Weekly Geopolitical Report – Data and Geopolitics: Part II (August 23, 2021)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

In Part I of this report, we discussed why today’s political leaders and governments are now paying such close attention to the control of data and information, and what that means for geopolitics.  In Part II, we will show how China is perhaps the best example of modern state control over data and information.  Indeed, China’s current “industrial policy” is essentially a form of “information policy.”  A central strategy for China’s current leadership is to generate, utilize, control, and protect information as a way of building up its geopolitical and economic power.  To wrap up the discussion, we will discuss the ramifications of this trend for investors.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (August 23, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning and happy Monday!  Schools are reopening, and it’s a risk-on day today.  U.S. equity futures are higher, and gold and oil are rebounding as well.  The Fed’s meeting at Jackson Hole is this week, but like last year, the meeting will be virtual.  Our coverage begins with an active weekend for the weather.  Tennessee had heavy rain, and there was a tropical storm in New England.  An update on Afghanistan is next, followed by China news and the international roundup.  We then discuss economics and policy, and we close with pandemic coverage.

Climate:  It was a busy weekend for extreme weather events.  Tennessee was hit with torrential rain over the weekend, with reports of 15” to 20” in some areas.  Flooding was widespread, as was the damage.  At least 22 people have died, and many more are missing.  Tropical Storm Henri slammed Rhode Island and other parts of New England over the weekend.  Hurricane Grace made landfall in Mexico as a category 3 storm; the storm caused at least eight fatalities.

China:  Taiwan’s reliance on the U.S. for defense is a concern.

  • Lithuania has faced the ire of Beijing for allowing Taiwan to open a diplomatic mission in Vilnius. China has retaliated by banning new food imports from Lithuania.
  • One worry for U.S. military planners is that Taiwan isn’t really preparing to resist a Chinese invasion. Although the country has bought flashy military hardware from the U.S., it hasn’t actually hardened itself to make an invasion difficult.  Taiwan needs to build shore barriers, lay sea mines, and take similar measures to make an amphibious assault difficult.  Complicating matters is that Taiwan has gone to a volunteer military and is struggling to find recruits.  Taipei’s plan appears to be hoping the U.S. intervenes.  Although we think the U.S. would (and we feel quite certain Japan would) take military action to defend Taiwan, it’s hard to sell that to the U.S. when Taiwan doesn’t appear willing to defend itself.
  • As China’s economy slows, iron ore prices are falling fast. Not only does a slowing economy need less iron, but Beijing is also pushing steel producers to use electric arc furnaces to make steel.  The feedstock is scrap and is less polluting.
  • As bitcoin mining leaves China, miners are returning to the U.S.

Afghanistan:  Here is what we are following:

Economics and policy:  Budget and infrastructure start to move through the House, and fears of peak growth are upon us.

  • Speaker Pelosi is preparing to move both the budget bills and the bipartisan infrastructure package. A moderate bloc of nine representatives is demanding the bipartisan bill go first; this plan is opposed by the populists, who fear that the budget will fail to pass in its current form, and thus, spending goals will fail.  Pelosi usually wins out on these things, but so far, the moderates are holding tight.  Our expectation is that both will eventually pass, but the current budget of $3.5 trillion won’t make it through in its current form; we expect something closer to $2.0 trillion.
  • Economic data continue to come in strong but are weaker than expected. This development is leading economists and strategists to suggest we have already seen peak growth.
  • Logistical snarls continue, and there are growing worries that there may not be enough container ships to meet demand. Supply constraints tend to trigger inflation, and this sort of inflation is difficult to address.  Policymakers, in the short run, can usually only affect demand, so they are forced to tighten policy, effectively taking spending power away from firms and households as prices rise.  In the longer run, deregulation can increase available supply, but with a rather long lag.
  • The Arizona election audit is due today. Although we expect it to generate a lot of headlines, any real action (recalls, new elections) must first pass through the courts, where the veracity of the audit will face tests.

International roundup:  Sweden’s PM is stepping down, and Merkel met with the leader of Ukraine.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 211,925,410, with 4,433,615 fatalities.  In the U.S., there are 37,711,989 confirmed cases with 628,504 deaths.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high-frequency data on various factors.  The CDC reports that 428,531,345 doses of the vaccine have been distributed, with 362,657,771 doses injected.  The number receiving at least one dose is 201,425,785, while the number receiving second doses, which would grant the highest level of immunity, is 170,821,621.  For the population older than 18, 62.4% of the population has been vaccinated.  The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.

 View PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly – The Impact of Older Americans on the Labor Market (August 20, 2021)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

In analyzing the path for the economy, an important factor is separating the temporary effects of the pandemic from those that are longer lasting.  The debate over whether inflation will be transitory is tied to this determination.  The impact on the labor markets is another element.  One change that appears to be permanent is that the pandemic accelerated retirement among baby boomers.

Currently, Americans born in 1959 or earlier are eligible for Social Security, but 65 years old remains the traditional retirement age.  Americans working past 65 years old, at least as a percentage of the total labor force, was common after WWII.  Social Security was still relatively new.  However, from 1947 to 1985, the participation rate for Americans over the age of 65 fell from the 28.6% peak in October 1949 to a low of 10.4% in June 1984.  The number of Americans in the labor force over the age of 65 peaked at 11.2 million in February 2020.  It has fallen since the onset of the pandemic.  The participation rate, the percentage of workers relative to the labor force, has declined since the onset of the pandemic and is continuing to decline.

The chart above shows both the actual number of civilians employed over the age of 65 and the percentage of these workers compared to the labor force of 65-year-olds and older.  Participation has been rising since the early 1990s.  Some of this rise is simply due to a rising population of Americans aged 65 years and older relative to the total population.

This chart shows the actual and projected level of 65-year-olds and older compared to the total population.  The percentage has been rising since 2003 and is forecast to plateau in 2040.  The entire baby boom generation will be 65 years or older by the end of the decade.

We developed a simple model to measure labor participation of those 65 years and older compared to the population of that age cohort.  Starting in 2008, the model generally predicted the path of participation in this age bracket.  However, since the pandemic, participation has plunged, and the pattern suggests that it’s likely permanent.  Using a similar calculation using the employment/population ratio for this age cohort, the decline in older worker employment represents around 833,000 jobs.  Assuming a stable labor force, that would have reduced the overall unemployment rate to 4.9%.

What impact would a decline in workers aged 65 and older have?  Since older workers are often paid more due to their years of service, losing these workers will, at least initially, improve margins.  It will almost certainly lead to some increased hiring of younger workers and may accelerate lowering the age of the workforce.  Industries will not be equally affected; some are at high risk.  For example, in 2020, 32.9% of farmers and 25.0% of aircraft assemblers are in this age bracket.

For markets, older Americans who leave the workforce may be inclined to reduce their equity positions.  However, returns in fixed income are paltry, so the potential negative impact might be less than one would expect.  Dividend-paying equities could be particularly attractive.  But overall, the impact on financial markets will likely be centered on the wage effects.

View PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Data and Geopolitics: Part I (August 16, 2021)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

For decades now, the post-industrial “information age” has been a key topic of interest for economists, business leaders, financial managers, and investors.  All have come to appreciate the implications of silicon-based semiconductors and the opportunities they create for mass data management, storage, communications, and analytics.  In recent years, data has also become a major concern for governments.  In Part I of this report, we discuss why political leaders are now paying closer attention to the control of data and information, and what that means for geopolitics.  In Part II next week, we will show how governmental control over data and information is playing out in China, in particular, and conclude with the ramifications for investors going forward.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (August 16, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning.  Risk markets are weaker this morning.  Fears of slowing global economic growth, the persistence of the pandemic, and the unsettling images from Kabul are weighing on sentiment.  Our coverage begins with the events in Afghanistan.  Up next is economics and policy, followed by China news and our international roundup.  We close with pandemic news.

Afghanistan:  We continue to monitor events in the country.  Over the weekend, the government of Ashraf Ghani has collapsed as he has fled the country.  Over the past month, the Taliban has captured key cities amid almost non-existent resistance in most areas.  By taking Kabul, the Taliban has effective control of the country.  The U.S. era in Afghanistan has come to a rapid and chaotic end.  The last land route out of Afghanistan has been taken by the Taliban, leaving air evacuation from Kabul airport as the only remaining exit.  The airport has reportedly come under fire, so leaving the country may not be possible at some point.  Scenes at the airport, similar to the iconic ones observed in 1975 Saigon, will become a lasting memoryCrowds have packed the airport, hoping for a flight out.  Western nations are scrambling to pull embassy personnel out of the country.  U.S. embassy officials were ordered to destroy sensitive materials, and most personnel are being evacuated.  It appears that U.S. forces control the Kabul airport, but it is unclear how long that will last.  The State Department has told remaining employees to stay at the embassy.  Helicopters have been ferrying workers out, as it has become too dangerous to escape by car.  European embassies will remain in Kabul to process visas for local employees who would be in great danger from the Taliban government.  Germany is sending its military to evacuate its embassy.

Unfortunately for the Taliban, taking territory is one thing, but governing is another.  Afghanistan is divided along tribal and ethnic lines, and once outside powers are ousted, the country will likely spiral into civil conflict.   When the Taliban was in control before 2001, it was a brutal regime; although we expect a return to such governance, it is possible the group may govern with a lighter hand this time around.  The old leadership is mostly gone, and the lesson from before is that harsh conditions trigger opposition.

Although it’s still a bit early to tell, our read is that the chaotic end to the U.S.-sponsored government in Afghanistan will have serious political ramifications.  The administration was caught flat-footed by the speed of the Taliban offensive.  SoS Blinken was on the Sunday news shows arguing that what was happening in Afghanistan “was not Saigon.”  It’s arguably worse.  What is going on in Kabul is being described as “Saigon on steroids.”  The U.S. had effectively withdrawn in 1973, and the government of South Vietnam held power until 1975.  Establishment figures are calling the decision to leave Afghanistan and the collapse of the government an intelligence and planning failure.   What went wrong?  The president appears to have made up his mind early on to exit Afghanistan.  As a policy, this is defensible.  Although it has been argued that a failed state in Afghanistan could be a breeding ground for international terrorism as it was with al Qaeda, there are many failed states in the world and the U.S. can’t occupy all of them.  Afghanistan, by itself, is not central to U.S. foreign policy interests.  However, what happened over the past two weeks shows a clear lack of preparation.  According to reports, the president didn’t take the advice of military leaders.  Again, this isn’t a shock; the military rarely wants to abandon missions.  Leaving like this isn’t in anyone’s playbook and suggests a lack of planning.  After all, the administration knew we were leaving.  The lack of preparation will have political costs.  It can be argued that the Trump administration left Afghanistan as unfinished business, and “leftover” issues are always part of transitions.  In any case, once you are sworn in, they become your problems.

Whenever an event like this occurs, questions are raised about America’s reliability as an ally.  The human tragedy of Afghans who supported the war effort and are left behind reflects badly on the U.S.  History shows that if an area of the world is considered a vital interest, the U.S. has remarkable staying power.  The security support for Europe and Japan can attest to this.  However, areas that are not vital can be abandoned rather quickly.

All presidencies face unexpected crises.  The George W. Bush administration wanted a “humble” foreign policy…until 9/11.  President Obama took power into the teeth of a deep recession and a financial crisis.  The pandemic clearly affected the Trump administration.  The Biden government has been aggressively pushing for major fiscal policy actions; Afghanistan will almost certainly become a serious distraction and could potentially derail the process.  To allow such chaos raises concerns about competence.

Economics and policy:  The FOMC is leaning toward policy tightening, and the House is starting to prepare for the budget and infrastructure bills.

  • We will have more to say on this topic in the next couple of weeks, but we are seeing unmistakable momentum for monetary policy tightening, despite Chair Powell’s insistence that it will be a while before the stimulus is reduced. Rising inflation and a rapid rebound in economic growth all support policy tightening.  However, while we are watching this trend toward reducing stimulus, we couldn’t help but notice last Friday’s plunge in consumer sentiment.

This chart shows the monthly percent change in the index; declines seen in August (the data is preliminary and will be finalized at the end of the month) are unusual, and more often than not, are tied to recessions.  What is depressing consumers?  It’s probably a lot of things, such as rising inflation, the lingering pandemic, political strife, etc.  This data suggests the FOMC should exercise caution.  We don’t have much experience with pandemic recoveries, and the Fed could get “wrong-footed” here.

China:  The Chinese economy is slowing, and there is growing evidence of Xi’s concentration of power.

  • There is a clear slowdown occurring in the Chinese economy. Although the Delta variant has played a role, monetary policy is also tight.  Since the Great Financial Crisis, China has tended to stimulate the economy whenever there was a slowdown.  Given the recent crackdowns on credit, it is possible that the Xi government has accepted slower growth.
  • For the past several months, investors have seen a whole series of edits from Beijing that have rattled several industries. One analyst suggests bureaucrats are acting swiftly on instructions or comments from General Secretary Xi in a fashion similar to the way they reacted to Chairman Mao’s instructions or comments during the Cultural Revolution.  If that is the case, predicting behavior will be exceedingly difficult.  It also reflects the growing concentration of power by Xi and the undermining of the CPC’s institutional framework created by Deng.
  • U.S. corporations are getting antsy about the continued constraints on doing business with China.   The Biden administration is conducting a review of tariffs and other constraints but appears to be in no hurry to relax anything.
  • U.S. higher education is facing a myriad of threats.  Weakening U.S. demographics and a backlash against high tuitions are part of the problem.  Another one is falling international student enrollment, especially from China.

International roundup:  Haiti, Beirut, and Canada are in the news.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 207,278,035, with 4,364,473 fatalities.  In the U.S., there are 36,680,793 confirmed cases with 621,636 deaths.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high-frequency data on various factors.  The CDC reports that 415,957,645 doses of the vaccine have been distributed with 356,433,665 doses injected.  The number receiving at least one dose is 198,088,722, while the number receiving second doses, which would grant the highest level of immunity, is 168,362,058.  The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.

 View PDF

Daily Comment (August 13, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning, all! U.S. equities appear to be headed for a higher open this morning. Our report begins with a discussion about inflation. Next, we provide a round-up of international news, including the Taliban’s advancement in Afghanistan and Bolsonaro’s attempt to undermine the electoral process in Brazil. U.S. economics and policy news are up next, including details about the latest Census survey. China news follows, and we end with our pandemic coverage.

Let’s talk about CPI: The Bureau of Labor Statistics released the latest price figures this week and it offered some reassuring news. The month-over-month rise in CPI decelerated to its slowest pace in five months. In July, headline CPI rose 0.5%, down from the previous month’s reading of 0.9%. Additionally, core CPI slowed from 0.9% in June to 0.3% in the latest report. The deceleration was led by a steep decline in the pace of price increases for used cars. The report showed that the rise in used car prices slowed from 10.5% in June to 0.2% in the following month. Despite the moderation in CPI, inflation fears may still be warranted.

The chart above shows the geometric mean of the two-year change in the producer and consumer price indexes. This chart is designed to improve the year-over-year comparability of the indexes by averaging the change over the last two years, thereby limiting the pandemic distortions. That being said, the data suggests that despite the moderation in consumer prices in July, price pressures are still building throughout the economy. At this time, it appears that this pressure may be related to a lack of inventory. As a result of material shortages, demand for goods and services remains high as firms attempt to rebuild their inventories to meet growing demand. As of June, retail inventories for motor vehicles and clothes are still well below their pre-pandemic levels, while sales appear to be very strong. Over time, we believe as production capacity expands inventories will return to their normal level and this should relieve the economy of some inflationary pressure. Therefore, the most recent report has not changed our view that inflation is likely transitory.

International news: 

  • The Venezuelan government and its opposition will meet in Mexico City on Friday to discuss how to resolve their differences. The discussion will be mediated by international observers such as Norway. At this time, there are no expectations of a breakthrough.
  • On Sunday, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is expected to announce a snap election on September 20 as he attempts to gain approval for his COVID-19 response. PM Trudeau is currently working with a minority government and relies on smaller parties to get legislation passed.
  • Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes opened a probe into President Jair Bolsonaro for posting documents from a sealed investigation. Bolsonaro has been trying to undermine the integrity of the election as he remains widely unpopular within the country. The documents that he posted were related to an investigation into the hacking of a federal election court. Over the last few months, he has been spreading unsubstantiated claims about election machines being targeted by foreign hackers. Bolsonaro’s behavior suggests that he may not accept the results of the election if he were to lose. Given the country’s history and Bolsonaro’s recent comments, we would not be surprised to see another military takeover in Brazil following the election. In this event, it would likely be very bad for Brazilian equities as Brazil would be hit by sanctions from the U.S. and Europe. However, in the long run we think conditions could become more favorable for stocks.
  • The Taliban has edged closer to taking over the country of Afghanistan. The rebel group has taken several major cities throughout the country at a much faster pace than originally anticipated. On Thursday, it took control of its 10th provincial capital as it edges closer to surrounding Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan. In response to the Taliban’s advancement, EU Foreign Policy Chief Josep Borrell suggested that the Afghan government should attempt to reach a settlement with the group. The U.S. and U.K. have deployed troops in Afghanistan in order to expedite the evacuation of staff from embassies within Kabul.

Economics and policy:

  • Details from the latest Census survey were released on Thursday. Here are a few takeaways from the report:
    • Over the last decade, the population grew 7.4%, the slowest pace since the Great Depression.
    • For the first time in history, the number of people who identify as White decreased.
    • People identifying as being more than one race were the fastest growing group. This change was partially due to adjustments made by the Census Bureau.
    • Additionally, almost half of the country’s children are nonwhite, suggesting the country will become more diverse over time.
    • Lastly, it appears more people have left rural areas in favor of cities. The change in demographics may have an impact on the makeup of Congress. An increase in urbanization generally favors Republicans’ ability to win more seats in the Senate.
  • Bill Gates announced that a fund run by his investment firm will commit $1.5 billion to the Department of Energy if Congress enacts a program aimed at developing technologies that cut carbon emissions. The initiative is meant to attract other investors to raise an additional $15 billion.
  • Home prices have risen in almost every part of the country according to the National Association of Realtors. The rise in home prices has likely been spurred by low interest rates.
  • The Supreme Court lifted a ban on New York State’s eviction moratorium as litigation over the dispute continues.

China:

COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 205,462,557 with 4,335,111 fatalities.  In the U.S., there are 36,306,917 confirmed cases with 619,093 deaths.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high-frequency data on various factors.  The CDC reports that 411,253,925 doses of the vaccine have been distributed with 353,859,894 doses injected.  The number receiving at least one dose is 196,505,543, while the number receiving second doses, which would grant the highest level of immunity, is 167,354,729.  The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.

 View PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly – Intellectual Property Takes Over Fixed Investment (August 13, 2021)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

It’s probably no surprise to anyone that information processing has become a bigger and bigger part of the economy over the last several decades.  By now, we’ve all gotten used to seeing new kinds of computers and telephones every year, and we’ve struggled with learning new software programs at home or at work.  Whether you call it the “digital economy” or the “knowledge economy,” what few people realize is that it’s about to reach an important milestone in the data on U.S. gross domestic product (GDP).  Therefore, this may be a good time to explore some of the investment ramifications of the trend.

In the U.S., private investment spending currently accounts for about 17.5% of total GDP, but the category naturally includes a lot of subcomponents.  Housing and corporate inventory investment are only a small part of the total.  The biggest component of the category is “nonresidential fixed investment,” which is often referred to as “corporate” fixed investment and makes up roughly 13.5% of GDP.  As late as the 1990s, corporate fixed investment was dominated by spending on machinery, equipment, and structures.  Investment in intellectual property—mostly spending on research and development—was a much smaller part of the category.  The difference now is that spending on intellectual property has exploded, mostly because of a surge in software investment.  Overall, corporate fixed investment has grown at an average annual rate of 7.6% over the last four decades (including price changes), with software investment rising at a rate of 10.9% and R&D investment rising at a rate of 7.1%.  As a result, intellectual property is on the verge of becoming the biggest component of corporate fixed investment.

The implications of this evolution are enormous.  In economic terms, the marginal cost of selling an additional software package or leveraging the R&D behind it can be minimal.  In addition, digital products and software can have big spillover effects, in the sense that they can give value to customers beyond the core service the software is designed for.  A good example of this is the “network effect” when the customer gets greater value from joining a social media network when the network has more people.  The low cost of selling additional units and the incentive to capture spillover value means that digital businesses have a huge incentive to grow their network and become as big as possible.  The growing dominance of intellectual property in the economy is probably one reason why corporate profits as a share of GDP have risen starkly over the last several decades (see chart below).  Note, however, that those businesses’ enormous size is now generating concerns that they are stifling competition, which could lead to tougher antitrust regulation around the world.

Naturally, investors are attracted to the increasing size and profitability of firms that produce software or can efficiently leverage their digital R&D.  In addition, as other businesses continue learning how to boost their productivity using big data, data management, data analysis, and artificial intelligence, they are probably less likely to cut their intellectual property investment in times of recession.  Indeed, intellectual property investment continued to rise throughout the Great Financial Crisis of 2008-2009 and the recession in 2020 due to the coronavirus, as shown in the first chart above.  From another perspective, the growth rate of inflation-adjusted intellectual property investment has had a standard deviation of just 5.2% since 2000, which is modestly lower than the standard deviation of 5.8% for overall GDP and dramatically lower than the average deviation of 13.9% for equipment and 14.4% for structures.  In sum, intellectual property investment is much more stable than investors realize, so there is a good economic reason why digital technology and software firms are increasingly being seen as “defensive.”  In many environments, we favor this sector for offering an attractive combination of good prospects with relatively less sales volatility than investors perceive.

View PDF