Weekly Geopolitical Report – The U.S.-China “Phase One” Trade Deal: Part II (February 3, 2020)

by Bill O’Grady

In Part I of this report, we offered a detailed examination of “Phase One” of the recent trade agreement between the U.S. and China.  This week, in Part II, we will examine the ramifications of the deal and conclude the report with market effects.

China appears to be the “loser” in this deal.  Our careful reading of the report does support the notion that China gave up more than it got in this arrangement.  All leaders of governments try to avoid looking weak; Chinese leaders especially worry about appearing fragile to avoid comparisons to the Opium War era.  So, if this take is accurate, what led to this outcome?

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The U.S.-China “Phase One” Trade Deal: Part I (January 27, 2020)

by Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

After months of negotiations, the U.S. and China signed “Phase One” of what is expected to be a multiple-phase trade deal.  After noting media response to the agreement, we were struck by the dismissive consensus narrative that has developed.  Our careful review of the document seemed to suggest a much more substantial arrangement had been struck and the general analysis missed a good deal of nuance.  In this report, we will offer a detailed recap of the official agreement.  We usually don’t engage in this sort of point-by-point analysis but, in this case, we feel it is necessary because points may have been overlooked.  Next week, in Part II, we will examine the implications of the deal, and, as always, close with market ramifications.

Intellectual Property
Even though President Trump has touted China’s commitment to ramp up U.S. imports under the deal, and media analysts have emphasized the U.S. promise to postpone or roll back its tariffs against China, the first 16 pages of the 94-page agreement focus on protecting intellectual property.  That suggests U.S. Trade Representative Lighthizer’s top priority was to rein in China’s longstanding efforts to soak up foreign technology and industrial secrets by hook or by crook.  It probably also signals the U.S. intention to pursue fundamental changes in China’s legal system and industrial structure over time.  The key provisions agreed upon include:

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The 2020 Geopolitical Outlook (December 16, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady and Patrick Fearon-Hernandez, CFA

(This is the last report for 2019; the next report will be published January 13, 2020.)

As is our custom, in mid-December, we publish our geopolitical outlook for the upcoming year.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape for 2020.  It is not designed to be exhaustive; instead, it focuses on the “big picture” conditions that we believe will affect policy and markets going forward.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: U.S. 2020 Presidential Election

Issue #2: Iran

Issue #3: China’s Debt

Issue #4: Demographics

Issue #5: North Korea

Honorable Mentions…

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Mid-Year Geopolitical Outlook (June 24, 2019)

by Bill O’Grady

(Due to the Independence Day holiday and a short summer hiatus, the next report will be published July 15.)

As is our custom, we update our geopolitical outlook for the remainder of the year as the first half comes to a close.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape for the rest of the year.  It is not designed to be exhaustive; instead, it focuses on the “big picture” conditions that we believe will affect policy and markets going forward.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: Deglobalization

Issue #2: Election Meddling

Issue #3: Iran

Issue #4: China

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The 2019 Geopolitical Outlook (December 17, 2018)

by Bill O’Grady

(N.B.  This will be the last WGR of 2018.  Our next report will be published January 7, 2019.)

As is our custom, we close out the current year with our geopolitical outlook for the next one.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape in the upcoming year.  It is not designed to be exhaustive, but rather it focuses on the “big picture” conditions that we believe will affect policy and markets going forward.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: China

Issue #2: European Politics

Issue #3: Rising Western Populism

Issue #4: Saudi Succession

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Mid-Year Geopolitical Outlook (June 25, 2018)

by Bill O’Grady

(Due to the Independence Day holiday, the next report will be published July 9.)

As is our custom, we update our geopolitical outlook for the remainder of the year as the first half comes to a close.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape for the rest of the year.  It is not designed to be exhaustive; instead, it focuses on the “big picture” conditions that we believe will affect policy and markets going forward.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: America’s Evolving Hegemony

Issue #2: Rising Western Populism

Issue #3: Rising Authoritarianism

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The 2018 Geopolitical Outlook (December 18, 2017)

by Bill O’Grady

(N.B.  This will be the last WGR of 2017.  Our next report will be published January 8, 2018.)

As is our custom, we close out the current year with our outlook for the next one.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape in the upcoming year.  It is not designed to be exhaustive; instead, it focuses on the “big picture” conditions that we believe will affect policy and markets going forward.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: The Big Picture

Issue #2: China Deleveraging

Issue #3: European Politics

Issue #4: North Korea

Issue #5: South American Populism

Issue #6: The Middle East

Issue #7: U.S. Domestic Politics

View the full report

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The 19th Party Congress (October 2, 2017)

by Bill O’Grady

On October 18th, the Communist Party of China (CPC) will meet for the 19th Party Congress.  China’s leadership for the next five years will be determined at this meeting.

In this report, we will offer a background on China’s government, focusing on the difference between de jure (what is the official structure of China’s governance) and de facto (how it really works).  From this discussion, we will examine the likely developments from this meeting and what they will mean for China and the world over the next five years.  As always, we will conclude with potential market ramifications.

China’s Government (Official Version)
China’s government has a parallel structure.  The CPC operates alongside the government of China.  Since the CPC is the only political body in China, the governance of China is dominated by the CPC, but there are elements of power that are separate from the party.  For example, Xi Jinping is both the President of China (head of government) and General Secretary of the Central Committee (head of the CPC).  He is also the Commander in Chief of the People’s Liberation Army.  There exists a National Party Congress (as noted below, the most powerful body in China, at least in theory) and a National People’s Congress, which is the primary legislative arm of the government.  The President has a strict legal limit of two five-year terms, while the General Secretary’s term limit is based on tradition.  In theory, a General Secretary could remain in that role after relinquishing the presidency.  This extended control of the CPC hasn’t happened since Mao Zedong,[1] who remained in control of the party from 1943 until his death in 1976.  Deng Xiaoping brought order to the transition of power, and since then General Secretaries have held office for 10 years, consisting of two five-year terms.

China’s most powerful body is the National Party Congress.  It meets every five years; in 2012, it had 2,268 members.[2]  Its primary job is to elect the Central Committee.  The Central Committee, which had 376 members in 2012, elects the General Secretary, the Politburo and the Standing Committee of the Politburo.  The Politburo consists of 25 members and is the executive body of the CPC.  The Standing Committee of the Politburo has seven members, all of which are also members of the Politburo.  The Central Committee meets annually, while the Politburo meets monthly and the Standing Committee of the Politburo meets weekly.

Thus, in theory, the most powerful body in China is the National Party Congress.  The second most powerful is the Central Committee, followed by the Politburo and the Standing Committee of the Politburo.

View the full report


[1] Mao was referred to as “Chairman of the Central Politburo” or “Chairman of the Central Committee.”

[2] As a point of reference, the CPC has 85.13 mm members out of a population of 1.4 bn, roughly 6.2% of the population.

Weekly Geopolitical Report – The Mid-Year Geopolitical Outlook (July 10, 2017)

by Bill O’Grady

As is our custom, we update our geopolitical outlook for the remainder of the year as the first half comes to a close.  This report is less a series of predictions as it is a list of potential geopolitical issues that we believe will dominate the international landscape for the rest of the year.  It is not designed to be exhaustive; instead, it focuses on the “big picture” conditions that we believe will affect policy and markets going forward.  They are listed in order of importance.

Issue #1: The Political Fragmentation of the West

Issue #2: North Korea

Issue #3: An Unsettled Middle East

Issue #4: A Resurgent Russia

Issue #5: China’s Financial Situation

View the full report