2022 Outlook: Update #1 (February 18, 2022)

by Mark Keller, CFA, Bill O’Grady, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

In our 2022 Outlook: The Year of Fat Tails, we outlined a forecast with a higher likelihood of events outside the norm. To compensate for the unusual level of uncertainty, we promised to provide frequent updates to the forecast. This report is the first of the year. One of our contentions in the forecast was that the FOMC would not raise interest rates this year. In light of developments, this position is untenable. Therefore, in this update, we will discuss four potential outcomes from the upcoming rate hike cycle and the potential effects on financial markets.

Monetary Policy
Over the past three months, we have seen a dramatic shift in expectations surrounding monetary policy. One way to observe them is by the behavior of the two-year deferred three-month Eurodollar futures implied yields.

In early November, the deferred Eurodollar futures were projecting steady policy for the next two years. In a mere three months, we have seen a rapid shift to nearly four rate hikes of 25 bps each.  Although similar shifts have occurred in the past, we note that when such shifts occur, the likelihood of recession does increase.

With tighter monetary policy looming, we would argue there are four likely terminal paths.  They are as follows:

  • Path #1: Policy is rapidly tightened, leading to a recession.
  • Path #2: Policy is tightened too slowly, causing a debasement crisis.
  • Path #3: Policy tightening triggers a financial crisis, leading to a rapid easing of policy.
  • Path #4: A soft landing occurs.

Read the full report

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Ukraine: Key Questions (February 14, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Bill O’Grady | PDF

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, now available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

For the past two months, Russia has been mobilizing around Ukraine, leading to fears that Moscow is planning to invade.  The U.S. has warned Russia against such action, lining out extensive sanctions and other potential responses.

Given the fluid nature of the situation in Ukraine, it is difficult to create a report detailing current events.  After all, they are changing so rapidly that this element is best left to the media.  Instead, we want to give some context to the current situation formatted in a series of questions with responses from both of us, Bill and Patrick.  As always, we will close with market ramifications.

Read the full report

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – Two Power Plays in Kazakhstan (January 31, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Bill O’Grady | PDF

Don’t miss the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, now available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google

Over the past month, unrest has developed in Kazakhstan.  The unrest began as protests against rising fuel prices, but it soon blossomed into broader, more widespread, and violent civil disorder that had the appearance of an inter-elite conflict.  Although Central Asia doesn’t usually garner the world’s attention, instability in the region could affect larger countries, such as China, Russia, and India.  The volatility in Kazakhstan was also something of a surprise as the country has tended to be stable during its period of independence since the fall of the Soviet Union.

Despite being often overlooked by the Western media, Kazakhstan is an important country.  It’s a major oil producer and the world’s dominant supplier of uranium.  Oil prices, already elevated, rose further on fears that the Kazakh disorder would lead to additional supply disruptions.  Uranium and associated equities also rose in price on the reports.  In this report, we begin with some background on Kazakhstan, including a short history and a discussion of the region’s role in Russia’s imperial behavior.  We next delve into the reasons for the January unrest and the way it played out for Kazakh and Russian leaders.  As always, we conclude with market ramifications.

Read the full report

Keller Quarterly (January 2022)

Letter to Investors | PDF

As I write this letter, stock markets around the world have spent much of the last three weeks selling off sharply.  After peaking on January 4, the S&P 500 has fallen over 12% from that high. This, after it returned over 28% last year (including dividends).  In fact, most indices were up double-digits last year and many, like the S&P, were up well over 20%.  How can investors bounce from optimism to pessimism so quickly?  It’s actually very common.  Remember, the market doesn’t require all investors to turn pessimistic to go down sharply.  Less than 5% of shareholders deciding to sell at the same time is enough to induce a sharp decline in stock prices.  That decline is enough for the other 95% to wonder, “Maybe I should sell too?” and away you go.  Before you know it, the market is down 10% and all the media is in a tizzy.

At times like this, it’s important to evaluate the realities of the market and the economy; in other words, what we know about the present versus what we don’t know about the future.  What we know is that the economies in the U.S. and developed countries around the world are continuing to expand from the pandemic-induced global recession of two years ago.  This expansion will naturally slow over the next few years but will most likely continue.  The delta variant of COVID, which was receding at the time we wrote our October letter, has been replaced by the omicron variant, which has once again frightened much of the public and policymakers.  At this point, omicron appears to be following the standard trend of virus evolution: it is more contagious and less lethal than prior variants.  It’s still very dangerous, of course, but this is the pattern we have previously discussed, and we expect it to persist as COVID continues to mutate.  Each variant will scare the markets as worries of economic slowdown emerge, but we expect these cycles will simply produce a “wave action” to economic progress.

We discussed inflation last quarter, namely, that we expected it to degrade over time as production and transportation problems are slowly repaired.  That is still our view.  We have seen such post-recession supply problems before, notably back in the mid-1980s, and they do eventually get better.  The labor shortages will not improve as quickly, which is why we expect inflation to normalize at around 3% per annum when all is said and done, rather than the 2% (or less) rate we’ve seen in the last decade.  But the economy and the markets can adjust to that rate rather easily without much damage to financial assets.  And, as we noted last quarter, it’s not a bad sign that there are unfilled jobs around.  That’s the sign of a strong economy, not a weak one. It may mean that corporate profit margins are reduced somewhat, but we note that they’re at all-time highs anyway, and that corporate profits this year should be at record levels.  More people working and making more money isn’t a bad thing; it’s the lifeblood of any economy.

What is new is that the Fed has decided to become an inflation-fighter.  (At least they’re saying they are.)  People are always worrying about Washington and politics.  Mostly, they’re worrying about the wrong things.  Their primary worry out of Washington almost always should be the Fed.  This is one of those years where the Fed’s action should be considered a key risk factor.

The problem is that the Fed really can’t do anything to fix the fundamental inflation problem, which is restricted supply.  All they can do is dampen demand, which would also hurt economic growth.  The stock market sold off recently, in our opinion, because it feared that an overly aggressive Fed might just come up with a “cure” for inflation that “kills the patient.”  Our best guess of Fed behavior in the year ahead is that they will raise rates a few times, the financial markets will sell off, and they will stop.  As we noted above, we think it’s likely that inflation will cool with or without Fed tightening.

But the Fed is always under pressure to “do something,” which means we are probably going to see a fair amount of volatility this year as the market worries about what the Fed might do.  But with the economy expanding nicely and corporate profits strong, we think the wise course of action is to remain optimistic for the year and beyond.  In fact, years of higher than normal volatility often give us good buying opportunities, especially when the underlying economy is strong (which is the case now).

One more thing: years of higher-than-normal volatility are often years of higher-than-normal emotions for investors.  This is dangerous.  As we’ve advised many times, investing should not be an emotional endeavor, but a rational one.  In fact, emotions are the enemies of successful long-term investing.  As COVID, Fed actions, and other factors create gyrating markets, we can all benefit by striving to keep our emotions in check.

We appreciate your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View PDF

Daily Comment (January 21, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Good morning! Today’s report begins with Treasury Secretary Yellen’s outlook on inflation. We then turn to a report from the Federal Reserve regarding digital currencies and comment on a few other U.S. economic and policy news items. Next, we discuss details about China’s investigation into the Ant Group. International news follows, and we wrap up with our pandemic coverage.

In an interview with CNBC, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen stated she expects inflation to slow down close to 2% by the end of the year. Her forecast assumes the pandemic is somewhat controlled by that time. Although we are more sanguine about inflation relative to our peers, we must admit that a prediction of 2% is a bit overly optimistic. In explaining her prediction, she mentioned that a key to lowering inflation would be to resolve the supply chain issues. Even though we agree that improving supply chains will help, our research suggests energy prices also must be addressed if the administration wants to successfully lower inflation.

In 2021, the average price of Brent Crude Oil rose nearly 60%, its sharpest rise in over 30 years. The strong rally in oil prices was driven by a surge in demand due to the reopening of the global economy, falling inventories, and shrinking capacity. We do not expect oil prices to have a similar rise in 2022, but a significant increase in oil prices will likely prevent inflation from reverting to 2% by year-end.

The chart above shows the primary driver in nondurable goods (which also includes food and apparel) inflation in 2021 was gasoline prices, a by-product of oil. With more analysts, including our firm, predicting the price of Brent Crude will reach $100 a barrel this year, we think it will be very difficult for inflation to fall to 2% in 2022. However, we still believe inflation will ease throughout the year to around 4.0-3.5%.

Economics and policy: 

China:

The Ant Group, an affiliate company of Alibaba (BABA, $131.03), has been implicated in a corruption scandal. A documentary alleged private companies made “unreasonably high payments” for private land to a brother of a Chinese Communist Party member in exchange for government favors. Although the Ant Group was not named directly in the documentary, public records seemed to link the group with the transaction. The crackdown on Alibaba shows Chinese regulators are still trying to rein in big tech companies.

International news:  

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 342,928,762, with 5,576,274 fatalities.  In the U.S., there are 69,309,309 confirmed cases with 860,248 deaths.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The CDC reports that 655,282,365 doses of the vaccine have been distributed, with 531,864,871 doses injected.  The number receiving at least one dose is 250,028,635, the number of second doses is 209,842,610, and the number of the third dose, the highest level of immunity, is 82,450,772. The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.

  • EU countries are set to update their rules on traveling. The new rules will allow travelers with a COVID-19 certificate to avoid additional testing or quarantine if they are not coming from a high-risk area. The European Center for Disease Prevention and Control coronavirus map, which tracks the rise in cases for most of Europe, will be used to determine whether travelers will be required to undergo additional screening.
  • There is growing concern that China will not be able to maintain its no-tolerance COVID-19 policy. The city has struggled to contain the virus despite extreme measures such as mass testing, stringent border controls, extensive contact tracing, and snap lockdowns. If COVID-19 cases continue to spread in China, it could lead to worsening supply chain problems.

Germany expects to see as many as 400,000 COVID-19 cases per day by mid-February.

View PDF