the U.S. forced India to cancel its orders for Russian jets. Lastly, Putin’s relationship with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has frayed after Turkey sold drones to Ukraine for its fight against Russia and has locked Russian warships out of the Black Sea. As Russia becomes more isolated, its need for a quick conclusion to the Ukraine war becomes more dire.

Although there are concerns that Russia will eventually retaliate against countries, the drawn-out war makes that outcome less likely to happen. Prior to Russia’s invasion into Ukraine, there were fears that Putin would stop supplying Europe with gas in retaliation for the sanctions. However, that will probably hurt Russia even more than the sanctions. Although Europe purchases 40% of its gas imports from Russia, Russia depends on Europe for trade. In 2020, 37% of Russia’s global trade went to Europe. Thus, cutting off Russian gas to Europe, especially when other countries are reluctant to buy it, is becoming a less viable option as Russia’s economy suffers the consequences of the country’s invasion of Ukraine. In the meantime, it appears Europe has started taking steps to diversify its supplies away from Russia.  The EU is set to adopt a new strategy to help boost its energy security and prepare for disruptions.

Non-Ukraine News

  • Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MBS, is resisting pressure from the U.S. to increase oil production in an attempt to gain concessions from President Biden. MBS wants the President to recognize him as the rightful leader of Saudi Arabia and provide his country with weapons to fight Houthi rebels in Yemen. The U.S. has been urging OPEC, which includes Saudi Arabia, to increase output even before the Ukraine crisis. However, the Russian invasion has made the situation more dire, as oil prices have risen above $100 a barrel for the first time since 2013. Although MBS claims to be holding out for concessions from the U.S., there is speculation that Saudi Arabia may not have the ability to increase production to offset Russia. Saudi Arabia has shown in recent months that it can produce more oil, but it is unclear how much capacity it actually has.
  • The Iran nuclear deal is on the verge of being completed. A major sticking point in talks is the end to a probe into Iran’s undeclared nuclear activity. The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog is expected to visit Tehran on Saturday. If he determines that the issue regarding nuclear activity has been resolved, it may remove the final obstacle preventing a deal. The removal of sanctions could make it easier for Iran to sell oil in the global market.
  • The invasion of Ukraine may complicate manufacturers’ ability to produce more semiconductors. Ukraine is one of the largest suppliers of neon gas in the world. It produces over 50% of the world’s supply, and neon is indispensable in chipmaking. As a result, the semiconductor shortage may be a consistent problem in 2022.
  • On Friday, South Korea started early voting for its election. Front-runners to winning the presidential nominations are conservative Yoon-Seok-youl and Lee Jae-myung of the ruling Democratic Party. The outcome is closely being watched by China, North Korea, and the U.S.; the new president could change Korea’s foreign policy stance. A win by the Yoon could lead to South Korea taking a tougher stance toward North Korea and China and a more amicable relationship with the U.S., while a win by Lee would likely keep the country on its current policy path. The latest opinion polls show the two are almost tied, with Lee leading Yoon by one percentage point (38% vs. 37%). The election will take place on March 9.
  • Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) has expressed openness to a much smaller spending bill. The new bill will feature prescription savings and a way to tax the wealthy.
  • Following his visit to Taiwan, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has called on the U.S. to recognize Taiwan.

View PDF

Daily Comment (March 3, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning! Today’s report begins with the latest developments of the Ukraine Crisis. We will then go over recent central bank news. Afterward, we will discuss economic and policy updates and conclude with our standard pandemic coverage.

Russia-Ukraine

Entering its 8th day, fighting in Ukraine has intensified. The latest reports show that Russia may have seized the provincial capital of Kherson, although Ukrainian officials have denied these accounts. Ukraine’s second-largest city, Kharkiv, continues to be pummeled with a barrage of indiscriminate airstrikes. Meanwhile, Russian troops are reportedly having an easier time moving through the southern part of Ukraine as it tries to take over the country. Despite Russian advances, Ukraine appears to be having some success.  In a battle against Russian Forces, Ukrainian troops recovered a document reportedly showing Moscow planned a 15-day war from February 20 to March 6. The document revealed call signals, an invasion map, and a personnel list. The information could not be independently verified for its accuracy, but a U.S. intelligence report suggested that Russia planned to invade Ukraine after the Beijing Olympics, which concluded on February 20.

The fallout from the invasion appears to be spreading throughout the financial markets. Russian energy firms that have not been sanctioned are finding it hard to find places to sell their products. Even with steep discounts, refineries have reduced or stopped purchasing Russian oil altogether due to concerns that the sector will eventually be sanctioned. Additionally, dockers have expressed an unwillingness to unload the cargo from destinations that may have originally sourced from Russia. The inability to find buyers for Russian products has pushed up commodity prices worldwide. Crude oil is on the verge of surpassing $120 a barrel, wheat prices rose above $11 a bushel, and zinc hit a new record at $4000 a ton. The ceiling for commodities isn’t clear, as Russia’s end game is still unknown.

However, the uncertainty regarding the extent of Russian hostility throughout eastern Europe has already started to impact bond markets. On Thursday, an image showed Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko standing in front of a map showing a planned invasion into Moldova’s breakaway region of Transnistria. Meanwhile, Russia has threatened Bosnia that it will retaliate if the country attempts to join NATO. The growing instability in Europe has led to an increased demand for U.S. treasuries over the last few weeks. The ten-year U.S. Treasury yield has fallen as much as 30 bps since reaching its two-year high on February 16. This flight to safety has started to gum up the financial plumbing. Treasury traders have failed to follow through on their purchase agreement by the greatest number since the start of the pandemic. Meanwhile, U.K. traders have been forced to use safeguard repo facilities as short-dated gilts are becoming scarcer. Although there doesn’t seem to be a funding crisis, if this problem persists it could force the Federal Reserve to reconsider ending quantitative easing.

Central Bank Policy

  • U.S. economic activity expanded at a moderate to a modest pace in mid-January, according to the Federal Reserve Beige Book. The publication looks at the economic conditions across the 12 Federal Reserve Districts. Despite the expansion of economic activity, many districts reported a temporary slowdown due to heightened absenteeism related to the surge in COVID-19 cases. Additionally, firms have expressed an increased willingness to raise prices as a way to mitigate the impact of rising wages and input prices.
  • The Federal Reserve is expected to hike rates in March, according to Fed Chair Jerome Powell. In a testimony to the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee, Powell stated the Ukraine situation would not deter another rate hike. Investors responded positively to Powell after he stated he does not favor an increase above 25 bps.

 Economic Policy and News

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 441,048,833, with 5,976,554 fatalities.  In the U.S., there are 79,143,885 confirmed cases with 954,519 deaths.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The CDC reports that 691,012,865 doses of the vaccine have been distributed, with 553,778,476 doses injected.  The number receiving at least one dose is 253,752,684, while the number of second doses is 215,775,839, and the number of the third dose, granting the highest level of immunity, is 94,552,155. The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (March 3, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices are moving sharply higher as sanctions expand against Russia.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories unexpectedly fell 2.6 mb compared to a 2.5 mb draw forecast.  The SPR declined 2.4 mb, meaning the net build was 5.0 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was unchanged at 11.6 mbpd.  Exports rose 1.1 mbpd, while imports dropped by the same amount.  Refining activity rose 0.3%.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

This chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s report shows we are “splitting the difference” between last year’s plunge and the usual rise seen in the 5-year average.  Given all the turmoil in markets, it is more likely that inventories hold steady in the coming weeks until refineries begin to ramp up for summer driving.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $70.37; using the euro/price model, fair value is $54.44.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $63.09.  Current prices are being driven by ESG and geopolitics, so the usual impact of inventory and the dollar has been overwhelmed.  However, the analysis shows that any sort of normalization will likely lead to lower oil prices; presumably, “normalization” may not return any time soon.

 Market news:

  • As part of the war response, the U.S. and other nations announced a 60 mb oil release from SPRs. We are not sure this action will have much of a positive impact (it hasn’t thus far).  As we noted last week, we expect the correlation between price and inventory to flip to positive in the coming weeks as consumers scramble to secure supply.  One of the primary reasons for creating SPRs was to discourage hoarding.  If consumers believe the SPRs can provide oil in a shortfall, they should be confident enough to avoid hoarding.  Unfortunately, the U.S. has been steadily releasing oil from the U.S. SPR, so the psychological impact of the news has dampened.

(Sources:  DOE, CIM)

  • This chart shows the weekly level of the SPR since August 1982. The current level, at 580 mb, is the lowest in nearly 20 years.
  • Divestment efforts from fossil fuels continue, which will tend to reduce funds available for investment.

Geopolitical news:

Alternative energy/policy news:

(Source:  Axios)

  View PDF

Daily Comment (March 2, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an update on the Russia-Ukraine war, in which Russia appears to be ratcheting up its attacks on civilians.  We next review a range of international and U.S. developments that have the potential to affect the financial markets today.  We wrap up with the latest on the coronavirus pandemic.

Russia-Ukraine:  As the Russian army continues to face obstacles to its military objectives, we see increasing evidence that it has shifted its focus toward attacks on Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure and population in order to create mass terror.  For example, it killed multiple civilians yesterday in a missile attack on Kyiv’s main television antenna, and today it has stepped up a fierce aerial assault on Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-biggest city.  Russia has also claimed that it has taken control of the key southeastern city of Kherson, although Ukrainian officials have denied that.  Meanwhile, Russian and Ukrainian representatives plan to meet again this afternoon on the Belarusian border to discuss peace, although we have seen no indications that would suggest those talks will be successful.  To put added economic pressure on Russia, President Biden said in his State of the Union address last night that the U.S. will join with the EU in banning Russian planes from its airspace.  Western companies also continue to announce they are ending or cutting back their business dealings in Russia, but in an effort to stop that, the Russian government said it would temporarily ban foreign firms from selling their assets in the country.

  • Finally, we want to follow up on the report from RIA Novosti that we cited yesterday.  As that report suggested, Russian officials believed they would be in Kyiv in short order, that the war would be over quickly, and that Ukraine would be under Russian control with a minimum of bloodshed.  The actions of Russia’s military tend to confirm this notion.  Russian units moved quickly on open roads, often outrunning their logistical support.  Social media pictures of Russian tanks on the side of the road, stuck for lack of fuel, began to circulate.  It seemed the plan was to move into Kyiv quickly, arrest the political leadership, and declare victory.  Likely, the goal was to move so quickly that the West would not have time to apply significant sanctions and would be forced to accept the fall of Kyiv as a fait accompli.
    • Obviously, things didn’t go according to plan.  The Ukrainians have put up valiant resistance.  The attacking forces, lacking logistical support, were thwarted in their aims.   The Russian military appeared disorganized and inept.  Western political leaders, impressed and emboldened by the bravery of Ukrainian President Zelensky, reacted with devastating sanctions.  Russia is isolated on the world stage, facing an economic calamity.
    • However, the newfound optimism about Ukraine’s ability to thwart Russia is probably misplaced.  The war isn’t over.  Russia now understands it is facing stiff resistance, so, if it intends to subdue the country, it will likely have to deploy “scorched earth” tactics.  If this is the case, we would expect Russian firepower to be trained on the major cities of Ukraine with devastating effects.  The loss of life could be horrific.  Russia bombed Chechnya indiscriminately in the Second Chechen War.  It would not be a huge surprise to see similar tactics deployed in the current situation.
    • Thus, investors should be prepared for a war of attrition against Ukraine.  We expect Russia to prevail but at an enormous cost.   The population of Ukraine will likely suffer huge losses, and Russian military casualties will also be high.  The West is already well on the way to making Russia a pariah state; if a war of attrition does result, expect sanctions to deepen and remain in place indefinitely.  Based on the ideas in this must-read assessment of President Putin’s psychology, we think investors should be prepared for even more dramatic moves by the Russians.

Hong Kong:  As a reminder that China is also flexing its authoritarian muscles, though not as brutally as Russia, former Hong Kong Bar Association President Paul Harris has left the city abruptly after being questioned by national security police.  Harris had become a target for pro-Beijing politicians and state-run media, who accused him of being “anti-China” for suggesting changes to the new national security law imposed on Hong Kong by China.  The sudden departure of Harris has raised concern about a new crackdown on political dissent within the city’s legal profession.

United States-China:  In its annual trade policy agenda, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said it would focus on a “holistic and pragmatic” approach to U.S.-China relations in order to achieve long-term benefits for American workers.  Separately, administration officials said the White House would soon announce a series of measures to confront China on its industrial subsidies and protect America’s edge in new technologies.

  • As part of that effort, the White House is also weighing heightened scrutiny of U.S. companies’ investments in China, tighter export controls on sensitive technologies, and greater cooperation with European and Asian allies and partners on subsidies and other issues.
  • As we’ve noted before, even policies aimed at protecting the U.S. economy from China’s unfair competitive practices could impose at least short-term costs on some companies and investors.  Regulatory risks related to the U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry remain high.

U.S. Politics:  In his State of the Union address last night, President Biden not only called for unity on the Russia-Ukraine war and the need to keep opposing President Putin, but he also hinted that the coronavirus pandemic could be coming to an end.  He pledged to combat rising prices by boosting domestic production of automobiles and semiconductors and rebuilding the nation’s roads and bridges.  Biden also called on Congress to work with him on priorities that were part of his stalled “Build Back Better” plan—though he no longer uses that term—including cutting the cost of prescription drugs, reducing energy costs, and lowering the cost of childcare.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  In testimony to be delivered to Congress today and tomorrow, Federal Reserve Chair Powell will argue that it would be appropriate for the central bank to raise its benchmark interest rate at its meeting in two weeks because of high inflation, strong economic demand, and a tight labor market.  In contrast, he’ll say it is too soon to tell how Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the strict economic curbs imposed by the West against Moscow would influence the U.S. economy.

  • While investors have rightly been focused on the Russia-Ukraine crisis over the last two weeks, Powell’s statement is a reminder that monetary policymakers have become quite hawkish on inflation and consider it urgent to hike interest rates.
  • All the same, the Russia-Ukraine crisis is consistent with our view that the Fed may not hike rates as far or as fast as the bond market had suggested prior to the war.  As Powell suggests, blowback from the war could weigh on the U.S. economy and financial markets, potentially precluding too many rate hikes.  Bond values have already strengthened because of the war, but if the Fed signals that its rate hikes won’t go very far, it will help keep those values up.  Indeed, many investors have already begun to ratchet down their expectations for monetary tightening going forward.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to  438,870,727 worldwide, with 5,966,478 deaths.  In the U.S., confirmed cases rose to 79,092,025, with 952,509 deaths.  (For an interactive chart that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population, click here.)  Meanwhile, in data on the U.S. vaccination program, the number of people who are considered fully vaccinated now totals 215,677,777, equal to 65.0% of the total population.

View PDF

Daily Comment (February 28, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with an extensive update on the Russia-Ukraine crisis.  Among many significant developments over the weekend, the Russian offensive seems to have stalled, prompting talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials this morning.  All the same, the U.S. and its allies have imposed sweeping sanctions against Russia, contributing to disruptions in many financial markets so far today.  Given our expansive treatment of the Russia-Ukraine crisis, we provide only a limited overview of some other important U.S. and international developments.  We wrap up with the latest on the coronavirus pandemic.

Russia-Ukraine:  Some developments over the weekend were positive, and some were negative, but on balance, we judge that security, economic, and financial-market risks have increased.  Among the positive developments, multiple reports suggest the Russian offensive has stalled out because of stronger-than-anticipated resistance from the Ukrainians and the Russian military’s own logistical, tactical, and morale shortcomings (for a map of Russia’s surprisingly limited military gains so far, see below).  Additional strong sanctions by Western governments and corporations announced over the weekend may help explain why both sides have agreed to negotiations on Monday at the Belarusian-Ukrainian border.  On the negative side, however, it appears Russian President Putin has become so frustrated with Russia’s slow progress that he is increasingly apt to adopt stronger, more dangerous measures.  On Sunday, he announced he was putting Russia’s nuclear forces on heightened alert, and many observers believe he will try to reinvigorate the Russian invasion by unleashing much more destructive attacks against civilian targets.  It also appears he is making sure that Belarusian President Lukashenka helps with his dirty work.  Over the weekend, Lukashenka pushed through constitutional changes that would increase his power and rid Belarus of its non-nuclear status, which would allow Russia to base nuclear missiles there.  Reports indicate Belarus will also send troops into Ukraine to support the Russian forces there.  In any case, the tensions continue to push energy prices sharply higher today and are weighing on most major equity markets.  The tensions also threaten new supply shortages that could push prices up for a range of globally traded commodities.

  • Among the longer-term impacts of the crisis, multiple European governments have recognized their military vulnerabilities after decades of excessively low defense spending, and they are now hiking their military budgets.
    • Summing up the change, former NATO Deputy Secretary-General Alexander Vershbow said in an interview that “Real power comes from military power. Putin certainly feels that way. And I think NATO is going to have to develop a culture of readiness and start talking Putin’s language.”
    • This change of policy is already driving up defense stocks.  Given how much military modernization and rebuilding will be necessary for some NATO countries, we suspect the trend could be attractive for investors for an extended period.
  • Even more fundamentally, it appears to us that the crisis has profoundly altered Western assessments of the threat from authoritarian leaders in key countries like Russia and China and galvanized Western resolve to oppose them.
    • At one level, Western perceptions are being driven by the leadership of Ukrainian President Zelensky, who has vowed to stay in the capital city of Kyiv and fight shoulder-to-shoulder with his countrymen until the end.  Few would argue that this former television comedian is perfect, but people worldwide have embraced his patriotic commitment to defending Ukraine.  In a quote that will live for the ages, Zelensky, over the weekend, responded to Western offers to help him escape by saying, “The fight is here . . . I need ammunition, not a ride.”
    • Broadly, the sight of Ukrainian popular resistance and self-sacrifice is proving to be an inspiration.  Examples include a video of Ukrainian civilians facing down Russian tanks, Ukraine’s “Ghost of Kyiv” air force pilot who has already downed six Russian jets, and the story of 13 Ukrainian border guards who responded to a Russian navy ship’s radioed demand to surrender by responding, “Russian Navy Ship:  Go f*** yourself,” at which point they were killed.  Some of those stories have already been called into question, but that’s not the point.  The point is that the Ukrainians fighting for their independence and democratic government have proven to be a sympathetic underdog that only serves to highlight the ugliness of authoritarian aggression.  As we’ve mentioned before, the result will probably be a continued rift between the world’s liberal democracies and the authoritarian blocs led by Russia and China.  Complete globalization is now dead, and the result is likely to be a world in which the liberal democracies are largely decoupled from the Russian and Chinese blocs, the defense industry is growing and invigorated, and global supply chains are shorter and costlier.

U.S. Economy:  New research from the Atlanta FRB shows the country’s youngest workers are securing the fastest wage increases of any age group.  Median hourly wages for workers aged 16 to 24 were 10.6% higher in January than a year earlier, far exceeding the 4% overall gain for all workers.  The gains largely reflect the post-pandemic economic recovery, especially at restaurants and other venues that employ a lot of younger people.

Australia:  Huge rainstorms over the weekend have submerged cities and towns in Queensland and New South Wales, triggering thousands of insurance claims and stoking criticism of Prime Minister Morrison’s stance on climate change.

China:  New research by consultancy AidData highlights the extent to which President Xi’s “Belt and Road Initiative” of big infrastructure loans to generally poor countries leaves them saddled with debt and under the influence of China.  The new research shows that BRI contracts have not only required collateral in the form of escrow accounts funded by the projects themselves, but also accounts funded by the overall revenues of a borrowing entity.

North Korea:  According to Japanese and South Korean intelligence officials, North Korea launched a suspected ballistic missile off its east coast on Sunday morning, restarting weapons tests after nearly a month of inaction and highlighting that destabilizing military activity remains a threat in the Asia-Pacific region.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to  435,483,792 worldwide, with 5,950,144 deaths.  In the U.S., confirmed cases rose to 78,939,203, with 948,397 deaths.  (For an interactive chart that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population, click here.)  Meanwhile, in data on the U.S. vaccination program, the number of people who are considered fully vaccinated now totals 215,457,016, equal to 64.9% of the total population.

View PDF

Business Cycle Report (February 25, 2022)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

 In January, the diffusion index rose further above the recession indicator, signaling that the economy remains in expansion. In financial markets, higher yields on Treasuries have weighed on equities. Meanwhile, manufacturing data suggests that supply chains are improving. Lastly, the labor market appears to be strong, with nonfarm payrolls surprising on the upside. That being said, ten out of the 11 indicators are in expansion territory. The diffusion index rose from +0.8182 to +0.84545, remaining well above the recession signal of +0.2500.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a recovery. On average, the diffusion index currently provides about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for a recovery. Continue reading for a more in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing and refer to our Glossary of Charts at the back of this report for a description of each chart and what it measures. A chart title listed in red indicates that the indicator is signaling recession.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (February 25, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning! Today’s Comment will keep our focus on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. We are seeing a modest “risk-on” this morning due to reports that Russia is open to talks on Ukraine.  We have our doubts about Moscow’s sincerity, but the news, on its face, is positive.

The Russian assault on Ukraine has entered its second day. The onslaught has started to become broader in its scope. On Thursday, Russian troops took over the Chernobyl nuclear plant and are holding the staff hostage. Additionally, Russia has engaged in cyber warfare, attacking several of Ukraine’s banks and government offices, and several cities have seen a decrease in their internet connectivity. Ukraine remains resilient in the face of the bombardment, but it has now resorted to extreme measures as it tries to protect its homeland. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has ordered males aged 18-60 to stay in the country and help fight. The latest report shows Russian forces are now closing in on Kyiv, and Zelensky has warned he has been placed on a kill list. Russia has pledged to persist with these attacks until Ukraine surrenders but stated it is willing to meet in Minsk for talks. President Zelensky has indicated he will not surrender but is open to talks. Reports from U.S. intelligence officials are concerned that Kyiv could fall to Russia within days, and conditions will favor Russia.

Over the next few days, Western countries’ ability to stay united will probably dictate whether or not Russia will feel emboldened. The biggest impediment appears to be Europe. Russia depends on Europe to sell its fuels and receive payments, so a blockade from receiving euros could potentially be a death knell to the Russian economy. However, Europe is very dependent on Russia for its energy needs; therefore, pain will be felt by both if Europe follows through with banning Russia from receiving euros. As the cost of inaction rises over the next few days, Europe will be more inclined to act. So far, we are not confident Europe is willing to go to the extreme to defend Ukraine, but if other countries are harmed, this may change. As a result, we suspect there will be a lot of market volatility as the situation plays out.

The West appears to be treating Ukraine as a prelude to a broader conquest into Eastern Europe and has been slowly hinting at the possibility of direct conflict with Russia if any NATO members are harmed. President Biden stated the U.S. is prepared to defend its NATO allies in the event of an attack from Russia. The U.S. plans to send 7000 additional troops into Germany to reinforce its defenses. Meanwhile, Putin claims he fears Ukraine may be developing nuclear weapons. Although there is no evidence of this being true, it suggests that he resents the fact that Russia is being treated differently than the U.S. when it invaded Iraq. To further voice his frustration, for what he feels to be a double standard, he vaguely threatened the West with nuclear war. Putin warned that intervention from the West will be met with “consequences that [they] have never encountered in [their] history.” Thus, the risk of a broader conflict within Europe remains elevated.

The Ukraine crisis is already starting to impact other countries. In Europe, the UEFA Champions League has moved its championship final from St. Petersburg to Paris. In China, importers have temporarily stopped the seaborne purchases of Russian oil while evaluating the potential implications of handling these shipments.  Additionally, food inflation will probably increase as a conflict in the black sea will limit shipments of commodities such as wheat. In the U.S., Cargill, an agricultural food company, stated its ship was hit while sailing in the Black Sea.

 Non-Russia-Ukraine news:

COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 431,799,542, with 5,930,216 fatalities.  In the U.S., there are 78,799,264 confirmed cases with 944,831 deaths.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The CDC reports that 688,186,745 doses of the vaccine have been distributed, with 551,855,907 doses injected.  The number receiving at least one dose is 253,307,984, while the number of second doses is 215,253,201, and the number who have received the third dose, granting the highest level of immunity, is 93,643,962. The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.

View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (February 25, 2022)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices briefly moved above $100 per barrel on news of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories unexpectedly rose 4.5 mb compared to a 1.0 mb draw forecast.  The SPR declined 2.4 mb, meaning the net build was 2.1 mb.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production was unchanged at 11.6 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.4 mbpd while imports increased 1.0 mbpd.  Refining activity rose 2.1%, recovering from the previous week’s decline tied to the cold snap that adversely affected refining in Texas and Louisiana.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

This chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  This week’s report shows we are “splitting the difference” between last year’s plunge and the usual rise seen in the 5-year average.  Under normal circumstances, we would anticipate a steady rise in stockpiles, but under current conditions, normal patterns may not develop this year.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $69.56; using the euro/price model, fair value is $54.54.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $62.62.  Current prices are being driven by ESG and geopolitics, so the usual impact of inventory and the dollar has been overwhelmed.  However, the analysis shows that any sort of normalization will likely lead to lower oil prices.

 Market news:

  • Clearly the crisis in Ukraine is bullish for oil and natural gas prices. For now, conditions are fluid, but we expect rising concerns about the security of supply.  One key relationship to watch is the correlation between oil prices and commercial crude oil inventories.

The normal relationship between inventory and price is inverse.  In general, rising inventories suggest excess supply, so rising stockpiles are usually bearish.  However, as the above chart shows, there are periods where the two series are positively correlated.  During the geopolitical turbulence of the 1970s into the early 1980s, U.S. commercial crude stocks and prices were positively correlated.  Another word for this condition is “hoarding.”  In other words, rising inventories indicate increasing demand.  Since 2007, inventories and prices have been inversely correlated; we will be watching closely to see if this correlation “flips.”  If it does, it would be considered very bullish for crude oil prices.

Geopolitical news:

  • As Russia faces sanctions from the West for its actions in Ukraine, one uncertainty is how well Moscow will cope. It should be noted that Russia has increased its reserves and has engaged in fiscal austerity, which should give it some ability to press back against sanctions.
  • One way the Biden administration is addressing high oil prices is to restore the nuclear deal with Iran. We estimate the removal of sanctions on Iran would likely add about 1.0 mbpd to the market.  Iran has been breaking sanctions in recent years, so the increase in supply will probably be modest.  In addition, due to distrust on both sides, the deal will probably be implemented in stages, meaning oil flows will not be immediate if a deal is struck.  One major worry is that Iran is so close to a “bomb” that the new deal will freeze it at the threshold level, meaning if the deal ever fails, Iran could rapidly become a nuclear power.
  • Israel, which opposes any thaw with Iran, is increasing its security cooperation with Bahrain. The threat from Iran is leading the Gulf States to normalize relations with Israel.  Even Turkey, which had been at odds with the Gulf States over the former’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood, is moving to improve relations.
  • Next week’s BWGR discusses the situation in Turkey. The country has been hit with rapid inflation caused in part by heterodox monetary policy.  Recent reports indicate that electric utility prices are soaring, adding to the woes of Turks.
  • Ethiopia has started generating electricity from the largest dam on the Blue Nile, raising fears that flows north will be cut.

Alternative energy/policy news:

  View PDF