Daily Comment (August 11, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

In today’s Comment, we open with a discussion of U.S. policy actions, with a focus on yesterday’s Senate passage of the bipartisan “hard” infrastructure bill and this morning’s Senate passage of a budget blueprint encompassing the Democrats’ big antipoverty and climate proposal.  We next turn to a review of key international news and end with a discussion of various developments related to the coronavirus pandemic.

U.S. Fiscal Policy: The Senate yesterday passed the $1 trillion, bipartisan “hard” infrastructure bill by a vote of 69 to 30.  The bill now must be passed by the House, where Democrats have yoked the fate of the infrastructure effort to passage of their broad $3.5 trillion antipoverty and climate effort.

  • As promised, Senate Majority Leader Schumer launched a budget bill encompassing the antipoverty and climate package immediately after passage of the infrastructure proposal.  That bill was approved by the Senate early this morning.  Up next: Schumer has set a deadline of September 15 for committee leaders to submit their individual components of the package.
  • Separately, in the midst of voting on the antipoverty and climate bill, almost all Republican senators signed onto a pledge not to help Democrats raise the debt ceiling, even though the Treasury Department is already bumping up against the current limit and risks of a default are rising if the ceiling isn’t lifted in the coming weeks.
    • With Republicans insisting that the Democrats take responsibility for the increased spending in their plans, one idea they are considering is a standalone vote to suspend the debt limit.  That move could put pressure on Republicans to support the measure or risk rattling financial markets if the vote fails.
    • Lawmakers could also attach the measure to another must-pass bill, like government funding, to force the issue.

U.S. Monetary Policy: Chicago FRB President Evans, a voting member on the FOMC this year, said he expects recent employment gains to continue, which would allow the Fed to declare that the economy has achieved the “substantial further progress” it targeted last December.  In that case, Evans said it would be appropriate for policymakers to start reducing their asset purchases, although he warned against tightening policy too early and accidentally forcing core inflation down below the Fed’s 2% target.

Cryptocurrencies: Poly Network, which links some of the world’s most widely used digital legers, said it suffered a cyberattack in which thieves stole crypto tokens worth approximately $600 million.  The loss will probably feed into growing concerns about the fast-growing cryptocurrency markets.

China: Against the backdrop of the government’s broad clampdown on Chinese technology companies, it turns out that its crackdown on education services is also broader than earlier known.  New reporting shows that many owners of private, for-profit schools have been forced to turn over their institutions to local governments without compensation.

  • China has approximately 190,000 private, for-profit schools, which educate about 20% of elementary, middle, and high school students.  Beijing wants to cut the share of elementary and middle school students studying at such institutions from 10% currently to just 5% as soon as the end of this year.
  • As the Chinese government continues to crack down on some sectors, investors are shifting their asset purchases toward industries they believe are favored by Beijing, such as high-tech manufacturing and renewable energy.  Shares of Chinese semiconductor companies, electric vehicle manufacturers, and solar panel makers listed in mainland China climbed over the past month, while shares of technology giants and companies that provide after-school tutoring suffered massive selloffs.

China-Canada: A Chinese court has jailed Canadian citizen Michael Spavor for 11 years for spying, in a case that is considered retaliation for Canada’s arrest of Meng Wanzhou, an executive for Chinese telecom giant Huawei.  The sentence also includes a fine and deportation of Spavor, although the deportation may only happen after the prison sentence is completed.  In any case, the sentence will probably further strain Chinese-Canadian relations.

United Kingdom-Germany-Russia: German police have arrested a U.K. man working at the British embassy in Berlin on charges that he was passing information on to Russian intelligence agents.  The man is accused of working with the Russian intelligence agents since last November.

United States-Germany-Russia: Secretary of State Blinken has appointed former diplomat Amos Hochstein as senior adviser on energy security, with a focus on measures to “reduce the risks” posed by the German-Russian Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline and support energy security in Eastern Europe.  The appointment of Hochstein, who had been an opponent of the pipeline and is seen as a hawk on Russia, could signal that the Biden administration still aims to take a tough approach toward Russia despite acquiescing to the almost-completed project.

Brazil: A military parade in Brasilia that was widely seen as an attempt by President Bolsonaro to intimidate Congress apparently backfired as lawmakers voted down an electoral change championed by the president.

Afghanistan: Taliban fighters have captured three more provincial capitals as they steadily tighten the noose on the central government in Kabul.  The Islamist group has now captured nine, or more than a quarter, of the country’s provincial capitals, more than half of the country’s mostly rural districts, and a number of economically important border crossings.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 204,192,836 worldwide, with 4,318,124 deaths.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 36,058,757, with 618,149 deaths.  Vaccine doses delivered in the U.S. now total 408,325,135, while the number of people who have received at least their first shot totals 195,646,711.  Finally, here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

 U.S. Policy Response

 View PDF

Daily Comment (August 10, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady, Thomas Wash, and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

In today’s Comment, we open with an update on U.S. policy news, including expectations that the Senate will pass the $1 trillion “hard” infrastructure bill this morning, even as Democrats released details on their proposed follow-on bill covering antipoverty and climate proposals.  We also discuss developments in the U.S. labor and cellphone markets.  We next turn to major foreign news items and end with the latest news related to the coronavirus pandemic.

U.S. Fiscal Policy: Senate Democrats released an outline of their $3.5 trillion antipoverty and climate plan encompassing a range of programs such as universal prekindergarten and expanded Medicare.  Democrats will focus on passing it as early as Tuesday, right after the Senate is expected to pass the $1 trillion “hard” infrastructure plan covering items like roads, bridges, airports, and broadband systems.

  • The plan includes higher taxes for corporations and high-income individuals as well.
  • It also includes a provision offering a pathway to lawful permanent status for certain migrants to the U.S.

U.S. Monetary Policy: Even though President Biden’s economic team generally supports renominating Federal Reserve Chair Powell to a second four-year term when his current term runs out in February, prominent progressives in the Democratic Party are increasingly agitating for someone who they think would be more closely aligned with their priorities.  Despite Powell’s forceful response to the coronavirus pandemic and his effort to push monetary policy more strongly in the direction of supporting full employment, especially for minorities, progressives are looking for a Democrat who would be more open to tighter regulation of the financial industry and perhaps even looser monetary policy.

  • If Powell is not renominated, the leading contender for the chair’s job is Fed Governor Lael Brainard, an economist appointed to the board in 2014 by former President Obama.
  • We think another possible choice would be Raphael Bostic, who currently serves as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and is a former Fed economist.

U.S. Labor Market: In the monthly JOLTS report yesterday, June unfilled job openings rose to a seasonally adjusted 10.1 million, reaching the highest level since record-keeping began in 2000.  The increase was driven largely by professional and business services, retail, and accommodation and food services as the month of June saw continued easing pandemic restrictions and thus more consumers dining out and traveling.  Importantly, the number of open jobs now exceeds the number of people counted as unemployed.  That signals a tight labor market, although it’s important to remember that this data would not yet reflect much impact from the rapidly spreading delta mutation of the coronavirus.  The chart below shows the ratio of unemployed workers to job openings.

U.S. Cellphone Market: Even as U.S. cellphone service providers reported adding some eight million new subscribers over the last year, a firm that tracks the industry said U.S. population and market trends could only explain four to six million of the new subscribers.

  • According to Jonathan Chaplin, a telecom analyst at New Street Research, “There’s something fishy going on…If you look at the subscribers at the end of the period and all the net adds they report, they don’t jibe.”
  • The disparity is raising concerns that the firms could be reporting inflated subscriber data, which naturally would not be taken well by investors.

China: Japan’s mammoth Softbank (SFTBY, 30.74) said it will cut its investment in Chinese start-ups until the extent of Beijing’s scrutiny of the tech sector becomes clear.  Founder Masayoshi Son said the investment conglomerate will take a “wait-and-see stance” until the situation settles in what he hopes would be a year or two.

  • We’ve been writing a lot about the way Chinese companies are facing both increased regulatory risk at home and pressure from the U.S.  That has led to a lot of volatility in Chinese stocks, although we’ve been able to avoid some of that volatility in some of our own strategies, where we’ve shifted our foreign stock exposure toward non-Chinese companies.
  • Not only are Chinese equities at risk from the new regulatory moves, but Chinese corporate bonds related to the companies under scrutiny have also depreciated.  Since Chinese bonds are now so widely held, the volatility is affecting investors around the world.

China-Cambodia: A report from Human Rights Watch has branded a Chinese-financed dam in Cambodia as a “disaster” for indigenous and ethnic minority communities.  The report claims that the Lower Sesan 2 dam, part of China’s signature Belt and Road Initiative, has “washed away the livelihoods” of communities that relied on fishing, forest-gathering, and farming when the areas upstream were flooded.  The report adds to multiple other reports accusing the program of damaging poor, developing countries despite China’s effort to use the initiative to expand its global influence.

China-Russia: Russian forces are participating in a regular Chinese military exercise for the first time this week, stoking concerns among Western analysts that the two U.S. adversaries are developing joint operational capabilities.

Russia: Although jailed opposition leader Alexey Navalny has largely dropped out of the headlines recently, the Russian government continues to put pressure on his organization in an apparent effort to rip it out of society “by the roots.”  In the latest move, the government has opened a criminal investigation into two exiled allies of Navalny for raising funds for organizations deemed by the authorities as “extremist.”

Afghanistan: Taliban forces overran a fifth provincial capital in northern Afghanistan yesterday, putting even more pressure on the central government in Kabul.  Taliban fighters now control more than half of the country’s 400 districts and a number of economically important border crossings as government security forces retreated to local cities.

Peru: Worries about the country’s new left-wing government are already weighing on economic activity, but they’re also exacerbating inflation.  Increased political and policy uncertainty have contributed to a 13% decline in the value of the currency since the start of the year, driving up costs for imports and the goods or services that compete with them.

COVID-19:  Official data show confirmed cases have risen to 203,559,532 worldwide, with 4,307,242 deaths.  In the United States, confirmed cases rose to 35,950,379, with 617,424 deaths.  Vaccine doses delivered in the U.S. now total 407,560,705, while the number of people who have received at least their first shot totals 195,222,906.  Finally, here is the interactive chart from the Financial Times that allows you to compare cases and deaths among countries, scaled by population.

Virology

Economic and Financial Market Impacts

  • Driven by the fast-spreading delta mutation, some consumers are rethinking their return to dining out, according to executives and industry data, threatening the U.S. restaurant sector’s rebound.  Recent consumer surveys show the delta variant has prompted Americans who say they are the most restricted in their activities to start pulling back again late last month.
  • One key impact of the delta variant has been on the debt of U.S. firms seen to be particularly at risk of renewed lockdowns, social distancing measures, or consumer retrenchment.  Bonds issued by cruise companies, cinema operators, and retailers have all fallen in price over the last week as more businesses delayed plans to return workers to offices due to the delta escalation, with others opting to impose vaccine requirements on their staff.

 View PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – August 15, 1971 (August 9, 2021)

by Bill O’Grady | PDF

Next week, we will observe the 50th anniversary of President Nixon’s decision to exit the Bretton Woods agreement.  This choice was part of a broader package of policy actions designed to deal with a series of issues, including inflation, unemployment, and a balance of payments problem.  As is often the case, the focus of attention from Nixon’s address to the nation was probably on the announced wage and price freeze.  But, his decision to end the link to gold was monumental.  We have discussed this issue before,[1] but in light of the impending anniversary, it seemed right to revisit it again.

This report begins with a review of the problems Nixon faced and how he addressed them.  To put the issue into context, we examine two trilemmas: 1) Robert Mundell’s trilemma, which frames exchange rate, capital account, and monetary policy; and 2) Dana Rodrik’s trilemma, which analyzes the relations between global economic integration, domestic politics, and the nation-state.  From there, we look at the world Nixon wrought, what remains, and what is struggling to be maintained.  As always, we close with market ramifications.

Read the full report


[1] See WGRs, “Weaponizing the Dollar: Part I (8/12/2019) and Part II (8/19/2019).”

Asset Allocation Weekly (August 6, 2021)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

In last week’s report, we updated our views on long-duration Treasuries, using our standard 10-year T-note model.  This week we are going to examine the impact of policy on long-duration Treasuries.

First, let’s start with the model.

The two most important variables in the model are fed funds and the 15-year average of the yearly change in CPI.  The latter acts as a proxy for inflation expectations.  We add the yen’s exchange rate, oil prices, German Bund yields, and the fiscal deficit scaled to GDP.  So, there are two policy variables in the model, fed funds and the fiscal deficit.

A truism that has developed in recent years is that divided government is good for financial markets because different parties in the White House and Congress means it is harder to enact major legislative changes.  To test this thesis, we created a binary variable that signaled if one party controlled the legislature and the executive branch, or not.  When we added the variable to the model, it was not statistically significant, nor did it change the model’s forecast.

Regression models are sensitive to initial conditions; simply put, where you start a model in time has a notable impact.  Jim Bullard, the president of the St. Louis FRB, likes to think of eras with certain conditions as “regimes.”  Applying Bullard’s notion of regimes, we next broke down the data by attitudes toward government.  In other words, the truism that divided government was good for financial markets may not have always been true.  To test this idea, we first ran the model from 1960 to 1982; attitudes toward the government were once positive.  For the generation that lived through WWII, the government was not seen as an obstacle to overcome but as a support.  The model did change; the government variable was statistically significant and showed that when the same party held both branches of government, yields were 50 bps lower.  From 1983 to the present, the government variable was also statistically significant, but the sign changed.  Unified government increased bond yields by 31 bps.  We propose that the Reagan/Thatcher revolution changed the views of government compared to the earlier era.

Another interesting factor is that in the earlier regime, deficits were bearish for bonds; in other words, a deficit led to higher yields.  In the current regime, deficits are less significant but the sign on the coefficient changed here as well.  Deficits now lead to lower yields, although the impact is quite modest.

Finally, the model from 1983 has a current fair value of 1.70%, which is a bit higher than the full model shown above.  Thus, its fair value is close enough to give us confidence that it is giving proper signals.  The other important takeaway from this analysis is that if the Democrats lose one of the houses of Congress in November 2022, caeteris paribus, the fair value yield would decline by nearly 50 bps.

View PDF

Weekly Geopolitical Report – Power, Influence, and Leadership in Geopolitics (August 2, 2021)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA | PDF

Xi Jinping.  Donald Trump.  Vladimir Putin.  Ronald Reagan.  Nelson Mandela.  When it comes to understanding geopolitics, most of us probably focus on the powerful, visionary leaders who can drive events forward toward their goals.  But few of us really try to think systematically about the characteristics that make a leader successful or the tactics he or she can use to shape the world.  This report offers a framework for assessing foreign leaders’ power and prospects, based on a recent book on the science of influence.  We show some of the ways we analyze political leaders’ ability to affect the geopolitical environment and, therefore, global investment prospects.  The concepts discussed may even be useful in other aspects of life, from marketing to career development or personal relationships.

Read the full report

Asset Allocation Weekly (July 30, 2021)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

One of the key developments in financial markets recently has been the quick rebound in bond prices and the associated drop in yields.  As investors started to sense faster economic growth and the prospect of rising inflation in the first quarter, they eagerly sold down their bond holdings, driving yields higher.  The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note jumped from 0.92% at the end of 2020 to an intraday high of more than 1.75% in late March (see following chart).  Since then, however, bond buying has gradually strengthened again, and yields trended downward throughout the second quarter.  Even when the Federal Reserve surprised markets in mid-June by hinting that the next interest rate hike might come by 2023, the resulting bond sell-off and yield jump was quickly reversed.  In July, investors began buying bonds and driving down yields even faster, with the 10-year Treasury yield falling below 1.13% on July 19.  This report looks at why yields are falling again and whether the downtrend is likely to continue.

It’s one thing to know where yields have been; it’s quite another thing to understand where they should be and where they may be going.  To get at that issue, our bond model estimates where the 10-year Treasury yield should be based on several variables.  The most important variables are the Fed’s “fed funds” interest rate and, as a proxy for inflation expectations, the 15-year average of the yearly change in the consumer price index (CPI).  Other variables in our model include the yen/dollar exchange rate, oil prices, German Bund yields, and the U.S. fiscal deficit scaled to gross domestic product (GDP).  As shown in the chart below, the jump on bond yields early this year merely brought the 10-year Treasury yield up to the fair value estimated by our model.  With the recent rebound in bond prices, yields have again fallen below their fair value, which the model currently puts at 1.65%.

In other words, bonds once again look expensive―not as expensive as at the beginning of 2021, but enough to suggest bond investors see reason for caution regarding monetary policy and economic prospects.  Many investors think the Fed will eventually tighten monetary policy just enough to smoothly bring down today’s high inflation rate.  A less benign view among other investors is that the Fed might tighten policy too soon or too quickly.  Those investors are worried about a policy mistake that could trip up the economic recovery and produce another recession.  Still other investors think longstanding structural factors such as globalization and population aging will eventually reassert themselves and push down growth and inflation to the levels seen before the coronavirus pandemic.  Such an environment of rising interest rates in the near term coupled with an eventual moderation in rates is consistent with the recent flattening in the yield curve.  For example, the chart below shows how the yield curve, represented by the difference between the 10-year and the two-year Treasury rates, has changed recently.

In any case, we think our model’s call for higher interest rates should be respected, especially given the risk that inflation could stay high for longer than anticipated and gradually push up longer-term inflation expectations.  We note that the 15-year average of CPI inflation that serves as a proxy for inflation expectations in our model is just under 1.90%.  Other measures of inflation expectations, such as consumer surveys and the difference between nominal and inflation-protected bond yields, point to even higher future inflation.  Even if the 10-year Treasury yield rebounds in the near term, we still believe it probably wouldn’t go much past 2.00%, but the risk of rising yields (and falling bond prices) has prompted us to reduce our exposure to longer-term bonds in several of our strategies for the third quarter.

View PDF

Business Cycle Report (July 29, 2021)

by Thomas Wash | PDF

The business cycle has a major impact on financial markets; recessions usually accompany bear markets in equities.  The intention of this report is to keep our readers apprised of the potential for recession, updated on a monthly basis.  Although it isn’t the final word on our views about recession, it is part of our process in signaling the potential for a downturn.

In June, the diffusion index rose further above the recession indicator, signaling that the recovery continues. In the financial markets, a sharp rise in inflation expectations led to a modest sell-off in equities in the middle of the month. Meanwhile, construction and manufacturing activity slowed as increasing costs for materials are becoming a problem for homebuilders and factories. Lastly, the labor market remains strong as payrolls rose at the fastest pace in 10 months. As a result, eight out of the 11 indicators are in expansion territory. The diffusion index rose from +0.3939 to +0.4545, above the recession signal of +0.2500.

The chart above shows the Confluence Diffusion Index. It uses a three-month moving average of 11 leading indicators to track the state of the business cycle. The red line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a contraction, while the blue line signals when the business cycle is headed toward a recovery. On average, the diffusion index is currently providing about six months of lead time for a contraction and five months of lead time for a recovery. Continue reading for a more in-depth understanding of how the indicators are performing and refer to our Glossary of Charts at the back of this report for a description of each chart and what it measures. A chart title listed in red indicates that indicator is signaling recession.

Read the full report