Asset Allocation Quarterly (Fourth Quarter 2023)

by the Asset Allocation Committee | PDF

  • Our three-year forecast includes a relatively mild recession followed by a recovery and the prospect for an economic expansion.
  • Geopolitical tensions are elevated with heightened potential for increased turmoil in the Middle East.
  • Inflation should moderate in the near-term but may reaccelerate within the forecast period due to structural influences such as deglobalization and labor market tightness.
  • The Fed’s monetary policy is likely to ease as economic conditions slow, and we expect a measured and careful approach by the FOMC as the presidential elections draw near.
  • We have extended duration by stepping into long-term Treasury bonds for their safety element.
  • In domestic equities, we maintain our value bias as well as cyclical sectors and quality factors.
  • Exposure to international developed markets was reduced due to continued monetary policy tightening from most developed market central banks.

ECONOMIC VIEWPOINTS

We are still anticipating a mild recession followed by a recovery within our three-year forecast period. While GDP growth has been positive, real-time indicators, such as the Chicago Fed Activity Index and the LEI, are exhibiting slowing growth. The long wait for an impending recession is a self-destructing prophecy to a degree—the more time that market participants have to prepare for a recession, the more opportunity they have to right-size their balance sheets and the less severe the recession is likely to be. Additionally, the Fed is close to, if not at, peak fed funds rates according to many indicators. No further hikes would support the economy and possibly avert a recession but would also allow inflation to run higher than the Fed’s 2% target rate.

Inflation has fallen recently, likely in response to the short-term smoothing of supply-chain problems and tighter monetary policy. Our expectation is that the volatility of inflation will be elevated within the forecast period due to underlying structural issues, such as deglobalization and labor market tightness. The U.S. labor market is expected to remain tight due to demographic shifts following the pandemic-prompted constriction of the 55+ age group labor pool and changing immigration policies. While the workforce is constrained, demand for workers has remained strong due to labor-hoarding and re-shoring. This has caused wage growth to persist at higher levels as compared to pre-pandemic periods. More importantly, wage growth has exceeded inflation over the past few months.

A significant longer-term mega-trend supporting domestic economic activity is the re-shoring of manufacturing capacity, including domestic reindustrialization and shortening supply-chains. Geopolitical tensions are likely to remain elevated, further encouraging international polarization into geopolitical blocs. Corporate fixed-asset investment, a proxy for manufacturing capacity expenditures, has been strong following the passage of the CHIPS and Inflation Reduction Acts. Capacity buildouts are multi-year endeavors, which will place increasing demands on construction, labor, and materials initially and skilled labor to operate in the long-term. We believe these pressures, combined with general supply-chain complexities, will further expose inflationary bottlenecks within the economy that will magnify inflation volatility.

The consequences of deglobalization are unfolding, such as the ongoing war in Ukraine and a geopolitical tragedy in the Middle East, which bear the potential to escalate unexpectedly and swiftly. Moreover, while the 2024 U.S. presidential election is rapidly approaching, the market is typically less concerned with the specific election outcome but it does have an aversion to uncertainty. From a market volatility perspective, a quick resolution to the primaries would be beneficial.

STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK

Given the long anticipation of a recession, corporations have likely had opportunity to optimize their inventories and liabilities, hence a deep recession is less likely. Additionally, domestic equity valuations could be supported by U.S. investors repatriating capital due to global geopolitical tensions and the historically high level of cash on the sidelines. Currently, the Technology sector accounts for approximately 28% of the S&P 500, and while optimism around AI and machine learning is strong, earnings within the sector have not kept up with the optimism. It will likely take years for AI to translate to productive uses, similarly to other transformational innovation such as the internet, electricity, and automobiles. In addition to our style tilt toward value over growth, we retain our Aerospace & Defense position and cyclical sector overweights in Energy, Metals & Mining, and Industrials. Remilitarization is accelerating as we see increased conflicts globally. The Mining and Energy sectors are likely to benefit from electrification/green energy policies as electrification is metals heavy.

We remain committed to our value bias across all market capitalizations. We view the sustainability of earnings growth as more attractive in equities categorized as value, with their valuation multiples remaining modest compared to historical data. In addition, the value style has a lower exposure to sectors that we view as overpriced. Although growth has vastly outperformed value year-to-date, we anticipate that we are in the early stages of a value outperformance cycle.

We believe that small and mid-capitalization stock valuations are attractive, with fundamentals continuing to be healthy. Mid-cap stocks remain at historically wide valuation discounts to large cap stocks. We maintain the quality factor, which screens for profitability, leverage, and cash flows, in our small and mid-cap exposures to limit potential risks during economic volatility. This quarter, we introduced a position in a uranium producers industry ETF within our mid-cap exposure. The changing nature of baseload energy production and the policies shaping it have created an opportunity for nuclear energy. Green energy policies have set ambitious goals for reducing fossil fuel usage, while the new green energy technologies cannot currently produce energy to the scale and consistency needed. With the supply of uranium having become crimped over the past decade, we view the supply/demand imbalance to offer a solid opportunity for the exposure.

We reduced our exposure to international developed equities in several strategies, but allocations remain in the more risk-tolerant portfolios. Although valuations remain low, risks have increased. Most developed market central banks persist on the tightening path in an attempt to control inflation. At the same time, economic growth is showing signs of slowing. This creates an environment for potential policy-driven errors. Given the increased geopolitical risks and re-shoring supply-chain activity, the U.S. dollar strength cycle has the potential to extend further than previously anticipated, resulting in additional downward pressure on international equities. Accordingly, in the Aggressive Growth strategy, we exited the emerging markets position due to increased geopolitical and economic growth risks. We believe that return/risk trade-offs are more attractively presented in domestic equities for the more risk-accepting portfolios.

BOND MARKET OUTLOOK

Although the quarter commenced with the market split in its anticipation of a Fed pause versus another increase in the fed funds rate prior to year-end, we believe that inflation will continue to moderate over the next several quarters and, accordingly, the Fed’s monetary policy will begin to ease. This chart indicates that the fed funds rate is well above its implied rate. Naturally there are potential curbs to our assessment, such as the structural forces of deglobalization that have the potential to keep inflation elevated above the Fed’s 2% target. Moreover, the aforementioned mega-trends will likely lead to greater volatility of inflation, especially relative to the docile environment that persisted during the period following the Great Financial Crisis. Nevertheless, the near-term outlook is for the inflation-fighting vehemence of the Fed to modulate, especially as the composition of its voting members turns more dovish next year. Consequently, we find the duration trade to be less fraught with the potential for turbulence that has existed since early 2022, and we expect the yield curve will flatten from its current inversion. This lends us the latitude to extend duration in the strategies from their prior concentration in the short-end and even place limited exposure to long-term U.S. Treasuries to hedge against the potential for even more increased geopolitical risks or a more severe recession.

The expectation for an economic contraction encourages a degree of caution toward investment-grade corporates. While companies carrying investment-grade ratings have sound balance sheets and have termed out their debt, thus avoiding a “debt wall” in the near-term, spreads to Treasuries remain contained relative to historical averages. In contrast, spreads on speculative grade bonds have risen to the point where we find it advantageous to selectively add to our exposure. Although the refinancing wave is poised to affect companies rated B and below over the next two years, with attendant difficulties for their cost of capital, our spec bond position is strictly held in the BB-rated segment which has little exposure to floating rate debt and can be characterized as an equity surrogate where incorporated.

OTHER MARKETS

Despite the currently low valuations of REITs, we expect the sector to continue to lag heading into an economic contraction and a continued high interest rate environment. Therefore, allocations to REITs remain absent in all strategies. In the commodity segment, we maintain a position in gold as a flight to safety asset during economic contractions and as a hedge against elevated geopolitical risks. For portfolios where the allocation to commodities is larger than 5%, we are adding a position in a broad-based commodity ETF with exposure to oil, gas, metals, and agriculture. Turmoil in the Middle East tends to support the broad commodity complex, especially oil and its derivatives.

Read the full report

Asset Allocation Fact Sheet

Keller Quarterly (July 2023)

Letter to Investors | PDF

At least once a decade, the stock market vibrates with excitement over a new technology and, in this revelry, the stocks of any company close to that technology separate themselves from the rest of the market as a rocket separates itself from the ground. That remarkable upward surge in stock prices provides validation to speculators that they’re doing the right thing in paying exorbitant prices for these stocks. No analysis of business models, profit margins, capital structures, dividends, or (least of all) valuations are required. All that’s needed to justify the investment is to cite the name of the technology: “It’s artificial intelligence!” No other explanation is needed. Other speculators nod knowingly. “It’s a sure thing!”

Prior speculations were provided with similarly simple justifications. “It’s crypto-currency!” “It’s electric vehicles!” “It’s the internet!” “It’s mobile phones!” “It’s personal computers!” “It’s semiconductors!” “It’s plastics!” “It’s television!” “It’s radio!” “It’s the airplane!” “It’s the automobile!”

The ironic thing is that most, if not all, of these new speculation-sparking technologies really are transformational. They change the economy and society. What’s rarely remembered years later is how much capital was incinerated along the way as investors chased one “sure thing” after another. In 1908, there were 253 automobile manufacturers in the United States; by 1929, there were 44. Even among those 44 companies, General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler were making 80% of all cars in that year. Fifty years later, they were the only three left. Yes, some of the 250 other manufacturers were acquired, but the majority simply went out of business, leaving investors with nothing to show for their optimism.

Stock market analysts as old as I am can name dozens of defunct companies in all these transformational industries. You can probably think of a few crypto and EV companies that have already “bit the dust.” It’s hard enough to forecast which technologies are going to succeed financially; it’s much harder to figure out which companies in these lanes are going to both survive and prosper.

All too many people today believe that this is investing. To us, it is simply speculation: a level of risk that we deem unwise. I’ve often likened this manner of investing to wildcat drilling, that is, drilling lots of speculative holes in the ground, hoping that at least one proves to be a gusher and delivers enough of a return to more than compensate for all the dry holes. While that makes sense to some, we’ve never gone that route. If that gusher never comes in, you’re left with lots of lost money.

What makes much more sense to us is to invest in companies that are successful today, whose prospects for staying successful seem bright based on current developments, and whose management teams have proven to be effective in adapting to changing conditions. In other words, we want to invest in what is, not what if.

T.S. Eliot voiced similar thoughts (with infinitely greater eloquence):

What might have been and what has been

Point to one end, which is always present.

                                  (Burnt Norton, I, 9-10)

With investing, as with life, we can get lost if we live in the past or in the future. We live in neither; we live in the present, and thus we can only invest in the present. But isn’t investing about the future? Future returns, future cash flows, etc.? Yes, but we can’t go to the future and see what’s there. We must invest in the present, using the best available information and judgment we can bring to the decision. When the present changes, we can adjust our decisions. The problem with the future is that you can’t know if or when it will change.

Loeb Strauss emigrated from Bavaria to the U.S. in 1848 and joined his older brothers’ wholesale dry goods business in New York. A year later, gold was discovered in California. Unlike other 20- year-olds, Loeb wasn’t interested in chasing the prospect of maybe finding gold; he went to San Francisco to sell wholesale dry goods. He imported clothing, umbrellas, bolts of fabric, and other such stuff from his brothers in New York and sold them to local retailers. When one of his customers asked him to help patent a method for making pants out of Strauss’ denim by putting rivets at the points of stress, Loeb (now known by his nickname Levi) quickly agreed. The blue jean was born. Not many of the 300,000 people who went to California to find gold made a serious amount of money. Not only was Levi much more successful than the dream-followers, but his business also survives to this day.

We like the example of Levi Strauss, who invested in the present rather than speculating on the future.

We appreciate your confidence in us.

 

Gratefully,

Mark A. Keller, CFA
CEO and Chief Investment Officer

View PDF

Daily Comment (July 11, 2023)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA, and Thomas Wash

[Posted: 9:30 AM EDT] | PDF

Our Comment today opens with news that Turkey has agreed to support Sweden’s accession to NATO, creating an even more formidable military bulwark in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  We next review a wide range of other international and U.S. developments with the potential to affect the financial markets today, including today’s voting on a controversial environmental law in Europe and new statements about interest rates by several policymakers at the Federal Reserve.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization:  Just ahead of today’s big NATO summit, the Turkish government yesterday unexpectedly released its veto on Sweden’s accession to the alliance.  According to NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg, Turkish President Erdoğan agreed to forward Sweden’s accession to the Turkish parliament “as soon as possible” after achieving several concessions from Sweden and NATO.  Those concessions apparently included steps aimed at aiding Turkey’s fight against Kurdish terrorists and the U.S. unlocking the sale of advanced F-16 fighter jets to Turkey.  The Hungarian government has also recently said it would lift its veto of Sweden’s accession.

  • The Turkish move helps ensure that the NATO summit will project heightened unity and new strength in response to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.
  • Over the longer term, this year’s accession of both Sweden and Finland to NATO will give the alliance increased overall military strength, better insight into Russian activities in northwestern Europe, and the potential to strangle civilian and military shipping in the Baltic Sea in the event of war with Russia.

China-Taiwan:  In a new sign that Taipei is getting more serious about defending against possible Chinese aggression, the government is holding its biggest civil defense drill in decades today.  This year’s version of the Wan’an air raid drill will take place in districts across the country and include practice evacuations of civilians to bomb shelters.

China:  The China Passenger Car Association yesterday said domestic Chinese brands made up 54% of the country’s wholesale shipments in the first half of 2023, up from 48% in the same period one year earlier.  That marked the second consecutive half in which domestic automakers sold more vehicles than foreign makers did.

  • As we have been discussing recently, the surge in domestic brands comes mostly from their sudden improvement in electric vehicles.
  • That has sapped the profitability of foreign brands operating in China and serves as a harbinger of the competitive threat that Chinese electric vehicles are likely to pose as they begin to be sold in the rich, highly advanced countries of the world.

European Union:  The European Parliament today and tomorrow will be voting on a divisive nature-restoration law that would require setting aside land to encourage the return of healthy ecosystems.  The law, proposed by the European Commission under the leadership of Ursula von der Leyen, has been criticized for potentially undermining farmers’ livelihoods, preventing wind farms from being built, and putting EU food security at risk.

  • Ahead of EU parliamentary elections in June 2024, von der Leyen’s own center-right European People’s Party has come out against the legislation. EPP leaders appear to be concerned that the law would play into the hands of far-right politicians, who are already gaining influence through Europe.
  • In an interview with the Financial Times, European Parliament President Metsola, who is also a member of the EPP, has warned that parliament members should refrain from crossing an “invisible line” between ambitious green policies and citizens’ support for the changes imposed on their lives.

United Kingdom:  Average weekly earnings in March through May were up 7.3% from the same period one year earlier, significantly more than anticipated and matching the record gain in the three months to April.  The strong wage growth has prompted even stronger expectations that the Bank of England will keep hiking interest rates, which in turn has given a further boost to the pound (GBP).  So far this morning, sterling is trading up 0.3% to a 15-month high of about $1.2895.

U.S. Monetary Policy:  At events yesterday, San Francisco FRB President Daly and Cleveland FRB President Mester both signaled interest rates should go at least a bit higher, with Mester saying a “somewhat tighter” policy stance would help strike the right balance between tightening too much and tightening too little in the face of price inflation.  The statements are consistent with the rising market expectation that the Fed will raise its benchmark short-term interest rate one or two more times, although perhaps with another pause interspersed.

  • Separately, New York FRB President Williams reiterated in a Financial Times interview that he sees a need for a few more rate hikes. In his view, the labor market remains tight enough to drive up wages and inflation, even though he sees signs that labor demand is gradually cooling.
  • Williams also noted that he doesn’t currently have a recession in his forecast. Nevertheless, he admitted that he sees “pretty slow growth” in the coming quarters.

U.S. Bank Regulation:  Michael Barr, the Fed’s vice chair for regulation, said in a speech yesterday that larger U.S. banks should further strengthen their capital cushions after the crisis among mid-sized lenders this spring.  According to Barr, a recent Fed review of big banks’ capital requirements suggested they should be required to boost their capital/risk-weighted asset ratio by about 2%.  The speech is being taken as a signal that Fed regulators will formally propose the change later this summer.

U.S. Labor Market:  Amid a general shortage of workers, a number of companies have said in recent earnings reports that a shortage of accountants is hampering their efforts to address weaknesses in financial reporting and control.  The lack of accountants reflects both a recent fall in the number of young people pursuing accounting degrees and a growing share of established accountants who are retiring.

Global Gold Market:  A survey by Invesco (IVZ, $17.37) found that global central banks not only boosted their purchases of gold in 2022 and early 2023, but they also shifted toward buying the physical asset instead of derivatives and opted to hold their gold in their own country.  As we’ve been arguing, the U.S.’s move to freeze Russia’s foreign reserves over its invasion of Ukraine last year has prompted many central banks to purchase more of the yellow metal for their own financial security.  Along with our expectations of higher average price inflation in the future, strong central bank buying is a key reason why we think gold will produce good returns in the medium-to-long term.

Global Green-Tech Minerals Market:  The International Energy Agency has issued a report saying global investment in green-technology mineral resources is starting to catch up with the growing demand for those materials.  According to the IEA, worldwide investment in green-tech mineral facilities rose 30% to more than $40 billion in 2022, building on a 20% increase in 2021.

  • Still, the report also cited some negative trends. For example, the rise in investment in 2022 was driven by China, which already dominates the production and refining of key green-tech materials.
  • The report also noted that the supply of some of these minerals, such as lithium and cobalt, remains too concentrated.

View PDF