Asset Allocation Quarterly (First Quarter 2022)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

  • We anticipate that economic growth will continue, but at a more modest pace than last year, and the potential for a recession within our three-year forecast period remains low.
  • The Fed’s prior intransigence on inflation has yielded to a more hawkish stance leading to expectations for the curtailment of balance sheet expansion and the probability of several rate hikes over the coming year.
  • Among strategies with income as an objective, the former elevated equity allocations are modestly reduced, while the heavy tilt toward value and overweight to lower capitalization stocks are retained.
  • Although the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar may remain elevated and could even modestly strengthen, global economic expansion mirrors that of the U.S. and valuations of international developed market companies are compelling.
  • Risks associated with China lead to an exclusion of emerging market positions in all but the most aggressive strategy.
  • A position in broad-based commodities, with an emphasis on oil, is employed across the array of strategies as is a position in gold given the advantages it affords during heightened geopolitical risk.

ECONOMIC VIEWPOINTS

Although we recognize the elevated prints on inflation and GDP will become more muted in the coming months, as the base effects of comparative numbers from a year ago will not be as stark, continuing issues with supply chains and unfilled job openings temper our economic enthusiasm. We believe the U.S. economy has recently entered a mid-cycle of expansion and the potential for a recession, while above zero, remains low for our three-year forecast period. A policy mistake by the Fed is one of the more prominent risks to our case for modulating inflation, a steady increase in wages, and economic growth, particularly in services as COVID variants run out of letters in the Greek alphabet. Recently released minutes from the Fed’s latest meeting reveal a level of zealousness in addressing inflation through advancing the curtailment of balance sheet expansion as well as hiking the fed funds rate multiple times in 2022 and likely beyond. As contrasted with short-lived inflation stemming from supply chain issues, the concerns of the Fed appear to be centered on fighting more durable inflation in the form of steadily increasing wages and rents and their congruent effect on long-run inflation expectations. The Fed will effectively be attempting to navigate a narrow channel of reducing the more pernicious aspects of inflation without detrimental effects on the labor market or economic growth. Narrowing this tight channel further is the extraction of fiscal stimulus. The generous fiscal provisions of the past 20 months have either expired or are expiring, and the passage of further legislation, especially in an election year, looks increasingly unlikely. Given the Fed’s intention for a series of rate hikes, the risks increase for a policy mistake. Yet if the Fed is deliberate and studied in its tightening in an attempt to normalize policy, we believe the chances for a mistake are markedly reduced.

The economies of other developed countries are now mostly into expansion, mirroring the U.S. in terms of both rapid recoveries to pre-pandemic peaks as well as projected growth rates of over 5% for all of 2021, representing the highest rate of growth since the early 1990s. In response, several central banks have commenced reversals of their prior ultra-accommodative monetary policies. Although the ECB and BOJ are probably going to be exceptions, with the former projected to wind down its net purchases for just its pandemic response bond purchase program, the BOE, RBA, and BOC have fully curtailed their government bond purchase programs and have indicated their intentions to increase rates, joining the ranks of Brazil, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, and South Korea, which tightened monetary policy several months ago. Moreover, fiscal support largely expired at the end of 2021, particularly in European countries. Not only are supply bottlenecks and inflation  as troublesome overseas as domestically, but the retraction of fiscal spending and monetary policy normalization produce a similar backdrop as in the U.S. Therefore, our expectation is that the global economy will continue to expand, albeit at a lower rate than last year. This expectation is tempered by the potential for policy mistakes, extended COVID mutations and related economic impact, and difficulties emanating from China. Beyond the saber-rattling toward Taiwan, concerns surrounding China include trade policies and premature loosening of credit conditions in the leveraged property market and the potential for corresponding negative effects on debt of other emerging markets.

STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK

We expect earnings growth to continue over our forecast period, yet at a slower pace than the rapid growth experienced last year. Concisely, we expect growth to increase at a decreasing rate. Similarly, we expect bottlenecks, inflation, and COVID to be peaking as well. We believe we are in the early portion of the mid-cycle of economic expansion, thus more cyclical lower market capitalization companies have particular appeal as they benefit from lower valuations and can adapt more nimbly to changing economic conditions. In normal periods, bouts of inflation can contribute to a lowering of P/E ratios. Core inflation is expected around the 3% level, and while we have no illusions that this time will be different, we believe it will disproportionately affect the mega-cap companies that have grown to encompass an unwieldy proportion of the U.S. equity market. As the accompanying chart indicates, the concentration of the largest companies has reached a proportion never experienced in U.S. equities. In fact, the top six account for nearly 25% as of this writing, all of which are names with a tech-heavy influence. It is often argued that the late 1990s experienced a similar concentration yet with a dearth of earnings. Our belief is that even with solid earnings, the concentration will abate over our forecast period and, by extension, contribute to a lower aggregate P/E level on the S&P 500.

(Source: Strategas Economics)

In order to ameliorate some risk we find inherent in the attenuation of holdings, we maintain a significant bias of 65% to value stocks, where the concentration is far less. In addition, within U.S. large cap equities, we maintain the more cyclically oriented sectors of Materials, Financials, and Housing, and introduce a defensive position in the Health Care sector. Across the array of strategies there is elevated exposure to lower market capitalizations owing to more favorable valuations and their potential to deftly navigate a changing inflationary picture and Fed tightening.

Beyond the U.S., favorable valuations are even more compelling than in lower capitalization domestic stocks. Even with a stable or moderately strengthening U.S. dollar, stocks in international developed markets, specifically the Eurozone and U.K., still harbor solid appeal based on traditional valuation metrics alone. Should a catalyst develop that reduces the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar, which is overvalued relative to almost every currency by historical measures, this will further benefit U.S.-based investors in international stocks. Although developed markets hold appeal, the heavy influence of China on emerging markets and its attendant risk results in a void to emerging market stocks in all but the most aggressive strategy, where the holding is explicitly ex-China.

BOND MARKET OUTLOOK

The anticipated termination of the Fed’s balance sheet expansion in March and the potential for the central bank to raise fed funds as many as four times this year leads to our modest expectations for bonds over the forecast period. As the accompanying chart indicates, real fed funds and the ex-post real 10-year Treasury note are at negative levels last experienced after the end of World War II. Although this does not necessarily portend dire consequences for bondholders, it introduces an element of caution that causes us to concentrate holdings in the short- and intermediate-term segments and reduce the prior heavy allocation to corporate bonds. Corporate bonds are near historically tight spreads. Similarly, the spreads of mortgage-backed securities [MBS] to maturity equivalent Treasuries are modestly tighter than average, leading to the exclusion of MBS in all strategies.

OTHER MARKETS

REITs have produced outsized returns over the past year. While the newer segments of data centers, communication towers, and warehouse fulfillment centers delivered another year of healthy returns, the traditional segments of hospitality, office, and retail fully recovered in 2021 from COVID-related investor fears. With REITs in the aggregate close to fully valued, especially in view of a more hawkish Fed, we find the potential risk/return profile to be more attractive in other equities.

Our expectation of a continuing global economic recovery, albeit at a less than frenetic pace, encourages an allocation to a broad-basket of commodities, with an emphasis on energy. We believe that the move away from oil will certainly not be abrupt; however, the restraint of capital for development of sources for new oil will hamper supply, while demand, though dampened, remains strong throughout our forecast period. Accordingly, we position a broad commodity ETF, the majority of which is in oil and its derivative products, across all strategies. In addition, we retain a position in gold across all strategies given its attraction as a haven from heightened geopolitical risk.

Read the full report

Bi-Weekly Geopolitical Report – What Would a U.S.-China War Look Like? (January 18, 2022)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

(Note: As we shift to a bi-weekly publication schedule for this report in 2022, we introduce the accompanying Geopolitical Podcast, now available on our website and most podcast platforms: Apple | Spotify | Google)

We’ve written extensively about the worsening geopolitical tensions between the United States and China, which have already affected investors.  For example, the Trump administration’s tariffs on Chinese imports have skewed economic developments in each country.  Businesses in each country have suffered, while others have benefitted.

Looking ahead, the risks are even bigger.  It’s important to stress that a U.S.-China war is not inevitable.  On each side, the top leadership probably wants to avoid war.  However, as each country flexes its muscles and pushes back against the other, there is a growing risk of miscalculation or mistake that leads to shooting and bloodshed.  Even if the conflict became “World War III,” it would not necessarily look the same as World War II.  A conflict between today’s two greatest powers would exemplify a new, unique form of modern warfare in terms of the domains in which it would be fought, the weapons utilized, the tactics and strategies employed, the alliances facing each other, and the goals pursued by each side.  This report describes the likely lead-up to such a war and how it might be fought.  As always, we wrap up with a discussion of the likely ramifications for investors.

Read the full report

2022 Outlook: The Year of Fat Tails (December 16, 2021)

by Mark Keller, CFA, Bill O’Grady, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Summary:

  • We don’t expect a recession in 2022. Real GDP growth will range between 3.0% to 3.5%. Inflation remains elevated, though price pressures will likely subside in H2 2022. We expect the core PCE deflator, the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation, to decline into a range between 3.5% to 3.0%. Overall CPI will decline into a range of 4.0% to 3.5%. So, inflation will remain elevated but should ease. Labor markets should slowly normalize, with unemployment reaching 4.0% by year’s end.
  • The 10-year T-note will end the year with a yield of 1.85%, with an intra-year peak of 2.20%. Our base case is that the Federal Reserve will end its balance sheet expansion by mid-2022, but the first rate hike is more likely to come in Q1 2023.
  • The S&P 500 will reach 5000 in 2022, approximately 6.0% higher than the expected 4700 at year-end 2021. Given liquidity conditions, we would carry an upside bias to this forecast. On the negative side, inflation is elevated, multiples are stretched, and bottlenecks and rising labor costs could eventually hurt margins. On the positive side, liquidity is ample, especially in the top 10% of households, and will tend to support equities. We favor value over growth and small caps over large caps. We remain favorable to foreign stocks.
  • We still view the dollar as overvalued, but some sort of exogenous catalyst will likely be necessary to change the current bullish sentiment.
  • We are bullish commodities and believe we are in the early stages of a broader bull market. Gold is undervalued on a long-term basis but is facing competition from bitcoin.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (December 14, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EST] | PDF

Note to readers: The Daily Comment will go on holiday after Friday’s comment and return on January 3, 2022. From all of us at Confluence Investment Management, have a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

In today’s Comment, we open with a review of key U.S. news, including an update on the weekend’s tornadoes, the status of President Biden’s latest fiscal program, and the opening of the Federal Reserve’s policy meeting today.  We next deal with a range of international news, including the recent U.S. pushback against China’s aggressive geopolitical moves.  We wrap up with the latest developments regarding the coronavirus pandemic.

U.S. Tornado Toll:  The number of confirmed fatalities from last weekend’s tornadoes rose to 88, with the vast majority of the deaths in Kentucky.  So far, we haven’t seen an estimate of insurable loss damages, but it could be high.  Although meteorologists believe the unusually powerful storms for this time of year had their origin in extraordinarily warm temperatures, they couldn’t yet tie them directly to global warming.  All the same, we note that as global temperatures trend upward, the increased heat in the atmosphere has coincided with a rise in particularly devastating storms, especially over land, as shown in the graph below.

U.S. Fiscal Policy:  President Biden lobbied Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia by phone yesterday in another effort to garner the senator’s support for the Democrats’ $1.75 trillion “Build Back Better” social policy and climate change legislation.  However, neither side reported any breakthrough, other than agreeing to talk again in the coming days.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  Today, the Fed begins its latest two-day policy meeting.  When the new policy statement is released tomorrow, the officials are expected to say they will accelerate the tapering of their bond-buying to end the program by March, which would position them to start hiking the benchmark fed funds interest rate in the first half of the year if they so choose.  However, Chair Powell’s abrupt mutation into an inflation hawk has some investors nervous about what the policymakers will actually do at the meeting.  Until the decision is out, it could lead to further volatility in the markets as it did yesterday.

  • As we noted in our Comment yesterday, most major central banks are holding a policy meeting this week, but their expected policy actions range widely.  Importantly, the IMF warned in its latest review of the British economy that the Bank of England is already behind on tamping down inflation pressures and must not delay rate hikes, even as the fast-spreading Omicron mutation of the coronavirus has some observers thinking the central bank might punt on rate hikes this week.
  • Separately, the Canadian government and the Bank of Canada yesterday agreed to renew the central bank’s mandate to target 2% annual inflation, with a new emphasis on giving the central bank flexibility to address economic challenges and help obtain full employment when conditions warrant.
    • Under the renewed mandate, which runs until the end of 2026, the central bank will set rate policy to achieve 2% annual inflation or the midpoint of a 1% to 3% target range.
    • The bank will have flexibility in rate setting to achieve “maximum sustainable employment . . .  The central bank will utilize the flexibility of the 1% to 3% range only to an extent that is consistent with keeping medium-term inflation expectations well anchored at 2%.”

United States-China:  In a major policy speech delivered in Jakarta, Secretary of State Blinken criticized “Beijing’s aggressive actions” against its neighbors and reaffirmed Washington’s commitment to an Indo-Pacific region “free from coercion and accessible to all.”

  • Blinken said the U.S. plans to strengthen its treaty alliances with Japan, South Korea, Australia, the Philippines, and Thailand in order to counter China’s aggressive geopolitical moves.  In addition, he said the Biden administration is developing a “comprehensive Indo-Pacific economic framework” that would include co-operation on trade, the digital economy, technology, supply chain resilience, and investments in decarbonization.
  • Although the speech broke little new ground, it drew a sharp rebuke from the Chinese government, which understands that its effort to build up Chinese power and geopolitical influence could be hemmed in to the extent that foreign nations understand the threat they face from China.

United States-China-Japan:  Elaborating on comments he made earlier this month, former Japanese Prime Minister Abe said that any Chinese attack on a U.S. military vessel in a contingency concerning Taiwan could become a situation allowing Japan to exercise the right of collective self-defense, i.e., military action.  Pointing out that Yonaguni Island — Japan’s westernmost territory — is only 110 kilometers away from Taiwan, Abe said, “If something happens here, it will definitely become a crucial situation” affecting Japan’s peace and security as stipulated in the country’s security legislation.  The statement points to a growing realization in Japan that the country faces a severe security risk from China and needs to strengthen its alliance with the U.S. to counter it.

Norway:  NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg said he has applied to become the governor of Norway’s central bank starting next October.  Stoltenberg, who formerly served as Norway’s prime minister, and finance minister before that, is a political heavyweight who would likely be a front-runner for the position, along with current deputy governor Ida Wolden Bache.

  • Stoltenberg’s supporters have said that having a political heavyweight in the role would be desirable and that few understand Norway’s economy as well as Stoltenberg, who, as finance minister, came up with the spending rule that decides how much government can take out of the oil fund each year.  Stoltenberg’s leadership of the central bank would likely be well received by investors.
  • In contrast, however, Stoltenberg’s critics argue that the credibility of both Norges Bank and the country’s sovereign wealth fund would be placed at risk by putting a former politician — and one who is close friends with current Labor leader and prime minister Jonas Gahr Støre— in charge.

Global Supply Chains:  Data from the OECD indicate corporate capital investment fell in the U.S., Canada, Japan, Germany, South Korea, the Netherlands, and Switzerland during the third quarter, despite the excess of demand over supply that’s driving up prices worldwide.  The causes of the slowdown appear mixed. Many businesses cite price rises, supply-chain problems, and uncertainty regarding how long the surge in consumer spending will last.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 270,933,004 worldwide, with 5,316,286 deaths.  In the U.S., confirmed cases rose to 50,120,820, with 798,722 deaths.  (For an interactive chart that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population, click here.)  Meanwhile, in data on the U.S. vaccination program, the number of people who have received at least their first shot totals 239,274,656.  The data show that 72.1% of the U.S. population has now received at least one dose of a vaccine, and 60.9% of the population is fully vaccinated.

Virology

 Economic and Financial Market Impacts

View PDF