Asset Allocation Weekly – The Impact of Older Americans on the Labor Market (August 20, 2021)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

In analyzing the path for the economy, an important factor is separating the temporary effects of the pandemic from those that are longer lasting.  The debate over whether inflation will be transitory is tied to this determination.  The impact on the labor markets is another element.  One change that appears to be permanent is that the pandemic accelerated retirement among baby boomers.

Currently, Americans born in 1959 or earlier are eligible for Social Security, but 65 years old remains the traditional retirement age.  Americans working past 65 years old, at least as a percentage of the total labor force, was common after WWII.  Social Security was still relatively new.  However, from 1947 to 1985, the participation rate for Americans over the age of 65 fell from the 28.6% peak in October 1949 to a low of 10.4% in June 1984.  The number of Americans in the labor force over the age of 65 peaked at 11.2 million in February 2020.  It has fallen since the onset of the pandemic.  The participation rate, the percentage of workers relative to the labor force, has declined since the onset of the pandemic and is continuing to decline.

The chart above shows both the actual number of civilians employed over the age of 65 and the percentage of these workers compared to the labor force of 65-year-olds and older.  Participation has been rising since the early 1990s.  Some of this rise is simply due to a rising population of Americans aged 65 years and older relative to the total population.

This chart shows the actual and projected level of 65-year-olds and older compared to the total population.  The percentage has been rising since 2003 and is forecast to plateau in 2040.  The entire baby boom generation will be 65 years or older by the end of the decade.

We developed a simple model to measure labor participation of those 65 years and older compared to the population of that age cohort.  Starting in 2008, the model generally predicted the path of participation in this age bracket.  However, since the pandemic, participation has plunged, and the pattern suggests that it’s likely permanent.  Using a similar calculation using the employment/population ratio for this age cohort, the decline in older worker employment represents around 833,000 jobs.  Assuming a stable labor force, that would have reduced the overall unemployment rate to 4.9%.

What impact would a decline in workers aged 65 and older have?  Since older workers are often paid more due to their years of service, losing these workers will, at least initially, improve margins.  It will almost certainly lead to some increased hiring of younger workers and may accelerate lowering the age of the workforce.  Industries will not be equally affected; some are at high risk.  For example, in 2020, 32.9% of farmers and 25.0% of aircraft assemblers are in this age bracket.

For markets, older Americans who leave the workforce may be inclined to reduce their equity positions.  However, returns in fixed income are paltry, so the potential negative impact might be less than one would expect.  Dividend-paying equities could be particularly attractive.  But overall, the impact on financial markets will likely be centered on the wage effects.

View PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Data and Geopolitics: Part I (August 16, 2021)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

For decades now, the post-industrial “information age” has been a key topic of interest for economists, business leaders, financial managers, and investors.  All have come to appreciate the implications of silicon-based semiconductors and the opportunities they create for mass data management, storage, communications, and analytics.  In recent years, data has also become a major concern for governments.  In Part I of this report, we discuss why political leaders are now paying closer attention to the control of data and information, and what that means for geopolitics.  In Part II next week, we will show how governmental control over data and information is playing out in China, in particular, and conclude with the ramifications for investors going forward.

Read the full report

Daily Comment (August 16, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning.  Risk markets are weaker this morning.  Fears of slowing global economic growth, the persistence of the pandemic, and the unsettling images from Kabul are weighing on sentiment.  Our coverage begins with the events in Afghanistan.  Up next is economics and policy, followed by China news and our international roundup.  We close with pandemic news.

Afghanistan:  We continue to monitor events in the country.  Over the weekend, the government of Ashraf Ghani has collapsed as he has fled the country.  Over the past month, the Taliban has captured key cities amid almost non-existent resistance in most areas.  By taking Kabul, the Taliban has effective control of the country.  The U.S. era in Afghanistan has come to a rapid and chaotic end.  The last land route out of Afghanistan has been taken by the Taliban, leaving air evacuation from Kabul airport as the only remaining exit.  The airport has reportedly come under fire, so leaving the country may not be possible at some point.  Scenes at the airport, similar to the iconic ones observed in 1975 Saigon, will become a lasting memoryCrowds have packed the airport, hoping for a flight out.  Western nations are scrambling to pull embassy personnel out of the country.  U.S. embassy officials were ordered to destroy sensitive materials, and most personnel are being evacuated.  It appears that U.S. forces control the Kabul airport, but it is unclear how long that will last.  The State Department has told remaining employees to stay at the embassy.  Helicopters have been ferrying workers out, as it has become too dangerous to escape by car.  European embassies will remain in Kabul to process visas for local employees who would be in great danger from the Taliban government.  Germany is sending its military to evacuate its embassy.

Unfortunately for the Taliban, taking territory is one thing, but governing is another.  Afghanistan is divided along tribal and ethnic lines, and once outside powers are ousted, the country will likely spiral into civil conflict.   When the Taliban was in control before 2001, it was a brutal regime; although we expect a return to such governance, it is possible the group may govern with a lighter hand this time around.  The old leadership is mostly gone, and the lesson from before is that harsh conditions trigger opposition.

Although it’s still a bit early to tell, our read is that the chaotic end to the U.S.-sponsored government in Afghanistan will have serious political ramifications.  The administration was caught flat-footed by the speed of the Taliban offensive.  SoS Blinken was on the Sunday news shows arguing that what was happening in Afghanistan “was not Saigon.”  It’s arguably worse.  What is going on in Kabul is being described as “Saigon on steroids.”  The U.S. had effectively withdrawn in 1973, and the government of South Vietnam held power until 1975.  Establishment figures are calling the decision to leave Afghanistan and the collapse of the government an intelligence and planning failure.   What went wrong?  The president appears to have made up his mind early on to exit Afghanistan.  As a policy, this is defensible.  Although it has been argued that a failed state in Afghanistan could be a breeding ground for international terrorism as it was with al Qaeda, there are many failed states in the world and the U.S. can’t occupy all of them.  Afghanistan, by itself, is not central to U.S. foreign policy interests.  However, what happened over the past two weeks shows a clear lack of preparation.  According to reports, the president didn’t take the advice of military leaders.  Again, this isn’t a shock; the military rarely wants to abandon missions.  Leaving like this isn’t in anyone’s playbook and suggests a lack of planning.  After all, the administration knew we were leaving.  The lack of preparation will have political costs.  It can be argued that the Trump administration left Afghanistan as unfinished business, and “leftover” issues are always part of transitions.  In any case, once you are sworn in, they become your problems.

Whenever an event like this occurs, questions are raised about America’s reliability as an ally.  The human tragedy of Afghans who supported the war effort and are left behind reflects badly on the U.S.  History shows that if an area of the world is considered a vital interest, the U.S. has remarkable staying power.  The security support for Europe and Japan can attest to this.  However, areas that are not vital can be abandoned rather quickly.

All presidencies face unexpected crises.  The George W. Bush administration wanted a “humble” foreign policy…until 9/11.  President Obama took power into the teeth of a deep recession and a financial crisis.  The pandemic clearly affected the Trump administration.  The Biden government has been aggressively pushing for major fiscal policy actions; Afghanistan will almost certainly become a serious distraction and could potentially derail the process.  To allow such chaos raises concerns about competence.

Economics and policy:  The FOMC is leaning toward policy tightening, and the House is starting to prepare for the budget and infrastructure bills.

  • We will have more to say on this topic in the next couple of weeks, but we are seeing unmistakable momentum for monetary policy tightening, despite Chair Powell’s insistence that it will be a while before the stimulus is reduced. Rising inflation and a rapid rebound in economic growth all support policy tightening.  However, while we are watching this trend toward reducing stimulus, we couldn’t help but notice last Friday’s plunge in consumer sentiment.

This chart shows the monthly percent change in the index; declines seen in August (the data is preliminary and will be finalized at the end of the month) are unusual, and more often than not, are tied to recessions.  What is depressing consumers?  It’s probably a lot of things, such as rising inflation, the lingering pandemic, political strife, etc.  This data suggests the FOMC should exercise caution.  We don’t have much experience with pandemic recoveries, and the Fed could get “wrong-footed” here.

China:  The Chinese economy is slowing, and there is growing evidence of Xi’s concentration of power.

  • There is a clear slowdown occurring in the Chinese economy. Although the Delta variant has played a role, monetary policy is also tight.  Since the Great Financial Crisis, China has tended to stimulate the economy whenever there was a slowdown.  Given the recent crackdowns on credit, it is possible that the Xi government has accepted slower growth.
  • For the past several months, investors have seen a whole series of edits from Beijing that have rattled several industries. One analyst suggests bureaucrats are acting swiftly on instructions or comments from General Secretary Xi in a fashion similar to the way they reacted to Chairman Mao’s instructions or comments during the Cultural Revolution.  If that is the case, predicting behavior will be exceedingly difficult.  It also reflects the growing concentration of power by Xi and the undermining of the CPC’s institutional framework created by Deng.
  • U.S. corporations are getting antsy about the continued constraints on doing business with China.   The Biden administration is conducting a review of tariffs and other constraints but appears to be in no hurry to relax anything.
  • U.S. higher education is facing a myriad of threats.  Weakening U.S. demographics and a backlash against high tuitions are part of the problem.  Another one is falling international student enrollment, especially from China.

International roundup:  Haiti, Beirut, and Canada are in the news.

COVID-19:  The number of reported cases is 207,278,035, with 4,364,473 fatalities.  In the U.S., there are 36,680,793 confirmed cases with 621,636 deaths.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high-frequency data on various factors.  The CDC reports that 415,957,645 doses of the vaccine have been distributed with 356,433,665 doses injected.  The number receiving at least one dose is 198,088,722, while the number receiving second doses, which would grant the highest level of immunity, is 168,362,058.  The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.

 View PDF

Daily Comment (August 13, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning, all! U.S. equities appear to be headed for a higher open this morning. Our report begins with a discussion about inflation. Next, we provide a round-up of international news, including the Taliban’s advancement in Afghanistan and Bolsonaro’s attempt to undermine the electoral process in Brazil. U.S. economics and policy news are up next, including details about the latest Census survey. China news follows, and we end with our pandemic coverage.

Let’s talk about CPI: The Bureau of Labor Statistics released the latest price figures this week and it offered some reassuring news. The month-over-month rise in CPI decelerated to its slowest pace in five months. In July, headline CPI rose 0.5%, down from the previous month’s reading of 0.9%. Additionally, core CPI slowed from 0.9% in June to 0.3% in the latest report. The deceleration was led by a steep decline in the pace of price increases for used cars. The report showed that the rise in used car prices slowed from 10.5% in June to 0.2% in the following month. Despite the moderation in CPI, inflation fears may still be warranted.

The chart above shows the geometric mean of the two-year change in the producer and consumer price indexes. This chart is designed to improve the year-over-year comparability of the indexes by averaging the change over the last two years, thereby limiting the pandemic distortions. That being said, the data suggests that despite the moderation in consumer prices in July, price pressures are still building throughout the economy. At this time, it appears that this pressure may be related to a lack of inventory. As a result of material shortages, demand for goods and services remains high as firms attempt to rebuild their inventories to meet growing demand. As of June, retail inventories for motor vehicles and clothes are still well below their pre-pandemic levels, while sales appear to be very strong. Over time, we believe as production capacity expands inventories will return to their normal level and this should relieve the economy of some inflationary pressure. Therefore, the most recent report has not changed our view that inflation is likely transitory.

International news: 

  • The Venezuelan government and its opposition will meet in Mexico City on Friday to discuss how to resolve their differences. The discussion will be mediated by international observers such as Norway. At this time, there are no expectations of a breakthrough.
  • On Sunday, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is expected to announce a snap election on September 20 as he attempts to gain approval for his COVID-19 response. PM Trudeau is currently working with a minority government and relies on smaller parties to get legislation passed.
  • Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes opened a probe into President Jair Bolsonaro for posting documents from a sealed investigation. Bolsonaro has been trying to undermine the integrity of the election as he remains widely unpopular within the country. The documents that he posted were related to an investigation into the hacking of a federal election court. Over the last few months, he has been spreading unsubstantiated claims about election machines being targeted by foreign hackers. Bolsonaro’s behavior suggests that he may not accept the results of the election if he were to lose. Given the country’s history and Bolsonaro’s recent comments, we would not be surprised to see another military takeover in Brazil following the election. In this event, it would likely be very bad for Brazilian equities as Brazil would be hit by sanctions from the U.S. and Europe. However, in the long run we think conditions could become more favorable for stocks.
  • The Taliban has edged closer to taking over the country of Afghanistan. The rebel group has taken several major cities throughout the country at a much faster pace than originally anticipated. On Thursday, it took control of its 10th provincial capital as it edges closer to surrounding Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan. In response to the Taliban’s advancement, EU Foreign Policy Chief Josep Borrell suggested that the Afghan government should attempt to reach a settlement with the group. The U.S. and U.K. have deployed troops in Afghanistan in order to expedite the evacuation of staff from embassies within Kabul.

Economics and policy:

  • Details from the latest Census survey were released on Thursday. Here are a few takeaways from the report:
    • Over the last decade, the population grew 7.4%, the slowest pace since the Great Depression.
    • For the first time in history, the number of people who identify as White decreased.
    • People identifying as being more than one race were the fastest growing group. This change was partially due to adjustments made by the Census Bureau.
    • Additionally, almost half of the country’s children are nonwhite, suggesting the country will become more diverse over time.
    • Lastly, it appears more people have left rural areas in favor of cities. The change in demographics may have an impact on the makeup of Congress. An increase in urbanization generally favors Republicans’ ability to win more seats in the Senate.
  • Bill Gates announced that a fund run by his investment firm will commit $1.5 billion to the Department of Energy if Congress enacts a program aimed at developing technologies that cut carbon emissions. The initiative is meant to attract other investors to raise an additional $15 billion.
  • Home prices have risen in almost every part of the country according to the National Association of Realtors. The rise in home prices has likely been spurred by low interest rates.
  • The Supreme Court lifted a ban on New York State’s eviction moratorium as litigation over the dispute continues.

China:

COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 205,462,557 with 4,335,111 fatalities.  In the U.S., there are 36,306,917 confirmed cases with 619,093 deaths.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high-frequency data on various factors.  The CDC reports that 411,253,925 doses of the vaccine have been distributed with 353,859,894 doses injected.  The number receiving at least one dose is 196,505,543, while the number receiving second doses, which would grant the highest level of immunity, is 167,354,729.  The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.

 View PDF

Asset Allocation Weekly – Intellectual Property Takes Over Fixed Investment (August 13, 2021)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

It’s probably no surprise to anyone that information processing has become a bigger and bigger part of the economy over the last several decades.  By now, we’ve all gotten used to seeing new kinds of computers and telephones every year, and we’ve struggled with learning new software programs at home or at work.  Whether you call it the “digital economy” or the “knowledge economy,” what few people realize is that it’s about to reach an important milestone in the data on U.S. gross domestic product (GDP).  Therefore, this may be a good time to explore some of the investment ramifications of the trend.

In the U.S., private investment spending currently accounts for about 17.5% of total GDP, but the category naturally includes a lot of subcomponents.  Housing and corporate inventory investment are only a small part of the total.  The biggest component of the category is “nonresidential fixed investment,” which is often referred to as “corporate” fixed investment and makes up roughly 13.5% of GDP.  As late as the 1990s, corporate fixed investment was dominated by spending on machinery, equipment, and structures.  Investment in intellectual property—mostly spending on research and development—was a much smaller part of the category.  The difference now is that spending on intellectual property has exploded, mostly because of a surge in software investment.  Overall, corporate fixed investment has grown at an average annual rate of 7.6% over the last four decades (including price changes), with software investment rising at a rate of 10.9% and R&D investment rising at a rate of 7.1%.  As a result, intellectual property is on the verge of becoming the biggest component of corporate fixed investment.

The implications of this evolution are enormous.  In economic terms, the marginal cost of selling an additional software package or leveraging the R&D behind it can be minimal.  In addition, digital products and software can have big spillover effects, in the sense that they can give value to customers beyond the core service the software is designed for.  A good example of this is the “network effect” when the customer gets greater value from joining a social media network when the network has more people.  The low cost of selling additional units and the incentive to capture spillover value means that digital businesses have a huge incentive to grow their network and become as big as possible.  The growing dominance of intellectual property in the economy is probably one reason why corporate profits as a share of GDP have risen starkly over the last several decades (see chart below).  Note, however, that those businesses’ enormous size is now generating concerns that they are stifling competition, which could lead to tougher antitrust regulation around the world.

Naturally, investors are attracted to the increasing size and profitability of firms that produce software or can efficiently leverage their digital R&D.  In addition, as other businesses continue learning how to boost their productivity using big data, data management, data analysis, and artificial intelligence, they are probably less likely to cut their intellectual property investment in times of recession.  Indeed, intellectual property investment continued to rise throughout the Great Financial Crisis of 2008-2009 and the recession in 2020 due to the coronavirus, as shown in the first chart above.  From another perspective, the growth rate of inflation-adjusted intellectual property investment has had a standard deviation of just 5.2% since 2000, which is modestly lower than the standard deviation of 5.8% for overall GDP and dramatically lower than the average deviation of 13.9% for equipment and 14.4% for structures.  In sum, intellectual property investment is much more stable than investors realize, so there is a good economic reason why digital technology and software firms are increasingly being seen as “defensive.”  In many environments, we favor this sector for offering an attractive combination of good prospects with relatively less sales volatility than investors perceive.

View PDF

Daily Comment (August 12, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Good morning.  U.S. equity futures are mostly steady this morning.  Financial markets are broadly steady, consistent with late summer trading.  Our coverage kicks off with news from China followed by the international roundup.  Economics and policy follow, and we close with our usual pandemic update.

China: U.S./China relations are taking on Cold War characteristics and Lithuania has Beijing upset.

  • One of the features of the Cold War was how the U.S. and U.S.S.R. used various tactics to steer nations into their respective camps. The Soviets used force (Eastern Europe) and supplied critical exports (Cuba) or military equipment (Egypt, India).  The U.S. provided security at low cost (Japan, Europe, Canada), market access (South and Central America), shared intelligence (U.K., Australia, New Zealand, Canada), and military aid (Southeast Asia).  After the Cold War ended, much of the U.S. assistance remained, although the domestic political support has waned over the years.  As relations between the U.S. and China devolve into a cold war, both nations are offering carrots and sticks to build alliances.  Although the U.S. has officially indicated that it won’t force nations to choose, recent actions suggest otherwise.  In Brazil, the U.S. is pushing the country to abandon Huawei (002502, CNY, 5.17) telecommunications equipment.  Brazil is a longtime user of China’s technology and getting it to give up on Huawei will be difficult.  According to reports, Jake Sullivan offered NATO membership if Huawei is forced out of Brazil.  Brazil is deeply reliant on China so prying the country away from Beijing will be difficult.
  • Lithuania has become a problem for Beijing. The Baltic nation has allowed Taiwan to open an office in the country under its own name, which smacks of statehood, something China opposes.  China has recalled its ambassador to Lithuania in protest.  As expected, state media is making all sorts of threats against Lithuania, including severing diplomatic relations, but there are limits to Beijing’s actions.  Lithuania is a small country, but it is a member of the EU and if China pushes aggressively, it could trigger a broader European reaction.
  • Evergrande (EGRNF, USD, 0.80), the troubled Chinese property developer, confirmed it is in talks to sell assets in a bid to improve its financial situation. China’s growth since the Great Financial Crisis has been debt-fueled and trying to bring debt growth under control will almost certainly lead to lower growth.
  • Michael Spavor, a Canadian citizen, has been sentenced to 11 years in prison on spying charges. It is improbable that Spavor is a spy (although that doesn’t mean Canadian intelligence doesn’t talk to him); instead, he is being used as leverage in the extradition case of Ming Wanzhou, the CFO of Huawei whom the U.S. accuses of violating Iranian sanctions.  The U.S. has protested the sentencing, but we doubt this will have much of an effect.
  • General Secretary Xi has been steadily reversing the policies of Deng. The latter opened the economy and, to some extent, opened the country socially as well.  As Xi has consolidated power, behavior control has become part of his policy.  The latest area seeing a crackdown is post-work bar tours and “harmful karaoke.”
  • There are reports that China is using subsidiaries controlled by the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps to export goods produced in the region that may involve detained labor.
  • Another element of Xi’s policies is the favoring of state-owned enterprises. This bias is undercutting small enterprises, which were important to the Chinese economy during the Deng years.  According to reports, small businesses are closing, putting pressure on the economy.
  • Although data for female participation isn’t calculated in China, anecdotal reports suggest women are increasingly working in construction as male workers become less available.
  • China has built two aircraft carriers and is working on a third. Interestingly enough, analysts are not all that concerned as there is a growing consensus that these vessels are becoming vulnerable to countermeasures.  Thus, it begs the question as to why China is building these, especially when it has developed missiles dubbed as “carrier killers.”
  • The Belt and Road project is facing rising criticism over human rights abuses. On a related note, Beijing is increasing its investments in Myanmar.

 International roundup: North Korea won’t be ignored and details on the activities of Russian mercenaries comes to light.

Economics and policy:  Policy tightening beckons and tax revenues rise.

COVID-19: The number of reported cases is 204,917,702 with 4,327,872 fatalities.  In the U.S., there are 36,193,574 confirmed cases with 618,496 deaths.  For illustration purposes, the FT has created an interactive chart that allows one to compare cases across nations using similar scaling metrics.  The FT has also issued an economic tracker that looks across countries with high frequency data on various factors.  The CDC reports that 409,566,315 doses of the vaccine have been distributed with 353,205,544 doses injected.  The number receiving at least one dose is 196,077,952, while the number receiving second doses, which would grant the highest level of immunity, is 167,105,507.  The FT has a page on global vaccine distribution.

 View PDF

Weekly Energy Update (August 12, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Oil prices remain depressed, with $67 acting as support.

(Source: Barchart.com)

Crude oil inventories unexpectedly fell 0.4 mb compared to the 2.0 mb draw forecast.  The SPR was unchanged this week.

In the details, U.S. crude oil production rose 0.1 mbpd to 11.3 mbpd.  Exports rose 0.8 mbpd, while imports were unchanged.  Refining activity rose 0.5%.

(Sources: DOE, CIM)

This chart shows the seasonal pattern for crude oil inventories.  We are well into the summer withdrawal season.  Note that stocks are well below the usual seasonal trough seen in early September.  A normal seasonal decline would result in inventories around 550 mb.  Our seasonal deficit is 69.2 mb.  Since early July, inventory levels have stabilized; as the chart indicates, seasonal inventory stabilization usually occurs in September, so if this pattern continues, the seasonal deficit should narrow.

Based on our oil inventory/price model, fair value is $61.67; using the euro/price model, fair value is $62.50.  The combined model, a broader analysis of the oil price, generates a fair value of $61.76.  The weaker EUR has started to affect the model forecast, putting all the models’ fair value calculations well below the current price.

Market news:

  • Headlining this week’s market news is the IPCC report that suggests global temperatures are rising rapidly and the odds of climate destabilization are rising. One element of this destabilization is wildfires, which are punishing Europe and the Western U.S.  Although devising new ways to limit methane and CO2 emissions will help limit the damage, in reality, much of the damage is already in place and even moving to zero emissions today will not likely prevent continued warming.  So, policymakers have to not only move on alternative energy but also climate mitigation.
  • The Senate passed a $1.2 trillion infrastructure package, which has some measures to address both mitigation and emissions control. The bill includes:
    • $73 billion for grid upgrades and increased powers to FERC for power lines. One of the problems facing the country is that alternative energy production usually exists in low population areas and long power lines are required to move the “juice” to where it is needed, which are urban areas.  However, building these lines is difficult because of local opposition, which is sometimes funded by urban utilities that don’t want the wind or solar competition.
    • $6 billion for nuclear energy which is designed to extend the life of existing facilities. Although nuclear power is controversial, it is clearly emission-free power.
    • $7.9 billion for funding clean energy initiatives, with an emphasis on battery manufacturing and recycling.
    • $15 billion for electrification, with half going to funding EV charging stations.
    • $8.5 billion for carbon capture and sequestration.
    • $1.0 billion for clean hydrogen.
    • An initiative but no funding for orphaned oil and gas wells.
    • Executive order for 50% zero emissions vehicles by 2030.

Overall, the bill mostly supports big electricity.  Distributed power didn’t get much support.  In addition, there was a clear focus on building the infrastructure for auto electrification.

  • Politics by its very nature leads to disingenuous behavior.  One of the primary functions of the political process is to determine who bears the cost of adjustment with any policy action.  Politicians always attempt to hide the costs from those who will bear them, or somehow argue that those stuck with the “bill” deserve the pain.  Acknowledging the fact that allocation costs and benefits are simply part of the political process isn’t enough; political operators also have to justify their actions.  After all, elections are popularity contests and being difficult makes one unpopular.  With that being said, we watched the recent actions by the administration with some degree of astonishment.  From the outset, as we have discussed in earlier reports, the administration has taken the path of acting on climate change.  The administration has enforced several actions, including restricting drilling on federal lands, discouraging the finance industry from supporting the fossil fuel industry, and threatening legal action against polluters, which are mostly oil and gas companies.  If the goal is to reduce CO2 emissions, rising energy prices are an unavoidable consequence.  However, this action conflicts with the popularity contest nature of elections.  And so, yesterday, National Security Director Sullivan criticized OPEC+ for not increasing oil production enough to lower oil and gas prices.
    • This criticism is epic in its disingenuousness.  Oil prices are up, in part, because the administration is reducing land available for oil and gas production and is starving the industry for investment funding.  These actions were taken due to climate concerns.  Pushing OPEC+ to boost output conflicts with the goal of addressing climate change.
    • The U.S. is rapidly abandoning involvement in the Middle East.  The U.S. troop withdrawal is leading to the Taliban retaking control in Afghanistan, which could destabilize parts of the region.  We are also reducing our involvement in Iraq to mere training of security forces.  Again, there are clearly justifiable reasons for reducing involvement in the region.  We can see peak oil demand on the horizon, and we should be focusing on great power competition with China.  Freeing up resources for this outcome makes sense.  But you can’t expect OPEC+ to listen when you have made it clear that most of the major oil-producing nations are no longer important.
    • The administration is also calling on the FTC to investigate gasoline “price gouging.”  I have covered energy since 1989 and have seen this sort of call occur numerous times.  It’s a bit like “rounding up the usual suspects.”
    • Overall, we don’t think this jawboning will have any effect.  The White House should be worried about higher energy prices hurting them politically.  An easy response would be to support domestic production which supports the U.S. economy.  Having OPEC+ increase output does nothing to meet climate change goals.
  • Recent fires in North Dakota are increasing calls for greater environmental rules on fracking in a region generally supportive to the activity.
  • The administration is reviewing oil and gas drilling rules for northern Alaska.
  • This week, the Senate held its amendment session for the upcoming budget.  In general, this activity is an exercise in political posturing.  The goal is to frame one party’s policies in a favorable light and make the opponent’s position unattractive.  It’s mostly a gaming session, but occasionally some insights emerge into the leanings of senators.  For example, an amendment to prevent the EPA from banning fracking picked up several Democratic Party votes.  Another one to means test EV tax credits won narrowly.  It is unlikely either will ever become law, but it does show where senators are leaning.
  • NOAA is still calling for an active hurricane season.  So far, the Atlantic has had seven named storms.  NOAA is still projecting 15-21 named storms.  Hurricane activity usually peaks on September 10.

Geopolitical news:

Alternative energy/policy news:

View PDF